Pornotopia

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Pornotopia is a term coined by the critic Steven Marcus to describe the idealised, imaginative space of pornography,[1] and used more broadly to describe a fantasy state dominated by universal sexual activity.[2]

Daniel Bell saw the hedonistic promotion of pornotopia in late capitalism as paradoxically undercutting the very virtues of bourgeois sobriety upon which capitalism was originally built.[3]

Structure

Pornotopia is characterized by its freedom from the normal social restraints of place and time - as Marcus put it, "It is always summertime in pornotopia".[4] External reality is either split off entirely, or its problems dissolved under a tide of sex.[5]

Narrative flow will hang on a tenuous line[6] - a picaresque adventure allowing for multiple encounters,[7] or perhaps a Sadean multiplication of all possible combinations of persons/orifices.

Beginnings will be sketchy, but, as Marcus argues, "it is an end, a conclusion of any kind, that pornography most resists":[8] one reason Susan Sontag singled out The Image as transcending its genre, was precisely its finely structured conclusion, retrospectively illuminating all that had gone before.[9]

Characters

Characters in Pornotopia are typically ithyphallic, ever ready for sex, and with an almost omnipotent capacity for renewal and further action.[10]

They are also largely invulnerable. Thus in the Story of O, just as the chains never rust in her fairytale-style chateau,[11] so too the inhabitants are never damaged by their ordeals, and never lose an iota of their allure in a triumph of the imaginary over the reality principle.[12]

Criticism

  • Marcus's concept of Pornotopia has been criticised for basing itself too exclusively upon a brief period of experience drawn solely from Victorian Britain.[13]
  • 21stC online-Pornotopia has been described[who?] as an arena of homosocial solace for lad culture, at the phantasised expense of their female counterparts.[14] Certainly Pornotopia to feminist eyes can appear as a place where no woman would like to live;[15] but perhaps that is to underestimate what sex-positive feminism has revealed about comparable female fantasies of omnipotent control and unlimited gratification.[16]

See also

References

  1. Steven Marcus, The Other Victorians (1971) p. 272-6
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Daniel Bell, The Winding Passage (1991) p. 302
  4. Steven Marcus, The Other Victorians (1971) p. 276
  5. Linda Williams, Hard Core (1989) p. 239 and p. 170
  6. T. Lovell/J. Hawthorne, Criticism and Critical Theory (1984)
  7. Edwin Morgan, 'Introduction' Alexander Trocchi, Helen and Desire (1997) p. vii
  8. Steven Marcus, The Other Victorians (1971) p. 282
  9. Susan Sontag, 'The Pornographic Imagination', in George Battaile, Story of the Eye (2001) p. 84-6 and p. 109-10
  10. Steven Marcus, The Other Victorians (1971) p. 275-6
  11. Jean Paulhan, 'Essay', in Pauline Réage, Story of O (1975) p. 163
  12. Jacques Lacan, The Ethics of Psychoanalysis (1992) p. 202
  13. Harrison, Brian. "Underneath the Victorians". Victorian Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3 (March 1967), pp. 239-262.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. E. Baruch, Women, Love and Power (2012) p. 199
  16. Nancy Friday, Women on Top (1991) p. 105 and p. 292

Further reading

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links