SpaceX South Texas Launch Site

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from SpaceX private launch site)
Jump to: navigation, search
SpaceX South Texas Launch Site
SpaceX private-launch facility location--TexasProposal--201304.jpg
Regional location of the proposed SpaceX Texas launch facility, from the FAA draft EIS, April 2013.
Location Boca Chica Village, Cameron County, Texas
Proposer SpaceX
Status Under construction
Type Space launch facility
Cost estimate US$100 million[1]
Cost estimate (low) US$85 million[2]
Start date September 2014
Completion date 2017[3][4]
Stakeholders Texas Enterprise Fund, Spaceport Trust Fund, Cameron County Spaceport Development Corporation

The SpaceX South Texas Launch Site is a spaceport being built at Boca Chica Village near Brownsville, Texas for the private use of Space Exploration Technologies Corporation (SpaceX).[5][6][7] Its purpose is "to provide SpaceX an exclusive launch site that would allow the company to accommodate its launch manifest and meet tight launch windows."[8] The launch site will be the world's first commercial orbital launch facility[5][9] and is intended to support launches of the SpaceX Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles as well as "a variety of reusable suborbital launch vehicles."[8] SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has also indicated that he expects "commercial astronauts, private astronauts, to be departing from South Texas,"[1] and foresees launching spacecraft to Mars in the future.[10]

During 2012 through mid-2014, SpaceX was considering seven potential locations around the United States for the new commercial launch pad. For much of this period, a parcel of land adjacent to Boca Chica Beach near Brownsville, Texas was the leading candidate location, during an extended period while the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) conducted an extensive environmental assessment on the use of the Texas location as a launch site. Also during this period, SpaceX began acquiring land in the area, purchasing approximately 41 acres (17 ha) and leasing 57 acres (23 ha) by July 2014.

SpaceX announced on 4 August 2014, that they had selected the location near Brownsville as the location for the new non-governmental launch site,[11] after the final environmental assessment completed and environmental agreements were in place by early July 2014.[12][13][14]

SpaceX did a ceremonial groundbreaking on the new launch facility in September 2014[15] and site soil preparation began in late 2015,[16] with the first launches from the facility expected to take place no earlier than 2018.[3][1][17] When completed, it will become SpaceX's fourth active launch facility, following three launch locations that are leased from the US government.

History

Private discussions between SpaceX and various state officials about a future private launch site began at least as early as 2011,[18] and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk mentioned interest in a private launch site for their commercial launches in a speech on 29 September 2011.[19]

The company publicly announced on 4 August 2014, that they had decided on Texas as the location for their new non-governmental launch site[11] with construction expected to begin later in 2014.

Launch site selection and environmental assessment regulatory process

As early as April 2012, at least five potential locations were publicly known, including "sites in Alaska, California, Florida,[20] Texas and Virginia."[21]

In September 2012, it became clear that Georgia and Puerto Rico were also interested in pursuing the new SpaceX commercial spaceport facility.[22] The Camden County, Georgia Joint Development Authority voted unanimously in November 2012 to "explore developing an aero-spaceport facility" at an Atlantic coastal site to support both horizontal and vertical launch operations.[23] The main Puerto Rico site under consideration at the time was land that had been formerly Roosevelt Roads Naval Station.[24]

By September 2012, SpaceX was considering a total of seven potential locations for the new commercial launch pad around the United States. For much of the time since, the leading candidate location for the new facility was a parcel of land adjacent to Boca Chica Beach near Brownsville, Texas.

From the beginning, one of the proposed locations for the new commercial-mission-only[8] spaceport was south Texas, which was revealed in April 2012 via preliminary regulatory documentation. The FAA's Office of Commercial Space Transportation initiated a Notice of Intent to conduct an Environmental Impact Statement[25] and public hearings on the new launch site, which would be located in Cameron County, Texas. The Texas site would support up to 12 commercial launches per year, including two Falcon Heavy launches.[26] "Before anything could be done on the project, an environmental impact statement, a public scoping period and a public scoping meeting would need to be held."[27][21] The first public meeting was held in May 2012.[27] [28]

By early 2013, Texas remained the leading candidate for the location of the new SpaceX commercial launch facility, although Florida, Georgia and other locations also remained in the running. Legislation was introduced in the Texas Legislature to enable temporary closings of State beaches during launches, limit liability for noise and some other specific commercial spaceflight risks, as well as considering a package of incentives to encourage SpaceX to locate at the Brownsville, Texas location.[17][29] 2013 economic estimates showed SpaceX investing approximately US$100 million in the development and construction of the facility, which would "create hundreds of jobs."[29] A US$15 million incentive package was approved by the Texas Legislature.[30][verification needed] The Texas incentive package had been under consideration since early 2012.[28]

Map showing proposed locations of the control center and vertical launch area at the Texas facility, from the FAA draft EIS, April 2013.

The FAA released a draft Environmental Impact Statement for the location in south Texas in April 2013, and "found that 'no impacts would occur' that would force the Federal Aviation Administration to deny SpaceX a permit for rocket operations near Brownsville."[31] The FAA will not issue a permit until after public hearings are completed and the draft report becomes final, originally expected in late 2013,[31] but was not actually released by the FAA until July 2014. The FAA Draft EIA identified three parcels of land—total of 12.4 acres (5.0 ha)—that would notionally be used for the control center. In addition, SpaceX had leased 56.6 acres (22.9 ha) of land adjacent to the terminus of Texas State Highway 4, 20 acres (8.1 ha) of which would be used to develop the vertical launch area; the remainder would remain open space surrounding the launch facility.[8]

A public hearing on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was held on 7 May 2013, at the International Technology Education and Commerce Center in Brownsville.[31] The public comment period ended on 24 June,[32] and the final EIS had been expected to be released before the end of 2013.[33][34] In January 2014, the FAA stated that they expect to have "the final Environmental Impact Statement on the Boca Chica site ready for public release by late this winter."[35]

In early July 2014 the FAA officially issued its Record of Decision concerning the Boca Chica Beach facility, and found that "the proposal by Elon Musk’s Space Exploration Technologies would have no significant impact on the environment,"[36] approving the proposal and outlining SpaceX’s proposal. This latest clearance allows SpaceX to apply for licenses from the FAA to launch the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy orbital vertical launch rockets, which also could carry the Dragon capsule, and a variety of smaller, reusable sub-orbital launch vehicles from the Boca Chica site."[36] The company formally announced selection of the Texas location in early August.[11]

In September 2013, the State of Texas General Land Office (GLO) and Cameron County signed an agreement outlining how beach closures would be handled in order to support a future SpaceX launch schedule. The agreement is intended to enable both economic development in Cameron County and protect the public’s right to have access to Texas state beaches. Beach closures would be allowed only on specific dates, and could not exceed a maximum of 15 hours per closure date, with no more than three scheduled space flights between the Saturday prior to Memorial Day and Labor Day, unless GLO approves the launch dates.[34]

Land acquisition and construction

With land procurement beginning in 2012, a groundbreaking in 2014, and major dirt work beginning in 2015, SpaceX is involved in a multi-year design and construction project near Boca Chica Beach.

Prior to a final decision on the location of the spaceport, SpaceX began purchasing a number of real estate properties in Cameron County, Texas beginning as early as June 2012.[32] By July 2014, SpaceX had purchased approximately 41 acres (17 ha) and leased 57 acres (23 ha) near Boca Chica Village and Boca Chica Beach.[37]

Prior to May 2013, five lots in the Spanish Dagger Subdivision in Boca Chica Village, adjacent to Highway 4 which leads to the proposed launch site, had been purchased. In May 2013, SpaceX purchased an additional three parcels, adding another 1 acre (0.40 ha),[32] plus four more lots with a total of 1.9 acres (0.77 ha) in July 2013, making a total of 12 SpaceX-purchased lots.[30] In November 2013, SpaceX substantially "increased its land holdings in the Boca Chica Beach area from 12 lots to 72 undeveloped lots" purchased, which encompass a total of approximately 24 acres (9.7 ha), in addition to the 56.5 acres (22.9 ha) leased from private property owners.[33] An additional few acres were purchased late in 2013, raising the SpaceX total "from 72 undeveloped lots to 80 lots totaling about 26 acres."[35] In late-2013, SpaceX completed a replat of 13 lots totaling 8.3 acres (3.4 ha) into a subdivision that they have named "Mars Crossing."[38][39] In early 2014, they purchased 28 additional lots that surround the proposed complex at Boca Chica Beach, raising the SpaceX-owned land to approximately 36 acres (15 ha) in addition to the 56-acre lease.[38]

By late September 2014, Dogleg Park completed a replat of lots totaling 49.3 acres (20.0 ha) into a second subdivision, this one named Launch Site Texas, made up of several parcels of property previously purchased. This is the site of the launch site itself while the launch control facility will be two miles west in the Mars Crossing subdivision. Dogleg Park has also continued purchasing land in Boca Chica, and now owns a total of "87 lots equaling more than 100 acres (40 ha).[39]

SpaceX broke ground on the new launch site on 22 September 2014,[15] but indicated that the principal work to build the facility "will not ramp up until the second half of 2015"[1] after the SpaceX launch site development team completes the work to build a second SpaceX pad in Florida, at a leased location: Kennedy Space Center Launch Pad 39A. The same team will manage the work to build the Boca Chica facility. Advance preparation work will commence ahead of that. SpaceX continues to anticipate it will spend approximately US$100 million over three to four years to build the facility, while the Texas state government will expend US$15 million to extend utilities and infrastructure to support the new spaceport.[1]

By late September 2014, the Mars Crossing command center area had been fenced and two portable buildings installed.[39] Vendor events for potential contractors and suppliers were scheduled in February 2015, with priority for limited appointments going to local vendors.[40] In July 2014, SpaceX applied for a permit to install small solar panels off-grid in the vicinity of the proposed launch control center."[14]

SpaceX is also modifying two residential properties in Boca Chica Village, but apparently planning to leave them in residential use, about 2 miles (3.2 km) west of the launch site.[41]

Utility-supplied grid electric power for the new facility will be provided by Magic Valley Electric Coop. "Potable water will be trucked to the facility, which will be served by a septic system."[39] There will also be a SpaceX-owned 6.5-acre (2.6 ha) photovoltaic power station on site to provide electrical power. Permit was applied for in July 2015; the general contractor for building the generation facility is SolarCity.[42][43]

The design phase for the facility was completed by March 2015.[44] Site soil preparation has begun, and some 310,000 cubic yards (240,000 m3) of new soil will be trucked to the facility between October 2015 and January 2016 to stabilize the ground at the site, using a process known as soil surcharging.[16][4]

In early 2016, SpaceX President and COO Gwynne Shotwell indicated that construction had been delayed by poor soil stability at the site, and that "two years of dirt work" would be required before it can build the launch facility. Construction costs will, as a result, be higher.[45] SpaceX in now not planning to complete construction until 2017, and the first launch from Boca Chica is not expected until 2018.[3][4]

Surrounding areas

In January 2016, the "South Padre Island Convention and Visitors Advisory Board (CVA) made a recommendation to the [South Padre Island] City Council to proceed with further planning regarding potential SpaceX viewing sites".[46]

Beyond Texas

SpaceX has indicated on several occasions that they will need more than the four launch sites currently in active use or in process. Discussions continue for future launch facility locations beyond Texas.

Georgia and Florida proposals

For both the Camden County, Georgia location, and for the new non-NASA, non-USAF Florida location for commercial launches being considered by Space Florida, the local governmental entities are pursuing Environmental Impact Assessments on their own. The Camden County Joint Development Authority has contracted for an EIS on 200 acres (81 ha) of authority-owned land, part of a larger 4,200 acres (1,700 ha) site. In Florida, Space Florida has initiated an EIS for a site on a portion of the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge.[47][48] As of January 2016, the Camden County spaceport project remains a live proposal, continuing to garner support from local residents and public funding agencies in late 2014 following the SpaceX selection of the Texas location,[49] and is specifically endeavoring to attract SpaceX to use the Camden location for future use.[50]

The Space Florida economic development agency is actively working to change the infrastructure and land use regulations on the space coast in order to attract private launch operators to build non-governmental launch facilities in Florida.[13]

Economic impact

The new launch facility was projected in a 2014 study to generate US$85 million of economic activity in the city of Brownsville and eventually generate approximately US$51 million in annual salaries from some 500 jobs projected to be created by 2024.[51]

A local economic development board was created for south Texas in 2014—the Cameron County Space Port Development Corporation (CCSPDC)—in order to facilitate the development of the aerospace industry in Cameron County near Brownsville. The first project for the newly established board is the SpaceX project to develop a launch site at Boca Chica Beach.[52] In early 2015, Cameron County transferred ownership of 25 lots in Boca Chica to CCSPDC, which may be used to develop event parking.[53]

Launch facility overview

Landing Complex 1 sign at Cape Canaveral in Florida, formerly Launch Complex 13.
Vertical launch area of the proposed SpaceX Texas facility, from the FAA draft EIS, April 2013.

The new private launch site will be SpaceX's fourth active orbital launch facility, and its first private facility. SpaceX currently leases three US government-owned launch sites: Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Space Launch Complex 40 in Florida and Vandenberg Air Force Base Space Launch Complex 4 in California are operational, while they are currently modifying Kennedy Space Center Launch Pad 39A just a few miles north of their existing Florida pad at LC40 on the adjacent Air Force Station.[54]

SpaceX also has one suborbital facility currently in use, the SpaceX Rocket Development and Test Facility in Texas, with an additional high-altitude suborbital test facility under construction in New Mexico,[55] with more than US$2 million expended on construction by May 2014,[56] and initial test flights beginning in 2014.[57]

The launch site is in Cameron County, Texas,[17] approximately 17 miles east of Brownsville with launch flyover range over the Gulf of Mexico.[8] "The latest clearance from the FAA on July 9, 2014, allows SpaceX to apply for licenses from the FAA to launch the Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy orbital vertical launch rockets, which also could carry the Dragon capsule, and a variety of smaller, reusable sub-orbital launch vehicles from the Boca Chica site. SpaceX proposes up to 12 launches a year through at least 2025, carrying payload to the International Space Station."[36] The launch site will be optimized for commercial activity, and may one day be used to fly spacecraft to Mars.[10]

The Texas launch location was projected in the draft EIS to include a 20 acres (8.1 ha) vertical launch area and a 12.2 acres (4.9 ha) area for a launch control center. The launch pad will be directly adjacent to the eastern terminus of Texas State Highway 4.

The vertical launch area will include a hangar for horizontal launch vehicle processing—in which the transporter erector will be stored between launches—as well as a launch pad and associated flame duct, water tower, four lightning protection towers, propellant storage and handling areas, associated workshop/warehouse/utility structures, and a "retention basin for deluge water."[8]

In the draft EIS preliminary plan, the control center was to be located approximately two miles (3.2 km) west of the vertical launch area, adjacent to Boca Chica Village. It would consist of two launch control center buildings, two payload processing facilities, a launch vehicle processing hangar, communication equipment, electrical generating equipment and diesel fuel storage, as well as a storage facility for small amounts of satellite propellants.[8]

Launches on orbital trajectories from Brownsville will have a constrained flight path, due to the Caribbean Islands as well as the large number of Oil platforms in the Gulf of Mexico. SpaceX has stated that they have a good flight path available for the launching of satellites on trajectories toward the commercially-valuable Geosynchronous orbit.[58]

Related facilities

The Brownsville Economic Development Council (BEDC) is building a space tracking facility in Boca Chica Village on a 2.3-acre (0.93 ha) site adjacent to the SpaceX launch control center. The STARGATE tracking facility is a joint project of the BEDC, SpaceX, and the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (formerly the University of Texas at Brownsville at the time the agreement was reached).[39]

Human-carrying launches

Although SpaceX initial plans for the Boca Chica launch site are to loft robotic spacecraft to geosynchronous orbits, Elon Musk indicated in September 2014 that "the first person to go to another planet could launch from [the Boca Chica launch site]",[59] but did not indicate which launch vehicle might be used for those launches, nor whether the MCT launch vehicle might launch from Texas even on unmanned flights.

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. 17.0 17.1 17.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. 21.0 21.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/environmental/nepa_docs/review/documents_progress/spacex_texas_launch_site_environmental_impact_statement/media/SpaceX_Texas_Launch_Site_Draft_EIS_V1.pdf (page 87)
  25. FAA Notice of Intent to conduct an Environmental Impact Statement, Federal Aviation Administration, 3 April 2012, retrieved 8 April 2012.
  26. "SpaceX Proposes New Texas Launch Site" http://www.citizensinspace.org/2012/04/spacex-proposes-new-texas-launch-site/
  27. 27.0 27.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. 28.0 28.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. 29.0 29.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. 30.0 30.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. 31.0 31.1 31.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. 32.0 32.1 32.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. 33.0 33.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. 34.0 34.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. 35.0 35.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. 36.0 36.1 36.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. 38.0 38.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. 39.0 39.1 39.2 39.3 39.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  44. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  45. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  46. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  47. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  48. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  49. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  50. to bid for spaceport, WSB-2 Atlanta, 5 January 2016, retrieved 7 January 2016.
  51. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  52. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  53. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  54. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  55. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  56. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  57. Businesses prepare for first flight, Las Cruces Bulletin, Alta LeCompte, 11 July 2014, accessed 30 July 2014.
  58. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  59. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.