Chasmataspidida

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Chasmataspidida
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Subphylum:
Class:
†Chasmataspidida

Caster & Brooks, 1956
Families & genera

Chasmataspididae Caster & Brooks, 1956

Diploaspididae Størmer, 1972

Lua error in Module:Taxonbar/candidate at line 22: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).

Chasmataspidida (often referred to informally as chasmataspids) is a extinct group of rare chelicerate arthropods. Chasmataspids are probably related to horseshoe crabs (Xiphosura) and/or sea scorpions (Eurypterida).[1] Indeed the first species to be discovered were thought to be unusual fossil horseshoe crabs, while later species were often based on specimens initially misidentified as eurypterids. There is some evidence that chasmataspids were present during the late Cambrian and the group is known sporadically in the fossil record through to the mid Devonian. Chasmataspids are most easily recognised by having an abdomen divided into a short forepart (or mesosoma) and a longer hindpart (or metastoma) comprising nine segments. There is some debate about whether they form a natural (i.e. monophyletic) group.

Genera

Chasmataspis

The first chasmataspid to be discovered was Chasmataspis laurencii, described by the American palaeontologists Kenneth E. Caster and H. K. Brooks.[2] These Ordovician fossils come from the site of the Douglas Dam in Tennessee, USA. They are the most xiphosuran-like of the known chasmataspid species, with a horseshoe-shaped headshield. Caster & Brooks raised a new family, Chasmataspididae, to accommodate these specimens. The species was redescribed by Jason Dunlop and colleagues.[3]

Diploaspis

The next species to be discovered were Diploaspis casteri and Heteroaspis novojilovi; both described by the Norwegian palaeontologist Leif Størmer from the early Devonian of Alken an der Mosel in Germany.[4]

A revision by Markus Poschmann and co-workers[5] recognised H. novojilovi as a synonym of D. casteri. The two genera appear to actually be preservational variants of the same species. Poschmann et al.. also described a second species as Diploaspis muelleri.

Forfarella

Forfarella mitchelli from the early Devonian of the Forfar region in the Midland Valley of Scotland was described by Jason Dunlop and colleagues;[6] although the fossil had actually been recognised as a chasmataspid and provisionally labelled as such some years previously by Charles Waterston. Forfarella mitchelli is not very well preserved, but does show the characteristic chasmataspid body plan.

Acahanarraspis

The stratigraphically youngest chasmataspid is Achanarraspis reedi, described by Lyall Anderson and colleagues[7] from the mid Devonian Achanarras quarry in Caithness, Scotland; a famous fossil fish locality.

Octoberaspis

Well preserved chasmataspids were recovered from the early Devonian of October Revolution Island, part of the Severnaya Zemlya group in the Russian Arctic. Originally briefly described as eurypterids, they were formally described as Octoberaspis ushakovi by Jason Dunlop.[8]

Loganamaraspis

The most recently discovered chasmataspid to be recognised is Loganamaraspis dunlopi from a famous Silurian fossil locality near Lesmahagow in Scotland. Described by Erik Tetlie and Simon Braddy,[9] it was placed in Diploaspididae, but interpreted as being somewhat more intermediate in form between the Chasmataspis and Diploaspis body plans.

Classification

  • †Chasmataspidida Caster & Brooks, 1956
    • = †Diploaspidida Simonetta & Delle Cave, 1978
  • Diploaspidae incertae sedis
    • †‘Eurypterus
      • †‘Eurypterusstoermeri Novojilov, 1959 – Devonian of Siberia

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.