Sorbs (tribe)

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Not to be confused with Sorbs.
File:Germanische und slavische Volksstaemme zwischen Elbe und Weichsel.jpg
Sorbs and their sub-tribes, Luzici, Milceni and Daleminci, seen in the southwest corner of early West Slavic tribal area.

The Surbi, also known as Sorbs in modern historiography, was an Early Slavic tribe in Lower Lusatia, part of the Wends. In the 7th century, the tribe was part of Samo's Empire. The tribe is last mentioned in the late 10th century.

History

7th century

Dervan's province.

The oldest mention of the Surbi is from the Frankish 7th-century Chronicle of Fredegar, in which they are mentioned as a Slavic tribe under the leadership of dux (duke) Dervan ("Dervanus dux gente Surbiorum que ex genere Sclavinorum"), which joined the Slavic tribal union of Samo (known in historiography as "Samo's Empire").[1] The Surbi lived in the Saale-Elbe valley, having settled in the Thuringian part of Francia.[1] The Saale-Elbe line marked the approximate limit of Slavic westward migration.[2] The Surbi and other Slavic tribes joined Samo after his decisive victory against Frankish King Dagobert I in 631.[1] Afterwards, these Slavic tribes continuously raided Thuringia.[1] The fate of the tribes after 658 is undetermined, though they subsequently returned to Frankish vassalage.

8th century

In 782, the Sorbs, inhabiting the region between the Elbe and Saale, plundered Thuringia and Saxony.[3] Charlemagne sent Adalgis, Worad and Geilo into Saxony, aimed at attacking the Sorbs, however, they met with rebel Saxons who destroyed them.[4]

In 789, Charlemagne launched a campaign against the Wiltzi; after reaching the Elbe, he went further and successfully "subjected the Slavs".[5] His army also included the Slavic Sorbs and Obotrites, under Witzan.[5] The army reached Dragovit, who surrendered, followed by other Slavic magnates and chieftains who submitted to Charlemagne.[5]

9th century

The Surbi ended their vassalage to the Franks (the Carolingian Empire) and revolted, invading Austrasia;[when?] Charles the Younger launched a campaign against the Slavs in Bohemia in 805, killing their dux, Lecho, and then proceeded crossing the Saale with his army and killed rex (king) Melito (or "Miliduoch") of the Surbi, near modern-day Weißenfels, in 806.[6][7] The region was laid to waste, upon which the other Slavic chieftains submitted and gave hostages.[8][9] The rebellious Sorbs were compelled in 816 to renew their oaths of submission.[10]

In May 826, at a meeting at Ingelheim, Cedrag of the Obotrites and Tunglo of the Sorbs were accused of malpractises; they were ordered to appear in October, after Tunglo surrendered his son as hostage and was allowed to return home.[11] The Franks had, sometime before the 830s, established the Sorbian March, comprising eastern Thuringia, in easternmost East Francia.

Map of the Sorbian March.

In 839, the Saxons fought "the Sorabos, called Colodici" at Kesigesburg and won the battle, managing to kill their king Cimusclo (or "Czimislav"), with Kesigesburg and eleven forts being captured.[12] The Sorbs were forced to pay tribute and forfeited territory to the Franks.[12]

The mid-9th century Bavarian Geographer mentioned the Sorbs having 50 civitates.[13]

Svatopluk I of Moravia (r. 871–894) may have incorporated the Sorbs into Great Moravia.[2]

10th century

Between 932 and 963 the Sorbs lost their independence and were rapidly Germanized.[14] Henry the Fowler had subjected the Stodorane in 928, and in the following year imposed overlordship on the Obotrites and Veletians, and strengthened the grip on the Sorbs.[15] Bishop Boso of St. Emmeram (d. 970), a Slav-speaker, had considerable success in Christianizing the Sorbs.[16]

In the 10th century the region came under the influence of the Duchy of Saxony, starting with the 928 eastern campaigns of King Henry the Fowler, who conquered the Sorbs and Miltzenia (Upper Lusatia) by 932.[citation needed] Gero II, Margrave of the Saxon Eastern March, reconquered Lusatia the following year and, in 939, murdered 30 Sorbian princes during a feast.[citation needed] As a result, many Sorbian uprisings followed.[citation needed] The March of Lusatia was established in 965, remaining part of the Holy Roman Empire, while the adjacent Northern March again got lost in the Slavic uprising of 983.[citation needed] The later Upper Lusatian region of the Milceni lands up to the Silesian border at the Kwisa river at first was part of the Margraviate of Meissen under Margrave Eckard I.[citation needed] A reconstructed castle, at Raddusch in Lower Lusatia, is the sole physical remnant from this early period.[citation needed] These are the last mentions of the tribe.

Aftermath

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. During the reign of Boleslaw I of Poland in 1002–18, three Polish-German wars were waged which caused Lusatia to come under the domination of new rulers. In 1018, on the strength of peace in Bautzen, Lusatia became a part of Poland; however, it returned to German rule before 1031. At the same time the Kingdom of Poland raised claims to the Lusatian lands and upon the death of Emperor Otto III in 1002, Margrave Gero II lost Lusatia to the Polish Duke Boleslaw I, who took the region in his conquests. After the 1018 Peace of Bautzen, Lusatia became part of his territory, however Germans and Poles continued struggling for administration of the region. It was regained in a 1031 campaign by Emperor Conrad II in favour of the Saxon German rulers of the Meissen House of Wettin and the Ascanian margraves of Brandenburg, who purchased the March of (Lower) Lusatia in 1303. In 1367 the Brandenburg elector Otto V of Wittelsbach finally sold Lower Lusatia to Emperor and Bohemian King Charles IV and it was incorporated into the Kingdom of Bohemia.

From the 11th to the 15th century, agriculture in Lusatia developed and colonization by Frankish, Flemish and Saxon settlers intensified. In 1327 the first prohibitions on using Sorbian in Altenburg, Zwickau and Leipzig appeared.

White Serbs and Serbs

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Main article: White Serbs

According to 10th-century De Administrando Imperio, the Serbs hailed from White Serbia (or "Boiki"), "the neighbour of Francia", having settled in the Balkans during the reign of Byzantine Emperor Heraclius (610–641) when the Serb Archon, one of two heirs, had led part of his tribe and claimed protection of the Emperor.[17] The archon was the progenitor of the first Serbian dynasty (the Vlastimirović), which ruled the Serbian Principality until c. 960.

According to German historian Ludwig Albrecht Gebhardi (1735–1802), the Serb Archon was most likely a son of Dervan.[18] This theory was supported by Miloš Milojević,[19] and Relja Novaković included the possibility that they were relatives in his work.[20]

Legacy

The modern Sorbs inhabit an area within Lusatia, Germany.

The ethnonym survived in the modern Slavic ethnic group of Lusatian Sorbs. The Slavic-speaking "Lusatian Sorbs", living in two enclaves of Cottbus and Bautzen, have close ties with each other.[2] These Lusatian Sorbs are descendants of the Milceni (Upper Sorbs) and the Luzici (Lower Sorbs); their dialects have developed into two separate written languages.[21] In 1900, the community numbered c. 150,000, of which two thirds were monolingual; today, there are c. 50,000 speakers, all of whom are bilingual.[21]

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Vlasto 1970, p. 142.
  3. ↑ Verbruggen 1997, p. 21.
  4. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. ↑ Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 9, Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, JSTOR (Organization), 1880, p. 224
  9. ↑ Verbruggen 1997, pp. 314-315.
  10. ↑ Bury 2011, p. 900.
  11. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. ↑ Vlasto 1970, p. 147.
  15. ↑ Vlasto 1970, p. 144.
  16. ↑ Vlasto 1970, p. 90.
  17. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Sources

Secondary sources
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
Primary sources
Retrieved from "https://infogalactic.com/w/index.php?title=Sorbs_(tribe)&oldid=715646905"