Black Swan Project

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

The Black Swan Project is the project name given by Odyssey Marine Exploration for its discovery and recovery of an estimated US$500 million (£314 million) worth of silver and gold coins, from the ocean floor. The source of the treasure was initially rumored to be the Merchant Royal, which sank near Land's End in 1641.[1] However, the most likely scenario now is that the recovered cargo was being carried by the Nuestra Señora de las Mercedes, which sank off Portugal in 1804. However, there still remains some uncertainty as to the true source of the treasure.[2]

Knowledge of the recovery became public on May 18, 2007 when the company flew 17 tons[3] of coins, mostly silver, from Gibraltar to a secure location of unknown address in Florida, USA. The company did not release the type, date, or nationality of the coins. At the time, Odyssey said that it planned to return to the site to perform an excavation expected to uncover more coins as well as other artifacts.[4] However, a dispute over the ownership of the coins has been winding its way through U. S. courts. Without commenting on the issue of ownership, the courts have so far decided that the treasure should be returned to Spain and, by court order, Odyssey is shipping it to them. Odyssey said it would pursue all legal avenues still open to it, taking the case to the U. S. Supreme Court if necessary. Odyssey intended to file its Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court on or before February 27, 2012. On February 27, 2012 the ship's treasure was flown back to Spain where it is expected that the coins will be distributed to museums.

Ship identity

Odyssey Marine stated on 21 May 2007 that most of the recovered coins and treasure are believed to be from a particular shipwreck, but it was likely that artifacts from other wrecks had also been mixed in and were recovered. Odyssey said that due to the location of the ship in an area known to contain a large number of colonial-era wrecks, the identity of the ship would not be disclosed pending further examination of the coins and artifacts.[1] It was also thought the treasure might be from a ship that Odyssey had petitioned a federal court for permission to salvage, which was located off the southwest coast of the United Kingdom,[1] within a five-mile (8 km) radius of Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found..[5]

Mike Johnson initially speculated that the treasure might be from the wreck of the English merchant ship Merchant Royal, which sank on 23 September 1641 whilst returning to London. That ship sank in heavy weather when its pumps failed to keep up with the water leaking through the hull planks. Over half the crew, including the captain, John Limbrey, were able to abandon ship and were rescued by a sister-ship, Dover Merchant, which was accompanying Merchant Royal from Cadiz to London. The survivors provided a detailed description of the lost cargo — described in 1641 as "300,000 Pounds in silver, 100,000 Pounds in gold, and as much again in jewel" — as well as a general location near the Isles of Scilly, about "21 leagues" (about 35 to 40 miles) from Lands End.[6]

In 2005, the co-founder of Odyssey Marine, Greg Stemm, had admitted to British shipwreck expert, Richard Larn, that his firm was searching for the Merchant Royal.[citation needed] Odyssey Marine's sonar search ships trolled the area extensively in 2005 and 2006, frequently calling in Falmouth for crew rest.[4] The Odyssey crew continued to search for the ship on the Discovery Channel 2009 television show Treasure Quest (filmed in 2008). Pictures of the coins released by Odyssey have had their markings obscured to prevent identification. However, from examining the edges of the coins it appears that they come from the middle of the 18th century — too late to be from the Merchant Royal.[7]

Rare coin expert Nick Bruyer, who examined a sample of 6,000 coins from the wreck, said of the discovery, "For this colonial era, I think (the find) is unprecedented... I don't know of anything equal or comparable to it."[3] He also believes much or all of the coinage is uncirculated.[3] The finds were shipped in a chartered jet to an undisclosed location in the United States to be examined.[3][6] Odyssey said they expected the wreck to become one of the "most publicised in history".[6] The entire operation is thought to have taken years and cost millions.[4]

Filing of claims

In order to establish a legal claim to the recovered cargo, Odyssey filed in U.S. court for an arrest of the cargo on April 4, 2007 and then published notice of that arrest on May 7, 2007. On May 31, 2007, the Spanish government, pursuant to the notice of the arrest, filed a claim against the recovered cargo based on the claim that the silver and gold coins recovered by Odyssey Marine came from a Spanish vessel, the Nuestra Señora de las Mercedes, a 36-gun Spanish frigate that went down off the Portuguese coast en route from Montevideo to Cádiz. The Mercedes, which was sunk by British Navy ships in October 1804, was known to be carrying more than a million silver dollars.

In January 2008, a US Federal Court in Tampa ordered Odyssey Marine to disclose details of the wreck site to the Spanish government and for both to return to court in March. During those proceedings, Odyssey Marine stated that its Black Swan treasure was recovered in the Atlantic approximately 180 miles (290 km) west of Portugal. That location would appear to rule out the Merchant Royal (which sank much further north in the Atlantic), and the Mercedes (which sank approximately 30 nautical miles (56 km) off the Portuguese coast), and HMS Sussex (which sank inside the Strait of Gibraltar.)[citation needed] The recovered bullion, being predominately silver coins, with some gold coins and copper ingots, strongly suggests it came from a colonial-era Spanish ship that sank while transporting newly minted silver from South America to Spain.[citation needed]

Salvage law in international waters, as recognized by some English speaking countries, could award 90% of recovered treasure to the salvage firm.[8] Spain claimed the entire ownership of the wreck and cargo, saying that it would pay no salvage award at all for the recovery because the cargo of the Mercedes would be protected by sovereign immunity, which supersedes admiralty law.[citation needed] Because some of the recovered coins were minted in Lima, the Peruvian government also laid claim to the treasure. In 2008, Jose Jimenez, a senior official with the Spanish Ministry of Culture stated that Spain would be willing to share the treasure 'out of a sense of a common cultural heritage'.[9] However, Peru, as well as the descendents of the merchants who shipped the coins as cargo aboard the Mercedes, are contesting Spain's right to the treasure, along with Odyssey, in a pending court case.[citation needed]

Dispute

Spain said it would exercise all of its jurisdictional rights in the event that the find is part of Spain's heritage.[10] The Spanish Government is believed to be investigating whether a crime has been committed by, or as part of the project and is concerned that the coins might not come from the Merchant Royal at all, but from HMS Sussex, which lies off Gibraltar in international waters, within 12 miles (19 km) of Gibraltar, and contrary to international norms claimed by Spain.[11][12] Both of these claims were denied by Odyssey Marine Exploration in a press release.[13] The exploration agreement reached in January 2007 between Odyssey Marine and the regional government required that official observers, approved by Andalucia, be present when the Odyssey Explorer resumes exploration of the wreck site.

On July 12, 2007, the vessel Ocean Alert belonging to Odyssey Marine was seized off Europa Point (Gibraltar) by the Spanish Civil Guard and sent to Algeciras to be searched. The seizure occurred at around 07:00 GMT soon after the ship left Gibraltar. Odyssey Marine claims the ship was in International Waters thereby rendering the seizure illegal.[14] The guard was investigating a possible "offence against Spanish historic heritage", it said in a statement.[15] Odyssey said the boarding was illegal and said the Civil Guard threatened to use force if Ocean Alert's captain did not follow orders. It said Spain had earlier promised the ship would be searched at sea.[15]

Seven hours after the detention of the Ocean Alert, the Spanish authorities decided to return passports and official documents to some members of the crew, and allowing some to leave.[16] The survey vessel was cleared for departure by the Spanish Civil Guard on July 14, 2007.

The Spanish Government stated that it considers it acted within its own territorial waters. The UK argued that the incident took place in international waters and was therefore illegal.[citation needed] However, Spain verbally stated its claim over the waters that it does not recognise Gibraltar waters except within the port of Gibraltar and that all waters up to 12 miles (19 km) from its coastline it claims, are considered Spanish waters.[17]

On July 26, 2007 Odyssey Marine Exploration was granted two of the three motions for an Extension of Time to file its responses to the Spain's Motions for More Definite Statements in the three admiralty arrests which Odyssey currently has pending at the U.S. District Court that has assumed jurisdiction over the sites.[18]

On October 16, 2007, Spain seized another vessel, Odyssey Explorer owned by Odyssey Marine Exploration as it sailed out of port from the British overseas territory of Gibraltar. The Odyssey Explorer captain, Sterling Vorus, claimed to have been in International Waters, but was forced to dock at Algeciras under what Vorus declared was "threat of deadly force." Once in port, Vorus was eventually arrested for disobedience after refusing inspection of the vessel without first receiving approval of Odyssey Explorer's flag state, the Commonwealth of the Bahamas. Vorus was released the following day. Aboard the Odyssey Explorer at the time of seizure, were about a dozen journalists and photographers, all of which had their video tapes, tape recorders, and computer memory storage devices seized by Spanish officials.[19]

On June 4, 2009, a U.S. magistrate judge in Tampa, Florida (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida) determined from written submissions that the treasure had come from the Spanish warship, "Nuestra Senora de las Mercedes". Declaring that he lacked jurisdiction to proceed with the case, he ruled in favor of Spain's claim of sovereign immunity. Odyssey Marine stated it planned to appeal the ruling (07CV614-reportandrecommendation-odyssey).[20]

On December 22, 2009, a U.S. district judge validated the magistrate's report and recommendations, but stayed the order to turn over the treasure to Spain until the Appeals process was completed. "The ineffable truth of this case is that the Mercedes is a naval vessel of Spain and that the wreck of this naval vessel, the vessel's cargo, and any human remains are the natural and legal patrimony of Spain," said the judge in his order.[21]

In January 2011, Odyssey Marine claimed that the language used in recently leaked diplomatic cables showed that the US State Department had been involved with negotiations to assist the Spanish government in receiving the treasure in exchange for the return of allegedly stolen artwork to a US private citizen. The US State Department declined comment while Spain denied Odyssey Marine's claim.[22] The Department of State's Office of Inspector General subsequently investigated the charges in response to a request by Representative Kathy Castor of Florida. In March 2011, it determined that it could find no evidence of a connection between the Black Swan case and the negotiations for the return of the artwork in question (a Pissaro painting).[23]

In September 2011, The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the lower court's determination that the unidentified ship was in fact the "Nuestra Senora de las Mercedes" and ruled that Odyssey Marine Exploration must return the 17 tons of silver coins and other recovered treasures to the Spanish government. The text of the decision can be found by searching the Appeals Court's opinions database for case no. 10-10269.[24] The Court's decision rested mainly on its interpretation of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and on the principle of comity. It said, "We do not hold the recovered [treasure] is ultimately Spanish property. Rather, we merely hold the sovereign immunity owed the shipwreck of the Mercedes also applies to any cargo the Mercedes was carrying when it sank."

January 31, 2012, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta rejected a motion from Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. to stay the same court's November decision ordering the company to turn over the hoard.[25]

On February 9, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an emergency application for a stay filed by Odyssey Marine, which said it wanted to maintain possession of a half billion dollars' worth of gold and silver coins until a final decision is made about who owns them. Justice Clarence Thomas, who has jurisdiction over applications from Florida, denied without comment the motion in Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc. v. Kingdom of Spain. Odyssey Marine Exploration had made an emergency appeal to the high court in an attempt to block a lower court's order last week that it turn over the treasure to Spain.[26]

Conclusion

On February 17, 2012, it was reported that U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark Pizzo ordered Odyssey to return the coins to Spain by February 24, 2012, where they will be dispersed to museums, not to heirs. The Supreme Court declined to stay this order and Odyssey will abide by the decision.[27] On February 24, 2012, two C-130 Hercules aircraft from the Ejército del Aire Español picked up the treasure in Florida and transported it to Spain.[28] Odyssey petitioned the Supreme Court to reconsider the issues in the case but on May 14, 2012, the court declined to take up the appeal.[29] The coins have been returned to Spain, whereby Spanish law dictates that they can never be sold to the Public.

As of April 2015, the treasure is on display at the Archaeological Museum of Alicante, as part of an extensive exhibit relating to the sinking of the ship, and the recovery of the treasure.

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[dead link]
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Shipwreck yields historic riches — US$500M worth - CNN — Obtained May 19, 2007
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 How to find a treasure trove - BBC News — Obtained May 19, 2007
  5. 500 Million Bucks Under The Sea, from The Smoking Gun
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Record wreck 'found off Cornwall' - BBC News - Obtained May 19, 2007
  7. Stop, that's our treasure, Spain tells Britain - The Times - Obtained June 23, 2007
  8. "Battle for the Black Swan," Discovery Channel, Apr. 4, 2009
  9. http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/06/08/spain.treasure/index.html Spain's lost treasure battle in U.S. court
  10. Sunken treasure stirs suspicion in Spain: Hundreds of millions of dollars in loot found at bottom of ocean could be part of country's heritage, Madrid government says By Alan Freeman, The Globe and Mail, May 23, 2007
  11. Spain Probes Treasure Hunters - The Guardian, May 21, 2007
  12. Spain suspicious over £250 m treasure haul - The Independent, May 21, 2007
  13. Odyssey Provides "Black Swan" Shipwreck Information Update - News release from Odyssey's official website — Obtained May 23, 2007
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. 15.0 15.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. http://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/notablecases/opinions/07cv614-reportandrecommendation-odyssey.pdf
  21. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. http://oig.state.gov/documents/organization/159287.pdf
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links