John Widgery, Baron Widgery

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Widgery Tribunal)
Jump to: navigation, search
The Right Honourable
The Lord Widgery
Kt OBE TD PC QC
11th Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales
In office
1971–1980
Nominated by The Lord Hailsham
Appointed by Queen Elizabeth II
Preceded by The Lord Parker of Weddington
Succeeded by The Lord Lane
Judge of the High Court of Justice
In office
1961–1980
Appointed by Queen Elizabeth II
Judge of the Court of Appeal
In office
1968–1980
Appointed by Queen Elizabeth II
Personal details
Born John Pasmore Widgery
(1911-07-24)24 July 1911
South Molton, Devon, England
Died Script error: The function "death_date_and_age" does not exist.
Nationality British
Alma mater Queen's College, Taunton
Known for Widgery Tribunal
Civilian awards Knight Bachelor
Life Peer
Military service
Allegiance  United Kingdom
Service/branch  British Army
Years of service 1938-1945
Rank Brigadier
Unit Royal Engineers (1938-1940)
Royal Artillery (1940-1945)
Battles/wars Normandy landings
Military awards Officer of the Order of the British Empire (Military Division)
Croix de Guerre (France)
Order of Leopold (Belgium)

John Passmore Widgery, Baron Widgery, Kt OBE TD PC QC (24 July 1911 – 26 July 1981) was an English judge who served as Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales from 1971 to 1980. He is principally noted for presiding over the now discredited and superseded Widgery Tribunal on the events of Bloody Sunday.[1]

Early career and war service

Widgery came from a North Devon family which had been living in South Molton for many generations. An ancestor had been a gaoler and his mother served as a magistrate. He attended Queen's College, Taunton, where he became head prefect.

He was admitted as a solicitor in 1933 after serving as an articled clerk, but instead of going into practice, he joined Gibson and Welldon, a well-known firm of law tutors. He was an effective lecturer in the years leading up to World War II while he was also commissioned into the Royal Engineers (Territorial Army) in 1938, having joined as a sapper. As a searchlight officer, in 1940 he transferred to the Royal Artillery. Widgery participated in the Normandy landings. By the end of the war he had an OBE,[2] the Croix de Guerre (France), and the Order of Leopold (Belgium), and had reached the rank of brigadier.

Barrister

After demobilization Widgery changed to another branch of the legal profession as he was called to the bar by Lincoln's Inn in 1946. He gathered a reputation for being a fast talker, and eventually came to specialise in disputes over rating and town planning, where his methodical approach and self-control were useful attributes. In 1958 he was made a Queen's Counsel, the first such award given to a post-war barrister.[3]

Widgery became a High Court judge in 1961, receiving the customary knighthood.[4] As a judge he did not draw attention to himself and his judgments tended not to include any comments which were pithy, memorable or quotable. However, his calmness produced judgments which were generally regarded as fair and humane. One example cited in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography was his justification for limiting damages for economic loss in Weller v Foot and Mouth Disease Research Institute, a judgment handed down in 1966.[5] Widgery headed several inquiries during his term.

Appellate courts

He received promotion to the Court of Appeal in 1968, but had barely got used to his new position when Lord Parker of Waddington (who had been Lord Chief Justice since 1958) announced his retirement. There was no obvious successor and Widgery was the most junior of the possible appointees. The Lord Chancellor, Lord Hailsham, chose Widgery largely on the basis of his administrative abilities. On 20 April 1971 he was created a life peer taking the title Baron Widgery, of South Molton in the County of Devon.[6]

Widgery Tribunal

Shortly after taking over, Widgery was handed the politically sensitive job of conducting an inquiry into the events of 30 January 1972 in Derry, where troops from 1st Battalion, Parachute Regiment had killed 13 civil rights marchers, commonly referred to as Bloody Sunday (a 14th person died shortly after Widgery's appointment). Widgery heard testimony from the paratroopers, who claimed they had been shot at, while the marchers insisted that no one from the march was armed. Widgery produced a report[7] that took the British Army's side. Widgery put the main blame for the deaths on the march organisers for creating a dangerous situation where a confrontation was inevitable. His strongest criticism of the Army was that the "firing bordered on the reckless".[8]

The Widgery Report was accepted by the British government and Northern Ireland's unionists but was immediately denounced by Irish nationalist politicians, and people in the Bogside and Creggan areas were disgusted by his findings. The British Government had acquired some goodwill because of its suspension of the Stormont Parliament, but that was said to have disappeared when Widgery's conclusions were published.[9] The grievance with Widgery's findings lingered and the issue remained live as the Northern Ireland peace process advanced in the 1990s.[5]

In January 1998, on the eve of the 26th anniversary of Bloody Sunday, Tony Blair announced a new inquiry, criticising the rushed process in which Widgery failed to take evidence from those wounded and did not personally read eyewitness accounts.[10] The resulting Bloody Sunday Inquiry lasted 12 years before the Saville Report was published on 15 June 2010. It demolished the Widgery report, finding that soldiers lied about their actions and falsely claimed to have been attacked.[11]

Prime Minister David Cameron, on behalf of the United Kingdom, formally apologised for the "unjustified and unjustifiable" events of Bloody Sunday.[12][13] As a result of the Saville report, even observers who are natural supporters of the British Army now regard Widgery as discredited:[14] the conservative historian and commentator Max Hastings has described the Widgery report as "a shameless cover-up".[15]

Lord Chief Justice

Widgery ruled in the case R v Commissioner of Metropolitan Police, ex parte Blackburn on the duty of the Crown to prosecute. The case was described as follows:[16] "A and B are alleged to have committed a crime. A is charged with the crime, convicted and sentenced. B is not charged. At the trial of A there is evidence which suggests that B may have committed or been a participant to the crime. Can the prosecution be compelled to prosecute B?" In 1968, the Court of Queen's Bench of Widgery, Melford Stevenson and Daniel Brabin issued judgment that "to prosecute must indisputably be a matter of discretion", which was affirmed by the Court of Appeal.

Widgery also ruled on the Crossman diaries case when the government attempted to suppress the publication on the grounds of confidentiality. He made it clear during the case that he felt Crossman had "broken the rules," but ultimately refused to grant an injunction preventing publication. In criminal cases, Widgery became concerned by an increasing number of cases resting on weak identification evidence. He declared in 1974 that misidentification was "the most serious chink in our armour when we say British justice is the best in the world." In March 1976 Widgery dismissed the first appeal by the Birmingham Six in respect of the Birmingham pub bombings.[17]

His later years in office were marred by persistent ill health and mental decline. In Private Eye[18] it was claimed that "he sits hunched and scowling, squinting into his books from a range of three inches, his wig awry. He keeps up a muttered commentary of bad-tempered and irrelevant questions – 'What d'you say?', 'Speak up', 'Don't shout', 'Whipper-snapper', etc.". He resisted attempts to get him to resign until the last moment, in 1980. For at least 18 months previously he had not been in control of either his administrative work or his legal pronouncements, he would fall asleep in court,[19] and it soon became apparent that he was suffering from dementia. He died two days after his 70th birthday, in 1981.

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. The London Gazette: (Supplement) no. 37138. p. 3218. 21 June 1945.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. The London Gazette: no. 42285. p. 1359. 21 February 1961.
  5. 5.0 5.1 R. F. V. Heuston, Widgery, John Passmore, Baron Widgery (1911–1981), rev. M.C. Curthoys, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn, May 2005. Retrieved 19 June 2010. (Subscription site)
  6. The London Gazette: no. 45348. p. 3995. 22 April 1971.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. University of Western Australia Law Review Editors: "R v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, ex parte Blackburn (failure to prosecute)" (1972) v10 n4 p.411
  17. Miscarriages of Justice; Bob Woffinden (1987).
  18. Issue No. 436 (1 September 1978).
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

Legal offices
Preceded by Lord Chief Justice
1971 - 1980
Succeeded by
The Lord Lane