Sea Launch

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Sealaunch)
Jump to: navigation, search
A launch of Zenit-3SL rocket from the Sea Launch platform Ocean Odyssey

Sea Launch is a multinational spacecraft launch service that used a mobile maritime launch platform for equatorial launches of commercial payloads on specialized Zenit-3SL rockets through 2013.

By 2013, it had assembled and launched thirty-one rockets, with three failures and one partial failure. All commercial payloads have been communications satellites intended for geostationary transfer orbit with such customers as EchoStar, DirecTV, XM Satellite Radio, PanAmSat, and Thuraya.

The launcher and its payload are assembled on a purpose-built ship Sea Launch Commander in Long Beach, California, USA. It is then positioned on top of the self-propelled platform Ocean Odyssey and moved to the equatorial Pacific Ocean for launch, with the Sea Launch Commander serving as command center. The sea-based launch system means the rockets can be fired from the optimum position on Earth's surface, considerably increasing payload capacity and reducing launch costs[1] compared to land-based systems.

Sea Launch mothballed its ships and put operations on long-term hiatus in 2014, following the Russian military intervention in Ukraine. By 2015, discussions on disposition of company assets are underway, and the Sea Launch partners are in a court-administered dispute about unpaid expenses that Boeing claims it incurred.

History

Sea Launch was established in 1995 as a consortium of four companies from Norway, Russia, Ukraine and the United States, managed by Boeing with participation from the other shareholders.[2][3] The first rocket was launched in March 1999.

On March 17, 2006, it was announced that Jim Maser, the President and General Manager of Sea Launch, would leave the company to join SpaceX as President and Chief Operating Officer.[4]

In June 2009, the provider of the Sea Launch service, Sea Launch Co. LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.[5][6] Sea Launch asserted that it would "continue to maintain all normal business operations after the filing for reorganization."[7] On August 6, 2010, Energia, which already owned 25% of Sea Launch, announced it planned to acquire a controlling interest of 85% in the company. As a result, the company planned to begin land-based launches from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in early 2011, while sea-based launches to be resumed in September 2011.[8][needs update]

Sea Launch emerged from bankruptcy effective October 27, 2010.[9] Energia Overseas Limited, a Russian corporation, is majority owner of the reorganized entity, with Boeing and other American companies retaining minority shares.

In 2013, Boeing sued RSC Energia, PO Yuzhnoye and KB Yuzhnoye. According to Boeing the companies refused to pay more than $350 million following the joint venture's bankruptcy filing in 2009.[10]

In mid-2014, following the 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine and the subsequent unrest in the eastern part of the country, there were a number of Russian media reports that indicated Sea Launch may be planning to mothball the Odyssey launch platform. The company formally denied those reports in June 2014, indicating it is continuing to buy Zenit rockets from Ukraine, and is still promoting its launch services to the international market,[11] even in August 2014.[12] However, in August 2014, Sea Launch conducted a reduction of their staff and removed from operating status both the Commander and Odyssey vessels in order to reduce operating costs during a period where they have no launches scheduled until late 2015.[12]

In July 2015, industry experts stated that the Chinese government was considering the purchase of the Sea Launch command ship and launch platform assets, but this was not confirmed by either company or Chinese government officials.[13]

In September 2015, Boeing won a court judgement against the Russian and Ukrainian partners within Sea Launch. The decision sets up a court trial planned for November 2015 where Boeing will argue that it was not properly reimbursed for US$356 million of expenses incurred while operating the Sea Launch launch system.[14]

As of December 2015, Roscosmos and Energia are attempting to find a buyer for the Sea Launch assets, due to the high cost of infrastructure maintenance of approximately US$30 million per year.[15]

Ownership and business

Sea Launch was founded by four companies from four countries, which shared the original ownership of Cayman Islands-registered Sea Launch.[16] After reorganising from Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2010, a majority share of the company was acquired by Russian interests.[10][17]

Founding company Nation of origin Initial share[16]

(1995 to 2010)

Share[10]

(Since 2010)

Contribution
Energia Russian Federation 25% 95% Block DM-SL rocket stage (it is used in the Zenit-3SL rocket as its 3rd stage)
Boeing Commercial Space United States 40% 2.5% System integration, payload enclosures (nose-cone that protects the satellite during launch)
Aker Solutions Norway 20% 2.5% Launch platform (Ocean Odyssey) and command ship (Sea Launch Commander)
SDO Yuzhnoye / PO Yuzhmash Ukraine 15% 0% Two-stage Zenit rocket (used as Zenit-3SL's stages 1 and 2)

The project was helped by Hughes Space and Communications, which in 1995 signed the first contract for 10 launches and 10 options, valued at $1 billion, and Space Systems/Loral, which then signed a five-launch contract.

Total cost of the project has been reported at $583 million in 1996. Chase Manhattan arranged about $400 million in loans in 1996. Loans were later guaranteed against political instability in Russia and Ukraine through 2012 by the World Bank (up to $175 million, of these up to $100 million in Russia and up to $75 million in Ukraine) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (up to $65 million).[3]

Sea Launch has a reciprocal agreement with Arianespace and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries through the Launch Services Alliance, providing assurance in case either company's system is not able to launch a payload for reasons of reliability, capacity, backlog, or otherwise. This was used for the first time in 2004 when Arianespace's Ariane 5 had to reschedule a group of launches for reliability reasons.

In 1999, shortly after the company was founded, the Sea Launch consortium claimed that their launch-related operating costs would be lower than a land-based equivalent due in part to reduced staff requirements. The platform and command ship have 310 crew members.[18]

Launches

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Sea Launch launch platform Ocean Odyssey

The first demonstration satellite was launched on March 27, 1999, and the first commercial satellite on October 9, 1999. Sea Launch has launched 29 rockets with 26 successes and 1 partial success as of September 2008. The first failure, of a Hughes-built communications satellite owned by ICO Global Communications, occurred on the second commercial launch on March 12, 2000, and was blamed on a software error that failed to close a valve in the second stage of the rocket.

A second rocket failed to launch on January 30, 2007, when Zenit-3SL exploded on the launch pad with the Boeing 702 NSS-8 satellite on board, seconds after engine ignition.

All Sea Launch missions to date have used the custom-designed three-stage Zenit-3SL launch vehicle, capable of placing up to 6,000 kg (13,000 lb) of payload into geosynchronous transfer orbit.[19] Sea Launch rocket components are manufactured by SDO Yuzhnoye / PO Yuzhmash in Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine (Zenit rocket for the first and second stages); by Energia in Moscow, Russia (Block DM-SL for third stage); and by Boeing in Seattle, United States (payload fairing and interstage structure).

Sea Launch rockets are assembled in Long Beach, California. The typical assembly is done on board the Assembly and Command Ship (the payload is first tested, fueled and encapsulated in the nearby Payload Processing Facility). The rocket is then transferred to a horizontal hangar on the self-propelled launch platform.

Following rocket tests, both ships then sail about 4,800 km (3,000 mi) to the equator at 154° West Longitude, Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found., in international waters about 370 km (230 mi) from Kiritimati, Kiribati. The platform travels the distance in about 11 days, the command ship in about eight days.

With the platform ballasted to its launch depth of 22 m (72 ft), the hangar is opened, the rocket is mechanically moved to a vertical position, and the launch platform crew evacuates to the command ship which moves about five kilometres (3.1 mi) away. Then, with the launch platform unmanned, the rocket is fueled and launched. The final ten seconds before launch are called out simultaneously in English and Russian.

Number Date Payload Mass Result
1 1999-03-27 DemoSat 4.5 t success
2 1999-10-09 DIRECTV 1-R 3.5 t success
3 2000-03-12 ICO F-1 2.7 t failure
4 2000-07-28 PAS-9 3.7 t success
5 2000-10-20 Thuraya-1 5.1 t success
6 2001-03-18 XM-2 ROCK 4.7 t success
7 2001-05-08 XM-1 ROLL 4.7 t success
8 2002-06-15 Galaxy IIIC 4.9 t success
9 2003-06-10 Thuraya-2 5.2 t success
10 2003-08-07 EchoStar IX/Telstar 13 4.7 t success
11 2003-09-30 Galaxy XIII/Horizons-1 4.1 t success
12 2004-01-10 Telstar 14/Estrela do Sul 1 4.7 t success
13 2004-05-04 DIRECTV-7S 5.5 t success
14 2004-06-28 Telstar-18 4.8 t launch anomaly
15 2005-03-01 XM-3 4.7 t success
16 2005-04-26 SPACEWAY-1 6.0 t success
17 2005-06-23 Intelsat IA-8 5.5 t success
18 2005-11-08 Inmarsat 4-F2 6.0 t success
19 2006-02-15 EchoStar X 4.3 t success
20 2006-04-12 JCSAT-9 4.4 t success
21 2006-06-18 Galaxy 16 5.1 t success
22 2006-08-22 Koreasat 5 4.9 t success
23 2006-10-30 XM-4 4.7 t success
24 2007-01-30 NSS-8 5.9 t failure
25 2008-01-15 Thuraya-3 5.2 t success
26 2008-03-19 DirecTV-11 5.9 t success
27 2008-05-21 Galaxy 18 4.6 t success
28 2008-07-16 EchoStar XI 5.5 t success[20]
29 2008-09-24 Galaxy 19 4.7 t success[21]
30 2009-04-20 SICRAL 1B 3.0 t success[22]
31 2011-09-24 Atlantic Bird 7 4.6 t success
32 2012-05-31 Intelsat 19 5.6 t success[23]
33 2012-08-19 Intelsat 21 6.0 t success
34 2012-12-03 Eutelsat 70B 5.2 t success
35 2013-02-01 Intelsat 27 6.2 t failure[24]
36 2014-05-26 Eutelsat 3B 6.0 t success[25]

NSS-8 launch failure

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

File:SeaLaunch-explosion.jpg
The Sea Launch NSS-8 launch explosion on January 30, 2007. The explosion has obscured the floating launch pad platform.

On January 30, 2007, the Sea Launch Zenit-3SL rocket carrying NSS-8 and 500 tons of fuel[26] exploded on launch.[27] Available imagery[28] shows a fireball much larger than the launch platform at sea level.[29]

Since the launch pad platform is vacated by all engineers during the automated launch process, there were no injuries. On February 1, 2007 Sea Launch released a statement detailing its status.[30]

It is believed that the failure was caused by a foreign object being ingested by the engine, causing the rocket to crash immediately.[31]

On February 3, 2007, photographs of the damage were posted on internet forums.[32] The launch platform damage is mostly superficial, though blast deflectors underneath the launch platform were knocked loose and were lost when they fell into the sea.

In March 2007, shortly after the NSS-8 launch failure, Hughes Network Systems switched the launch of SPACEWAY-3 from a Sea Launch Zenit-3SL to an Ariane 5.[33][34]

Repairs of the launch platform were completed in September 2007.[35] The Sea Launch platform underwent repairs in Canada, docked near CFB Esquimalt, just west of Victoria, British Columbia, and departed on July 31, 2007. Both vessels returned to their home port in Long Beach, California.[36]

Concerns and investigations

During project development in 1998 Boeing was fined US$10 million by the United States Department of State for technical violations of the Arms Export Control Act in handling of missile technology while dealing with its foreign Sea Launch partners. This is the largest civil penalty of its kind, although it could have been as much as US$102 million.[37] The Sea Launch project was suspended for two months during the investigation.

The Department of State found that between January 1994 and January 1998 Boeing illegally exported "defense articles" and "defense services", although no national security breaches were determined.[38] The violations were uncovered by Boeing's internal investigation.

At about the same time United States Customs Service attempted to block Sea Launch from bringing Zenit-3SL rockets (classified as missiles) into California for assembly without a munitions import licence. The matter was settled in the company's favour.[39]

Also in 1998, 16 member states of the South Pacific Forum issued a communiqué asking the United States to suspend the project indefinitely until and unless their environmental concerns are remedied. It was mostly criticized by the island nation of Kiribati.[37]

The project was criticized in 1997 by International Transport Workers' Federation (ITWF) for registering its sea vessels in Liberia.[37] In May 1999 Sea Launch reached an agreement with the ITWF, which allows crew members to use ITWF inspectors.

Land launch

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Using existing Zenit infrastructure at the Baikonur Cosmodrome, the "Land Launch" system is based on a modified version of the Sea Launch vehicle, the three-stage Zenit-3SL rocket. Land Launch's Zenit-3SLB vehicle addresses the launch needs of commercial satellites weighing up to 3.5 metric tons (3.9 short tons). The two-stage Zenit-2SLB is also available for lifting payloads up to 13 metric tons (14 short tons) to inclined low Earth orbits.

The first launch was on April 28, 2008, when a Zenit-3SLB launched Spacecom Ltd's AMOS-3 spacecraft from LC-45/1 at Baikonur.

Advantages of equatorial ocean-platform based launches

Sea Launch command ship Sea Launch Commander

Advantages of equatorial launch site:

  • The rotational speed of the Earth is greatest at the equator, providing a minor extra launch "boost".
  • The need for a "plane change" to the zero degree inclination of geostationary orbit is eliminated, providing a major extra launch "boost". This allows 17.5%-25% more mass to be launched to geostationary orbit than the same rocket launched from Cape Canaveral, which is at 28.5 degrees north latitude.
  • Any orbital inclination could be reached, thus (for example) combining in one launch site the attainable inclinations of both Cape Canaveral and Vandenberg.

Advantages of ocean-based over a conventional land-based launch platform:

  • An ocean launch reduces risks related to launching over populated areas, providing better safety to third parties.
  • Absence of range conflicts with other launch systems and a near total absence of ship or overhead air traffic that would constrain launch.

Recognition

Sea Launch was awarded the Space Foundation's Space Achievement Award in 2000.[40]

See also

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Sea Launch Takes Proactive Steps to Address Manifest Gap, August 22, 2014, News & Events – Press Releases – 2014, accessed August 27, 2014.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Boeing Wins U.S. Court Judgment Against Russian, Ukrainian Sea Launch Partners, SpaceNews, 30 September 2015, retrieved 27 November 2015.
  15. Sea Launch On The Sales Block?, Satnews, 3 December 2015, accessed 8 December 2015.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. which includes a video of the accident on YouTube
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. 37.0 37.1 37.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links