Baxstrom v. Herold
From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
| Baxstrom v. Herold | |
|---|---|
|
|
| Argued December 9, 1965 Decided February 23, 1966 |
|
| Full case name | Baxstrom v. Herold, State Hospital Director |
| Citations | 383 U.S. 107 (more)
86 S. Ct. 760; 15 L. Ed. 2d 620; 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2214
|
| Court membership | |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Warren, joined by Fortas, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, Clark, White, Douglas |
| Concurrence | Black |
 |
Wikisource has original text related to this article: |
Baxstrom v. Herold, 383 U.S. 107 (1966), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that civil commitment following a prison term did not run afoul of double jeopardy principles.[1]
References
- ↑ Bonnie, R.J. et al. Criminal Law, Second Edition. Foundation Press, NY: 2004, p. 664
External links
<templatestyles src="Asbox/styles.css"></templatestyles>
|
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
