Covariance matrix

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
A bivariate Gaussian probability density function centered at (0, 0), with covariance matrix [ 1.00, 0.50 ; 0.50, 1.00 ].
Sample points from a multivariate Gaussian distribution with a standard deviation of 3 in roughly the lower left-upper right direction and of 1 in the orthogonal direction. Because the x and y components co-vary, the variances of x and y do not fully describe the distribution. A 2×2 covariance matrix is needed; the directions of the arrows correspond to the eigenvectors of this covariance matrix and their lengths to the square roots of the eigenvalues.

In probability theory and statistics, a covariance matrix (also known as dispersion matrix or variance–covariance matrix) is a matrix whose element in the i, j position is the covariance between the i th and j th elements of a random vector (that is, of a vector of random variables). Each element of the vector is a scalar random variable, either with a finite number of observed empirical values or with a finite or infinite number of potential values specified by a theoretical joint probability distribution of all the random variables.

Intuitively, the covariance matrix generalizes the notion of variance to multiple dimensions. As an example, the variation in a collection of random points in two-dimensional space cannot be characterized fully by a single number, nor would the variances in the x and y directions contain all of the necessary information; a 2×2 matrix would be necessary to fully characterize the two-dimensional variation.

Because the covariance of the i th random variable with itself is simply that random variable's variance, each element on the principal diagonal of the covariance matrix is the variance of one of the random variables. Because the covariance of the i th random variable with the j th one is the same thing as the covariance of the j th random variable with the i th one, every covariance matrix is symmetric. In addition, every covariance matrix is positive semi-definite.


Throughout this article, boldfaced unsubscripted X and Y are used to refer to random vectors, and unboldfaced subscripted Xi and Yi are used to refer to random scalars.

If the entries in the column vector

 \mathbf{X} = \begin{bmatrix}X_1 \\ \vdots \\ X_n \end{bmatrix}

are random variables, each with finite variance, then the covariance matrix Σ is the matrix whose (ij) entry is the covariance

= \mathrm{cov}(X_i, X_j) = \mathrm{E}\begin{bmatrix}
(X_i - \mu_i)(X_j - \mu_j)


\mu_i = \mathrm{E}(X_i)\,

is the expected value of the ith entry in the vector X. In other words,

= \begin{bmatrix}
 \mathrm{E}[(X_1 - \mu_1)(X_1 - \mu_1)] & \mathrm{E}[(X_1 - \mu_1)(X_2 - \mu_2)] & \cdots & \mathrm{E}[(X_1 - \mu_1)(X_n - \mu_n)] \\ \\
 \mathrm{E}[(X_2 - \mu_2)(X_1 - \mu_1)] & \mathrm{E}[(X_2 - \mu_2)(X_2 - \mu_2)] & \cdots & \mathrm{E}[(X_2 - \mu_2)(X_n - \mu_n)] \\ \\
 \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \\
 \mathrm{E}[(X_n - \mu_n)(X_1 - \mu_1)] & \mathrm{E}[(X_n - \mu_n)(X_2 - \mu_2)] & \cdots & \mathrm{E}[(X_n - \mu_n)(X_n - \mu_n)]

The inverse of this matrix, \Sigma^{-1} is the inverse covariance matrix, also known as the concentration matrix or precision matrix;[1] see precision (statistics). The elements of the precision matrix have an interpretation in terms of partial correlations and partial variances.[citation needed]

Generalization of the variance

The definition above is equivalent to the matrix equality

 \mathbf{X} - \mathrm{E}[\mathbf{X}]
 \mathbf{X} - \mathrm{E}[\mathbf{X}]
 \right)^{\rm T}

This form can be seen as a generalization of the scalar-valued variance to higher dimensions. Recall that for a scalar-valued random variable X

\sigma^2 = \mathrm{var}(X)
= \mathrm{E}[(X-\mathrm{E}(X))^2] = \mathrm{E}[(X-\mathrm{E}(X))\cdot(X-\mathrm{E}(X))].\,

Indeed, the entries on the diagonal of the covariance matrix \Sigma are the variances of each element of the vector \mathbf{X}.

Correlation matrix

A quantity closely related to the covariance matrix is the correlation matrix, the matrix of Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients between each of the random variables in the random vector \mathbf{X}, which can be written

\text{corr}(\mathbf{X}) = \left(\text{diag}(\Sigma)\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \, \Sigma \, \left(\text{diag}(\Sigma)\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}

where \text{diag}(\Sigma) is the matrix of the diagonal elements of \Sigma (i.e., a diagonal matrix of the variances of X_i for i = 1, \dots, n).

Equivalently, the correlation matrix can be seen as the covariance matrix of the standardized random variables X_i/\sigma(X_i) for i = 1, \dots, n.

Each element on the principal diagonal of a correlation matrix is the correlation of a random variable with itself, which always equals 1. Each off-diagonal element is between 1 and –1 inclusive.

Conflicting nomenclatures and notations

Nomenclatures differ. Some statisticians, following the probabilist William Feller, call the matrix \Sigma the variance of the random vector X, because it is the natural generalization to higher dimensions of the 1-dimensional variance. Others call it the covariance matrix, because it is the matrix of covariances between the scalar components of the vector X. Thus

 (\mathbf{X} - \mathrm{E} [\mathbf{X}])
 (\mathbf{X} - \mathrm{E} [\mathbf{X}])^{\rm T}

However, the notation for the cross-covariance between two vectors is standard:

 (\mathbf{X} - \mathrm{E}[\mathbf{X}])
 (\mathbf{Y} - \mathrm{E}[\mathbf{Y}])^{\rm T}

The var notation is found in William Feller's two-volume book An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications,[2] but both forms are quite standard and there is no ambiguity between them.

The matrix \Sigma is also often called the variance-covariance matrix since the diagonal terms are in fact variances.


For \Sigma=\mathrm{E} \left[ \left( \mathbf{X} - \mathrm{E}[\mathbf{X}] \right) \left( \mathbf{X} - \mathrm{E}[\mathbf{X}] \right)^{\rm T} \right] and  \boldsymbol{\mu} = \mathrm{E}(\textbf{X}), where X is a random p-dimensional variable and Y a random q-dimensional variable, the following basic properties apply:[3]

  1.  \Sigma = \mathrm{E}(\mathbf{X X^{\rm T}}) - \boldsymbol{\mu}\boldsymbol{\mu}^{\rm T}
  2.  \Sigma \, is positive-semidefinite and symmetric.
  3.  \operatorname{cov}(\mathbf{A X} + \mathbf{a}) = \mathbf{A}\, \operatorname{cov}(\mathbf{X})\, \mathbf{A^{\rm T}}
  4.  \operatorname{cov}(\mathbf{X},\mathbf{Y}) = \operatorname{cov}(\mathbf{Y},\mathbf{X})^{\rm T}
  5.  \operatorname{cov}(\mathbf{X}_1 + \mathbf{X}_2,\mathbf{Y}) = \operatorname{cov}(\mathbf{X}_1,\mathbf{Y}) + \operatorname{cov}(\mathbf{X}_2, \mathbf{Y})
  6. If p = q, then \operatorname{var}(\mathbf{X} + \mathbf{Y}) = \operatorname{var}(\mathbf{X}) + \operatorname{cov}(\mathbf{X},\mathbf{Y}) + \operatorname{cov}(\mathbf{Y}, \mathbf{X}) + \operatorname{var}(\mathbf{Y})
  7. \operatorname{cov}(\mathbf{AX} + \mathbf{a}, \mathbf{B}^{\rm T}\mathbf{Y} + \mathbf{b}) = \mathbf{A}\, \operatorname{cov}(\mathbf{X}, \mathbf{Y}) \,\mathbf{B}
  8. If \mathbf{X} and \mathbf{Y} are independent or uncorrelated, then \operatorname{cov}(\mathbf{X}, \mathbf{Y}) = \mathbf{0}

where \mathbf{X}, \mathbf{X}_1 and \mathbf{X}_2 are random p×1 vectors, \mathbf{Y} is a random q×1 vector, \mathbf{a} is a q×1 vector, \mathbf{b} is a p×1 vector, and \mathbf{A} and \mathbf{B} are q×p matrices of constants.

This covariance matrix is a useful tool in many different areas. From it a transformation matrix can be derived, called a whitening transformation, that allows one to completely decorrelate the data[citation needed] or, from a different point of view, to find an optimal basis for representing the data in a compact way[citation needed] (see Rayleigh quotient for a formal proof and additional properties of covariance matrices). This is called principal components analysis (PCA) and the Karhunen-Loève transform (KL-transform).

Block matrices

The joint mean \boldsymbol\mu_{X,Y} and joint covariance matrix \boldsymbol\Sigma_{X,Y} of \boldsymbol{X} and \boldsymbol{Y} can be written in block form

 \boldsymbol\mu_X \\
\end{bmatrix}, \qquad
 \boldsymbol\Sigma_{\mathit{XX}} & \boldsymbol\Sigma_{\mathit{XY}} \\
 \boldsymbol\Sigma_{\mathit{YX}} & \boldsymbol\Sigma_{\mathit{YY}}

where \boldsymbol\Sigma_{XX} = \mbox{var}(\boldsymbol{X}), \boldsymbol\Sigma_{YY} = \mbox{var}(\boldsymbol{Y}), and \boldsymbol\Sigma_{XY} = \boldsymbol\Sigma^T_{\mathit{YX}} = \mbox{cov}(\boldsymbol{X}, \boldsymbol{Y}).

\boldsymbol\Sigma_{XX} and \boldsymbol\Sigma_{YY} can be identified as the variance matrices of the marginal distributions for \boldsymbol{X} and \boldsymbol{Y} respectively.

If \boldsymbol{X} and \boldsymbol{Y} are jointly normally distributed,

\boldsymbol{x}, \boldsymbol{y} \sim\ \mathcal{N}(\boldsymbol\mu_{X,Y}, \boldsymbol\Sigma_{X,Y})

then the conditional distribution for \boldsymbol{Y} given \boldsymbol{X} is given by

\boldsymbol{y}|\boldsymbol{x} \sim\ \mathcal{N}(\boldsymbol\mu_{Y|X}, \boldsymbol\Sigma_{Y|X})

defined by conditional mean

\boldsymbol\mu_Y + \boldsymbol\Sigma_{YX} \boldsymbol\Sigma_{XX}^{-1}
 \mathbf{x} - \boldsymbol\mu_X

and conditional variance

\boldsymbol\Sigma_{YY} - \boldsymbol\Sigma_{\mathit{YX}} \boldsymbol\Sigma_{\mathit{XX}}^{-1} \boldsymbol\Sigma_{\mathit{XY}}.

The matrix ΣYXΣXX−1 is known as the matrix of regression coefficients, while in linear algebra ΣY|X is the Schur complement of ΣXX in ΣX,Y

The matrix of regression coefficients may often be given in transpose form, ΣXX−1ΣXY, suitable for post-multiplying a row vector of explanatory variables xT rather than pre-multiplying a column vector x. In this form they correspond to the coefficients obtained by inverting the matrix of the normal equations of ordinary least squares (OLS).

As a linear operator

Applied to one vector, the covariance matrix maps a linear combination, c, of the random variables, X, onto a vector of covariances with those variables: \mathbf c^{\rm T}\Sigma = \operatorname{cov}(\mathbf c^{\rm T}\mathbf X,\mathbf X). Treated as a bilinear form, it yields the covariance between the two linear combinations: \mathbf d^{\rm T}\Sigma\mathbf c=\operatorname{cov}(\mathbf d^{\rm T}\mathbf X,\mathbf c^{\rm T}\mathbf X). The variance of a linear combination is then \mathbf c^{\rm T}\Sigma\mathbf c, its covariance with itself.

Similarly, the (pseudo-)inverse covariance matrix provides an inner product, \langle c-\mu|\Sigma^+|c-\mu\rangle which induces the Mahalanobis distance, a measure of the "unlikelihood" of c.[citation needed]

Which matrices are covariance matrices?

From the identity just above, let \mathbf{b} be a (p \times 1) real-valued vector, then

\operatorname{var}(\mathbf{b}^{\rm T}\mathbf{X}) = \mathbf{b}^{\rm T} \operatorname{var}(\mathbf{X}) \mathbf{b},\,

which must always be nonnegative since it is the variance of a real-valued random variable. From the symmetry of the covariance matrix's definition it follows that only a positive-semidefinite matrix can be a covariance matrix. Conversely, every symmetric positive semi-definite matrix is a covariance matrix. To see this, suppose M is a p×p positive-semidefinite matrix. From the finite-dimensional case of the spectral theorem, it follows that M has a nonnegative symmetric square root, that can be denoted by M1/2. Let \mathbf{X} be any p×1 column vector-valued random variable whose covariance matrix is the p×p identity matrix. Then[citation needed]

\operatorname{var}(\mathbf{M}^{1/2}\mathbf{X}) = \mathbf{M}^{1/2} (\operatorname{var}(\mathbf{X})) \mathbf{M}^{1/2} = \mathbf{M}.\,

How to find a valid correlation matrix

In some applications (e.g., building data models from only partially observed data) one wants to find the "nearest" correlation matrix to a given symmetric matrix (e.g., of observed covariances). In 2002, Higham[5] formalized the notion of nearness using a weighted Frobenius norm and provided a method for computing the nearest correlation matrix.

Complex random vectors

The variance of a complex scalar-valued random variable with expected value μ is conventionally defined using complex conjugation:


where the complex conjugate of a complex number z is denoted z^{*}; thus the variance of a complex number is a real number.

If Z is a column-vector of complex-valued random variables, then the conjugate transpose is formed by both transposing and conjugating. In the following expression, the product of a vector with its conjugate transpose results in a square matrix, as its expectation:

\right] ,

where Z^\dagger denotes the conjugate transpose, which is applicable to the scalar case since the transpose of a scalar is still a scalar. The matrix so obtained will be Hermitian positive-semidefinite,[6] with real numbers in the main diagonal and complex numbers off-diagonal.


If \mathbf{M}_{\mathbf{X}} and \mathbf{M}_{\mathbf{Y}} are centred data matrices of dimension n-by-p and n-by-q respectively, i.e. with n rows of observations of p and q columns of variables, from which the column means have been subtracted, then, if the column means were estimated from the data, sample correlation matrices \mathbf{Q}_{\mathbf{X}} and \mathbf{Q}_{\mathbf{XY}} can be defined to be

\mathbf{Q}_{\mathbf{X}} = \frac{1}{n-1} \mathbf{M}_{\mathbf{X}}^T \mathbf{M}_{\mathbf{X}}, \qquad \mathbf{Q}_{\mathbf{XY}} = \frac{1}{n-1} \mathbf{M}_{\mathbf{X}}^T \mathbf{M}_{\mathbf{Y}}

or, if the column means were known a-priori,

\mathbf{Q}_{\mathbf{X}} = \frac{1}{n} \mathbf{M}_{\mathbf{X}}^T \mathbf{M}_{\mathbf{X}}, \qquad \mathbf{Q}_{\mathbf{XY}} = \frac{1}{n} \mathbf{M}_{\mathbf{X}}^T \mathbf{M}_{\mathbf{Y}}

These empirical sample correlation matrices are the most straightforward and most often used estimators for the correlation matrices, but other estimators also exist, including regularised or shrinkage estimators, which may have better properties.

As a parameter of a distribution

If a vector of n possibly correlated random variables is jointly normally distributed, or more generally elliptically distributed, then its probability density function can be expressed in terms of the covariance matrix.[citation needed]


In financial economics

The covariance matrix plays a key role in financial economics, especially in portfolio theory and its mutual fund separation theorem and in the capital asset pricing model. The matrix of covariances among various assets' returns is used to determine, under certain assumptions, the relative amounts of different assets that investors should (in a normative analysis) or are predicted to (in a positive analysis) choose to hold in a context of diversification.

See also


  1. Wasserman, Larry (2004). All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference. ISBN 0-387-40272-1.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  2. William Feller (1971). An introduction to probability theory and its applications. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-25709-7. Retrieved 10 August 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  3. Taboga, Marco (2010). "Lectures on probability theory and mathematical statistics".<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  4. Eaton, Morris L. (1983). Multivariate Statistics: a Vector Space Approach. John Wiley and Sons. pp. 116–117. ISBN 0-471-02776-6.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  5. Higham, Nicholas J. (2002). "Computing the nearest correlation matrix—a problem from finance". IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis. 22 (3): 329–343. doi:10.1093/imanum/22.3.329.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  6. Brookes, Mike. "The Matrix Reference Manual". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Further reading