Mega Borg Oil Spill

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

The Mega Borg Oil Spill occurred in the Gulf of Mexico on June 8, 1990, roughly 50 miles off the coast of Texas, when the oil tanker Mega Borg caught on fire and exploded. The cleanup was one of the first practical uses of bioremediation.

Initial explosion and cause

At 11:30 PM on the evening of Saturday June 8, 1990,[1] an explosion in the cargo room of the Norwegian oil tanker the Mega Borg “ruptured the bulkhead between the pump room and the engine room”,[1] causing the ship to catch fire and begin to leak oil.[2] The 853-foot-long, 15-year-old vessel was about 50 miles off the coast of Galveston, Texas when the explosion occurred.[3] The weather at the time was calm and the tanker had easily passed Coast Guard safety inspections in April earlier that year.[3] While the direct cause of the engine room explosion remains unknown, the initial blast occurred during a lightening process in which the Mega Borg was transferring oil onto a smaller Italian tanker, the Fraqmura, in order to then transport the oil to Houston.[2] This transfer was necessary, as the Mega Borg was too large to dock at the Texas port. Three million gallons of the total 38 million gallons of light Angolan Palanca crude oil on board the tanker were able to be transferred to the Fraqmura before the blast.[4] Two days after the initial blast, there were five successive explosions in a ten-minute window. These explosions greatly increased the rate of the spill from the tanker into the water. By the end of that day (June 11) the tanker stern had dropped 58 feet and had stabilized five feet above the water line.[3] This was either due to shifting cargo or the tanker taking on water, which would be an indication of the vessel’s imminent sinking.

The light crude oil spilled in the Mega Borg incident was brown and evaporated much quicker than the heavy crude oil in spills such as the Exxon Valdez. This means that the oil is less likely to heavily coat nearby beaches, flora and fauna, however the tanker was carrying more oil than the Exxon Valdez incident spilled in total, so there was a lot of concern about the oil not being able to evaporate if the slick became too thick.[3]

The fire caused by the initial explosion took eight days to burn out, making it hard for firefighters to board the tanker and stop the leakage of oil.[3] However, the fire was helpful in the fact that it functioned as a natural in situ burning – out of the over 4.6 million spilled gallons, only 12,000 to 40,000 were left after the fire had burned out both on the water and on the tanker.[4]

Cleanup and containment

Two days after the spill, on Monday June 11, eight ships with skimmers, booms, and fire equipment encircled the Mega Borg, with 12 more ships on the way. The Elf Acquitane Petroleum Company of Houston (owners of part of the Mega Borg’s cargo) used planes to spread dispersants within five miles of the site of the tanker’s explosion.[3] By June 13, the previously 30 mile by 10 mile oil sheen [5] had diminished to 13 miles long by 5 miles wide.[2]

After an eight-day-long fire, from June 8 to June 16, the Coast Guard was able to contain and put out the flames. This then allowed for workers to stabilize the engine room and begin pumping out and unloading any remaining oil.[4] Once the fire was stopped, “high seas barrier booms were brought in to contain the rest of the leaked oil [6] During the eight days the fire lasted, firefighters were continuously cooling the ship with both water and, once the fire had sufficiently died down, with foam cannons.[7] One, however experimental, part of the cleanup process was the release of about 100 pounds of bacteria over an acre of the slick. Known as bioremediation, this process has been used in labs, but never before on the open ocean. The microbes work by breaking down oil by “eating” it and turning the “hydrocarbons into more benign byproducts.” The only drawback to this method is that scientists are unsure about whether or not the bacteria cause more toxins to be released into the water. .[8] A “slick-sucking vessel” was sent by the Coast Guard and was waiting on standby in case the Mega Borg sank and released its entire load of oil into the ocean.[9]

Controversy

The nearest fire control equipment of the type necessary for a fire of this size and type was in Louisiana, so it had to be shipped in and was not available as quickly as some people believe it should have been. Additional equipment was shipped in from the Netherlands, adding to the belief that it could have been found closer to the spill site and thus the oil could have been contained earlier.[3] Local officials in Galveston argued that the decision to use foreign equipment delayed cleanup by two days, but Tony Redding, a spokesman for the Dutch company that lead the salvage (Smit Tak B.V.), said that all of the necessary materials were assembled “less than a day after the initial explosion” and that Absolutely no delay was encountered as a result of the airlifting of equipment from Europe.” [4]

Some local officials also asked why foam was not used until five days after the explosion. Redding answered this by explaining that “A foam attack without extensive cooling has no chance of killing a fire of this type.”[4]

Social and environmental effects

The explosion’s initial damage was inflicted on the 41 crew members aboard – two of them died, two disappeared and are presumed dead, and 17 were injured.[3]

The Gulf of Mexico is one of the United States’ richest fishing grounds,[10] and the Mega Borg spill added to an abundance of oil spills that have happened in the area. This effects not only marine microorganisms in deep waters, but larger deep-water fish and thus both recreational and commercial fishermen. Additionally, the National Wildlife Refuges near Galveston’s shores, nearby salt marches, and oyster reefs were all in potential danger depending on the extent of the slick’s spread.[3]

On June 29, 1990, it was reported that tar balls from the Mega Borg spill were appearing as far away as Louisiana beaches.[11]

Legal impact

The Mega Borg spill brought attention to the 984 protocols, legislation that has been held up in Senate since 1985. The Protocols passed the House, but have not been ratified due to arguments over international liabilities and whether or not the US should join international funding groups for oil spills. If ratified, the protocols would do a number of things, including creating multiple new federal response teams, creating a new fleet of special containment booms and skimmers.[12]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Leveille, Thomas P.. "The Mega Borg Fire and Oil Spill: A Case Study." U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Oil Spill Conference (1991): n. pag.ioscproceedings.org. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Reports, Wire. "FIREBOATS ATTACK GULF TANKER BLAZE." Journal of Commerce [Galveston] 12 June 1990, sec. MARITIME: 3B. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Compilation. "Gulf firefighters battle wind, waves." St. Petersburg times [St. Petersburg] 14 June 1990, City Edition ed., sec. NATIONAL: 1A. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  6. Fehr, Stephen C.. "New Blasts Wrack Tanker Burning off Texas; Spill of Light Crude Oil Is Accelerated; Four Are Feared Dead." The Washington Post[Washington] 11 June 1990, sec. First Section: A1. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  7. Rigby, Peter. "Norwegian Tanker Me6ga Borg Rocked by Explosion." Sunday Tasmanian [Hobart Mercury] 13 June 1990: 1. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  8. Compilation. "Oil-eating microbes used to curb supertanker spill." St. Petersburg Times 16 June 1990, sec. NATIONAL: 3A.Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  9. Compilation. "Tanker is Still Losing Oil." St. Petersburg Times 13 June 2013, City Edition ed., sec. NATIONAL: 1A.Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  10. Morris, Julie, and Mark Mayfield. "'Gulf is just being trashed'; Oil spill stirring up more troubled waters,' More and more risk for the gulf'." USA Today [Galveston] 12 June 1990, Final Edition ed., sec. NEWS: 1A. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  11. Leavitt, Paul. "Mega Borg tar balls appear in Louisiana." USA Today [Galveston] 29 June 1990, Final Edition ed., sec. NEWS: 3A. Print.
  12. DiBenedetto, William. "SKINNER URGES PASSAGE OF OIL SPILL LEGISLATION, ADOPTION OF TREATIES." Journal of Commerce [Washington] 14 June 1990, sec. MARITIME: 8B. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • AP. "FIREFIGHTERS START GAINING CONTROL OVER STUBBORN SUPERTANKER BLAZE." Journal of Commerce [Galveston] 13 June 1990, sec. MARITIME: 8B. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • Belkin, Lisa. "Flaming Oil Is Spilled Into Gulf as Blasts Rack Tanker." The New York Times 11 June 1990, sec. A: 1.lexisnexis.com. Web. 21 Jan. 2012.
  • Booth, William. "Test of Oil-Eating Microbes Starts in Gulf; Supertanker Still Leaking Crude off Texas Coast Near Galveston." The Washington Post 16 June 1990, sec. First Section: A1. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • Compilation. "Gulf firefighters battle wind, waves." St. Petersburg times [St. Petersburg] 14 June 1990, City Edition ed., sec. NATIONAL: 1A. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • Compilation. "Oil-eating microbes used to curb supertanker spill." St. Petersburg Times 16 June 1990, sec. NATIONAL: 3A.Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • Compilation. "Tanker is Still Losing Oil." St. Petersburg Times 13 June 2013, City Edition ed., sec. NATIONAL: 1A.Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • DiBenedetto, William. "SKINNER URGES PASSAGE OF OIL SPILL LEGISLATION, ADOPTION OF TREATIES." Journal of Commerce [Washington] 14 June 1990, sec. MARITIME: 8B. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • Fehr, Stephen C.. "New Blasts Wrack Tanker Burning off Texas; Spill of Light Crude Oil Is Accelerated; Four Are Feared Dead." The Washington Post[Washington] 11 June 1990, sec. First Section: A1. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • Leavitt, Paul. "Mega Borg tar balls appear in Louisiana." USA Today [Galveston] 29 June 1990, Final Edition ed., sec. NEWS: 3A. Print.
  • Leveille, Thomas P.. "The Mega Borg Fire and Oil Spill: A Case Study." U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Oil Spill Conference (1991): n. pag.ioscproceedings.org. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • Maraniss, David. "Shipowner's Choice of Firefighters Stirs Dispute; Local Crews Could Have Arrived Faster, Competitor Says; Situation at Tanker Stabilized." The Washington Post 13 June 1990, Final Edition ed., sec. First Section: A4. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • Morris, Julie, and Mark Mayfield. "'Gulf is just being trashed'; Oil spill stirring up more troubled waters,' More and more risk for the gulf'." USA Today [Galveston] 12 June 1990, Final Edition ed., sec. NEWS: 1A. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • Morris, Julie. "Legacy of the Mega Borg; Bacteria could mop up oil; Wary Texas keeps an eye on beaches." USA Today[Galveston] 15 June 1990, sec. NEWS: 3A. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2012.
  • Reports, Wire. "FIREBOATS ATTACK GULF TANKER BLAZE." Journal of Commerce [Galveston] 12 June 1990, sec. MARITIME: 3B. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • Rigby, Peter. "Norwegian Tanker Me6ga Borg Rocked by Explosion." Sunday Tasmanian [Hobart Mercury] 13 June 1990: 1. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • Staff, Journal of Commerce. "MEXICAN SHIP AIDED MEGA BORG OIL CLEANUP." Journal of Commerce [Mexico City] 6 July 1990, sec. MARITIME: 6B. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • Suro, Roberto. "Ship Burned All Week; Salvagers Explain Why." The New York Times 17 June 1990, Late Edition ed., sec. Section 1, National Dest: 18. Lexis Nexis. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.
  • "THE MEGA BORG FIRE AND OIL SPILL: A CASE STUDY." U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Oil Spill Conference (1991): n. pag. ioscproceedings.org. Web. 21 Jan. 2014.