Buyla inscription

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Buyla)
Jump to: navigation, search
The Buyla Inscription
280px
The buckled bowl bearing the Buyla inscription.
Material gold
Created Middle or Late Avar Period (670 AD – 800 AD)
Discovered 1799 near Nagyszentmiklós (today Sânnicolau Mare in Timiş County, Romania)
Present location Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna

The Buyla inscription is a 9-word, 56-character inscription written in the Greek alphabet but in a non-Greek language. It is found on a golden buckled bowl or cup which is among the pieces of the Treasure of Nagyszentmiklós[1][2] which are now in the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna.[1][3] The bowl is 12 cm in diameter and weighs 212 g, and has a handle or buckle, perhaps for hanging on a belt. The inscription is found around the outside of a circular design in the middle of the bowl. In the place where the inscription begins and ends, there is a cross. The inscription reads: ΒΟΥΗΛΑ·​ΖΟΑΠΑΝ·​ΤΕϹΗ·​ΔΥΓΕΤΟΙΓΗ·​ΒΟΥΤΑΟΥΛ·​ΖΩΑΠΑΝ·​ΤΑΓΡΟΓΗ·​ΗΤΖΙΓΗ·​ΤΑΙϹΗ.[4]

Prevailing opinion is that the language of the text is a Turkic language, and several translations have been proposed, though none are agreed upon.[1][5][2] Vilhelm Thomsen translated the inscription: "Boila zoapan finished this bowl [this drinking cup], which Boutaoul zoapan made suitable for hanging up."[6] Nikola Mavrodinov translated it: "Bouila zoapan made this cup; Boutaul Zoapan made this cup suitable for drinking from."[6] Gyula Németh translated it: "Boila chaban's bowl, which was made to his order; Boutaoul had a buckle made for it, and this is his bowl."[6] Paul Lazăr Tonciulescu translated it: "Jupan Buila [has] all rights, jupan Butaul [has the right of] entering [in] all towns.[7]

Description

The treasure of Nagyszentmiklós

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Main article: Treasure of Nagyszentmiklós

The treasure of Nagyszentmiklós, of which the bowl is a part, consists of 23 decorated gold vessels weighing around 10 kg.[8][9][3] It was found in 1799 on the banks of the Aranca river, near Nagyszentmiklós (today Sânnicolau Mare in Timiş County, Romania),[10][3][11] in the region of Avar settlement in the Carpathian Basin.[12] It was also attributed to the lower Danube Bulgars,[13] but the current view is that the treasure is of Avar origin and closely related to the Avar culture.[14][12][13][15]

The objects were made by specialized craftsmen in the 7th and 8th centuries[14][16][12] and were hoarded by local lords.[17][18] The treasure was last "used" and buried in the second half of the 8th century or perhaps in the early 9th century.[12][18]

Some of the vessels bear runiform inscriptions. Similar characters can be found on a bone needle case excavated in the Late Avar cemetery of Szarvas (in Békés County, Hungary) and dated to the second half of the 8th century.[8][19] Based on this evidence, some scholars proposed a similar date for the Nagyszentmiklós inscriptions.[8][11]

The inscription

A drawing of the inscription made by József Hampel.

The Buyla inscription is engraved in Greek letters on the inner bottom of a round buckled bowl (no. 21 in József Hampel's list), on a flat ring surrounding a lavishly decorated disk.[20][21]

The inscription has the following text, easily readable, and uses a 'C'-shaped glyph for sigma:[22][23][21]

† ΒΟΥΗΛΑ • ΖΟΑΠΑΝ • ΤΕϹΗ • ΔΥΓΕΤΟΙΓΗ • ΒΟΥΤΑΟΥΛ • ΖΩΑΠΑΝ • ΤΑΓΡΟΓΗ • ΗΤΖΙΓΗ • ΤΑΙϹΗ

The lower case equivalent is:

† βουηλα • ζοαπαν • τεση • δυγετοιγη • βουταουλ • ζωαπαν • ταγρογη • ητζιγη • ταιση

The transliteration is:

† bouēla • zoapan • tesē • dugetoigē • boutaoul • zōapan • tagrogē • ētzigē • taisē

Paleographic and epigraphic considerations

Some of the letters of the inscription have distinctive shapes. The letters sigma and epsilon have broad arcs.[24] The base line of delta juts out on both sides.[25] Beta has also a prominent base line, a form found in the Greek inscriptions from Bulgaria dated to the early 9th century,[24][26][27] but otherwise it is rarely attested in the Greek-writing world: only[24][26] on several Cherson coins of the Byzantine emperor Basil I (867-886)[26][27][28] and also on one inscription of the same emperor, found in Mesembria (today Nesebar, Bulgaria).[26][29] The shape of alpha is also attested on the 9th century Greek inscriptions from Bulgaria.[24] On the other hand, omega's unusual shape, with a middle vertical line higher than the rounded sides, is specific for the 6th century Greek inscriptions and the oldest forms of the Greek Uncial script.[24][30]

Vowels

In this inscription there is a free alternation between ε and αι, η and ι, and ο and ω.[31][32] These groups became homophones in Koine Greek, merging to /ɛ/, /i/ and /o/.[31][33] Also ου was read /u/,[33] υ was read /y/,[34][32][33] and οι was read either /y/[34][33] or /ø/.[35]

Interpretations

In the late 19th century, József Hampel suggested that the treasure of Nagyszentmiklós was buried by Gepids in the 4th or 5th century AD,[36][37] and attempted to decipher the text of the inscription using the Greek language. Three words end in -γη, which was read by Hampel as the Greek γῆ = "land, country". He concluded that the inscription records two Gepid princes, Bouila and Boutaoul, and the three lands they ruled: Tagro, Etzi and Dygetoi.[38][39][40] The last toponym was connected with the Getae of the Classical Antiquity.[41][40] This interpretation was sharply criticized by Vilhelm Thomsen and Gyula Németh, who showed that the language of the inscription cannot be Greek, but an old Turkic language.[42][43]

Today almost all scholars share the view that the text was written in a Turkic language,[1][44][2] but it has not been deciphered and the exact classification of the language has been a subject of debate.[1][5] It has been often compared with the Turkic Bulgar language of the First Bulgarian Empire,[32][5][27] attested on several 8th-9th century inscriptions found in north-eastern Bulgaria and written in Greek letters.[45] More recently Eugene Helimski argued the language is close to Proto-Tungusic,[46] but this proposal was rejected by Marcel Erdal as far-fetched.[47]

Buyla

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Main articles: Boyar and Boila

It is generally agreed that the first word is the Turkic title buyla or boyla (also spelled boila[48]) which is attested on several Old Turkic and Danube Bulgar inscriptions[49][50] and also mentioned by some 9th and 10th centuries Byzantine authors.[49][51] Some scholars proposed that Buyla should be read as a personal name in this text.[2][49]

Butaul

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Main article: Butaul

Butaul is usually read as a personal name.[2][52][53] It may be interpreted as "son of Buta" with the final -ul being a development of the Turkic oğul = "son".[52][54] This etymology was challenged based on the observation that according to the predominant model of construction of Turkic patronymics, the possessive forms oğlu or oğli are expected.[52][55] Based on the names attested on Old Turkic inscriptions, Erdal posited the reading But Aul.[52]

Zoapan

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Main article: Župan

In 1900, Karl Brugmann derived the Common Slavic *županъ from župa "district, small administrative region",[56] an etymology that was accepted by many linguists.[57] However, others suggested the opposite evolution: župa as a back formation from župan, a title of Iranian etymological origin, generally found among Slavs.

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Alemany 2009, p. 5.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Róna-Tas 1999, pp. 131-132.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 Daim 2003, p. 515.
  4. ↑ Gyula Moravcsik, Byzantinoturcica: Sprachreste der Türkvölker in den byzantinischen Quellen (1983)
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Göbl & Róna-Tas 1995, p. 19.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 according to Gyula László and István Rácz (The treasure of Nagyszentmikloś, 1984)
  7. ↑ Paul Lazăr Tonciulescu - "De la Țara Luanei la Ieud", Editura Miracol, București, 1998
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 Pohl 1988, p. 182.
  9. ↑ Bálint 2010, p. 153.
  10. ↑ Hampel 1885, p. 3.
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 Róna-Tas 1999, p. 131.
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Daim 2003, p. 516.
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 Fiedler 2008, p. 218.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Bálint 2010, pp. 153,155.
  15. ↑ Róna-Tas 1999, p. 132.
  16. ↑ Curta 2006, p. 94.
  17. ↑ Bálint 2010, p. 155.
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 Róna-Tas 1999, pp. 131,264.
  19. ↑ Róna-Tas 1999, pp. 127,131.
  20. ↑ Hampel 1885, p. 44.
  21. ↑ 21.0 21.1 Erdal 1988, p. 221.
  22. ↑ Hampel 1885, p. 47.
  23. ↑ Thomsen 1918, p. 15.
  24. ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 Erdal 1988, p. 222.
  25. ↑ Erdal 1988, pp. 222-223.
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 26.3 Beshevliev 1963, p. 21.
  27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 27.2 Thomsen 1918, p. 27.
  28. ↑ Wroth 1908, pp. 442-443.
  29. ↑ Beshevliev 1952, p. 31.
  30. ↑ Beshevliev 1963, p. 19.
  31. ↑ 31.0 31.1 Thomsen 1918, pp. 18-19.
  32. ↑ 32.0 32.1 32.2 Erdal 1988, p. 223.
  33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 33.2 33.3 Petrounias 2007, pp. 602-605.
  34. ↑ 34.0 34.1 Thomsen 1918, p. 19.
  35. ↑ Erdal 1988, p. 224.
  36. ↑ Hampel 1898, p. 58.
  37. ↑ Göbl & Róna-Tas 1995, p. 14.
  38. ↑ Hampel 1898, pp. 47-51.
  39. ↑ Göbl & Róna-Tas 1995, p. 13.
  40. ↑ 40.0 40.1 Thomsen 1918, p. 17.
  41. ↑ Hampel 1898, pp. 48-50.
  42. ↑ Thomsen 1918, pp. 17-18.
  43. ↑ Göbl & Róna-Tas 1995, pp. 17-18.
  44. ↑ Göbl & Róna-Tas 1995, pp. 18-19.
  45. ↑ Fiedler 2008, pp. 189-191.
  46. ↑ Helimski 2000, pp. 271-277.
  47. ↑ Erdal 2007, p. 79.
  48. ↑ Pohl 1988, pp. 182,305.
  49. ↑ 49.0 49.1 49.2 Gobl & Róna-Tas 1995, p. 22.
  50. ↑ Erdal 1988, pp. 225-226.
  51. ↑ Erdal 1988, p. 225.
  52. ↑ 52.0 52.1 52.2 52.3 Erdal 1988, p. 226.
  53. ↑ Gobl & Róna-Tas 1995, p. 23.
  54. ↑ Göbl & Róna-Tas 1995, p. 23.
  55. ↑ Helimski 2000, p. 271.
  56. ↑ Brugmann 1900, p. 111.
  57. ↑ Alemany 2009, p. 7.

Bibliography

  • * Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

http://bolgnames.com/Images/Treasure_1.pdf http://bolgnames.com/Images/Treasure_2.pdf

Retrieved from "https://infogalactic.com/w/index.php?title=Buyla_inscription&oldid=716951897"