Opinions of Curtis Yarvin on various systems of government

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

The following are some opinions of Curtis Yarvin on various systems of government.

Systems

Totalitarianism

Gray quotes Yarvin as saying, with regard to his proposed neocameralism, "a totalitarian dictator has little in common with a neocameralist CEO".[1]

Nazism

Dylan Matthews quotes Yarvin: "Universalist lawful democracy is the least demotist of demotisms, Demotism Lite if you will. Compared to . . . Nazism, there's much to be said for it. But this is a rather low bar."[2]

Fascism

According to Lecher, Yarvin's work has "been criticized as veiled fascism."[3]

Communism

Dylan Matthews quotes Yarvin: "Universalist lawful democracy is the least demotist of demotisms, Demotism Lite if you will. Compared to Communism . . . there's much to be said for it. But this is a rather low bar."[2]

Authoritarianism

Rosie Gray writes that according to neoreaction.net -- a site that Social Matter editor Hadley Bishop told her sums up their views -- "Neoreaction is a political worldview and intellectual movement based largely on the ideas of Mencius Moldbug." Gray writes, "The worldview espouses an explicitly authoritarian idea, a rejection of the post-Enlightenment vision of a world that is continually improving as it becomes more democratic."[1]

Monarchism

According to Colin Lecher, Yarvin's work is sometimes branded as neo-monarchism.[3]

Gray notes, "Moldbug even envisioned a kind of CEO at the top: 'The personality cult of dictatorship is quite misleading - a totalitarian dictator has little in common with . . . even a cameralist monarch.'"[1]

Neocameralism

According to Gray, Moldbug in his writings defined "his 'neo-cameralist' philosophy based on Frederick the Great of Prussia's 'cameralist' administrative model."[1]

Matthews writes, "But while mainstream libertarians are outspoken about democracy's deficiencies, they rarely propose an alternative. The neoreactionaries do: monarchy. Well, not monarchy specifically, but some kind of nondemocratic system with rule-driven succession. Moldbug likes to use the term 'formalism,' or 'neocameralism,' a reference to 'cameralism,' the philosophy of government embraced by Frederick the Great of Prussia. Moldbug's vision is corporatist, where instead of a nation belonging to a royal family, it belongs to corporation with shareholders to whom it is accountable. 'To a neocameralist, a state is a business which owns a country,' he writes."[2]

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.