Space Launch System

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Space Launch System
Orange tank SLS - Post-CDR.jpg
Artist's rendering of the SLS Block 1 launching with Orion.
Function Launch vehicle
Manufacturer Boeing, United Launch Alliance, Orbital ATK, Aerojet Rocketdyne
Country of origin United States
Project cost US$7 billion (2014-18, 2014 estimate),[1] to
$35 billion (until 2025, 2011 est.)[2][3][better source needed]
Cost per launch US$500 million (2012 projection)[4]
Size
Height 211 ft 11 in (64.6 m), Core Stage
Diameter 27 ft 7 in (8.4 m), Core Stage
Stages 2
Capacity
Payload to LEO 150,000 to 290,000 lb (70,000 to 130,000 kg)
Associated rockets
Family Shuttle-Derived Launch Vehicles
Comparable Saturn V, Energia, N-1
Launch history
Status Undergoing development
Launch sites LC-39B, Kennedy Space Center
First flight No later than November 2018[5]
Notable payloads Orion MPCV, Europa Multiple-Flyby Mission
Boosters (Block 1)
No. boosters 2 five-segment Solid Rocket Boosters
Thrust 3,600,000 lbf (16,000 kN)
Total thrust 7,200,000 lbf (32,000 kN)
Specific impulse 269 seconds (2.64 km/s) (vacuum)
Burn time 124 seconds
Fuel PBAN, APCP
First stage (Block 1, 1B, 2) - Core Stage
Length 211 ft 11 in (64.6 m)
Diameter 27 ft 7 in (8.4 m)
Empty mass 187,990 lb (85,270 kg)
Gross mass 2,159,322 lb (979,452 kg)
Engines 4 RS-25D/E[6]
Thrust 1,670,000 lbf (7,440 kN)
Specific impulse 363 seconds (3.56 km/s) (sea level), 452 seconds (4.43 km/s) (vacuum)
Fuel LH2/LOX
Second stage (Block 1) - ICPS
Length 44 ft 11 in (13.7 m)
Diameter 16 ft 5 in (5 m)
Empty mass 7,690 lb (3,490 kg)
Gross mass 67,700 lb (30,710 kg)
Engines 1 RL10B-2
Thrust 24,800 lbf (110.1 kN)
Specific impulse 462 seconds (4.53 km/s)
Burn time 1125 seconds
Fuel LH2/LOX
Second stage (Block 1B, Block 2) - Exploration Upper Stage
Diameter 27 ft 7 in (8.4 m)
Engines 4 RL10
Thrust 99,000 lbf (440 kN)
Fuel LH2/LOX

The Space Launch System (SLS) is an American Space Shuttle-derived heavy expendable launch vehicle being designed by NASA. It follows the cancellation of the Constellation program, and is to replace the retired Space Shuttle. The NASA Authorization Act of 2010 envisions the transformation of the Constellation program's Ares I and Ares V vehicle designs into a single launch vehicle usable for both crew and cargo, similar to the Ares IV. The SLS will be the most powerful rocket ever built, with about 20% more thrust than the Saturn V and a comparable payload capacity, putting the SLS into the super heavy-lift launch vehicle class of rockets.[7][8][9][10] [11]

The SLS launch vehicle is to be upgraded over time with more powerful versions. Its initial Block 1 version is to lift a payload of 70 metric tons to low Earth orbit (LEO), which will be increased with the debut of Block 1B and the Exploration Upper Stage.[12] Block 2 will replace the initial Shuttle-derived boosters with advanced boosters and is planned to have a LEO capability of more than 130 metric tons to meet the congressional requirement.[13] These upgrades will allow the SLS to lift astronauts and hardware to various beyond-LEO destinations: on a circumlunar trajectory as part of Exploration Mission 1 with Block 1, to a near-Earth asteroid in Exploration Mission 2 with Block 1B, and to Mars with Block 2. The SLS will launch the Orion Crew and Service Module and may support trips to the International Space Station if necessary. SLS will use the ground operations and launch facilities at NASA's Kennedy Space Center, Florida.

During the joint Senate-NASA presentation in September 2011, it was stated that the SLS program has a projected development cost of $18 billion through 2017, with $10 billion for the SLS rocket, $6 billion for the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and $2 billion for upgrades to the launch pad and other facilities at Kennedy Space Center.[14][15]

Design and development

Space Launch System's planned upgrade path

On September 14, 2011, NASA announced its design selection for the new launch system, declaring that it, in combination with the Orion spacecraft,[16] would take the agency's astronauts farther into space than ever before and provide the cornerstone for future US human space exploration efforts.[17][18][19]

Three versions of the SLS launch vehicle are planned: Block 1, Block 1B, and Block 2. Each will use the same core stage with four main engines, but Block 1B will feature a more powerful second stage called the Exploration Upper Stage (EUS), and Block 2 will combine the EUS with upgraded boosters. Block 1 has a baseline LEO payload capacity of 70 metric tons (77 short tons) and Block 1B has a baseline of 105 metric tons (116 short tons). The proposed Block 2 will have lift capacity of 130 metric tons (140 short tons), which is similar to that of the Saturn V.[13][20] Some sources state this would make the SLS the most capable heavy lift vehicle built;[21][22] although the Saturn V lifted approximately 140 metric tons to LEO in the Apollo 17 mission.[7][23]

During the development of the SLS a number of configurations were considered, including a Block 0 with three main engines,[24] a Block 1A variant that would have upgraded the vehicle's boosters instead of its second stage,[24] and a Block 2 with five main engines and a different second stage, the Earth Departure Stage, with up to three J-2X engines.[25] In February 2015, it was reported that NASA evaluations showed "over performance" versus the baseline payload for Block 1 and Block 1B configurations.[26]

On July 31, 2013 the SLS passed the Preliminary Design Review (PDR). The review encompassed all aspects of the SLS' design, not only the rocket and boosters but also ground support and logistical arrangements.[27] On August 7, 2014 the SLS Block 1 passed a milestone known as Key Decision Point C and entered full-scale development, with an estimated launch date of November 2018.[28][5]

Vehicle description

Rendering of the SLS Block 1 with its older black-and-white paint scheme, showing the large core stage, two 5-segment SRBs, and the smaller upper stage.

Core stage

The core stage will be 8.4 meters (28 ft) in diameter and utilize four RS-25 engines.[6][24] Initial flights will use modified RS-25D engines left over from the Space Shuttle program;[29] later flights are expected to switch to a cheaper version of the engine not intended for reuse.[30] The stage's structure will consist of a modified Space Shuttle External Tank with the aft section adapted to accept the rocket's Main Propulsion System (MPS) and the top converted to host an interstage structure.[21][31] It will be fabricated at the Michoud Assembly Facility.[32]

The core stage will be common across all currently planned evolutions of the SLS. Initial planning included studies of a smaller Block 0 configuration with three RS-25 engines,[33][34] which was eliminated to avoid the need to substantially redesign the core stage for more powerful variants.[24] Likewise, while early Block 2 plans included five RS-25 engines on the core,[25] it was later baselined with four engines.[26]

Boosters

File:Saturn V-Shuttle-Ares I-Ares V-Ares IV-SLS Block I&II.png
Comparison of the Saturn V, Space Shuttle, Ares I, Ares V, Ares IV, SLS Block I and SLS Block II

Shuttle-derived solid rocket boosters

Blocks 1 and 1B of the SLS will use two five-segment Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs), which are based on the four-segment Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters. Modifications for the SLS included the addition of a center booster segment, new avionics, and new insulation which eliminates the Shuttle SRB's asbestos and is 860 kg (1,900 lb) lighter. The five-segment SRBs provide approximately 25% more total impulse than the Shuttle SRB and will not be recovered after use.[35][36]

Orbital ATK (formerly Alliant Techsystems) has completed four full-scale, full-duration static fire tests of the five-segment SRB. Development Motor 1 (DM-1) was tested on September 10, 2009; DM-2 was tested on August 31, 2010, and DM-3 on September 8, 2011. The DM-2 motor was cooled to a core temperature of 40 °F (4 °C), and DM-3 was heated to above 90 °F (32 °C). These tests validated motor performance at extreme temperatures.[37][38][39] Qualification Motor 1 (QM-1) was tested on March 10, 2015.[40]

Advanced boosters

For Block 2, NASA plans to switch from Shuttle-derived five-segment SRBs to advanced boosters.[41] This will occur after development of the Exploration Upper Stage for Block 1B. Early plans would have developed advanced boosters before an updated second stage; this configuration was called Block 1A. By 2012 NASA planned to select these new boosters through an Advanced Booster Competition which was to be held in 2015.[6][42] Several companies proposed boosters for this competition:

  • Aerojet, in partnership with Teledyne Brown, offered a booster powered by three AJ1E6 engines, which would be a newly developed LOX/RP-1 oxidizer-rich staged combustion engine. Each AJ1E6 engine would produce 4,900 kN (1,100,000 lbf) thrust using a single turbopump to supply dual combustion chambers.[43] On February 14, 2013, NASA awarded Aerojet a $23.3 million, 30-month contract to build a 2,400 kN (550,000 lbf) main injector and thrust chamber.[44]
  • ATK proposed an advanced SRB nicknamed "Dark Knight". This booster would switch from a steel case to one made of lighter composite material, use a more energetic propellant, and reduce the number of segments from five to four.[45] It would deliver over 20,000 kN (4,500,000 lbf) maximum thrust and weigh 790,000 kg (1,750,000 lb) at ignition. According to ATK, the advanced booster would be 40% less expensive than the Shuttle-derived five-segment SRB. It is uncertain if the booster will allow SLS to deliver the mandated 130 t to LEO without the addition of a fifth engine to the core stage,[26] as a 2013 analysis indicated a maximum capacity of 113 t with the baselined four-engine core.[46]
  • Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne and Dynetics proposed a liquid-fueled booster named "Pyrios".[47] The booster would use two F-1B engines which together would deliver a maximum thrust of 16,000 kN (3,600,000 lbf) total, and be able to continuously throttle down to a minimum of 12,000 kN (2,600,000 lbf). The F-1B would be derived from the F-1 engine, which powered the first stage of the Saturn V. It would have been easier to assemble, with fewer parts and a simplified design,[48] while providing improved efficiency and a thrust increase of 110 kN (25,000 lbf).[49] Estimates in 2012 indicated that the Pyrios booster could increase Block 2 low-Earth orbit payload to 150 t, 20 t more than the baseline.[50]

Christopher Crumbly, manager of NASA’s SLS advanced development office in January 2013 commented on the booster competition, "The F-1 has great advantages because it is a gas generator and has a very simple cycle. The oxygen-rich staged combustion cycle [Aerojet’s engine] has great advantages because it has a higher specific impulse. The Russians have been flying ox[ygen]-rich for a long time. Either one can work. The solids [of ATK] can work."[51]

Later analysis showed the Block 1A configuration would result in high acceleration which would be unsuitable for Orion and could require a costly redesign of the Block 1 core.[52] In 2014, NASA confirmed the development of Block 1B instead of Block 1A and called off the 2015 booster competition.[26][53] In February 2015, it was reported that SLS is expected to fly with the five-segment SRB until at least the late 2020s, and modifications to Launch Pad 39B, its flame trench, and SLS's Mobile Launcher Platform were evaluated based on SLS launching with solid-fuel boosters.[26]

Upper stage

An RL10 engine, like the one pictured above, will be used as the second stage engine in both the ICPS and EUS upper stages.

Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage

Block 1, scheduled to fly Exploration Mission 1 (EM-1) by November 2018,[5] will use the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS). This stage will be a modified Delta IV 5-meter Delta Cryogenic Second Stage (DCSS),[54] and will be powered by a single RL10B-2. Block 1 will be capable of lifting 70 t in this configuration, however the ICPS will be considered part of the payload and be placed into an initial 1,800 km by -93 km suborbital trajectory to ensure safe disposal of the core stage. ICPS will perform an orbital insertion burn at apogee, and then a translunar injection burn to send the uncrewed Orion on a circumlunar excursion.[55]

Exploration Upper Stage

The Exploration Upper Stage (EUS) is scheduled to debut on Exploration Mission 2 (EM-2). It is expected to be used by Block 1B and Block 2 and, like the core stage, will be 8.4 meters in diameter. The EUS would be powered by four RL10 engines,[56] and would complete the SLS ascent phase and then re-ignite to send its payload to destinations beyond low-Earth orbit, similar to the role performed by the Saturn V's 3rd stage, the J-2 powered S-IVB.[57]

Other upper stages

The Bimodal Nuclear Thermal Rocket engines on the Mars Transfer Vehicle (MTV). Cold launched, it would be assembled in-orbit by a number of Block 2 SLS payload lifts. The Orion crew capsule is docked on the right.
  • The Earth Departure Stage, powered by J-2X engines,[58][59] was to be the upper stage of the Block 2 SLS had NASA decided to develop Block 1A instead of Block 1B and the EUS.[57]
  • An additional beyond-LEO engine for interplanetary travel from Earth orbit to Mars orbit, and back, is being studied as of 2013 at Marshall Space Flight Center with a focus on nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) engines.[60] In historical ground testing, NTRs proved to be at least twice as efficient as the most advanced chemical engines, allowing quicker transfer time and increased cargo capacity. The shorter flight duration, estimated at 3–4 months with NTR engines,[61] compared to 8–9 months using chemical engines,[62] would reduce crew exposure to potentially harmful and difficult to shield cosmic rays.[63][64][65][66] NTR engines, such as the Pewee of Project Rover, were selected in the Mars Design Reference Architecture (DRA).[64][67][68][69]
  • In 2013, NASA and Boeing analyzed the performance of several second stage options. The analysis was based on a second stage usable propellant load of 105 metric tons, except for the Block 1 and ICPS, which will carry 27.1 metric tons. The ICPS upper stage and upper stages using four RL10 engines and two MB60 engines and one J-2X engine were studied.[70] In 2014, NASA also considered using the European Vinci instead of the RL10. The Vinci offers the same specific impulse but with 64% greater thrust, which would allow for a reduction of one or two of the four second stage engines for the same performance for a lower cost.[71][72]

Robotic exploration missions to Jupiter's water-ice moon Europa are increasingly seen as well suited to the lift capabilities of the Block 1B SLS.[73]

Fabrication and testing

In mid-November 2014, construction of the first SLS began using the new welding system at NASA's Michoud Assembly Facility, where major rocket parts will be assembled.[74]

The SLS will have the ability to tolerate a minimum of 13 tanking cycles due to launch scrubs and other launch delays before launch. The assembled rocket is to be able to remain at the launch pad for a minimum of 180 days and can remain in stacked configuration for at least 200 days without destacking.[75]

In January 2015, NASA began test firing RS-25 engines in preparation for use on SLS. Tests continued throughout Spring of 2015. A second round of similar tests are planned for 2016.[30]

Multiple facilities throughout the country have started full scale fabrication of different segments of the launch vehicle. Orbital ATK began casting propellant for the solid rocket boosters and manufacturing parts for the boosters in 2016. The company test fired a solid rocket booster in early 2015, and a second booster firing is planned for early 2016. Confidence article builds for the core stage began on 5 January 2016 and were expected to be completed in late January of that year. Once completed the test articles will be sent to ensure structural integrity at Marshall Spaceflight Center. The ICPS for EM-1 was slated for assembly in late January, and a structural test article was delivered to NASA in 2015 for confidence testing.[76]

Program costs and funding

In August 2014, as the SLS program passed its Key Decision Point C review and entered full development, costs from February 2014 until its planned launch in September 2018 were estimated at $7.021 billion.[28] Ground systems modifications and construction would require an additional $1.8 billion over the same time period. As of February 2015 the Orion spacecraft was expected to enter its Key Decision Point C review in the first half of 2015.[77]

During the joint Senate-NASA presentation in September 2011, it was stated that the SLS program had a projected development cost of $18 billion through 2017, with $10 billion for the SLS rocket, $6 billion for the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and $2 billion for upgrades to the launch pad and other facilities at Kennedy Space Center.[14] These costs and schedule were considered optimistic in an independent 2011 cost assessment report by Booz Allen Hamilton for NASA.[78] An unofficial 2011 NASA document estimated the cost of the program through 2025 to total at least $41bn for four 70 t launches (1 unmanned, 3 manned),[2][3] with the 130 t version ready no earlier than 2030.[79]

The Human Exploration Framework Team (HEFT) estimated unit costs for Block 0 at $1.6bn and Block 1 at $1.86bn in 2010.[80] However, since these estimates were made the Block 0 SLS vehicle was dropped in late 2011, and the design was not completed.[81] The Space Review estimated the cost per launch at $5 billion, depending on the rate of launches.[82][83] NASA announced in 2013 that the European Space Agency will build the Orion Service Module.[84]

NASA SLS deputy project manager Jody Singer at Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama stated in September 2012 that $500 million per launch is a reasonable target cost for SLS, with a relatively minor dependence of costs on launch capability.[4] By comparison, the cost for a Saturn V launch was US$185 to US$189 million in 1969-1971 dollars,[85][86] not accounting for inflation.

On July 24, 2014, Government Accountability Office audit predicted that SLS will not launch by the end of 2017 as originally planned since NASA is not receiving sufficient funding.[87]

For Fiscal Year 2015, NASA received an appropriation of US$1.7 billion from Congress for SLS, an amount that was approximately US$320 million greater than the amount requested by the Obama administration.[88]

Criticism

The Space Access Society, Space Frontier Foundation and The Planetary Society called for cancellation of the project in 2011–12, arguing that SLS will consume the funds for other projects from the NASA budget and will not reduce launch costs.[89][90][91] U.S. Representative Dana Rohrabacher and others added that instead, a propellant depot should be developed and the Commercial Crew Development program accelerated.[89][92][93][94][95] Two studies, one not publicly released from NASA[96][97] and another from the Georgia Institute of Technology, show this option to be a possibly cheaper alternative.[98][99]

Others suggest it will cost less to use an existing lower payload capacity rocket (Atlas V, Delta IV, Falcon 9, or the derivative Falcon Heavy), with on-orbit assembly and propellant depots as needed, rather than develop a new launch vehicle for space exploration without competition for the whole design.[100][101][102][103][104] The Augustine commission proposed an option for a commercial 75 metric ton launcher with lower operating costs, and noted that a 40 to 60 t launcher can support lunar exploration.[105]

Mars Society founder Robert Zubrin, who co-authored the Mars Direct concept, suggested that a heavy lift vehicle should be developed for $5 billion on fixed-price requests for proposal. Zubrin also disagrees with those that say the U.S. does not need a heavy-lift vehicle.[106] Based upon extrapolations of increased payload lift capabilities from past experience[citation needed] with SpaceX's Falcon launch vehicles, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk stated in 2010 that he would "personally guarantee" that his company could build the conceptual Falcon XX, a vehicle in the 140-150 t payload range, for $2.5 billion, or $300 million per launch, but cautioned that this price tag did not include a potential upper-stage upgrade.[107][108] SpaceX's privately-funded MCT launch vehicle, powered by multiple Raptor engines, has also been proposed for lifting very large payloads from Earth in the 2020s.[109]

Rep. Tom McClintock and other groups argue that the Congressional mandates forcing NASA to use Space Shuttle components for SLS amounts to a de facto non-competitive, single source requirement assuring contracts to existing shuttle suppliers, and calling the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to investigate possible violations of the Competition in Contracting Act (CICA).[90][110][111] Opponents of the heavy launch vehicle have critically used the name "Senate launch system".[54] The Competitive Space Task Force, in September 2011, said that the new government launcher directly violates NASA’s charter, the Space Act, and the 1998 Commercial Space Act requirements for NASA to pursue the "fullest possible engagement of commercial providers" and to "seek and encourage, to the maximum extent possible, the fullest commercial use of space".[89]

Phil Plait has voiced his criticism of SLS in light of ongoing budget tradeoffs between Commercial Crew Development and SLS budget, also referring to earlier critique by Lori Garver.[112] Garver, former NASA Deputy Administrator, has called for cancelling the program.[113] Chris Kraft, the legendary NASA mission control leader from Apollo era, has expressed his criticism of the system as well.[114]

Bill Nye now supports SLS, and The Planetary Society now accepts that a Mars mission could be had with existing budgets.[115] Doubts have also been expressed about the utility and cost of depots.[116]"Patrick R. Chai and Alan W. Wilhite of Georgia Tech presented a study earlier this year estimating that depot tanks would lose about $12 million worth of propellant per month in low Earth orbit if protected only with passive insulation."[117]

SLS program mission schedule

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

The list below includes only confirmed missions.

Confirmed SLS missions (launch history)
Mission Acronym Vehicle Manned Launch date Status Duration Remarks Reference
Exploration Mission 1 EM-1 SLS Block I No By November 2018 Planned Send unmanned Orion capsule on trip around the Moon, deploy Near-Earth Asteroid Scout, Lunar Flashlight, BioSentinel, SkyFire, Lunar IceCube, and 6 other small CubeSats.[118][119] [5][120]
Europa Multiple-Flyby Mission EMFM SLS Block IB No 2022–2025 Planned Send a Europa probe (Europa Clipper) and a lander to Jupiter. Congress has mandated this flight to launch by 2022. This flight will also test out the new upper stage, as required per NASA rules for human-rating. [121][122][123]
Exploration Mission 2 EM-2 SLS Block IB Yes 2021-2023 Planned Send an Orion capsule with four crew members into a lunar orbit. [56][124][125][126][123]
Asteroid Crewed Redirect Mission ACRM SLS Block IB Yes 2026 Planned Send an Orion capsule in 2026 with four crew members to an asteroid that had been robotically captured and placed in lunar orbit in late 2025 (Asteroid Redirect Mission). [127][128]

Payload mass to various orbits

This includes cancelled/proposed SLS variants.

Vehicle Orbit or
location
Payload mass
(metric tons)
Example mission Reference
Saturn IB Low Earth orbit (LEO) 21.0 Apollo program, manned and unmanned spacecraft to LEO
Delta IV Heavy Low Earth orbit 28.79 Comparison only
Vulcan-561 + ACES Low Earth orbit 30.5 Comparison only [129]
Saturn C-3 Low Earth orbit 45 Comparison only [130]
Vulcan-500 Heavy + ACES Low Earth orbit 46.5 Comparison only [129]
Falcon Heavy (Expendable) Low Earth orbit 53 Comparison only [131]
Falcon Heavy (Expendable) Geostationary
transfer orbit
(GTO)
21.2 Comparison only [131]
Falcon Heavy (Expendable) Mars 13.2 Comparison only [131]
Block 0 Low Earth orbit 70 Send payloads to low Earth orbit, launch an Orion capsule and cargo to the International Space Station if Commercial Crew Development does not come to fruition [132]
Block I Low Earth orbit 70 Send payloads to low Earth orbit [133]
Block I Earth-Moon L-2 28 Send Orion capsule beyond the Moon, launch B330, Exploration Gateway Platform [133]
Block I Near Earth object 12 Asteroid Redirect Mission [133]
Block I Low Lunar orbit 12 Visit captured asteroid [133]
Block I Jupiter 4 Europa Clipper, Jupiter orbiter followup to Galileo [133][134]
N1 Low Earth orbit 95 Comparison only
Energia Low Earth orbit 100 Comparison only
Block IA Low Earth orbit 105 Send payloads to low Earth orbit, preparation for human mission to Mars [135][136][132]
Block IB Low Earth orbit 105 Send payloads to low Earth orbit, preparation for human mission to Mars [133]
Block IB Trans-Lunar injection 39.2 Human-assisted Lunar sample return [133]
Block IB Earth-Moon L-2 45 Crewed Lunar surface mission, launch B330, Exploration Gateway Platform, Skylab II, Deep Space Habitat, or Nautilus-X, launch Orion and logistics module to these space stations [133]
Block IB Earth-Sun L-2 40 Advanced Technology Large-Aperture Space Telescope [133][134]
Block IB Near Earth object 40 Planetary defense [133]
Block IB Saturn 6 Titan Saturn System Mission [134]
Block IB Uranus 5 Uranus orbiter and probe [133][134]
Block II Low Earth orbit 130 Preparation for human mission to Mars [133][134]
Block II 200 AU 2 Interstellar probe [133][134]
Saturn V Low Earth orbit 140 Comparison only [citation needed]

See also

Videos

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. 7.0 7.1 The Congress of the United States. Congressional Budget Office, October 2006, pp. X,1,4,9. "The Apollo Saturn V launch vehicle had a lift capability of 140 metric tons to low Earth orbit."
  8. http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/26/boeing-builds-the-most-powerful-rocket-ever-made.html
  9. http://www.gizmag.com/nasa-space-launch-system-sls-critical-design-review/38612/
  10. http://www.space.com/12954-nasa-rocket-powerful-space-launch-system.html
  11. http://www.cnbc.com/2016/01/26/boeing-builds-the-most-powerful-rocket-ever-made.html
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. 21.0 21.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. 25.0 25.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. 26.0 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. 28.0 28.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. 30.0 30.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  44. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  45. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  46. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  47. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  48. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  49. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  50. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  51. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  52. http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/07/wind-tunnel-testing-sls-configurations-block-1b/
  53. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  54. 54.0 54.1 Rosenberg, Zach. "Delta second stage chosen as SLS interim". Flight International, May 8, 2012.
  55. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  56. 56.0 56.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  57. 57.0 57.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  58. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  59. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  60. http://www.space-travel.com/reports/NASA_Researchers_Studying_Advanced_Nuclear_Rocket_Technologies_999.html
  61. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  62. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  63. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  64. 64.0 64.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  65. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  66. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  67. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  68. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  69. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  70. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  71. http://seradata.com/SSI/2013/06/sls-may-change-upper-stage-eng/
  72. http://seradata.com/SSI/2014/11/next-steps-for-sls-europes-vinci-is-a-contender-for-exploration-upper-stage-engine/
  73. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  74. SLS Engine Section Barrel Hot off the Vertical Weld Center at Michoud. NASA
  75. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  76. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  77. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  78. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  79. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  80. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  81. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  82. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  83. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  84. NASA Signs Agreement for a European-Provided Orion Service Module
  85. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  86. The Apollo Spacecraft: A Chronology, volumes I through IV.
  87. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  88. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  89. 89.0 89.1 89.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  90. 90.0 90.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  91. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  92. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  93. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  94. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  95. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  96. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  97. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  98. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  99. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  100. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  101. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  102. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  103. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  104. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  105. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  106. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  107. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  108. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  109. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  110. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  111. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  112. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  113. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  114. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  115. http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2726/1
  116. http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1447/1
  117. http://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/space-exploration/deep-space/nasa-strongly-in-orbit-fuel-depots/
  118. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGKry-AmV-c
  119. http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/cubesat/missions/neascout.php
  120. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  121. https://thespacereporter.com/2016/01/additional-1-3-billion-nasa-fund-next-mars-rover-europa-mission/
  122. http://www.planetary.org/blogs/guest-blogs/van-kane/20160105-nasa-europa-lander.html
  123. 123.0 123.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  124. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  125. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  126. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  127. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  128. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  129. 129.0 129.1 http://www.ulalaunch.com/products_vulcan.aspx
  130. http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/saturnc3.html
  131. 131.0 131.1 131.2 http://www.spacex.com/falcon-heavy
  132. 132.0 132.1 http://www.spacelaunchreport.com/sls0.html
  133. 133.00 133.01 133.02 133.03 133.04 133.05 133.06 133.07 133.08 133.09 133.10 133.11 133.12 http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/defense-space/space/sls/docs/sls_mission_booklet_jan_2014.pdf
  134. 134.0 134.1 134.2 134.3 134.4 134.5 https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/Creech_SLS_Deep_Space.pdf
  135. http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/623766main_8143_Singer-AD_industry_day-021312_FINAL3.pdf
  136. http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2012/03/sls-specifications-take-shape-development-continues/

External links