Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey
Duration 12 September – 7 November 2017 (2017-09-12 – 2017-11-07)
Location Australia
Type Survey
Budget $122 million
Organised by Australian Bureau of Statistics
Participants Adults on the electoral roll
Outcome Australian national electorate votes to support same-sex marriage
Website marriagesurvey.abs.gov.au

The Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey was a national survey that gauged support for legalising same-sex marriage. The survey was held via the postal service between 12 September and 7 November 2017. Unlike electoral voting, which is compulsory in Australia, responding to the survey was voluntary with 79.52% of registered voters responding.

A survey form, instructions, and a reply-paid envelope were mailed out by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) to every person on the federal electoral roll, asking the question "Should the law be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry?" The ABS outlined processes to ensure eligible Australians lacking access to post could participate.[1]

The survey returned 7,817,247 (61.6%) "Yes" responses and 4,873,987 (38.4%) "No" responses. An additional 36,686 (0.29%) responses were invalid and the total turnout was 12,727,920 (79.5%).[2]

The survey result was non-binding on the government. Prior to the survey, the Liberal–National Coalition government had pledged to facilitate a private member's bill to legalise same-sex marriage in the Parliament in the event of a "Yes" outcome. This is expected to allow parliamentary debate and a vote potentially leading to (though still not guaranteeing) the legalisation of same-sex marriage. Both the Coalition and the opposition Labor Party have promised to allow their MPs a conscience vote on the relevant legislation. Had the survey returned a majority "No" result, the government had said it would not allow a parliamentary debate or vote on legalising same-sex marriage.

Many same-sex marriage proponents were critical of the postal survey, viewing it as a costly delay and legally redundant to holding a conscience vote on same-sex marriage in the parliament.[3] The survey was subject to two legal challenges questioning the authority of the ABS to conduct the survey and the government's right to fund the cost of the survey from funds designated by law for "urgent" and "unforeseen" circumstances. Both legal challenges failed; the High Court of Australia found that the survey was lawful.

Adults on the electoral roll in Australia as of 24 August 2017 were eligible to participate. By this date 98,000 new voters had added themselves to the roll, which was at a record high. Survey forms were distributed from 12 September with the ABS encouraging returns promptly (preferably to be received before 27 October to ensure sufficient processing time). The survey closed on 7 November and the results were released on 15 November 2017.

<templatestyles src="Template:TOC limit/styles.css" />

Background

History

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Marriage in Australia, the constitutional province of the federal parliament, was legally defined as a union as between a man and a woman in 2004.[4] Same-sex unions in Australia are treated as de facto unions under federal law. These unions provide couples with most, though not all, of the legal rights of marriage, although those rights may be difficult to assert and are not always recognised in practice.[5][6] Aside from the legal aspects, de facto relationships do not have the same symbolic significance as marriage.[7] Before the July 2016 federal election, the Coalition Turnbull government promised to hold a national vote on same-sex marriage in the form of a compulsory plebiscite.[8] Opposition to this idea centred on its criticism as an expensive delaying tactic and that it was the duty of the parliament, rather than a matter related to the Australian Constitution.[9]

While the Coalition won 76 of the 150 seats in the lower house in the 2016 election and managed to form a majority government by one seat, they failed to pass the necessary legislation for a (compulsory attendance) referendum/plebiscite. The legislation passed the House of Representatives on 20 October 2016 by a vote of 76–67, but was rejected by the Senate on 7 November 2016 by a vote of 33–29.[10][11] The idea of a postal plebiscite was originally proposed by Warren Entsch and later endorsed by Peter Dutton and Mathias Cormann.[12] Dutton pointed out that a postal vote would not need legislation to operate.[13] In August 2017, following an attempt by five Liberal Party MPs to change party policy and have a free vote in the parliament on same-sex marriage legislation,[14] the government announced it would move for a voluntary postal survey to be held later that year.[15] It was stated that this would only occur in the event the government's (compulsory) referendum/plebiscite legislation was again rejected by the Senate. That occurred on 9 August 2017, when a government-initiated motion in the Senate to debate the Plebiscite (Same-Sex Marriage) Bill 2016 was tied at 31–31; resulting in the motion being defeated.[16]

Following the result in the Senate, the government directed the Australian Statistician to begin the process of surveying the views on same-sex marriage of all Australians on the electoral roll.[17] The government asserted that this proposal did not require legislative approval from the parliament, arguing that the provisions of the Appropriations Act and the law governing the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) enabled it to use the ABS for such a purpose.[18] This was argued by the government to be similar to the process by which God Save the Queen was replaced by Advance Australia Fair as the Australian national anthem.[19] The government announced the ABS would be assisted by having staff seconded from the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC), the organisation responsible for elections in Australia and managing the electoral roll.[20] The cost of the survey to the Australian taxpayer was forecast to be $122 million.[15] This expense, as well as the notion that the debate would activate ideological extremists and that normal electoral rules would not apply, were criticised in Parliament.[21] By 7 September, the date the high court challenges against the survey were heard, a total of $14.1 million had already been spent by the ABS on the postal survey – $8 million on advertising for the survey, $5.3 million on printing costs, and $600,000 for staff.[22]

The AEC reported that about 68,000 enrolment transactions were completed on 10 August, compared with an average of 4,000 per day.[23] In the period 8–14 August over 16,000 people had enrolled, and over 200,000 have updated their details.[24] By 20 August, over 36,000 had enrolled, and over 434,000 had updated their enrolment details.[25] By 22 August, over 54,000 had enrolled.[26] By 25 August the roll achieved a record high with over 16 million Australians on the roll (an additional 90,000 people had joined with a further 165,000 transactions still to be processed).[27] 65,000 of these new voters are between the ages of 18 and 24.[28] With 933,592 enrolment transactions completed by the AEC at the end of processing, more than 98,000 people were added to the roll, and the total number of Australians eligible to participate in the survey was 16,005,998.[29] However, after the results of the survey were released, the ABS revealed that in fact 16,006,180 surveys were mailed out to eligible Australians.[30]

The Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee opened a Public Inquiry into the arrangements around the postal survey on 14 August[31] with evidence given by the ABS at hearings on 17 August.[32] Further hearings involving the ABS, AEC, Australia Post, Department of Finance and Department of Human Services occurred on 7 September[33] and 15 September 2017.[34]

Key dates

Key dates relating to the survey were:[35][36]

  • 24 August 2017: The final day for citizens to update or add their name and details to the electoral roll in order to receive a survey form
  • 12 September 2017: Survey forms began to be mailed out to all Australian voters over a two-week period
  • 25 September 2017: The date all survey forms were expected to have arrived, and eligible Australians could commence ordering replacement materials (for those lost or spoilt). The paperless options (online form and IVR telephony survey option) opened.
  • 20 October 2017 (6pm local time): Requests for replacement material closed
  • 27 October 2017: The date all eligible Australians were strongly encouraged to return their form by
  • 7 November 2017 (6pm local time): Responses received after this date were not processed
  • 15 November 2017 (10am AEDT): Statistics and integrity report released to the public

The result of the survey (including participation rates) were released at a national level, at a state and territory level and at an electorate level.[1]

Legal challenges

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Two legal challenges were lodged contesting the legality of the survey with the High Court of Australia, both on the grounds of unlawful funding from legally-specified funds and unlawful operation by the ABS. The first was by same-sex marriage advocates Shelley Argent (national spokeswoman of Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays) and Felicity Marlowe (member of Rainbow Families), along with independent MP Andrew Wilkie. They announced they would challenge the postal survey in the High Court on 9 August 2017 and seek a temporary injunction.[37][38] The second challenge was by Australian Marriage Equality and Greens Senator Janet Rice.[39][40]

An additional complaint was lodged by a 17-year-old boy with the Australian Human Rights Commission in August 2017, on the basis that the rules did not allow provisionally enrolled 16- and 17-year-old Australians the right to participate in the survey.[41][42] The complaint could have lead to a federal court case to argue for the right of about 50,000 Australians aged 16 and 17 on the electoral roll to vote, however the boy dropped his complaint on 22 September, after a Greens amendment to the Marriage Law Survey (Additional Safeguards) Act 2017 was rejected by the Parliament earlier in the month.[43] Legal counsel to the boy advised that the rejected amendment would make the age discrimination complaint much more difficult to argue, because parliament had considered and rejected extending the vote to enrolled 16- and 17-year-olds.[43]

High Court ruling

The High Court pronounced its orders in both cases on 7 September 2017. The court determined that the survey was lawful, allowing it to proceed as scheduled.[44][45] The challengers were ordered to pay costs.[46] The High Court handed down its unanimous reasons on 28 September 2017, finding that $295 million had been appropriated by parliament, and that whether the expenditure was unforeseen was a matter for the Minister's satisfaction and there was no error of law in either his reasoning or his conclusion. The information to be collected was "statistical information" of matters prescribed in the Census and Statistics Regulation 2016 (Cth). As the court had considered and rejected the grounds of the application, there was no need to decide whether or not whether the plaintiffs had standing.[47][48]

Survey process

The survey was conducted on a voluntary basis, with no requirement on the part of the eligible Australian to mail back the survey form. This led to concerns over a potentially low voter turnout/response rate and the prospect of Indigenous Australians in remote communities being unable to complete a survey.[49][50] Concern had been expressed regarding: electors whose addresses were not visible on the electoral roll (known as silent electors);[51] disenfranchisement in remote communities;[52] Australians overseas;[53] prisoners;[54] non-English speakers;[55] and young people.[56][57] Early criticism was also levelled at issues of privacy, with the recent census problems of 2016 being cited.[58] The ABS advised that survey responses would be anonymous and protected under the secrecy provisions of the Census and Statistics Act 1905.[59] Prior to the survey commencing, former Privacy Commissioner Malcolm Crompton independently reviewed the ABS's privacy approaches and mitigations and announced he was suitably satisfied.[60] The ABS also worked to address concerns with special strategies like paperless options (telephony and online form) and form drop off and pick up points in remote and capital city locations.[61] Additionally, the bureau noted that Australians could also authorise a "trusted person" to complete the survey on their behalf.[1] Whilst any person could be appointed a "trusted person", the Chief Minister of the ACT, Andrew Barr offered to fulfill the role for any citizen.[62][63] Auditors and an external observer process were established to assure the integrity of the process, though the observers are subject to a lifetime confidentiality agreement.[64] A quality and integrity report will be published by the ABS alongside the release of the survey results.[1] During the survey period, online sellers were contacted by the ABS asking them to remove ads by people offering to sell their postal survey or answer. The ABS advised that such an action would likely constitute an offence under the Census and Statistics Act 1905, the Commonwealth Criminal Code and the survey safeguards legislation passed by Parliament.[65][66] The Digital Transformation Agency assisted the ABS with the paperless options for the survey, though due to the compressed timescale of the survey, concerns were anonymously raised by staff that the normal processes were not completed, such as sufficient user testing.[67]

Unlike elections or referendums, there were no automatic special regulations relating to advertising requirements or prohibited content for the survey of the kind found in the Electoral Act.[68] Consequently, the Government and Opposition engaged in negotiations to introduce legislation designed to replicate these type of regulations, as well as create measures to prevent vilification, intimidation, or threats to cause harm on the basis of the sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status or the religious convictions of someone during the survey period.[69] On 13 September, the government introduced the Marriage Law Survey (Additional Safeguards) Bill 2017 for these purposes in the Senate.[70] The bill passed the Senate, after an amendment moved by Greens leader Richard Di Natale to allow 16- and 17-year-olds the right to participate in the survey was defeated. The bill immediately proceeded to and was passed by the House of Representatives.[70] The bill received royal assent on 13 September and went into effect the following day.[70][71] The Act's provisions automatically expire on 15 November 2017.[71] Neither the "Yes" or "No" campaign received public funding in the survey, as was envisioned for a compulsory attendance plebiscite.[72] Prime Minister Turnbull also ruled out a ban on foreign donations for the survey.[73]

All Australians whose names are on the electoral roll or had applied to be put on the roll before 24 August 2017 were mailed a survey form and enrolled Australians living overseas along with those in certain special categories were entitled to complete a survey using paperless methods.[74][75] The AEC made a statement that provisionally-enrolled 16- and 17-year-olds would not be posted a survey form[76] and an amended direction was later issued by the Government to the Australian Statistician making this clear.[77] This direction was subject to a Human Rights Commission complaint by a 17-year-old boy, which was later withdrawn.[78][43]

More than 16 million letters were sent from 12 September over almost two weeks (with all delivered by 25 September) and silent electors' packages were sent by the AEC and delivered by the end of September.[79][80] After several "Yes" respondents posted images of their complete forms on social media, the ABS cautioned participants to not photograph their form barcodes, so as to prevent any fraudulent conduct. Additionally, survey forms could be invalidated in the event the question was rephrased by the participant or the barcode was obscured or removed.[81] The ABS issued several examples of what constituted a valid and invalid response (such as marking both boxes "Yes" and "No" or crossing out one of the words on the form).[82] The ABS advised Australians who received extra survey forms, addressed to the previous occupant who failed to update their electoral details, to write on the front of the envelope "return to sender" and send it back.[83] In Australia, it is illegal to open mail addressed to another person.[84] In the rare instance of multiple responses being received from an individual, the ABS noted that only the last valid response could expect to be counted.[85] On 25 September, the ABS confirmed that all survey forms had been mailed to eligible voters and outlined the process for additional forms to be sent to people who did not receive, lost or spoilt their form.[86] The bureau also confirmed that changing your mind was not a valid reason for requesting a new form.[87]

Weekly estimate of responses

On 28 September, the ABS announced that it would release weekly national estimates of the total number of survey responses received, beginning from 3 October 2017 and ending 7 November. The primary input to the first three weekly estimates, issued at the National level only, was Australia Post's assessment of the number of containers of sorted envelopes rather than counts of individual forms. Adjustments were made based on factors such as responses received through other channels and an allowance for forms that are damaged or invalid. From the fourth estimate, released on 24 October 2017, the ABS changed the estimation method to use the counts of processed forms. This led to an increase in estimated turnout to 74.5% of the population, up 7.0% on the previous week, despite only 300,000 new responses, or 1.9% of the total, being received during that timeframe.[88]

Week[89] Estimated responses Estimated rate of response
3 October 9,200,000 57.5%
10 October 10,000,000 62.5%
17 October 10,800,000 67.5%
24 October 11,900,000 74.5%
31 October 12,300,000 77.0%
7 November 12,600,000 78.5%

Question

The survey form asked respondents: "Should the law be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry?"[90]

Legislation proposed

The government did not release a draft bill legalising same-sex marriage prior to the survey, which led to uncertainty over what form legislation would take in the event of a "Yes" verdict.[91] The wording of an exposure draft of a same-sex marriage bill from early 2017, released by the Attorney-General's office, proposed to amend the definition of "marriage" and replace the terms "man" and "woman" with the gender neutral phrase "two people".[92] The proposed wording "two people" differs from the wording of the survey question, which refers explicitly to "same-sex couples".[93][94]

Liberal Senator Dean Smith, who drafted a same-sex marriage bill in August 2017, argued his bill struck a "fair balance" in protecting the rights of same-sex couples and the religious freedoms of celebrants.[95] The bill allows current civil celebrants to become religious celebrants and refuse to perform same sex marriages, and incorporates parts of the Sex Discrimination Act, to allow religious organisations to refuse their services for same-sex marriages.[96] Smith’s bill was formally backed by the Labor Party parliamentary caucus on 17 October 2017.[97] However, conservative MPs in the government responded by suggesting up to 100 amendments to the bill may be needed if the "Yes" vote carried.[95]

A rival bill was released on 13 November by Liberal Senator James Paterson, a conservative supporter of same-sex marriage.[98] The bill contained various protections allowing the refusal of same-sex weddings by anyone who holds a religious or "conscientious belief" against same-sex marriage, including private service providers such as florists and bakers.[99][100] Prime Minister Turnbull reacted negatively to Paterson's bill, saying the government "would not countenance" supporting a bill which discriminated against same-sex weddings and that the bill would have "virtually no prospect of getting through the Parliament".[101]

Support and opposition

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Party positions in a parliamentary vote

These are the official positions held by political parties in the Australian Parliament with regard to the issue of same-sex marriage. The Australian Labor Party official position is in support of same-sex marriage, though any MPs and Senators are not bound vote for it in Parliament until 2019.[102] The Liberal Party position in regard to same-sex marriage is to hold a plebiscite of some kind before any change to the law is made; though the party had no official position on the survey question, hence Liberal MPs (including Cabinet members) were free to campaign and vote for either side,[103] and all politicians were entitled to use their electoral printing and communications budget to campaign.[104] MPs may, in the event of a vote, choose to vote according to how their individual electorates respond to the survey, or according to how the national result turns out, or according to their own consciences.[105]

Position Political parties Ref
Yes Australian Greens [106]
Labor Party* [107]
Nick Xenophon Team [108]
style="background-color: Template:Derryn Hinch's Justice Party/meta/color" | Derryn Hinch's Justice Party [109]
Liberal Democratic Party [110]
No Australian Conservatives [111]
National Party [103]
Katter's Australian Party [112]
Subject to public vote Jacqui Lambie Network [113]
Liberal Party [103]
One Nation* [114]
*Conscience vote allowed for MPs.

"Yes" campaign

The campaign for supporting voting in favour of same-sex marriage in the survey received support from Labor,[115] the Liberals and Nationals for yes campaign,[116] and four minor political parties represented in the Federal parliament, and from prominent lobby groups including Australian Marriage Equality and GetUp!.[117][118]

"No" campaign

The campaign advocating voting against changing the marriage laws in the survey was supported by the Nationals[103] and three minor parties represented in the Federal parliament. Several groups opposed to same-sex marriage, including the Australian Christian Lobby and the Marriage Alliance, formed the Coalition for Marriage to co-ordinate the "No" campaign.[119][120][121]

Neutral

The Liberal Party of Australia did not hold a position either way in the survey.[103]

Public opinion

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Opinion polls in Australia over several years in the lead-up to the survey indicated a comfortable majority of Australians supported same-sex marriage.[122][123][124][125] A Guardian Essential poll conducted just prior to the announcement of the postal survey indicated that 43% approved of a postal vote and 38% disapproved,[126] whereas a week later, 39% approved of the postal survey and 47% disapproved of it.[127] A small boycott movement existed, although most same sex marriage campaigners who were against a national vote on same-sex marriage urged participation in the postal survey.[128]

Voting intentions

Date Firm Yes No Undecided Sample size Notes
9–12 November 2017 Newspoll[129] 63% 37% 1,625 [N 1]
3–6 November 2017 Essential[130][131] 64% 31% 5% 1,792 [N 1]
26–30 October 2017 Galaxy Research[132][133] 66% 34% N/A 1,000 [N 1]
26–29 October 2017 EMRS[134] 64% 28% N/A 1,000
26–29 October 2017 Newspoll[135][136] 62% 35% 3% 1,623 [N 1]
59% 35% 6% [N 2]
12–22 October 2017 Essential[137][138] 60% 34% 5% 1,859 [N 1]
39% 33% 28% [N 3]
12–16 October 2017 YouGov[139][140] 61% 35% 3% 1,067 [N 1]
54% 28% 18% [N 3]
12–15 October 2017 Newspoll[141][142] 56% 37% 7% 1,583
6–8 October 2017 Roy Morgan Research[143] 61.5% 17.5% N/A 1,554 [N 4]
2 October 2017 ReachTEL[144][145] 70.3% 21.1% N/A 4,888 [N 5]
28 September – 1 October 2017 Essential[146][147] 64% 30% 6% 1,841 [N 1]
50% 36% 14% [N 3]
22–25 September 2017 Essential[148][149] 58% 33% 9% 1,803
21–24 September 2017 Newspoll[150] 57% 34% 9% 1,695
15–18 September 2017 Essential[151][152] 55% 34% 11% 1,808
14–18 September 2017 YouGov[153][154] 59% 33% 9% 1,056
6–9 September 2017 Ipsos[155] 70% N/A N/A 1,400
28 August – 6 September 2017 Newgate Research[156] 58.4% 31.4% 10.2% 800
1–4 September 2017 Essential[157][158] 59% 31% 11% 1,784
17–22 August 2017 Essential[159][160] 57% 32% 11% 1,817
17–21 August 2017 YouGov[161] 59% 33% 8% 1,012
17–20 August 2017 Newspoll[162][163] 63% 30% 7% 1,675

Likelihood of voting in the survey

Date Firm Voted already Definitely will Probably will Probably won't Definitely won't Undecided Sample size Notes
9–12 November 2017 Newspoll[129] 79% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,625 [N 6]
3–6 November 2017 Essential[130][131] 86% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,792 [N 7]
26–29 October 2017 Newspoll[135] 76% 10% 5% 2% 2% 3% 1,623
12–22 October 2017 Essential[137][138] 75% 8% 4% 3% 3% 4% 1,859
12–16 October 2017 YouGov[139][140] 67% 13% 7% 3% 6% 5% 1,067
12–15 October 2017 Newspoll[141] 65% 19% 6% 2% 3% 5% 1,583
2 October 2017 ReachTEL[144] 79% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4,888
2 October 2017 Newgate Research[164] 77% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
28 September – 1 October 2017 Essential[146][147] 47% 33% 6% 3% 3% 5% 1,841
22–25 September 2017 Essential[148][149] 36% 45% 8% 1% 2% 5% 1,803
21–24 September 2017 Newspoll[150] 15% 67% 7% 2% 2% 7% 1,695 [N 8]
15–18 September 2017 Essential[151][152] 9% 62% 12% 2% 3% 8% 1,808
6–9 September 2017 Ipsos[155] 65% N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,400
1–4 September 2017 Essential[157][158] 62% 16% 4% 3% 10% 1,784
23 August 2017 ReachTEL[165] 78.7% 10% 4.1% 7.2% 2,382 [N 9]
17–22 August 2017 Essential[159] 63% 18% 4% 6% 9% 1,817
17–20 August 2017 Newspoll[162] 67% 15% 4% 3% 11% 1,675 [N 10]

Activities during the campaign

Advocacy by territory and local governments

File:Rainbow ACTION bus September 2017.jpg
A Canberra bus with rainbow wrap advertising as support from the ACT Government for the city's LGBTIQ community during the survey period.[166]
File:Sydney Town Hall illuminated in support of Vote Yes.jpg
Sydney Town Hall illuminated in pride colours and flying a rainbow flag in support of the "Yes" vote.

The Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly and several local governments such as the City of Sydney took official positions supporting the "Yes" campaign.[167][168] Public servants in the ACT were warned against campaigning in the survey whilst in official uniform.[169][170] The move to offer official support was criticised by some opposition members in the ACT, and similar criticisms lead to the City of Darebin backing down on plans to restrict "No" campaigners from using council facilities.[171][172]

Debate over freedom of religion

Several figures and institutions supporting a "No" vote raised the issue of religious freedom during the survey period. Former Prime Minister John Howard rejected the assurances of Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and requested that the government explicitly detail proposed religious freedom provisions to potentially be included in same-sex marriage legislation.[173][174][175] Likewise several leaders in the Catholic Church raised freedom of religion concerns, citing the case of a Tasmanian archbishop, who was requested to appear at an anti-discrimination commission after having disseminated material supporting a Christian view of marriage.[176] The veracity of the concerns over religious freedom was disputed heavily in the community. Some groups, such as the National Catholic Education Commission said they were unsure if Catholic schools could continue to teach the Catholic view of marriage in the event same-sex marriage was legalised, however academics Marion Maddox and Carol Johnson challenged this by arguing that religious organisations would continue to be able to access exemptions from anti-discrimination laws and, consequently, remain free to refuse same-sex marriage if it is eventually introduced.[177][178] The divisions extended to the governing Liberal Party, whose president rejected claims that religious freedom could be under threat, in direct contradiction to the party's vice-president, who said that same-sex marriage would have consequences for freedom of speech, religion and association.[179][180]

Both Prime Minister Turnbull and Bill Shorten, leader of the Opposition, spoke in favour of religious freedom protections, with Turnbull stating he was an even "stronger believer" in freedom of religion than same-sex marriage.[181] Shorten said the Labor Party would “make sure that concerns about religious freedom are met with and dealt with and are treated with respect”.[182] The prospect of additional religious freedom exemptions being added to existing Australian anti-discrimination law troubled some "Yes" advocates, who feared such provisions could allow service providers to discriminate on any basis, not just limited to couples' sex. Tiernan Brady described the campaign for religious freedom exemptions as "a blatant attempt to unravel existing anti-discrimination laws which serve everyone in Australia well, not just LGBTI people".[183]

In response to a Newspoll question on the subject; "Do you think parliament should provide guarantees in law for freedom of conscience, belief and religion if it legislates for same-sex marriage?", 62% responded Yes, 18% responded No and 20% said they were "uncommitted".[162] In contrast, a poll conducted by Galaxy later in the survey found 78% of respondents said Yes in response to the question; "If the majority vote ‘yes’ in the postal survey, should same-sex couples be treated the same under the law compared with other couples?"[184]

Advertising and media

Advertising by both sides was extensive for much of the survey period. The first television ad for the "No" campaign, revealed shortly after the campaign began, featured three women and focused on the Safe Schools education program.[185] The "Yes" campaign promptly aired a rebuttal by Dr. Kerryn Phelps.[186] A "No" supporter funded the skywritten message "Vote No" over Sydney in September, which was defended by Turnbull as an expression of free speech.[187]

Subsequent "Yes" ads focused heavily on a concerted "get out the vote" effort, and featured high-profile figures such as Ian Thorpe and others posting their surveys, as well as a themed ad screened during the finale of popular television show The Bachelor.[188][189] The "Yes" campaign were also responsible for a widespread SMS message to many Australian mobile phones which lead to some complaints over how people's numbers were obtained, however the campaign advised the numbers were generated through random dialling technology previously used in elections.[190]

Both of the "No" campaign's next most prominent advertisements concentrated mostly on the notion of gender theory in school curriculum, one such ad focusing on the book The Gender Fairy and featuring two of the mothers from the original advertisement.[191][192][192] The other advertisement included archive footage of one of the founders of the Safe Schools program and included material alleged to have been available for viewing by year seven students which was subsequently deemed inappropriate for unrestricted viewing by the Australian Commercial Television Code of Practice.[193][194]

File:Marriage Equality stickers.png
Rainbow flag-patterned stickers on mail boxes asking for no anti-equality or hate mail. Similar stickers were promoted as a way to show support for same-sex marriage and reduce the amount of unwanted materials received.[195]

Legislation in effect for the duration of the survey made it illegal to vilify, intimidate, threaten or harm "on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status or religion", with a fine of up to $12,600 for breaches.[196] Furthermore, all campaign material was required to be properly authorised.[197] By 26 September, marketing services group Ebiquity estimated that the lead "No" group (Coalition for Marriage) had spent about $3,975,872 on advertising, a figure higher than their estimate for the two lead "Yes" groups (Australian Marriage Equality and the Equality Campaign), about $2,920,740.[198] Two donations of note were made in the course of the survey; $1 million was personally donated by Qantas CEO Alan Joyce to the "Yes" campaign, and $1 million was donated by the Anglican Diocese of Sydney to the "No" campaign.[199][200] Former Prime Minister Tony Abbott said in November that the "No" campaign had 20,000 donors who donated around $6 million to the campaign.[201]

At the 2017 NRL Grand Final, American rapper Macklemore was booked to perform several songs, including "Same Love".[202] The song topped the Australian charts in 2013, and was regarded as an anthem for same-sex marriage advocates during the campaign in Macklemore's home state of Washington. In the days leading up to the grand final, the single returned to the top of the Australian iTunes charts.[203] Several prominent conservative politicians voiced strong opposition to the scheduled performance of "Same Love", given its high-profile support for the "Yes" campaign during the voting period of the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey.[204][205] Macklemore acknowledged the controversy several days before the final, but vowed to "go harder" as a result.[206]

Discussion of impact on children

The rights and welfare of children, particularly as it related to same-sex parenting, was occasionally discussed publicly through the survey. Organisations such as the Australian Catholic Bishops' Conference, the Presbyterian Church of Australia and the Australian National Imams Council all advocated strongly for nuclear family structures during the survey.[176][207][208] A fact check article published in The Conversation, which was based on a review of the literature on outcomes for children of same-sex parents, showed equal or better outcomes for children raised by parents of the same gender.[209] Likewise, a review published late in the survey period by the Medical Journal of Australia agreed with The Conversation's findings, but noted that the effects of being exposed to stigma and discrimination could lead to poorer public health outcomes for the children in same-sex parented families.[210]

Counselling for those impacted and mental health

A number of helplines, conselling services and mental health strategies were made available to LGBTIQ people by several organisations, including the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.[211] Similar services were available for Defence,[212] Victorian local councils[213] and health services such as Alfred Health.[214] State governments in Western Australia, Victoria and Queensland all allocated additional funds, ranging from $60,000 to $500,000, to LGBTIQ mental health services.[215][216][217]

Other groups, such as Slater and Gordon, the Australian Psychological Society and Minus 18 unveiled material and mechanisms designed to offer support and relief for those affected by the debate, such as parents of young children and LGBTIQ teenagers who experienced difficulties dealing with the public discussion.[218][219][220][non-primary source needed]

The survey period was associated with increases in the number of LGBTIQ people requesting assistance for mental health issues. Reach Out Australia, which lead the pro-same-sex marriage campaign by five mental health services, reported increases (variously at) 20,[221] 30[222] and 40[223] per cent in clients during the survey period and crisis support service Lifeline noted a spike in calls about the impact of the survey.[224]

Vandalism and abuse

The survey was accompanied by a variety of acts of vandalism and abuse by both parties. In September, a banner reading "Burn Churches, Not Queers" was unfurled at a Coalition for Marriage meeting,[225] and in October several churches in Victoria and New South Wales were graffitied with messages criticising "No" voters.[226][227][228] Similarly, a passenger train on the Sydney Trains network was vandalised with messages encouraging "No" votes, including foul language and the Nazi swastika.[229] The ABC created a digital news service designed to track incidents of violence and abuse throughout the survey, with both "Yes" and "No" voters/organisations being targeted on occasions.[230]

Result

National result

Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey[2]
Choice Votes  %
Referendum passed Yes 7,817,247 61.6
No 4,873,987 38.4
Valid votes 12,691,234 99.71
Invalid or blank votes 36,686 0.29
Total votes 12,691,234 100.00
Registered voters and turnout 16,006,180 79.5

State and territory breakdown

Result[2]
State/Territory Yes No Invalid
 %  %
New South Wales 2,374,362 57.8 1,736,838 42.2 11,036
Victoria 2,145,629 64.9 1,161,098 35.1 11,028
Queensland 1,487,060 60.7 961,015 39.3 7,088
Western Australia 801,575 63.7 455,924 36.3 3,188
South Australia 592,528 62.5 356,247 37.5 2,778
Tasmania 191,948 63.6 109,655 36.4 805
Australian Capital Territory 175,459 74.0 61,520 26.0 534
Northern Territory 48,686 60.6 31,690 39.4 229
Total for country 7,817,247 61.6 4,873,987 38.4 36,686

Electorate breakdown

Breakdown of voting by electorate[231]
Electorate Yes (%) Yes Votes No (%) No Votes Formal total Participation rate (%) State/Territory
Adelaide 70.10% 62,769 29.90% 26,771 89,540 81.23% South Australia
Aston 61.97% 48,455 38.03% 29,730 78,185 81.37% Victoria
Ballarat 70.54% 65,613 29.46% 27,405 93,018 81.40% Victoria
Banks 44.88% 37,736 55.12% 46,343 84,079 79.88% New South Wales
Barker 52.26% 42,498 47.74% 38,827 81,325 76.82% South Australia
Barton 43.64% 37,153 56.36% 47,984 85,137 77.84% New South Wales
Bass 61.69% 36,249 38.31% 22,510 58,759 78.99% Tasmania
Batman 71.16% 66,383 28.84% 26,906 93,289 83.68% Victoria
Bendigo 68.73% 63,412 31.27% 28,852 92,264 82.41% Victoria
Bennelong 49.84% 42,943 50.16% 43,215 86,158 80.99% New South Wales
Berowra 54.56% 48,471 45.44% 40,369 88,840 84.54% New South Wales
Blair 60.02% 47,194 39.98% 31,433 78,627 76.44% Queensland
Blaxland 26.05% 20,406 73.95% 57,926 78,332 75.01% New South Wales
Bonner 62.05% 52,139 37.95% 31,891 84,030 82.21% Queensland
Boothby 68.51% 62,139 31.49% 28,556 90,695 84.10% South Australia
Bowman 62.13% 53,529 37.87% 32,627 86,156 81.23% Queensland
Braddon 54.03% 30,054 45.97% 25,573 55,627 75.77% Tasmania
Bradfield 60.58% 53,681 39.42% 34,927 88,608 83.54% New South Wales
Brand 67.09% 51,953 32.91% 25,481 77,434 75.85% Western Australia
Brisbane 79.51% 72,812 20.49% 18,762 91,574 81.48% Queensland
Bruce 46.91% 34,644 53.09% 39,203 73,847 77.44% Victoria
Burt 56.97% 44,058 43.03% 33,275 77,333 76.04% Western Australia
Calare 60.19% 54,091 39.81% 35,779 89,870 77.81% New South Wales
Calwell 43.16% 37,839 56.84% 49,823 87,662 78.56% Victoria
Canberra 74.07% 89,590 25.93% 31,361 120,951 83.05% Australian Capital Territory
Canning 60.23% 48,486 39.77% 32,019 80,505 78.25% Western Australia
Capricornia 54.06% 39,917 45.94% 33,917 73,834 74.61% Queensland
Casey 68.06% 59,959 31.94% 28,144 88,103 83.73% Victoria
Chifley 41.31% 32,871 58.69% 46,702 79,573 73.67% New South Wales
Chisholm 61.59% 49,448 38.41% 30,844 80,292 82.14% Victoria
Cook 55.04% 47,505 44.96% 38,804 86,309 82.00% New South Wales
Corangamite 71.56% 69,723 28.44% 27,708 97,431 84.81% Victoria
Corio 67.72% 62,658 32.28% 29,865 92,523 83.25% Victoria
Cowan 58.82% 44,388 41.18% 31,075 75,463 77.82% Western Australia
Cowper 60.01% 57,493 39.99% 38,317 95,810 78.97% New South Wales
Cunningham 65.67% 60,906 34.33% 31,840 92,746 81.63% New South Wales
Curtin 72.22% 59,638 27.78% 22,943 82,581 83.87% Western Australia
Dawson 55.15% 42,539 44.85% 34,599 77,138 73.97% Queensland
Deakin 65.69% 55,464 34.31% 28,973 84,437 84.35% Victoria
Denison 73.78% 45,005 26.22% 15,992 60,997 82.14% Tasmania
Dickson 65.16% 54,206 34.84% 28,988 83,194 81.63% Queensland
Dobell 65.75% 59,475 34.25% 30,987 90,462 78.67% New South Wales
Dunkley 71.97% 62,840 28.03% 24,471 87,311 81.66% Victoria
Durack 59.16% 39,304 40.84% 27,128 66,432 67.75% Western Australia
Eden-Monaro 64.92% 57,223 35.08% 30,926 88,149 79.75% New South Wales
Fadden 61.81% 52,154 38.19% 32,218 84,372 76.13% Queensland
Fairfax 64.32% 58,510 35.68% 32,451 90,961 80.80% Queensland
Farrer 55.21% 48,432 44.79% 39,297 87,729 77.18% New South Wales
Fenner 74.01% 85,869 25.99% 30,159 116,028 81.44% Australian Capital Territory
Fisher 62.83% 52,023 37.17% 30,783 82,806 80.64% Queensland
Flinders 69.99% 68,291 30.01% 29,275 97,566 81.78% Victoria
Flynn 51.48% 39,020 48.52% 36,783 75,803 75.36% Queensland
Forde 60.55% 46,937 39.45% 30,585 77,522 75.87% Queensland
Forrest 63.80% 51,612 36.20% 29,285 80,897 78.64% Western Australia
Fowler 36.34% 27,847 63.66% 48,782 76,629 72.22% New South Wales
Franklin 68.77% 44,746 31.23% 20,322 65,068 82.54% Tasmania
Fremantle 70.09% 57,541 29.91% 24,559 82,100 80.32% Western Australia
Gellibrand 68.10% 62,045 31.90% 29,065 91,110 81.96% Victoria
Gilmore 61.98% 59,322 38.02% 36,386 95,708 80.35% New South Wales
Gippsland 60.16% 51,196 39.84% 33,910 85,106 80.43% Victoria
Goldstein 76.30% 69,726 23.70% 21,663 91,389 85.82% Victoria
Gorton 53.34% 49,834 46.66% 43,587 93,421 77.05% Victoria
Grayndler 79.89% 73,208 20.11% 18,429 91,637 84.97% New South Wales
Greenway 46.36% 38,016 53.64% 43,980 81,996 76.30% New South Wales
Grey 53.31% 40,811 46.69% 35,750 76,561 74.95% South Australia
Griffith 76.60% 69,171 23.40% 21,132 90,303 81.63% Queensland
Groom 49.16% 40,536 50.84% 41,915 82,451 79.72% Queensland
Hasluck 62.41% 47,880 37.59% 28,836 76,716 79.49% Western Australia
Herbert 62.85% 48,110 37.15% 28,441 76,551 71.93% Queensland
Higgins 78.34% 70,059 21.66% 19,375 89,434 84.19% Victoria
Hindmarsh 63.29% 57,947 36.71% 33,613 91,560 81.47% South Australia
Hinkler 50.69% 40,649 49.31% 39,548 80,197 77.91% Queensland
Holt 50.68% 47,147 49.32% 45,875 93,022 76.52% Victoria
Hotham 59.60% 47,986 40.40% 32,524 80,510 80.07% Victoria
Hughes 58.41% 51,337 41.59% 36,558 87,895 83.62% New South Wales
Hume 58.57% 51,284 41.43% 36,271 87,555 78.72% New South Wales
Hunter 64.38% 59,137 35.62% 32,723 91,860 78.27% New South Wales
Indi 63.09% 54,563 36.91% 31,925 86,488 81.79% Victoria
Isaacs 65.33% 56,645 34.67% 30,063 86,708 80.53% Victoria
Jagajaga 73.51% 65,098 26.49% 23,453 88,551 85.01% Victoria
Kennedy 46.74% 33,160 53.26% 37,784 70,944 70.24% Queensland
Kingsford Smith 64.11% 56,297 35.89% 31,510 87,807 79.51% New South Wales
Kingston 68.10% 58,863 31.90% 27,567 86,430 80.44% South Australia
Kooyong 73.67% 63,592 26.33% 22,729 86,321 85.72% Victoria
La Trobe 67.45% 61,807 32.55% 29,826 91,633 82.62% Victoria
Lalor 56.78% 57,062 43.22% 43,429 100,491 76.73% Victoria
Leichhardt 63.37% 47,750 36.63% 27,606 75,356 67.62% Queensland
Lilley 67.66% 59,991 32.34% 28,671 88,662 81.25% Queensland
Lindsay 56.17% 49,071 43.83% 38,295 87,366 76.27% New South Wales
Lingiari 54.48% 19,026 45.52% 15,898 34,924 49.97% Northern Territory
Longman 60.43% 51,268 39.57% 33,576 84,844 77.59% Queensland
Lyne 55.31% 51,416 44.69% 41,539 92,955 81.04% New South Wales
Lyons 58.70% 35,894 41.30% 25,258 61,152 77.87% Tasmania
Macarthur 52.05% 43,323 47.95% 39,907 83,230 75.17% New South Wales
Mackellar 68.01% 62,350 31.99% 29,330 91,680 83.81% New South Wales
Macquarie 63.87% 56,180 36.13% 31,778 87,958 82.45% New South Wales
Makin 60.44% 51,547 39.56% 33,743 85,290 79.32% South Australia
Mallee 54.28% 42,495 45.72% 35,795 78,290 78.40% Victoria
Maranoa 43.91% 35,475 56.09% 45,308 80,783 77.91% Queensland
Maribyrnong 59.87% 53,208 40.13% 35,658 88,866 78.65% Victoria
Mayo 64.74% 57,361 35.26% 31,247 88,608 83.51% South Australia
McEwen 65.39% 73,705 34.61% 39,007 112,712 80.48% Victoria
McMahon 35.07% 29,146 64.93% 53,967 83,113 77.62% New South Wales
McMillan 62.75% 61,479 37.25% 36,500 97,979 81.14% Victoria
McPherson 65.48% 54,034 34.52% 28,486 82,520 77.88% Queensland
Melbourne 83.69% 81,287 16.31% 15,839 97,126 82.69% Victoria
Melbourne Ports 81.97% 70,589 18.03% 15,523 86,112 81.97% Victoria
Menzies 56.95% 47,137 43.05% 35,626 82,763 83.80% Victoria
Mitchell 49.10% 42,112 50.90% 43,652 85,764 81.39% New South Wales
Moncrieff 63.78% 50,566 36.22% 28,717 79,283 75.70% Queensland
Moore 67.99% 56,690 32.01% 26,690 83,380 82.97% Western Australia
Moreton 60.92% 47,418 39.08% 30,413 77,831 79.36% Queensland
Murray 57.62% 48,205 42.38% 35,452 83,657 79.24% Victoria
New England 52.52% 44,608 47.48% 40,324 84,932 76.67% New South Wales
Newcastle 74.78% 71,158 25.22% 23,999 95,157 82.49% New South Wales
North Sydney 71.79% 64,813 28.21% 25,473 90,286 83.58% New South Wales
O'Connor 56.17% 43,554 43.83% 33,987 77,541 75.50% Western Australia
Oxley 60.33% 44,655 39.67% 29,365 74,020 75.85% Queensland
Page 59.72% 55,943 40.28% 37,727 93,670 78.32% New South Wales
Parkes 52.74% 41,408 47.26% 37,108 78,516 72.34% New South Wales
Parramatta 38.38% 29,299 61.62% 47,038 76,337 74.63% New South Wales
Paterson 65.52% 60,915 34.48% 32,059 92,974 79.12% New South Wales
Pearce 63.89% 54,305 36.11% 30,699 85,004 76.16% Western Australia
Perth 71.46% 57,510 28.54% 22,967 80,477 80.37% Western Australia
Petrie 61.64% 53,144 38.36% 33,067 86,211 78.56% Queensland
Port Adelaide 61.30% 53,649 38.70% 33,869 87,518 76.07% South Australia
Rankin 54.56% 41,570 45.44% 34,621 76,191 74.30% Queensland
Reid 52.73% 43,567 47.27% 39,061 82,628 77.50% New South Wales
Richmond 67.87% 62,591 32.13% 29,625 92,216 80.04% New South Wales
Riverina 54.63% 47,333 45.37% 39,308 86,641 76.99% New South Wales
Robertson 65.72% 58,689 34.28% 30,614 89,303 81.21% New South Wales
Ryan 72.66% 64,967 27.34% 24,451 89,418 84.51% Queensland
Scullin 53.37% 48,245 46.63% 42,147 90,392 79.59% Victoria
Shortland 67.67% 62,455 32.33% 29,836 92,291 82.24% New South Wales
Solomon 65.26% 29,660 34.74% 15,792 45,452 66.63% Northern Territory
Stirling 61.11% 47,225 38.89% 30,060 77,285 78.21% Western Australia
Sturt 61.57% 52,308 38.43% 32,655 84,963 81.21% South Australia
Swan 64.66% 49,093 35.34% 26,830 75,923 77.50% Western Australia
Sydney 83.67% 76,144 16.33% 14,860 91,004 80.36% New South Wales
Tangney 61.63% 48,338 38.37% 30,090 78,428 83.86% Western Australia
Wakefield 61.00% 52,636 39.00% 33,649 86,285 75.45% New South Wales
Wannon 61.01% 49,340 38.99% 31,529 80,869 81.05% Victoria
Warringah 75.01% 64,999 24.99% 21,660 86,659 83.76% New South Wales
Watson 30.36% 24,915 69.64% 57,160 82,075 76.77% New South Wales
Wentworth 80.85% 69,279 19.15% 16,410 85,689 82.42% New South Wales
Werriwa 36.26% 30,252 63.74% 53,174 83,426 73.84% New South Wales
Whitlam 62.27% 57,562 37.73% 34,879 92,441 79.84% New South Wales
Wide Bay 55.65% 46,507 44.35% 37,065 83,572 79.19% Queensland
Wills 69.95% 68,450 30.05% 29,399 97,849 82.73% Victoria
Wright 56.81% 47,109 43.19% 35,812 82,921 78.71% Queensland

Aftermath

Marriage Amendment Act

The bill sponsored by Dean Smith is expected to be introduced to the Senate shortly. It would amend the Marriage Act to recognise same-sex marriages.[232]

Response to results

Speaking immediately after the survey results were released, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull called the outcome "overwhelming" and recommitted to passing same-sex marriage legislation in the Parliament before Christmas.[233]

See also

Notes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Among respondents who voted already.
  2. Among all respondents, whether they had voted already or not.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Among respondents who have not yet voted.
  4. 21% of respondents refused to answer the question or declared no intention to vote.
  5. The Yes figure is a combination of people who say they have already voted yes (64.3%) and people who say they still intend to vote yes (6%). The No figure is a combination of people who say they have already voted no (15.5%) and people who say they still intend to vote no (5.7%). An additional 5.7% say that they do not intend to vote and 2.8% say they have not received a survey form.
  6. 17% of respondents said they had not voted and 4% were "uncommitted"
  7. 14% of respondents said they had not voted.
  8. The undecided number included 5% who say they "may or may not" participate and 2% who are "uncommitted".
  9. The poll asked respondents if they were "very likely, somewhat likely, somewhat unlikely or very unlikely" to participate in the survey, and did not give an option of being undecided.
  10. The undecided number included 9% who say they "may or may not" participate and 3% who are "uncommitted".

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. 43.0 43.1 43.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  44. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  45. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  46. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  47. Wilkie v Commonwealth; Australian Marriage Equality v Minister for Finance [2017] HCA 40 (28 September 2017), High Court.
  48. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  49. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  50. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  51. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  52. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  53. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  54. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  55. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  56. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  57. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  58. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  59. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  60. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  61. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  62. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  63. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  64. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  65. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  66. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  67. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  68. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  69. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  70. 70.0 70.1 70.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  71. 71.0 71.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  72. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  73. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  74. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  75. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  76. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  77. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  78. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  79. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  80. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  81. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  82. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  83. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  84. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  85. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  86. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  87. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  88. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  89. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  90. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  91. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  92. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  93. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  94. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  95. 95.0 95.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  96. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  97. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  98. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  99. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  100. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  101. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  102. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  103. 103.0 103.1 103.2 103.3 103.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  104. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  105. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  106. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
    Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  107. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  108. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  109. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  110. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  111. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  112. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  113. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
    Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  114. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  115. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  116. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  117. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  118. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  119. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  120. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  121. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  122. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  123. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  124. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  125. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  126. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  127. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  128. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  129. 129.0 129.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  130. 130.0 130.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  131. 131.0 131.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  132. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  133. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  134. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  135. 135.0 135.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  136. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  137. 137.0 137.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  138. 138.0 138.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  139. 139.0 139.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  140. 140.0 140.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  141. 141.0 141.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  142. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  143. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  144. 144.0 144.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  145. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  146. 146.0 146.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  147. 147.0 147.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  148. 148.0 148.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  149. 149.0 149.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  150. 150.0 150.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  151. 151.0 151.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  152. 152.0 152.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  153. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  154. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  155. 155.0 155.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  156. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  157. 157.0 157.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  158. 158.0 158.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  159. 159.0 159.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  160. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  161. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  162. 162.0 162.1 162.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  163. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  164. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  165. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  166. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  167. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  168. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  169. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  170. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  171. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  172. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  173. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  174. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  175. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  176. 176.0 176.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  177. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  178. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  179. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  180. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  181. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  182. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  183. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  184. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  185. Paul Karp, (29 August 2017), Coalition for Marriage ad blitz links marriage equality to gender education: No campaign ads claim schools will allow boys to wear dresses and compel students to role play same-sex relationships, The Guardian. Retrieved 1 September 2017
  186. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  187. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  188. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  189. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  190. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  191. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  192. 192.0 192.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  193. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  194. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  195. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  196. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  197. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  198. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  199. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  200. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  201. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  202. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  203. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  204. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  205. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  206. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  207. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  208. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  209. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  210. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  211. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  212. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  213. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  214. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  215. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  216. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  217. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  218. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  219. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  220. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  221. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  222. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  223. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  224. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  225. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  226. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  227. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  228. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  229. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  230. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  231. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  232. Press Conference With Senator The Hon. Mathias Cormann, Acting Special Minister Of State (8 August 2017), Parliament House, Canberra. Retrieved 24 September 2017
  233. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links