Belarusian referendum, 1996

A seven-question referendum was held in Belarus on 24 November 1996. Four questions were put forward by President Alexander Lukashenko on changing the date of the country's independence day, amending the constitution, changing laws on the sale of land and the abolition of the death penalty. The Supreme Council put forward three questions on constitutional amendments by the Communist and Agrarian factions, local elections and the national finances.

All of Lukashenko's proposals were approved, namely changing Belarus's national day, amending the constitution, and retaining the death penalty and a ban on land sales. Voter turnout was claimed to be 84.1%. However, the referendum, like its 1995 predecessor, was condemned by international organizations including the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, as falling far short of democratic standards, while others described it as a further consolidation of Lukashenko's dictatorship.

Background

In the summer of 1996 President Lukashenko presented constitutional amendments for approval to the Supreme Soviet. However, the Soviet then produced a counterproposal, one provision of which would abolish the position of President. The ensuing power struggle escalated quickly, leading to intervention by Russian officials to try and negotiate a compromise that included declaring that the referendum would not be binding.

Results

Question I: Independence Day

Voters were asked whether Independence Day (Republic Day) should be moved to 3 July, the day of liberation of Belarus from Nazi Germany in World War II.

Choice	Votes	%
For	5,450,830	89.4
Against	646,708	10.6
Invalid/blank votes	83,925	–
Total	6,181,463	100
Registered voters/turnout	7,346,397	84.1
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Question II: Presidential constitutional amendments

Voters were asked whether they approved of constitutional amendments put forward by President Lukashenko, which dramatically increased the president's power. Among other things, these amendments gave Lukashenko's decrees the force of law, gave him near-total control over the budget and extended his term to 2001.

Choice	Votes	%
For	5,175,664	88.2
Against	689,642	11.8
Invalid/blank votes	316,157	–
Total	6,181,463	100
Registered voters/turnout	7,346,397	84.1
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Question III: Sale of land

Voters were asked whether they approved of the free sale of land.

Choice	Votes	%
For	948,756	15.6
Against	5,123,386	84.4
Invalid/blank votes	109,321	–
Total	6,181,463	100
Registered voters/turnout	7,346,397	84.1
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Question IV: Death penalty abolition

Voters were asked whether they approved of the abolition of the death penalty.

Choice	Votes	%
For	1,108,226	18.2
Against	4,972,535	81.8
Invalid/blank votes	100,702	–
Total	6,181,463	100
Registered voters/turnout	7,346,397	84.1
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Question V: Soviet constitutional amendments

Voters were asked whether they approved of the constitutional amendments put forward by the Supreme Soviet.

Choice	Votes	%
For	582,437	10.0
Against	5,230,763	90.0
Invalid/blank votes	368,263	–
Total	6,181,463	100
Registered voters/turnout	7,346,397	84.1
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Question VI: Local elections

Voters were asked whether they approved of the direct elections to local bodies.

Choice	Votes	%
For	1,739,178	28.7
Against	4,321,866	71.3
Invalid/blank votes	120,419	–
Total	6,181,463	100
Registered voters/turnout	7,346,397	84.1
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Question VII: State financing

Voters were asked whether all state expenses should be part of the national budget.

Choice	Votes	%
For	1,989,252	32.8
Against	4,070,261	67.2
Invalid/blank votes	121,950	–
Total	6,181,463	100
Registered voters/turnout	7,346,397	84.1
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Aftermath

Although Lukashenko and the Supreme Soviet had signed the agreement that the Soviet would have the final decision on whether to adopt the constitutional amendments, Lukashenko broke the agreement. After the constitution was promulgated a new House of Representatives was assembled, with only Lukashenko loyalists admitted. Around sixty members of the Supreme Soviet who rejected the new constitution continued to work in the Soviet, which was recognised as the legitimate parliament by the international community.

Controversy

Due to several violations of electoral norms and Lukashenko's use of the state-owned media, Russia and some other CIS countries were the only members of the OCSE to recognise the results.

The Belarusian Helsinki Committee found that:

1. The local referendum commissions that should have been formed by local legislative bodies no later than one month before the referendum, were only set up for 5–7 days;
2. President Lukashenko illegally removed Viktar Hanchar, chairman of the Central Commission for Elections and National Referendums, from office. As a result, the work of the Commission, that was supposed to control the legality of the vote, was paralyzed;
3. By the time early voting began (9 November), polling stations had not been provided with proposed amendments and additions to the Constitutions, so the citizens did not know what they were voting for;
4. Voters were illegally called (and in many cases forced) to vote earlier than the actual date of the referendum. As a result, by the day of the referendum, nearly a quarter of voters has already voted;
5. Ballot papers were printed by the Office of Presidential Affairs of the Republic of Belarus. They were taken to polling stations without passing through the Central Commission for Elections and National Referendums and its regional divisions. There was no accounting for the number of ballots;
6. The referendum was funded not from the state budget, but from unknown "charitable" contributions, which was illegal. The Central Commission for Elections and National Referendums was completely removed from funding the referendum;
7. There was agitation and propaganda in favour of the position of president Lukashenko. In some cases the agitation was carried out directly at polling stations;
8. On the day of the referendum, observers, representatives of political parties and public organizations had obstacles placed in their way in trying to monitoring the voting, they were not allowed to enter the voting stations and were not given information they required;
9. There were numerous violations of the law at polling stations, such as no booths for secret ballots, no draft amendments and additions to the Constitution, voters were allowed to vote without presenting identification documents, seals on ballot boxes have been damaged, evidence of forgery of voter signatures have been found.

The opposition also spoke of rigging of the referendum. According to Siarhiej Kaliakin, head of the Eurocommunist faction of the parliament, 20 to 50 percent of the votes counted have been falsified. Siamion Sharetski, speaker of parliament, called the 1996 referendum "a farce and violence against the people" and said that "the outcome of such a plebiscite could not be accepted either in Belarus nor by the international community". The opposition did not recognise the results of the, not those of the previous referendum held in 1995. The oppositional Conservative Christian Party calls for a return to the Constitution of 1994. Alena Skryhan, the deputy head of Communist fraction of the Parliament in 1996 said that the referendum had led to monopolization of all branches of power by president Lukashenko. Since then, various Belarusian opposition figures and former officials have criticized the referendum, with former Minister of Labour, Aliaksandr Sasnou, calling it a "coup".

External links

• Official 1996 Belarus Referendum data
• Ці быў рэфэрэндум 1996 году паваротным пунктам?
• Фотакроніка-1996
• 24 ноября - вторая годовщина референдума; “Белорусская газета”, 23 ноября 1998 года

Projects of the Constitution

• Parliamentary project (Communist and agrarian deputy groups): (Belarusian), (English) (chapter 10 has been not translated)
• Presidential project (Russian)
• Earlier presidential project (not put into referendum), 20 September 1996 (Russian)