1733 English cricket season

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

In the 1733 English cricket season, cricket continued to rely mainly on its patrons but there are fewer reports of matches than in the three previous seasons.

Matches

date match title venue result source
22 May (Tu) London v Greenwich Blackheath London won by 15 runs [1]
notes

London scored 112 in the first innings after going in first. No other totals were mentioned.

28 May (M) London v Greenwich Artillery Ground London won by 18 runs [1]
notes

This was a rematch first announced in the report of the previous game.

26 June (Tu) Fulham v Chelsea Parson’s Green Fulham won by 3 runs [1]
notes

The prize was 30 guineas.

5 July (Th) London v Kent Artillery Ground Kent won by 60 runs [2][3]
notes

Advertised as for one guinea each man with wickets to be pitched at one o’clock and the spectators to keep outside the line round the ground. "If any persons get on the Walls (sic), they will be prosecuted as the Law directs; and the Company are desired to come through the Py'd Horse Yard, Chiswell Street".

c.11 July (W) Surrey v Middlesex Moulsey Hurst Middlesex won by 3 runs [4]
notes

The report says the teams "were very hard matched". The Prince of Wales gave each player a guinea after the game.

1 August (W) Kent v Surrey & Middlesex Moulsey Hurst Surrey & Middlesex won [5]
notes

The Kent v Surrey & Middlesex match was arranged immediately after the match on or about Wed 11 July by Frederick, Prince of Wales and Edwin Stead. The Prince of Wales awarded a silver cup to the winners of the Wednesday, 1 August match and this is the first known instance of a cup being played for. This is also mentioned in Kent Cricket Matches.

20 August (M) Ealing & Acton v London Ealing Common result unknown [1]
notes

Announced by Berington's Evening Post as: "for £50, play or pay".

31 August (F) The Prince of Wales' XI v Lord Gage’s XI Moulsey Hurst result unknown [6]
notes

The announcement in the St James Evening Post (Sat 25 to Tues 28 August) states:

"On Friday next a great Match at Cricket will be play’d on Molesey (sic) Hurst; by 11 of the best Players in the County on each Side, for a Wager of 100 Guineas between His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales, and the Right Honourable, the Lord Gage".

Waghorn reported this in Dawn of Cricket as being on the following Friday, 7 September, and he confusingly recorded the county as Suffolk when it was in fact Sussex. Lord Gage is the former Sir William Gage. The Prince of Wales was by now completely taken with cricket and had become another great patron of the sport.

10 September (M) Surrey v Kent Kennington Common result unknown [7][8]
notes

The same game seems to be dated 20 September in Dawn of Cricket which may be a Gregorian equivalent, although it is possible by reference to a game reported by Buckley in 1736 that Dawn of Cricket has got the year wrong, let alone the day and month. The game reported in Kent Cricket Matches is correctly dated Monday, 10 September (Julian Calendar). Kent Cricket Matches and Dawn of Cricket both report word for word a condition about roping the enclosure.

12 September (W) London v Kent Artillery Ground Kent won by 3 wickets [1]
notes

This seems to be the earliest known result wherein the win was by a certain number of wickets, unless the Richmond v Chambers game in 1731 was actually conceded by Richmond. London scored 65 & 35; Kent scored 71 "and the second hands of the Kentish men won the wager and had three men to spare".

c.19 September (W) Croydon v London Duppas Hill, Croydon drawn [9]
notes

Team scores are known: Croydon 95 & 76; London 89 & 41-5. Time expired and it was drawn. Croydon had three given men and it was reported that the betting reached record levels, but that statement could not have been verifiable even at the time. It is interesting that the Croydon team was called "the country men". The report says a rematch would take place at the Artillery Ground "on Wednesday next".

26 September (W) London v Croydon Artillery Ground drawn due to rain [10]
notes

This was the rematch of the previous game. London had a lead of 8 runs when play was abandoned but we do not what stage the game had reached. Reported in the Whitehall Evening Post dated Saturday 29 September.

County cricket

On the basis that Middlesex defeated Surrey on Moulsey Hurst and then a combined Surrey/Middlesex team defeated Kent, it can be tentatively suggested that Middlesex had the strongest team at inter-county level[fc 1] in 1733, subject to other matches and results coming to light.[11]

Other events

Tuesday, 22 May. The earliest known match in Hampshire took place at Stubbington, near Portsmouth, when a team of bachelors were beaten "most shamefully" by a team of married men. The report for this and the following match was found in the American Weekly Mercury, a Philadelphia newspaper, dated 20 to 27 September 1733.[12]

Tuesday, 29 May. The return match of the above took place at Titchfield and the married men won again.[12]

Footnotes

  1. "Champion County" is an unofficial seasonal title proclaimed by media or historians prior to December 1889 when the official County Championship was constituted.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Buckley, p. 8.
  2. Waghorn, Dawn of Cricket, p. 11.
  3. Buckley, p. 238.
  4. Waghorn, Cricket Scores, pp. 4–5.
  5. Waghorn, Cricket Scores, pp. 5–6.
  6. McCann, p. 14.
  7. Maun, p. 61.
  8. F. S. Ashley-Cooper, Kent Cricket Matches 1719-1880, Gibbs & Sons, 1929
  9. Waghorn, Cricket Scores, p. 6.
  10. Buckley, p. 9.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Maun, p. 59.

Bibliography

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Additional reading

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.