United States Senate election in California, 1992
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
County Results
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. The 1992 United States Senate election in California took place on November 3, 1992, at the same time as the special election to the United States Senate in California. Incumbent Democrat Alan Cranston decided to retire. Democrat Barbara Boxer won the open seat. Both of California's present Senators were elected for the first time. This is not a unique occurrence; it would happen again in Tennessee in 1994 and Kansas in 1996. Fellow Democrat Dianne Feinstein, California's senior senator, won the special election and was inaugurated in November 1992.
Contents
Major candidates
Democratic
- Barbara Boxer, U.S. Congresswoman
Republican
- Bruce Herschensohn, conservative TV talk show commentator
- Tom Campbell
Campaign
The election between Boxer and Herschensohn was very close. At the eleventh hour, controversy emerged that the Republican nominee attended a strip club, which some Republican operatives later blamed for Herschensohn's loss.[1]
Four days before Election Day polls showed Herschensohn had narrowed a double digit deficit, trailing by 3 points. Political operative Bob Mulholland disrupted a campaign appearance with a large poster advertising a strip club shouting "Should the voters of California elect someone who frequently travels the strip joints of Hollywood?" Herschensohn admitted he had visited a strip club once, with his girlfriend and another couple. With press coverage of the story, Herschensohn spent the waning days of the campaign denying related allegations. When the votes were cast and counted, Barbara Boxer won the election by five points.[2] Although Republicans have blamed the defeat on the underhanded tactics of the Boxer campaign, evidence of the connection between Mulholland's outburst and the campaign never surfaced. [3][4][5]
Results
Overall
The election was very close. Boxer was declared the winner by the Associated Press at 1:22 A.M. Pacific Coast Time.
1992 United States Senate election, California | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
Democratic | Barbara Boxer | 5,173,467 | 47.90 | |
Republican | Bruce Herschensohn | 4,644,182 | 43.00 | |
American Independent | Jerome N. McCready | 373,051 | 3.45 | |
Peace and Freedom | Genevieve Torres | 372,817 | 3.45 | |
Libertarian | June R. Genis | 235,919 | 2.18 | |
No party | Write-ins | 267 | 0.00% | |
Invalid or blank votes | 574,862 | 5.05% | ||
Total votes | 11,374,565 | 100.00 | ||
Voter turnout | 54.52% | |||
Democratic hold |
By county
Final results from the Secretary of State of California.[6]
County | Boxer | Votes | Hersch. | Votes | McC. | Votes | Torres | Votes | Genis | Votes | W/I | V's |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
San Francisco | 76.57% | 233,068 | 18.72% | 56,972 | 1.48% | 4,503 | 1.84% | 5,602 | 1.38% | 4,214 | 0.00% | 13 |
Alameda | 66.94% | 343,020 | 25.08% | 128,489 | 3.08% | 15,768 | 2.85% | 14,610 | 2.04% | 10,477 | 0.01% | 29 |
Marin | 63.47% | 80,902 | 29.14% | 37,150 | 2.59% | 3,299 | 2.08% | 2,656 | 2.72% | 3,464 | 0.00% | 1 |
Santa Cruz | 61.21% | 67,927 | 29.27% | 32,482 | 2.98% | 3,309 | 3.18% | 3,525 | 3.36% | 3,726 | 0.00% | 2 |
San Mateo | 59.39% | 158,490 | 32.68% | 87,209 | 2.49% | 6,638 | 2.87% | 7,669 | 2.58% | 6,879 | 0.00% | 0 |
Yolo | 58.23% | 35,006 | 33.10% | 19,900 | 3.70% | 2,222 | 2.85% | 1,711 | 2.12% | 1,274 | 0.00% | 0 |
Sonoma | 56.76% | 108,991 | 32.65% | 62,696 | 4.05% | 7,772 | 3.69% | 7,084 | 2.85% | 5,476 | 0.00% | 7 |
Mendocino | 55.99% | 19,818 | 33.10% | 11,718 | 4.60% | 1,627 | 3.28% | 1,160 | 3.03% | 1,074 | 0.00% | 0 |
Contra Costa | 55.17% | 203,563 | 35.76% | 131,923 | 3.65% | 13,462 | 3.06% | 11,290 | 2.36% | 8,711 | 0.00% | 3 |
Santa Clara | 54.11% | 314,884 | 35.55% | 206,913 | 3.61% | 21,001 | 3.59% | 20,922 | 3.14% | 18,261 | 0.00% | 2 |
Los Angeles | 52.55% | 1,410,423 | 39.60% | 1,062,974 | 2.56% | 68,630 | 3.57% | 95,779 | 1.72% | 46,195 | 0.00% | 65 |
Solano | 51.87% | 67,007 | 36.50% | 47,148 | 5.12% | 6,615 | 4.02% | 5,188 | 2.49% | 3,217 | 0.00% | 0 |
Napa | 49.63% | 25,746 | 39.81% | 20,655 | 4.32% | 2,240 | 3.55% | 1,841 | 2.69% | 1,396 | 0.00% | 0 |
Sacramento | 49.09% | 215,853 | 40.90% | 179,844 | 3.96% | 17,425 | 3.79% | 16,684 | 2.25% | 9,911 | 0.00% | 0 |
Monterey | 48.65% | 54,400 | 41.05% | 45,903 | 4.16% | 4,648 | 3.63% | 4,058 | 2.51% | 2,801 | 0.00% | 0 |
Humboldt | 48.63% | 27,916 | 43.13% | 24,757 | 3.14% | 1,802 | 3.38% | 1,941 | 1.72% | 986 | 0.00% | 0 |
Lake | 46.82% | 10,805 | 40.54% | 9,357 | 6.01% | 1,388 | 3.51% | 810 | 3.12% | 720 | 0.00% | 0 |
Alpine | 45.18% | 272 | 43.19% | 260 | 5.81% | 35 | 4.65% | 28 | 1.16% | 7 | 0.00% | 0 |
Santa Barbara | 45.11% | 70,998 | 46.25% | 72,793 | 3.49% | 5,486 | 3.46% | 5,444 | 1.70% | 2,673 | 0.00% | 0 |
Stanislaus | 45.03% | 55,688 | 45.18% | 55,875 | 4.31% | 5,332 | 3.64% | 4,501 | 1.85% | 2,285 | 0.00% | 0 |
Imperial | 44.66% | 11,614 | 43.79% | 11,389 | 3.15% | 819 | 7.07% | 1,839 | 1.33% | 347 | 0.00% | 0 |
San Benito | 43.68% | 5,415 | 44.59% | 5,527 | 4.76% | 590 | 4.34% | 538 | 2.63% | 326 | 0.00% | 0 |
Tuolumne | 42.81% | 9,811 | 46.24% | 10,596 | 4.86% | 1,113 | 3.87% | 886 | 2.21% | 507 | 0.01% | 2 |
Del Norte | 42.36% | 3,891 | 46.69% | 4,289 | 6.00% | 551 | 3.05% | 280 | 1.91% | 175 | 0.00% | 0 |
Mono | 42.23% | 1,820 | 47.19% | 2,034 | 4.01% | 173 | 3.83% | 165 | 2.74% | 118 | 0.00% | 0 |
San Diego | 42.17% | 399,087 | 47.35% | 448,181 | 4.06% | 38,434 | 3.53% | 33,379 | 2.89% | 27,336 | 0.00% | 12 |
San Joaquin | 42.15% | 66,484 | 47.57% | 75,032 | 4.41% | 6,963 | 3.94% | 6,213 | 1.92% | 3,036 | 0.00% | 0 |
S. L. Obispo | 41.23% | 41,824 | 49.24% | 49,945 | 4.47% | 4,530 | 2.89% | 2,933 | 2.17% | 2,205 | 0.00% | 0 |
Siskiyou | 40.60% | 8,115 | 47.87% | 9,568 | 6.33% | 1,266 | 3.00% | 599 | 2.21% | 441 | 0.00% | 0 |
Plumas | 40.48% | 4,032 | 47.47% | 4,728 | 7.13% | 710 | 2.78% | 277 | 2.13% | 212 | 0.01% | 1 |
Amador | 40.38% | 6,082 | 48.91% | 7,366 | 5.07% | 764 | 3.23% | 486 | 2.41% | 363 | 0.00% | 0 |
Ventura | 39.62% | 104,335 | 50.62% | 133,274 | 3.89% | 10,253 | 3.66% | 9,629 | 2.20% | 5,793 | 0.01% | 25 |
Nevada | 39.45% | 17,091 | 49.87% | 21,609 | 5.35% | 2,317 | 2.74% | 1,186 | 2.60% | 1,125 | 0.00% | 0 |
Placer | 39.33% | 34,905 | 50.50% | 44,813 | 3.98% | 3,532 | 3.72% | 3,297 | 2.47% | 2,193 | 0.00% | 0 |
Merced | 39.21% | 17,848 | 49.12% | 22,360 | 5.35% | 2,434 | 3.47% | 1,579 | 2.85% | 1,298 | 0.00% | 0 |
Sierra | 38.69% | 705 | 48.19% | 878 | 7.14% | 130 | 3.02% | 55 | 2.96% | 54 | 0.00% | 0 |
El Dorado | 38.66% | 24,601 | 50.86% | 32,368 | 4.68% | 2,975 | 3.33% | 2,116 | 2.48% | 1,576 | 0.00% | 0 |
Calaveras | 38.35% | 6,402 | 49.54% | 8,269 | 5.80% | 969 | 3.35% | 559 | 2.96% | 494 | 0.00% | 0 |
Lassen | 38.09% | 3,761 | 48.85% | 4,823 | 7.67% | 757 | 3.33% | 329 | 2.06% | 203 | 0.00% | 0 |
Riverside | 38.05% | 160,630 | 51.83% | 218,778 | 4.39% | 18,512 | 3.63% | 15,323 | 2.11% | 8,891 | 0.00% | 0 |
Butte | 37.41% | 31,505 | 51.47% | 43,338 | 5.11% | 4,306 | 3.28% | 2,762 | 2.73% | 2,296 | 0.00% | 0 |
Fresno | 36.93% | 78,321 | 55.59% | 117,891 | 2.16% | 4,587 | 3.78% | 8,009 | 1.53% | 3,248 | 0.00% | 3 |
S. Bernardino | 36.90% | 164,620 | 51.81% | 231,143 | 4.74% | 21,138 | 4.38% | 19,555 | 2.14% | 9,558 | 0.02% | 100 |
Mariposa | 36.86% | 2,989 | 51.92% | 4,211 | 5.36% | 435 | 3.86% | 313 | 2.00% | 162 | 0.00% | 0 |
Trinity | 35.16% | 2,261 | 49.51% | 3,184 | 7.79% | 501 | 4.15% | 267 | 3.39% | 218 | 0.00% | 0 |
Yuba | 34.03% | 5,638 | 52.67% | 8,726 | 7.24% | 1,199 | 3.30% | 547 | 2.76% | 458 | 0.00% | 0 |
Colusa | 33.57% | 1,859 | 56.19% | 3,112 | 5.00% | 277 | 3.21% | 178 | 2.02% | 112 | 0.00% | 0 |
Orange | 33.41% | 317,740 | 57.89% | 550,502 | 3.20% | 30,400 | 3.21% | 30,550 | 2.29% | 21,783 | 0.00% | 2 |
Kings | 33.09% | 8,151 | 57.15% | 14,079 | 3.63% | 895 | 4.85% | 1,196 | 1.28% | 315 | 0.00% | 0 |
Modoc | 32.64% | 1,429 | 54.07% | 2,367 | 8.18% | 358 | 3.22% | 141 | 1.90% | 83 | 0.00% | 0 |
Madera | 31.89% | 9,401 | 59.74% | 17,609 | 3.42% | 1,009 | 3.82% | 1,127 | 1.12% | 329 | 0.00% | 0 |
Inyo | 30.98% | 2,563 | 58.59% | 4,847 | 4.96% | 410 | 3.36% | 278 | 2.12% | 175 | 0.00% | 0 |
Sutter | 30.83% | 7,719 | 59.04% | 14,783 | 4.86% | 1,216 | 3.23% | 809 | 2.05% | 513 | 0.00% | 0 |
Tehama | 30.71% | 6,450 | 56.62% | 11,893 | 6.47% | 1,360 | 3.08% | 647 | 3.12% | 655 | 0.00% | 0 |
Kern | 30.30% | 53,141 | 60.97% | 106,916 | 3.58% | 6,286 | 3.54% | 6,200 | 1.61% | 2,823 | 0.00% | 0 |
Tulare | 29.24% | 25,311 | 62.21% | 53,856 | 3.54% | 3,066 | 3.78% | 3,273 | 1.23% | 1,067 | 0.00% | 0 |
Shasta | 28.39% | 18,868 | 59.44% | 39,507 | 6.15% | 4,085 | 3.78% | 2,515 | 2.24% | 1,492 | 0.00% | 0 |
Glenn | 26.27% | 2,271 | 62.16% | 5,373 | 6.12% | 529 | 3.23% | 279 | 2.22% | 192 | 0.00% | 0 |
See also
References
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. The authors were LA Times staff writers.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Steinberg is a Republican political strategist in Sherman Oaks.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/1992_general/statement_of_vote_general_1992.pdf
External links
- JoinCalifornia 1992 General Election
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.