Miles Prance

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Miles Prance (fl. 1678) was an English Roman Catholic who was caught up in and perjured himself during the Popish Plot and the anti-Catholic hysteria of London during the reign of Charles II.

Life

Prance was born on the Isle of Ely, the son of a Roman Catholic, and he rose quickly from humble origins as an apprentice goldsmith to servant-in-ordinary to Catherine of Braganza, Charles II's queen. He was married with a family, living in Covent Garden at the time of his arrest.[1]

Popish Plot

Sir Edmund Berry Godfrey died in October 1678; he disappeared from his home and was found dead at Primrose Hill, having apparently been strangled and run through with a sword some days before his death. Godfrey, though normally quite tolerant in religious matters, had been militating against the Jesuits around the time of the Popish Plot. Prance was known to be a Roman Catholic and suspicion fell upon him for the death, even though it was thought by many to be suicide.[2]

Arrest and interrogation

Prance unwisely drew attention to himself by attending one of the Plot trials, and then publicly defending the accused as "very honest men". William Bedloe, a notorious confidence trickster and later a Popish Plot accuser, investigated Prance and interrogated one John Wren, Prance's lodger who owed him rent.[3] Wren stated that Prance had been out of the house on the night of the murder (this was later found to be untrue, although another lodger, Joseph Hale, told the same story). Prance was arrested and sent to Newgate Prison. He was confined to the notorious Little Ease cell, where he was put in chains. He was denied a fire, despite the bitter winter weather, and nearly froze to death as a result. So anxious was the Government for him to confess that he was even threatened with the rack, which had been illegal for fifty years.[4]

In prison, Prance confessed and then recanted. He then confessed to a different version of the crime and recanted that. Finally, after being visited by William Boys, Gilbert Burnet, and William Lloyd, he settled on the story to which he stuck throughout the Plot trials. He said that two Irish priests, "Fitzgerald" and "Kelly", told him of a plot to kill Godfrey, and that two workmen, Henry Berry, Robert Green, together with the Queen's chaplain Thomas Godden and Godden's servant, Lawrence Hill, followed and strangled Godfrey while Prance kept watch.[5] They then hid Godfrey's body in nearby Somerset House (this detail seems to have been an attempt to implicate the Queen, whose private residence it was, in the murder) and waited before placing it in a ditch and running it through with Godfrey's own sword, to look like the discrediting death by suicide.

Prance later admitted that all of this was pure invention: it is not even clear if the priest called Kelly existed, though Fr Fitzgerald did. Prance could produce no credible motive for the murder, saying vaguely that Godfrey had offended the two priests in some way. He never explained why he had accused Berry, Green and Hill, who were unquestionably innocent, nor why they should wish Godfrey dead. Kenyon argues that lack of a plausible motive is the central flaw with all theories about Godfrey's murder; none of the named suspects, on careful analysis, had a sufficient reason to kill him.[6]

Perjury

Berry, Green, and Hill were arrested, and Godden fled the country; Fr Fitzgerald, whom the others admitted to knowing, apparently went free, probably because he was a member of the household of the envoy from Venice. Prance perjured himself at the trial, but made a good impression on the jury:[7] Mrs. Hill protested in open court that "Prance knows all these things to be as false as God is true" and she rightly predicted that "the truth shall be declared after, when it is too late." Sir William Scroggs, the Lord Chief Justice, replied that he could not believe that Prance would swear three men to their deaths for nothing, even though he presumably knew that threats of torture had been used to make Prance confess.[8] All three men were executed. Prance then split the reward for finding the killers with Bedloe. Bedloe and Titus Oates used Prance to inform on several Roman Catholics during the Popish Plot. He offered evidence against Thomas Whitbread (alias Harcourt) and John Fenwick, two Jesuit priests, in June 1679 and received a £50 pension from the King in January 1680. He also helped Oates attack Roger L'Estrange and wrote pamphlets defending himself against charges of multiple contradictions. After the breaking of the Plot, he assumed a lower public profile.

Recantation

However, when James II came to the throne, Prance was tried for his part in the Plot. He was found guilty of perjury in 1686 and was fined £100, ordered to stand in the pillory, and to be whipped.[9] Queen Catherine interceded on his behalf to prevent the last of these punishments, arguing that he had returned to the Roman Catholic faith and was repentant. He said that only fear for his life had compelled him to lie and inform and that his mistreatment in prison had coerced his testimony As Mrs Hill had correctly predicted, he admitted that her husband was wholly innocent, as were Green and Berry.[10] In 1688, he tried to flee to France. He was captured, questioned before the House of Lords, and then permitted to leave England.

References

  1. ↑ Kenyon p.150
  2. ↑ Kenyon p.89
  3. ↑ Kenyon p.150
  4. ↑ Kenyon p.153
  5. ↑ Kenyon p.151
  6. ↑ Kenyon p.151
  7. ↑ Kenyon pp.165-6
  8. ↑ Kenyon p.166
  9. ↑ Kenyon p.295
  10. ↑ Kenyon p.295

Sources

  • Kenyon, J.P. The Popish Plot Phoenix Press Reissue 2000

External links

  • Wikisource-logo.svg Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. On the perjury.
Retrieved from "https://infogalactic.com/w/index.php?title=Miles_Prance&oldid=454838"