1728 English cricket season

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
1728 English cricket season
Cricket formats major, including single wicket

The overriding impression of the 1728 English cricket season is that teams of county strength were formed to play major matches[fc 1][fc 2] as the patrons sought stronger combinations to help them in the serious, for them, business of winning wagers. Easily the most successful this year was Edwin Stead whose Kent teams were "too expert" for the Sussex teams led by the Duke of Richmond and Sir William Gage.

List of matches

date match title venue result source
25 June (Tu) Edwin Stead's XI v Duke of Richmond's XI Coxheath Edwin Stead's XI won? [1]
notes

The date of the Coxheath match is confirmed by G. B. Buckley in his Fresh Light on 18th Century Cricket Appendix B, based on a report in the Kentish Weekly Post on 19 June. Buckley was correcting an oversight in F. S. Ashley-Cooper's Kent Cricket Matches. The full reference is given by Timothy J. McCann and confirms the patrons, date and venue; the 18th century rendition of Coxheath was Cock's Heath. The results of this match and the next one at Penshurst Park are surmised from the report of the Stead v.Gage game (see below).

 ? July Duke of Richmond's XI v Edwin Stead's XI Penshurst Park Edwin Stead's XI won? [1]
notes

The only known primary source is a brief mention in the Whitehall Evening Post dated 6 August 1728. The results of this match and the previous one at Coxheath are surmised from the report of the Stead v.Gage game (see below).

early August[2] Edwin Stead's XI v Sir William Gage's XI Penshurst Park Edwin Stead's XI won [2][3][4]
notes

The results of the first two games above are surmised from the report of this game at Penshurst Park, which states that the victory of Stead's XI over Sir William Gage's XI was "the third time this summer that the Kent men (i.e., Stead's XI) have been too expert for those of Sussex (i.e., Gage's XI)". In the Stead v Gage game, it seems that Stead's team won the game although Gage's XI needed just 7 in their second innings. The report clearly infers that the teams selected by Richmond, Gage and Stead were representative of the respective counties.[5]

date unknown Duke of Richmond's XI v Sir William Gage's XI Lewes result unknown [1]
notes

All that is known is "a match between elevens" organised by the two patrons.

County cricket

This proclamation of Kent's superiority is the first time that the concept of a "Champion County"[fc 3] can be seen in the sources and it is augmented by the "turned the scales" comment made by a reporter after Sussex defeated Kent in 1729.[3][6] The 1729 report added that the "scale of victory had been on the Kentish side for some years past".[3] In 1730, a newspaper referred to the "Kentish champions".[7] It must be noted, however, that the County Championship was not formally constituted until December 1889 and such claims have no official basis as would be understood now: they should perhaps be viewed as early examples of "bragging rights" but it cannot be said for certain that a form of "championship", or at least the idea of one, was not recognised.[8]

Other events

Swiss traveller César de Saussure[9] noted in his journal the frequency with which he saw cricket being played while he was making his journeys across southern England in June. He referred to county matches as "a commonplace" and wrote that "everyone plays it, the common people and also men of rank".[10]

In several sources, a match Gentlemen of Middlesex v Gentlemen of London is listed as due to take place in Islington on Tuesday (sic), 5 August.[2][3][4][5] In fact, 5 August 1728 was a Monday[11] and recent research has confirmed that the match in question was due to be held on Tuesday, 5 August 1729.[12]

Footnotes

  1. The term "major cricket" deserves some qualification. It is not limited to "first-class cricket" which is a misleading concept that is essentially statistical and may typically ignore the more important historical aspect of a match if statistical information is missing, as is invariably the case re matches played prior to 1772. From that season, scorecards began to be created habitually and there is a continuous and adequate, though incomplete, statistical record commencing in 1772. Major cricket in the Stuart and Hanoverian periods includes both single wicket and eleven-a-side games. Features of these matches include high stakes, large crowds and evidence that the teams are representative of several parishes, perhaps of whole counties. Except in rare instances, village cricket in the shape of a match played between two parish teams, would be classified as minor.
  2. Note that surviving match records to 1825 are incomplete and any statistical compilation of a player's career in that period is based on known data. Match scorecards were not always created, or have been lost, and the matches themselves were not always recorded in the press or other media. Scorecard data was not comprehensive: e.g., bowling analyses lacked balls bowled and runs conceded; bowlers were not credited with wickets when the batsman was caught or stumped; in many matches, the means of dismissal were omitted.
  3. An unofficial seasonal title proclaimed by media or historians prior to December 1889 when the official County Championship was constituted.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 McCann, p. 8.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Wilson, p. 50.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Waghorn, p. 7.
  4. 4.0 4.1 ACS, p. 19.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Maun, volume 1, p. 37.
  6. Wilson, p. 50.
  7. Buckley (FL18C), p. 4.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. César de Saussure, A Foreign View of England in the Reigns of George I and George II. The Letters of Monsieur César de Saussure to his Family, General Books LLC, 2010.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Bibliography

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Additional reading

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.