Hydrodynamic separator
Hydrodynamic separators (HDS) are stormwater management devices that use cyclonic separation to control water pollution. They are designed as flow-through structures with a settling or separation unit to remove sediment and other pollutants.[1] HDS are considered structural best management practices (BMPs), and are used to treat and pre-treat stormwater runoff.
Contents
Design and applications
HDS systems use the physics of flowing water to remove a variety of pollutants and are characterized by an internal structure that either creates a swirling vortex or plunges the water into the main sump.[2]:1 Along with supplemental features to reduce velocity, an HDS system is designed to separate floatables (trash, debris and oil) and settleable particles, like sediment, from stormwater. HDS systems are not effective for the removal of very fine solids or dissolved pollutants.[1] The systems are also subject to scour and sediment washout during large storm events, e.g. a 10-year storm.[2]:42
Evaluating HDS technologies
A number of factors are relevant in selecting an HDS product for a site.
Sizing and treatment performance
HDS systems should be sized based on treatment objectives including desired level of pollutant removal, drainage basin characteristics, climate of the region, and particle size to be targeted. Performance is also sensitive to water temperature, i.e. season. Care must be taken to avoid routing excess flow through the device and compromising performance. Each vendor’s product has different pollutant removal rates that should be evaluated before selecting the system.[1]
The TAPE and TARP programs are evaluation programs sponsored by several state agencies in the U.S. These programs include lab and field testing and provide specific sizing criteria for hydrodynamic separation systems.[3][4][5]
Currently, the EWRI-ASCE and the ASTM International are developing comprehensive verification guidelines and standard test methods for assessing the performance of these devices.
Maintenance and inspection requirements
HDS systems are not maintenance-intensive, when compared with land-based BMP’s.[1] Each manufactured system is different, therefore maintenance and inspection requirements should be looked at closely when purchasing an HDS system. Vacuum trucks are typically used for maintenance, so unobstructed access to accumulated pollutants for removal is critical.[citation needed]
Installation and operating costs
Costs for HDS systems depend on site-specific conditions such as land characteristics, amount of runoff to be treated, system depth and performance requirements. Be aware that not all HDS systems are alike in treatment performance, and basing a decision solely on the installation and operating cost of a system may compromise system performance and the environment. Long-term maintenance costs should also be considered with overall costs when purchasing or selecting a stormwater BMP as initial installation and operating costs may not reflect the long-term investment needed to maintain the system.[1]
Land costs
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), “Using structural BMPs that can be placed underground and are design to withstand site specific soil, groundwater and traffic loading conditions provide valuable savings in land area compared to conventional volume-based stormwater treatment practices such as ponds, wetlands, and swales.”[1] HDS systems may be ideal for areas where land is not readily available and/or tight retrofits are needed as they are installed underground.
Regulations and approvals for hydrodynamic separators
As stormwater regulations become increasingly stringent, many states and municipalities have developed criteria to govern the use and sizing of HDS systems, and publish lists that identify acceptable HDS systems.[6] Other jurisdictions evaluate the applicability of HDS on a site-specific basis.[7] It is increasingly common to use HDS as the first component of a treatment train, a combination of BMPs in series, to remove coarse solids and floatable pollutants that can rapidly clog other BMPs thus prolonging their maintenance cycle.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. "Storm Water Technology Fact Sheet: Hydrodynamic Separators." September 1999. Document No. EPA 832-F-99-017.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Mohseni, Omid; Saddoris, David A.; McIntire, Kurtis D.; Gulliver, John S. (2010). "Hydrodynamic Separator Sediment Retention Testing." Technical Report No. MN/RC 2010-10. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Transportation.
- ↑ State of Washington. Department of Ecology. Olympia, WA. Technology Assessment Protocol - Ecology (TAPE): Guidance for Evaluating Emerging Stormwater Treatment Technologies. January 2008.
- ↑ New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). Trenton, NJ (2007). "Technology Acceptance and Reciprocity Partnership (TARP) Program."
- ↑ New Jersey Corporation for Advanced Technology (NJCAT). Bordentown, NJ. "A Comprehensive Approach to Performance Verification for Stormwater Treatment Systems." Accessed 2011-12-22.
- ↑ For example, see NJDEP list of approved "Stormwater Manufactured Treatment Devices." 2011-09-01.
- ↑ For example, see Maryland Department of the Environment, "Maryland’s Stormwater Program & Proprietary Practices." 2005.
External links
- Stormwater Technologies Clearinghouse - University of Massachusetts
- Environmental Protection Agency - Stormwater Program
- Technology Acceptance and Reciprocity Partnership (TARP) - Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection
- NJCAT Technology Verification Program - Verification program for hydrodynamic separator systems. Provides list of approved systems.
