Structured sale

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

A structured sale is a special type of installment sale pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code.[1] Installment sales permit sellers to defer recognition of gains on the sale of a business or real estate to the tax year in which the related sale proceeds are received. Structured sales allow the seller of an asset to pay taxes over time while having the payments guaranteed by a high credit quality alternate obligor, who accepts assignment of the buyers periodic payment obligation. Transactions can currently be done as small as $100,000.

In a structured sale, rather than the buyer paying the installments, the buyer pays cash, some of which is used as consideration for a third party assignment company to accept the payment obligation. The assignment company then purchases an annuity from a life insurance company with high financial ratings from A. M. Best. Case law and administrative precedents support recognition of the original contract terms after a substitution of obligors.[2] In addition, a properly handled transaction will avoid issues with constructive receipt and economic benefit. There are also some companies that use Key Man Life Insurance Policies in place of annuities, which provides the added protection of a death benefit to the seller as well as a payout that continues long after the seller passes. This may preferable when the seller is interested in passing wealth to their beneficiaries after death. A Key Man Policy may also pay out more than an annuity in certain circumstances.

While negotiating the installment payments, the seller is free to design payment streams with a great deal of flexibility. Each installment payment to the seller has three components: deferred return of basis, deferred capital gain, and ordinary income earned on the money in the annuity. Under the doctrine of constructive receipt, with a properly documented structured sale, no taxable event is recognized unless a payment is actually received. Taxation is the same as if the buyer were making installment payments directly.

Structured sales are an alternative to a section 1031 exchange, which defers recognition of capital gain, but forces the seller to continue holding some form of property. Structured sales work well for sellers who want to create a continuing stream of income without management worries. Retiring business owners and downsizing homeowners are examples of sellers who can benefit.

The structured sale must be documented, and money must be handled in such a way that the ultimate recipient is not treated as having constructively received the payment prior to the time it is actually paid. For the buyer, there is no difference from a traditional cash-and-title-now deal, except for additional paperwork. Because of tax advantages to the seller, structuring the sale might, however, make the buyer's offer more attractive. Because the buyer has paid in full, the buyer gets full title at time of closing.

There are no direct fees to the buyer or seller to employ the structured sale strategy. The structured settlement specialist who implements the transaction is paid directly by the life insurance company that writes the annuity.

The internal rate of return is comparable to long term high quality debt instruments.

Although Allstate Life was the originator of the structured sale concept, it departed the structured settlement business in 2013. New entrants to the market include TFSS, Treasury Funded Structured Settlements as well as South Peak Capital who specialize in Life Insurance Backed Structured Installment Sales (LIBSIS).

Internal Revenue Service Private Letter Ruling 150850-07 dated June 2, 2008 confirmed that the taxpayer does not constructively receive payment for tax purposes until the actual cash payment is made pursuant to a properly drafted non-qualified assignment.

Notes

  1. 26 U.S.C. § 453.
  2. See IRS Revenue R-ling 82-122, 1982-1 C.B. 80 (Jan. 1, 1982) (amplifying IRS Rev. R-l. 75-457); Wynne v. Commissioner, 47 B.T.A. 731 (1942); and Cunningham v. Commissioner, 44 T.C. 103 (1965).