Scarborough and Whitby Railway

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Scarborough and Whitby Railway
Seal of the Scarborough and Whitby railway.jpg
Track gauge 4 ft 8 12 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge
Scarborough and Whitby Railway
WRMU Railwayto Sandsend
Whitby West Cliff
Whitby Town
Prospect Hill Junction
Bog Hall Junction
Esk Valley Lineto Ruswarp
Larpool Viaduct(Over River Esk)
Hawsker
A171 road
Robin Hood's Bay
Fyling Hall
Ravenscar Tunnel
Ravenscar
Staintondale
Hayburn Wyke
Cloughton
Scalby
Scalby Viaduct(Over Scalby Beck)
Gallows Close goods yard
Falsgrave Tunnel
Scarborough Central
Scarborough Londesborough Road
Falsgrave Junction
York to Scarborough Lineto Seamer

The Scarborough & Whitby Railway was a railway line from Scarborough to Whitby in North Yorkshire, England. The line followed a difficult but scenic route along the North Yorkshire coast.

The line opened in 1885. It closed in 1965 (see Beeching Axe).

History

Background

Before the line's construction, several schemes had been proposed that would have resulted in a line between Scarborough and Whitby: the Scarborough, Whitby, Stockton-on-Tees and Newcastle and North Junction Railway, from Stockton-on-Tees, via Guisborough to Whitby and then Scarborough was registered in 1845.[1][2][note 1] Another scheme, the Scarborough, Whitby and Staithes Railway, would connect to the Cleveland Railway near Skinningrove, connecting the towns of the Yorkshire coast, and of North Yorkshire; the line was opposed by the North Eastern Railway (NER), who were improving the Esk Valley Line, the line failed to be given assent in the 1864 session of Parliament.[4][note 2]

There were other lines promoted to connect along the north coast of Yorkshire between Scarborough and Whitby, including the Scarborough and Whitby Railway Company which issued a prospectus in late 1864.[5] The company placed a bill in parliament, aiming to raise £275,000 capital plus £91,600 in loans,[6] the bill was not opposed in parliament,[7] and was passed at the third reading in April 1865.[8] The line was to be 19¼ miles long, and pass Scalby, Burniston, Cloughton, Stainton-dale, Robin Hood's Bay and Hawsker between Scarborough and Whitby.[9] The line sanctioned by the 1865 act was not built due to lack of finance.[10][note 3]

In October 1865 the NER opened a line between Castleton and Grosmont completing a route between Scarborough, Whitby and the ports of the north-east via the North York Moors,[11] it had also completed improvement works in July, allowing express trains to travel between the two coastal towns in one and a half hours.[11] The NER ran twice-daily express trains over this route, but the service was not profitable, and was withdrawn.[10]

Construction and acquisition, 1872–1898

Efforts to construct a line restarted in 1870; a new route was proposed,[12] initial estimates of the cost of the line were approximately £100,000.[12][13] During the same period the Whitby Loftus line was being developed, which with the proposed line would complete the north-south link in the eastern part of the north of the country.[14]

The engineer, Mr. Birch proposed a line starting at Larpool Hall near Whitby, with a 1 in 40 gradient to a station at Hawsker, then stations at Bay Town (Robin Hood's Bay), near Fyling Hall, at Hayburn Wyke, then a station serving Cloughton and Burniston, then Scalby, before terminating near West Parade in Scarborough. A branch line was proposed, from the start at Crowdy Hill in Whitby connecting to the River Esk, where a wharf would be built.[14]

An act allowing construction of the new line was passed on 29 June 1871.[15][note 3]

Construction of the line began on 4 May 1872.[17] The 20.5-mile (33.0 km) line was engineered by Sir Charles Fox and Son, and cost approximately £27,000 per mile. Included in the construction was a large 13-arch brick viaduct over the River Esk near Whitby (see Larpool Viaduct).[18]

The company needed further acts allowing it to raise extra capital for, and to extend the timescale of the construction, and to make connections with lines in Whitby and Scarborough.[19][20][21] In 1878/9 shortage of funds led to the possibility of the scheme being abandoned.[22]

The line was opened on 16 July 1885. The NER operated the line until 1898, when the company acquired the railway for £261,633, less than half its capital cost.[18]

Operation, 1898–1965

The line passed into the hands of the London and North Eastern Railway at the 1923 Grouping. At the southern end of the route, the goods yard at Gallows Close (north of Falsgrave tunnel) was expanded for use as a carriage yard in the busy summer months, with excursions routed via the overspill station at Scarborough Londesborough Road sent there for storage between turns. This practice continued after nationalisation of the railway system in 1948.

During its operational lifetime the Scarborough and Whitby line became notoriously impracticable and difficult to work. The junction layouts at both ends of the line (Prospect Hill in Whitby and Falsgrave in Scarborough) meant that trains had to reverse direction in order to gain access to the route. These movements, particularly in the days of steam, were time-consuming and disrupted the movement of other trains. This problem was especially acute at Scarborough, where Central station was extremely busy during the summer months. The route itself was steeply graded in both directions (1 in 39 being the steepest) and its location along the coast meant that the rails were often slippery due to rain and sea mists. This made driving conditions in bad weather extremely difficult and great skill was needed from the engine crews to prevent trains from stalling on the climbs.

Services were dieselised at the beginning of the 1960s. This did much to resolve the reversal issues at Whitby and Scarborough but even these new trains were found to struggle with the gradients and services were often disrupted when weather and sea conditions were poor. Increasing road competition and a consequent drop in passenger usage outside of the peak summer seasons ultimately led to the route being proposed for closure in the 1963 Beeching Report along with both of the others serving Whitby. A public outcry followed, but this was not enough to keep the line open and it closed to all traffic in March 1965.[22] [23]

Post-closure

Map of route and surrounding railways

The track was subsequently lifted in 1968, although speculation about a potential potash mine near Hawsker meant that the track from there to Whitby remained in place until 1972.

The line is now used as a bridleway for cycles, pedestrians and horses, known as the "Scarborough to Whitby Rail Trail", or "Scarborough to Whitby Cinder Track".[24][25]

Notes

  1. At the same time George Hudson was promoting the construction of a harbour and docks at Scarborough.[3]
  2. The Cleveland Railway was acquired by the NER in 1865.
  3. 3.0 3.1 The company established by the 1865 act was abandoned after the passing of the 1871 act.[16]

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Tomlinson 1915, pp. 611, 613.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Tomlinson 1915, p. 620.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Tomlinson 1915, p. 659.
  18. 18.0 18.1 Tomlinson 1915, p. 696.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Sources

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Literature

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found., share prospectus

External links

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Film documenting the line at the time of closure (1963–8)
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.