Conestoga (rocket)

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Percheron (rocket))
Jump to: navigation, search
The first, and only, Conestoga 1620, prior to its launch from Wallops Island. The engine bells on the clustered boosters vary depending on their firing order; the larger bells are tuned for higher altitudes.

The Conestoga was a launch vehicle design funded by Space Services Inc. of America (SSIA) of Houston, Texas. Conestoga originally consisted of surplus LGM-30 Minuteman stages with additional strap-on boosters, as required for larger payloads. It was the world's first privately funded commercial rocket, but was launched only three times (once as a modified design) before the program was shut down.

Percheron

SSIA had originally intended to use a design by Gary Hudson, Percheron, which was intended to dramatically lower the price of space launches. Key to the design was a simple pressure-fed kerosene-oxidizer engine that was intended to reduce the cost of the expendable booster. Various loads could be accommodated by clustering the basic modules together. SSIA conducted an engine test firing of the Percheron on Matagorda Island on August 5, 1981, but the rocket exploded due to a malfunction.[1] SSIA then asked Hudson to become head of R&D at SSIA, but because they wished to focus on solid fuel rockets, he declined.[2]

Conestoga I

SSIA founder David Hannah then hired Deke Slayton, one of the original Mercury Seven astronauts. Slayton had just left NASA after running the Space Shuttle Landing and Approach validation testing (among earlier roles). SSIA purchased an Aries research rocket from Space Vector, Inc. which was developed for the U.S. Navy and NASA using the second stage of the Minuteman missile. The first launch of the new Conestoga I design took place on 9 Sep 1982, consisting of the core missile stage and a 500 kg dummy payload which included 40 gallons of water. The payload was successfully ejected at 313 km, and the Conestoga I became the first privately funded rocket to reach space.[3]

SSIA launched a second rocket in 1989, providing commercial support for microgravity experiments, using the Black Brant sounding rocket which they referred to as "Starfire."

Conestoga 1620

Destruction of the Conestoga 1620. Some motors remained propulsive after flight termination, and can be seen corkscrewing out of control.

SSIA was purchased by EER Systems in December 1990. The design was modified again, this time using Castor engines like those used on the Scout, a workhorse of the 1960s. The new design was known as the Conestoga with a four-digit number following it indicating the arrangement of the boosters.

In May 1990 the Center for Space Transportation and Applied Research (CSTAR) pitched to NASA their Commercial Experiment Transporter (COMET) payload concept, a low-cost standardized bus with both sub-orbital and orbital components. Mission duration for the COMET would be longer than for existing sounding rockets, and the orbital portion would be free-flight and not disturbed by crew movement as it was on the Space Shuttle. Westinghouse agreed to provide the bus and "service module," Space Industries Inc. built the re-entry module, and EER was contracted to provide several Conestoga launchers.

The entire COMET program quickly ran into delays and budget overruns, and it was not until the end of the program that a COMET (now known as METEOR) and Conestoga 1620 were finally ready for launch. The satellite payload included a number of experiments, including material (evaluation of exposure to the harsh space environment) and biological (assessment of seed reaction to micro-gravity; growth fluids were to be injected into the seed containers after launch), as well as GPS/radar correlation tracking. The satellite included a recoverable section that was to separate on command after several weeks in orbit, fire a small internal retro-motor, and descend for recovery off the Virginia coast.

The launch took place from a clamshell gantry, which included power and environmental control, at the south end of Wallops Flight Facility on 23 October 1995; the rocket launched normally, but broke up 46 seconds into the flight. EER determined that an unknown source of low frequency noise had caused the guidance system to order course corrections when none were needed, causing the steering mechanism to eventually run out of hydraulic fluid. NASA had already decided to deny further funding, due to the original delays, and EER subsequently got out of the rocket business.

The remaining assets were purchased by L-3 Communications in 2001 for $110 million.

Conestoga Versions

Due to the modular design of the Conestoga, a large number of configurations were possible. The version number encoded the configuration:

  • the first digit encoded the type of booster motor
  • the second digit was the number of booster motors clustered around the core
  • the third digit encoded the type of the first upper stage
  • the fourth digit encoded the type of the second upper stage
Version Stages Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Payload (kg)
Conestoga 1229 4 2 Castor-4B 1 Castor-4B Star-48V HMACS - 363 kg
Conestoga 1379 4 3 Castor-4B 1 Castor-4B Star-63V HMACS - 770 kg
Conestoga 1620 4 4 Castor-4A/B 2 Castor-4B 1 Castor-4B Star-48V - 1179 kg
Conestoga 1669 5 4 Castor-4A/B 2 Castor-4B 1 Castor-4B Star-63D HMACS 1361 kg
Conestoga 1679 5 4 Castor-4A/B 2 Castor-4B 1 Castor-4B Star-63V HMACS 1497 kg
Conestoga 3632 5 4 Castor-4A/B-XL 2 Castor-4B-XL 1 Castor-4B-XL Orion-50 Star-48V 2141 kg

Various Conestoga configurations, with the COMET launcher highlighted.

Launch history

Date/Time (GMT) Rocket Launch site Payload Outcome Apogee Remarks
1981-08-05 Percheron Matagorda Island Failure 0 kilometres (0 mi) Pad explosion.[4]
1982-09-09, 10:17 Conestoga 1 Matagorda Island 18 kg (40 lb) water Success 309 kilometres (192 mi) [5]
1995-10-23, 22:03 Conestoga 1620 Wallops Island Pad 0A Meteor recoverable experimental sat Failure 10 kilometres (6.2 mi) Hydraulic fluid depletion.[6]

See also

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. in Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.