Early American publishers and printers

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
A typical printing press of the 18th century. Religious enthusiasm and the need for bibles and other religious works is largely what promoted the first printing efforts in the colonies. Before and during the American Revolution colonial printers were actively publishing newspapers and pamphlets expressing the strong sentiment against British colonial policy and taxation.

Early American publishers and printers played a central role in the social, religious, political and commercial developments in colonial America, before, during and after the American Revolution. Printing and publishing in the 17th and 18th centuries among the Thirteen Colonies of British North America first emerged as a result of religious enthusiasm and the need for bibles and other religious literature. By the mid 18th century printing took on new proportions with the newspapers that began to emerge, most notably in Boston. When the British Crown began imposing new taxes, many of these newspapers became highly critical and outspoken about the British colonial government, which was widely considered unfair among the colonists.[1][2][3][4]

In the early years of colonial settlement communications between the various colonies, which were often hundreds of miles apart, usually consisted of dispatches, hand-written one at a time, then carried by private carriers to their destinations. Before 1700 there were no newspapers in the colonies, so official news came slowly, especially to those who lived away from the colonial seat of government in the major townships.[5] Colonial law and news overall was therefore not available in comprehensive print form for the common colonist, whose only knowledge of these things was usually passed on by word of mouth from colonial officials, or by means of a simple post in a town square. While many colonists possessed bibles, usually brought over from England, they were generally in short supply, while religious literature overall was lacking in the colonies.[6]

As the remote British Crown in Parliament continued to impose additional taxes, in particular the Stamp Act of 1765, various colonial newspapers and pamphlets began openly criticizing imperial policy with acrimonious accounts of such affairs. These were published by notable printers, like Benjamin Franklin, William Goddard, William Bradford and others, who were politically involved in the controversy with the British Crown over taxation, freedom of the press and other such rights. A number of printers, like Goddard and Bradford, belonged to the Sons of Liberty and used their printing presses as a means of promoting colonial opposition to the Stamp Act and other royal legislation they deemed unfair to them as colonial Englishmen who lacked representation in the Parliament.[7] The open criticism of this advent coming from the press often brought accusations of printing libelous and seditious material.[5][8]

The plentiful historical accounts of the colonial period still have brought little investigation into how printers effected the religious, social and political growth in the colonies. Most scholarship on printers and publishing in the colonies confines itself to either an account of individuals such as Isaiah Thomas in the context of each colony, or only lends itself to the mechanics of printing presses and typography, as does Lawrence Wroth in The Colonial Printer.[9] According to Wroth, the overall subject of early American printing and publishing as it affected political and social issues in the colonies and how it ultimately led to a revolution, which is the focus of this article, has been pursued with a "noticeable reluctance".[4][10]

Colonial newspapers

The Pennsylvania Gazette, May 9, 1754 issue

Newspapers in colonial America served to disseminate vital political, social and religious information which explicitly appealed to the colonist's growing sense of unity with other Americans.[11] This was a cause of great concern to colonial government who felt the mass dissemination of news and opinion undermined their authority.[12] Colonial Boston was the place where the American newspaper was born, and where it was nurtured through its initial stages.[13] Initially newspapers were delivered through the mails at no charge for postage until 1758.[14]

During the first quarter of the eighteenth century, there were twice as many printers in Boston as there were for the rest of the country. There were only six American newspapers where four of them were published in Boston. Moreover, the greater majority of the books and pamphlets of the period bore a Boston imprint, making eastern Massachusetts the literary and typographic center of colonial America.[15]

Colonial newspapers played an active role during the Christian revivalist controversy that occurred in the early 1740s. The controversy centered around Boston, where Thomas Fleet was one of the most visible critics, using his Boston Evening Post to publish criticism against the established Clergy, and the newspaper of Thomas Prince, The Christian History.[16]

On September 25, 1690, the first newspaper to emerge in the British colonies in America was the Publick Occurrences Both Forreign and Domestick, printed and published in Boston by Richard Pierce for Benjamin Harris.[17] Harris had fled England for fear of religious persecution and speaking out against the crown.[18] His newspaper was welcomed and received enthusiastically by the colonists, however, it was not approved or well regarded by the colonial governor, especially since it had no official printing license, required by British law at that time. i.e."no person [was to] keep any printing-press for printing, nor [was] any book, pamphlet or other matter whatsoever" without "especial leave and license first obtained" from the governor. As one historian put it, "the first newspaper published in America became the first to be suppressed by the authorities"[19] In 1695 Harris returned to England where he was arrested for publishing his newspaper.[20] Because Harris' newspaper carried a story about a battle waged by Governor Winthrop during the French and Indian War involving the brutal treatment of French prisoners of war, which angered the authorities, they ordered the immediate suspension of the paper.[21][22] The first successful newspaper in America was The Boston News-Letter which appeared in 1704, and until 1719 it was the only newspaper in the colonies.[23][24]

It was not until 1704 that the colonies' second newspaper, The Boston News-Letter, appeared. Printed by Bartholomew Green for John Campbell, proprietor and Postmaster in Boston, this newspaper was also published in Boston, but had government approval and remained in operation for 74 years until 1776, when the British occupied Boston.[25][26][19] The Hartford Courant is considered to be the oldest continuously published newspaper in the United States, though there is some debate on that status. Before the Stamp Act of 1765 there were twenty-four newspapers among the colonies, save New Jersey, whose news came from newspapers in neighboring Philadelphia and New York.[27] By 1787 Thomas Jefferson expressed the sentiment now shared by many printers over the idea of freedom of the press when he said, "Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter."[28]

Among the dozens of newspapers that existed before and during the American Revolution, many of them proved to be exceptionally noteworthy in terms of criticizing colonial government, promoting freedom of the press, and other freedoms, and furthering the cause for American independence. Newspapers easily accomplished these ends as they had already become indispensable to the colonists who relied on them for information prior to the revolution, and who considered the printed distribution of materials an essential means in keeping the overall community informed, while promoting the ideals of freedom they embraced.[23][29] Newspapers would also play an important role in outlining public debates while the Constitution was being ratified in 1787–1788.[30][31]

The first magazine that appeared in American colonies, The American Monthly Magazine, came from the press of Andrew Bradford in February, 1741, and its editor, John Webbe. Ein Geistliches Magazien, by Sower in 1764, is believed to have been the first religious periodical published in America.[32] In 1719 the Boston Gazette was established in Boston; the first newspaper in Philadelphia, the American Weekly Mercury, was also founded by Andrew Bradford the same year. In 1736 the first newspaper in to emerge in Virginia was the Virginia Gazette,[lower-alpha 1] founded by William Rind In Virginia. Rind was soon appointed public printer. This gazette printed Thomas Jefferson's A Summary View of the Rights of British America in 1774, two years before he drafted the Declaration of Independence.[23][33]

The New-England Courant made its appearance on Monday, August 7, 1721, as the third newspaper to appear in Boston and the fourth in the colonies. Founded in Boston by James Franklin, Benjamin Franklin's older brother, who was started in retaliation[34] for losing his printing job at the Boston Gazette when its ownership changed hands and the printing was given to Samuel Kneeland.[35][36] Writing under the assumed name of Silence Dogood, Benjamin Franklin wrote more than a dozen articles. One such article led to James Franklin's month long imprisonment in 1726 by British colonial authorities for printing what they considered seditious articles after he refused to reveal the identity of the author. After being released, James resumed his printing practice. Franklin's newspaper had been current for only four months when it was ordered shut down, where he was "... strictly forbidden by this Court to print or publish the New-England Courant, or any other pamphlet or paper of the like nature, except it be first supervised by the Secretary of this Province; and the Justices of His Majesty's Sessions of the Peace for the County of Suffolk ... "[37][38][39]

On October 2, 1729, Samuel Keimer, the owner of The Pennsylvania Gazette in Philadelphia, who failed to make a success out of this newspaper, fell into debt and before fleeing to Barbados sold the Gazette to Benjamin Franklin and his partner Hugh Meredith.[40][41][42][lower-alpha 2] Under Franklin The Gazette became the most successful newspaper in the colonies.[44] On December 28, 1732, through the Gazette Franklin announced that he had just printed and published the first edition of The Poor Richard, (better known as Poor Richard's Alamanack) by Richard Saunders, Philomath. The almanack proved to be a huge success with a printing run that lasted more than twenty-five years.[45]

The Pennsylvania Evening Post was the first newspaper to print a copy of the United States' Declaration of Independence

Around 1740 Christopher Sower imported type from the Egenolff-Luther foundry in Frankfurt and used it to print many books, including the 1743 German Bible, the first to be printed in any European language in America.[46] The first printing press constructed in America was made at Germantown, Pennsylvania in 1750. At the same place, in 1772, the first regular foundry for casting type was built by Christopher Sower,[lower-alpha 3] however, its type implements were sent over from Germany and were intended solely for the production of German types.[47] The third press to appear in the colonies. Salem was the third town in the Colonies, in the order of time, to enjoy the advantages of a public printing press.[48]

On June 19, 1744, Franklin took on David Hall as a business partner and made him manager in charge of the Gazette, allowing Franklin the time to pursue his scientific and other interests.[49][50][51] Upon the proposal of the Stamp Act, Hall warned Franklin that subscribers to their newspaper were already cancelling their accounts in anticipation of the unpopular tax — not over an increase in the cost it would place on the newspaper, but on principle.[52][lower-alpha 4] After buying out Franklin in May 1766, Hall took on another partner and established a new firm of Hall and Sellers which printed the Continental paper currency issued by Congress during the American Revolutionary War.[53][54]

James Davis came to the North Carolina province in 1749, answering a call by their Assembly for an official printer to print their laws, legal journals and paper currency. He became the first printer to establish a print shop in that colony and in the process, founded and printed North Carolina's first newspaper, the North-Carolina Gazette.[55][56] In 1755 Benjamin Franklin appointed Davis as the first postmaster of North Carolina.[57]

The first newspaper established in Connecticut was The Connecticut Gazette in New Haven, on April 12, 1755, a weekly newspaper issued every Friday, by James Parker, in New Haven.[58][59][60] As the premier newspaper in that colony, it functioned as a military record in reporting the events of the French and Indian War. Parker's partner was Benjamin Franklin who often helped printers in getting started. That year Parker also published ten religious pamphlets, five almanacs and two New York newspapers. He rarely visited New Haven and left his junior partner, John Holt, as the editor of the newspaper. The Gazette had, for a time, a large circulation throughout the Connecticut Colony. The Gazette was continued by Parker & Company till 1764, was briefly suspended, but was later revived by Benjamin Mecom. Its motto, printed on its front page read, "Those who would give up Essential Liberty, to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety". The Gazette, like other newspapers of that period, was highly critical of the Stamp Act.[59][61]

The Providence Gazette was first published October 20, 1762, by William Goddard, and later with his sister Mary Katherine Goddard, at the time the only newspaper printed in Providence. The paper was published weekly and passionately defended the rights of the colonies before the revolution and ably supported the cause of the country during the war. After American independence was established following the war it continued to promote federal republican principles.[62]

The Pennsylvania Chronicle, published by William Goddard, first number appeared January 6, 1767. This was the fourth newspaper to be printed in the English language established in Philadelphia, and the first with four columns to a page, printed in the northern colonies.[63]

The Pennsylvania Evening Post was a newspaper published for the duration of the American Revolutionary War, by Benjamin Towne, from 1775 to 1783. It was the first newspaper to publish the United States Declaration of Independence, and was the first daily newspaper in the United States.[64][65] By 1740 there were sixteen newspapers in the British colonies, all weeklies. By the time of the American Revolution in 1775, there were some thirty-seven newspapers in business, routinely publishing literature promoting colonial independence from Britain.[23]

Freedom of the Press evolution

File:Printing Tercentenary 3c 1939 issue U.S. stamp.jpg
In 1939 the U.S. Post Office issued a stamp depicting Daye's printing press, commemorating the 300th anniversary of printing in colonial America.

Many printers in England who were printing literature promoting the English Reformation fled England to the European continent or to the new world to escape religious and political prosecution under the reigns of King Henry VIII and Queen Mary I, both Catholics who were trying, unsuccessfully, to reverse the Reformation movement during their reigns.[66] John Daye, who was printing and distributing Protestant literature and pamphlets, and who brought the first printing press over to the colonies was a definitive example of this advent.[67] At the same time there was a need for the General Assembly to establishment a press and appoint an official printer to perform the printing of legislative acts.[68] Salem was the third town in the Colonies, after Cambridge and Boston, to see the introduction of a printing press.[69]

With the invention of the printing press a powerful tool was given to the common class who naturally was inclined to publicly challenge monarchial authority. In relatively little time the potential influence of the printing press became evident in many countries and increased with the years, despite all the efforts at censorship by the ruling class.[4]

Before 1660 prosecutions involving seditious news accounts were virtually unknown in the colonies, but a pattern of change became evident in the latter 1600s. Prosecutions involving sedition climbed from a low of only 0.7 percent in the 1660s to 15.1 percent by the 1690s. Despite the fact that the alleged cases almost always involved the truth, they were clearly on the rise in the colonies.[70] Historian Larry D. Eldridge notes that there were 1,244 seditious speech prosecutions before the Zenger case, and has drawn from the court records of every colony that existed before 1700.[71] During this time many writers accordingly felt it necessary to write under an assumed name for fear of prosecution and confiscation of their printing presses.[72][73]

Many printers were accused of sedition and libel for publishing critical accounts of colonial authority. The first such significant case of press censorship presented itself during the trial of Thomas Maule in 1696, when he publicly criticized the conduct of Quakers during one of the Salem Witch Trials. For publishing his work, Truth Held Forth and Maintained, he was arraigned as the first person in the province to be prosecuted for the crime of libel. Maule was sentenced to receive ten lashings for saying that Rev. John Higginson "preached lies, and that his instruction was the doctrine of devils."[74][75]

Benjamin Franklin became the most active printer and publisher in the colonies beginning in the early 18th century.

Newport in Rhode Island, with the 1727 arrival of James Franklin was the fourth town in New England where a printing press operation was introduced.[68] Franklin had removed to the more liberal town of Newport from Boston because of the ordeals he had experienced when he criticized various official and religious dignitaries in his newspaper, The New-England Courant, which he was jailed for in 1722.[76][lower-alpha 5]

Another definitive example involved the trial of John Peter Zenger who was tried for libel in New York in 1735 for allegedly libeling Governor William Cosby, but was freed on the basis that Zenger's account was true. The now landmark case proved to be an importance step toward establishing freedom of the press in the colonies. The British government subsequently felt that the printing and publishing trade as practiced in the colonies undermined their authority.[75]

While the technology of printing saw little change from the middle of the seventeenth century to the end of the eighteenth, its usefulness broadened considerably during this time. The first printing press arrived in the colonies in 1638 and belonged to British printer Stephen Daye[lower-alpha 6] and was part of the founding of Harvard University. This press was established to allow the printing of religious works without fear of interference from Parliament. Its first printing turned out the Freeman's Oath, published in January 1639.[77][78][24] Both the college and its press were outgrowths of the Puritan commitment to learning and religious literacy. Printing presses, books and newspapers were primarily found in the northern colonies, as the southern colonies were either royal or proprietary and were not allowed to govern themselves as much as those in the north during their early histories.[78]

In 1752 Jonathan Mayhew, the founder of Unitarian Church in America, openly criticized the colonial government in Massachusetts. One of Mayhew's sermons, during an election, strongly promoted the Republican form of government. His sermon was published just after the colonial Assembly passed a bill imposing various custom duties. The bill was strongly attacked in a pamphlet from the offices of Samuel Adams' newspaper, The Independent Advertiser. The bill was derided as the " Monitor of Monitors," claiming that the Legislature was tartly handled. Immediately after the publication of Mayhew's sermon, it became the cause for alarm and consternation among the colonial authorities. David Fowle, the printer, brother of Zechariah Fowle, also a printer, was arrested and, for refusing to divulge the name of the writer of the newspaper article, was sent to jail and harsly interrogated for several days.[79] Fowle became disgusted with the Government of Massachusetts and removed to Portsmouth and bought out New Hampshire Gazette, where he would publicly criticize the Stamp Act of 1765.[80]

Stamp Act of 1765

Newspapers with black borders protesting the Stamp Act
New Hampshire Gazette, October 31, 1765 issue
The Pennsylvania Journal, October 31, 1765 issue

With the passage of the Stamp Act in 1765, which imposed a tax on newspapers and advertisements, deeds, wills, claims, indentures, contracts and other such legal documents,[81][lower-alpha 7] printers began publishing highly polemic accounts challenging the morality of the Stamp Act – an effort that often invited charges of sedition and libel. Newspaper printers and publishers felt the new tax would greatly increase the costs of their newspapers and other publications, and would likely cause much of their readership to drop their subscriptions.[84] Many newspaper editors protested the Stamp Act by printing editions with black boarders along the edges, and often included articles which strongly derided the Stamp Act.[85][86] The passage of the act also caused many printers to suspend their publications rather than to pay what they strongly felt was an unfair tax and an imposition on their livelihood, subsequently uniting them in their opposition to its legislation. Newspapers were the vehicle that asserted the greatest social and political pressure on the Stamp Act and were instrumental in its repeal less than a year later.[87][83]

In one definitive example, The Constitutional Courant was a single issue colonial American newspaper published in response to the Stamp Act. Printed by William Goddard under the assumed name of Andrew Marvel, the newspaper vociferously attacked the Stamp Act in strong language, which caught the attention of colonial printers and royal colonial officials alike.[88][89][90] Other examples included The Halifax Gazette which also published a highly critical account, proclaiming that "The people of the province were disgusted with the stamp act." The damning paragraph gave great offense to the royal government of that province, and its publisher, Anthony Henry, was called to account for printing what the Crown considered to be sedition.[91]

The Sons of Liberty took an active role by intimidating those royal officials charged with its operation and collection of taxes.[92][93] As newspapers continued to openly criticize the Stamp Act the often violent protests spread, causing many tax collecting commissioners throughout the colonies to quit their jobs. Benjamin Franklin, while serving as colonial agent in London, had warned the Parliament that the act would only serve to create animosity between the colonies and the British Crown. After much protest the act was repealed in 1766. Newspaper coverage of the Stamp Act, and public protests, marked the first serious colonial challenge to British rule over the colonies.[94][83]

Religious printing

File:The Whole Booke of Psalms, printed in 1640, title page.jpg
Book of Psalms, translated into English, printed by Stephen Daye, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1640. First book printed in British North America

Religious perspectives became prominent in colonial American literature during the later 17th-century and into the 18th-century, and were mostly found in Puritan writings and publications,[95][lower-alpha 8] often resulting in charges of libel and sedition levied by the British Crown. The Puritans already had a history for being persecuted for printing and distributing their views in England, openly criticizing the Church of England. In 1637 King Charles passed a Star Chamber decree that outlined thirty-three regulations which provided for the complete control and censoring of any religious, political or other literature they deemed seditious or otherwise questionable. Among other regulations, it forbade any literature that criticized the Church of England, the State, or the government.[97][lower-alpha 9] The decree bore hard upon all minority parties, but with special severity upon Catholics, Puritans, and separatists. The provisions also gave the authority for the punishment of unlawful publications in the colonies where such impositions were employed in an effort to silence the Puritans. Archbishop William Laud in particular was the most persistent in preventing and punishing unauthorized printing of religious, political and other material. By 1730, however, enforcing these provisions, in the colonies, which included the licensing of printing presses, prior approval of literature slated for publication, etc., became increasingly difficult.[99][100][101]

In 1752 Samuel Kneeland and his partner Bartholomew Green, commissioned by Daniel Henchman, printed an edition of the King James Bible that was the first Bible printed in America in the English language. As the British Crown owned the printing rights it was illegal to print this Bible in America.[102] Subsequently the printing was conducted as privately as possible and bore the London imprint of the copy from which it was copied, to avoid prosecution and detection of the unauthorized printing.[103] In the process Kneeland was printing the first Bible ever produced from the Boston Press.[104]

In 1663 English Puritan missionary John Eliot over the course of forty years, attracted some eleven hundred Indians to the Christian faith, and established fourteen reservations, or "praying towns" for his followers. Along with other religious works, he published what came to be known as the Eliot Indian Bible. Printed by Samuel Green it was the first Bible published in British-American colonies in an effort to introduce Christianity to the Indian peoples. Eliot's Bible was a translation of the Geneva Bible into the Algonquian language commonly spoken by the Indians in Massachusetts.[105][106]

In Philadelphia, 1692, where printer William Bradford, following several minor quarrels with the colonial authorities for printing works without a license, Bradford became embroiled in a sectarian dispute by taking the side of George Keith in his quarrel with the Quaker oligarchy and ended up on trial for seditious libel.[107]

File:Jefferson, a bill for establishing religious freedom.jpg
Thomas Jefferson's Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom. Broadside, printed in Williamsburg in 1779, is the earliest known printed version of the proposed bill.[108][lower-alpha 10]

Cotton Mather was a Puritan minister in New England and a prolific author of books and pamphlets and is considered one of the most important intellectual figures in colonial America. Mather made free use of the presses in the New England colonies, sometimes in an effort to counter the attacks made on Puritans by George Keith and others. Between 1724 and 1728 he printed sixty-three titles on colonial presses. He is noted for his Magnalia Christi Americana, published in 1702, which outlines the religious development of Massachusetts, and other nearby colonies in New England from 1620 to 1698. In an effort to promote Puritan ethics, he wrote, Ornaments for the Daughters of Zion, written for the benefit of young women on appropriate dress and behavior. He became a controversial figure for his involvement in the events surrounding the Salem witch trials of 1692–1693.[110][111][112]

Jonas Green, a protégé of Benjamin Franklin in Philadelphia, and members of the Green family had been engaged in operating the presses of the Puritan colonies. For twenty-eight years Green was the public printer to the Province of Maryland.[113] Joseph Galloway,[lower-alpha 11] a close friend of Franklin, opposed the Revolution as a Tory, and by 1778 had fled to England. Like many Tories he believed, as he asserted in this pamphlet, that the Revolution was, to a considerable extent, a religious quarrel, caused by Presbyterians[lower-alpha 12] and Congregationalists and the circular letters and other accounts they had printed and distributed.[115] Benjamin Franklin, however, raised as a Presbyterian, who for a time became a Deist, then a non-denominational Protestant Christian,[116] realized the value of printing and promoting overall religious values as a means of strengthening the social fabric and as a means of uniting the colonies in their opposition to British rule.[117][lower-alpha 13] Franklin ultimately published more religious works than any other eighteenth-century American printer.[119]

Thomas Dobson, who arrived in Philadelphia in 1754 was the first printer in the United States to publish a complete Hebrew Bible.[120] Robert Aitken, a Philadelphia printer who arrived there in 1769, was the first to publish the Bible and the New Testament in the English language in the newly formed United States.[121][122]

The Christian History, a weekly journal, featured various accounts of the revival and propagation of religion in Great-Britain and America. It was published by Kneeland & Greene, with Thomas Prince, Jr., as editor and publisher, was issued regularly for two years, from March 5, 1743, to February 23, 1745.[123] Prince authored other works, including his definitive 1744 work, An Account of the Revival of Religion in Boston in the Years 1740-1-2-3.[124][lower-alpha 14]

American Revolution

File:Common Sense pamphlet scan crop.jpg
Common Sense pamphlet by Thomas Paine, considered the most influential work supporting the cause for American independence

One of the earliest historians of the American Revolution, David Ramsay, said that, "in establishing American independence, the pen and press had merit equal to that of the sword."[125][126] For years historians have debated as to the extent of influence that various religious doctrine had in fostering the ideals that ultimately brought about the American Revolution.[127] However, it is evident that many religious works frequently offered accounts that promoted the ideals of freedom of speech and of the press, and other liberties, and openly criticized the British Crown over what they regarded as incursions on their rights and freedom — issues that were fundamental in advancing the revolution. As such, the colonial authorities were always watchful of any statements that they felt were seditious that occurred within the context of published religious literature.[128]

In the years just prior to the war Massachusetts played a central role as the leader in the Revolution, where Boston was considered by royal authorities as a "hot-bed of sedition".[129] During this time printers and publishers played a fundamental role in promoting the call for independence in the and uniting the American colonies in that end. Highly influential works like Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania, written by John Dickinson, consisting of twelve letters, were widely read and reprinted in nearly all newspapers throughout the thirteen colonies, and played a major role in uniting the colonists against the Townshend Acts. William Goddard was the first printer to publish Dickinson's work," which proposed limiting Parliament's power, and wrote that these essays "deserved the serious attention of all North-America.[130][131] Thomas Paine's 1776 work, Common Sense, outlined moral and political arguments and is considered "the most incendiary and popular pamphlet of the entire revolutionary era", and was printed by Robert Bell.[132] In response to Paine's work, James Chalmers, under the assumed name of Candidus[lower-alpha 15] countered it with a pamphlet entitled The Plain Truth, also printed by Robert Bell, which was not received well by a patriotic populace who drove Chalmers into exile.[133]

The concepts of "Patriot" and "Loyalist" were not fully distinctive in many ways until 1774 when the idea of independence became the central political and social issue. Many printers embraced the idea of a free press doctrine that expected printers not to take sides, and allow for a "free and open press" in which a variety of political ideals could be freely and publicly debated.[134]

Before the ideals of independence and revolution came to be embraced among the colonists the differences in their settlements and forms of government, in religion, culture, trade and domestic policy, were so great that Benjamin Franklin, who well understood the situation, said, that nothing but the oppression of the entire country would ever unite them. To effect this he believed the colonists needed to appreciate the idea that their rights as men were far more important than the rights allowed in a particular colony. Samuel Adams also recognized this back in 1765 when he said that Americans as a whole would never unify and fight for independence "unless Great Britain shall exert her power to destroy their Libertys".[135] Newspapers like the Boston Gazette, which also printed the titles of new religious books, and the Massachusetts Spy, were fundamental in promoting the ideals that closed the religious, cultural and political gap between the colonies.[136]

Prior to the revolution printing was primarily confined to the capitals of the various colonies. During the war, however, many printers and publishers set up their operations in other towns, making it less likely for their presses and shops to be confiscated or destroyed by British forces. After independence was finally established, by the peace of 1783, printing presses and newspapers multiplied very fast, not only in seaports, but in nearly all the principal inland villages and towns.[137] There existed two primary types of print that influenced the political developments during the American Revolution: pamphlets and newspapers. Pamphlets became an important means for conveying revolutionary ideals during controversies between the colonists and the Crown. Often written by prominent writers under an assumed name they have been referred to by scholars as the principle agents of change during the revolutionary era.[138]

At the outbreak of war at Lexington and Concord in April 1775, it became clearly evident that the Whigs dominated the press and postal networks and could use them to subvert Tory and Loyalist polemics. Printing and publication of Loyalist propaganda was subsequently confined to the various cities, ports and surrounding localities under British military control. After the Declaration of Independence was officially issued to the British Crown, only fifteen Loyalist newspapers emerged at various times and places, but none of them managed to publish continuously in the instability and uncertainty of war from 1776 to 1783. British occupied New York City had the longest-lived and most-popular Loyalist newspapers, including Hugh Gaine's New-York Gazette and the Weekly Mercury. Others included The Massachusetts Gazette, the leading Tory newspaper, published by Richard Draper[139] and Alexander Robertson's The Royal American Gazette,[140] James Rivington's Royal Gazette, and William Lewis's New York Mercury. Rivington undoubtedly had sided with the British, while Gaine, typical of many loyalists from the lower colonies, felt equally sympathetic for colonial rights but harbored an aversion to open rebellion and violence. Neither of these printers became a partisan of the British cause the actual war had started, where British occupation of New York City made it nearly impossible to be neutral.[141][142] After 1770, as colonial tensions with England mounted, the Loyalist newspapers lost most of their advertising sponsors.[143]

File:Samuel Adams by John Singleton Copley.jpg
The revolutionary writings of Samuel Adams appeared in newspapers across the New England colonies.[144]

Printers provided an invaluable service to various statesmen, notable patriot figures and the Continental Congress by disseminating their political and social views and other accounts before and during the war. In the autumn and winter of 1768 Samuel Adams of Boston was busy writing for various newspapers, mostly in the Boston Gazette. The Gazette functioned as his main voice, and as a rallying medium for patriot leaders. The newspaper was noted for its bitter, yet well written, accounts about the perceived injustices occurring in the colonies.[145] Adams wrote fiery accounts about the revolutionary cause through this newspaper. Adams contributed a forceful letter of December 19, 1768 to this newspaper, and according to historian James Kendall Hosmer, it would "perhaps be impossible to find a better illustration of the superior political sense of the New Englanders". Through it Adams assailed the British Parliament over the issue of taxation without representation: i.e."When pressed with that fundamental principle of nature and the Constitution, that what is a man's own is absolutely his own, and that no man can have a right to take it from him without his consent".[146] The office of the Boston Gazette on Court Street, also functioned as a meeting place for various revolutionary figures like Joseph Warren, James Otis,[lower-alpha 16] Josiah Quincy, John Adams, Benjamin Church, and other patriots scarcely less conspicuous. Many of these figures typically belonged to the Sons of Liberty. In those groups Samuel Adams emerged more and more the forcible and eminent figure, while his writings were also published in newspapers distant.[148][149][150]

John Dunlap,the founder of The Maryland Gazette, was one of the most successful Irish/American printers of his era. He printed the first copies of the United States Declaration of Independence,[151] and A Summary View of the Rights of British America, by Thomas Jefferson.[152] In 1778, the Congress appointed Dunlap to print the Congressional Records, and for five years he continued in this capacity as their official printer.[153] Dunlap and his partner David Claypoole printed the Constitution of the United States on September 19, 1787, for use by the Constitutional Convention, and later published it for the first time in The Pennsylvania Packet.[lower-alpha 17] On September 21, 1796, the Packet was the first newspaper to publish George Washington's Farewell Address.[154]

Mathew Carey was one of a number of printers who fled to the American colonies to escape prosecution for printing and publication of the Volunteers Journal, a Dublin newspaper that promoted the anti-British Volunteer movement, which the British Crown at the time naturally considered seditious literature.[155]

In 1777 the Continental Congress commissioned Mary Katherine Goddard to print copies of the Declaration of Independence for distribution among the colonies. Many of these copies were signed by John Hancock, President of the Congress, and Charles Thomson, Permanent Secretary, and are sought after by historians and collectors.[156]

Printing presses and type

Before a printer could realistically consider going into the printing business, the finances required to purchase a printing press, and type, had to be secured. Both of these necessities were expensive and not always easily obtainable. In the later 17th and early 18th centuries most of the wares used for printing were produced in England and were shipped to the colonies, which also added to the costs considerably and made availability difficult for an upstart printer trying to establish himself. Foundries for producing type didn't appear in the colonies until well into the 18th century, and it wasn't until 1775 where type overall became practically obtainable in a variety of print types. Historian Lawrence C. Wroth, in his 1938 work, The Colonial Printer, comparatively outlines the various sorts of print type that were available in the late 1600s up until 1770.[157]

File:Priting type foundry.jpg
Workers at their stations casting type in William Caslon's foundry, 1750: On the floor are shown, many times enlarged, the two halves of a type mold.[158]

As with printing presses and newspapers, there were laws regulating the number of foundries that were allowed to produce type in England. In 1637 a Star Chamber Decree mandated that only four persons in England should be allowed to operate a letter foundry at any given time, where each foundry was limited to the number of apprentices it could have. By 1693, however, the decree had expired, but the number of foundries nonetheless never increased in any significant measure. Even English printers often found themselves seeking type from Dutch foundries. Subsequently, no printing presses existed in the colonies until the first press arrived at Cambridge, brought over from London in 1639.[159] In the colonies, as in England, much of the type used by printers came from Dutch foundries. Many examples of Dutch type exist in the printed works produced in the colonies from 1730 to 1740.[160]

Up until the middle of the 18th century, the printing presses employed in the colonies were imported from England. The difficulty of machining the iron screw essential to the operation of the press left no choice for the American printer but to purchase them from abroad. Isaac Doolittle, a clock maker and a man of many crafts, built the first printing press made on American soil in 1769, which was purchased by William Goddard.[161]

The first types appeared in the colonies from type foundries in Holland and England. Some notable type founders and type designers included William Caslon (1693-1766), and John Baskerville (1707-1775), both leading printers in England during their day. Their typefaces greatly influenced the evolution of English type design and were first to establish an English national typographic style, which ultimately impacted printing style in the English-American colonies.[162] Caslon typefaces quickly became popular among colonial printers in the mid-eighteenth century up to the American Revolution. While in Europe, Benjamin Franklin had purchased many hundreds of pounds of type from the Caslon family for his presses in Philadelphia and other cities.[163] His first use of Caslon type was employed in the printing of The Pennsylvania Gazette in 1738.[164] Books, newspapers and broadsides, were mostly printed in Caslon old style types, while many important printed works were also printed with Caslon type, including the first printed version of the Declaration of Independence, by John Dunlap in 1776.[165]

Bookbinding

Bookbinders also played an important role in the printing and publishing trade. Unlike newspapers and pamphlets, after the printing of volumeous works had been performed the numerous pages had to be bound into a book, which was accomplished by means of a bookbinding press and the special skill required by a bookbinder.[166] The first book on record printed on an American printing-press needing the services of a bookbinder was The Whole Book of Psalms, published at Cambridge in 1640.[167] John Ratcliff of the seventeenth century is the first identifiable bookbinder in colonial America, credited for binding Eliot's Indian Bible in 1663.[168]

Some booksellers and publishers, like William Parks,[169] Isaiah Thomas,[170] and Daniel Henchman[171] performed their own bookbinding, however, bookbinders in general were an obscure lot and were generally not known by name for the works they bound. There were very few exceptions where bookbinder's names were included in the inscription along with the printer on the title page or inside cover. A few books bound by Andrew Barclay of Boston provide a few of the known examples of works containing the bookbinder's name on a trade label.[166]

Paper production in the colonies

File:Rittenhouse manor.jpg
William Rittenhouse established America's first paper mill on the Monoshone Creek, in Pennsylvania

The manufacturing of paper was essential to the printing and publishing industry, newspapers in particular, and brought many people together to help in the effort to collect linen rags used in the production of paper. Because there were no newspapers in the colonies before 1700 paper was not yet a vital commodity in high demand. Books were uncommon and usually brought over from abroad. The first printing presses were established in Cambridge, in the Massachusetts Bay colony in 1638, and others soon emerged in New York, Boston and Philadelphia, but the overall production of printed matter was small.A s the 18th century unfolded more printing presses and newspapers came into existence and soon the paper shortage was felt by printers.[172]

William Rittenhouse in partnership with William Bradford, established the first paper mill in colonial America in 1690, on the Monoshone Creek, a tributary to the Wissahickon Creek just north of Philadelphia. It was the only paper mill in the colonies for twenty years.[173] The Rittenhouse family also built other papers mills, their last being built in 1770.[174]

The second paper mill in America was erected by another settler of Germantown named William De Wees, who was a brother-in-law of Nicholas Rittenhouse, William's son who had been an apprentice at the Rittenhouse mill. The third paper mill to emerge was established by Thomas Wilcox on Chester Creek, in Delaware county, twenty miles from Philadelphia. Wilcox had sought employment working at Rittenhouse's paper mill, but the paper production was still young and business was slow. After some years of saving money he managed to start up his own paper mill in 1729[175] Through the efforts of Daniel Henchman, the first paper mill to appear north of New Jersey was in 1729 at Milton on the Neponset River.[176][177] The shortage still worsened, however, in the years approaching the American Revolution, and became serious when the war finally broke out.[178][179] Benjamin Franklin and William Parks established a paper mill in Williamsburg, Virginia in 1742, the first in the Virginia colony. Prior to 1765 most of the paper used by the colonial printers had to be imported from England, as the existing colonial paper mills, mostly located in Pennsylvania, were not able to provide enough to meet the demands of the growing colonies.[180][181]

Benjamin Franklin was active in organizing the collection of rags used for paper making. His sales of this material to paper makers, along with his sales of paper to colonial printers, took on great proportions. In the process his contributions and advisory capacity proved him to be a major factor in colonial paper making and its trade.[182] Franklin took a particular interest in the paper production in the colonies, and especially in Pennsylvania, and is credited for starting up eighteen paper mills in that province. Subsequently, Delaware county in Pennsylvania, became the paper-mill center in the latter years of the 18th century. Franklin as a writer often wrote at length about the importance of paper making and how it was integral to the printing and publishing industry. In June, 1788, he read a treatise before the American Philosophical Society in Philadelphia entitled, "Description of the Process to be Observed in Making Large Sheets of Paper in the Chinese Manner, with one Smooth Surface."[183]

When the colonial assemblies passed nonimportation agreements in 1769, which followed the passage of the Stamp Act in 1765 and the Townshend Acts in 1767, the shortage soon became serious. By 1775 the existing supply of imported paper was nearly exhausted, and the fifty-three colonial paper mills soon proved to be inadequate to meet the demand for paper. The situation prompted the colonial governments, and even the Continental Congress, to take action to augment the output of paper.[179] Various newspapers also rose to the occasion and rallied many of the colonists to help in the effort to produce paper. Newspapers like the Pennsylvania Gazette and the Virginia Gazette published articles that outlined the need for this essential raw material and appealed to the general public to collect linen rags, offering them a bonus in addition to their value to persons bringing in the greatest annual quantity of the badly needed material.[178][184] Eventually, paper would be produced from saw dust, but this and other major innovations in paper making did not occur until the 1790s.[185]

"Laid paper" and "wove paper"

The three main elements absolutely required for printing and publishing were the printing press, ink and paper. At times, any of these items could be difficult to acquire—especially paper, which required a paper mill and a skilled crew to manufacture it. The paper produced in the American colonies throughout the greater part of the eighteenth century was a variety known as "laid paper", in distinction to the "wove" paper that came into use late in that century. When held up to the light, laid paper revealed innumerable fine lines running the length of the sheet, crossed at intervals of about an inch by the coarser lines, called "chain" lines — impressions formed by the bottom of the mold, where fine wires extended from end to end which were held firmly in place by coarse wires that cross the mold from side to side. It was not until 1757 that the British type designer John Baskerville invented his "wove paper", produced by a mold composed of tightly woven fine brass wires which produced a much smoother paper, that lacked the wire lines and chain lines found in laid paper. The smoother paper allowed for a more distinct and clearer printing result. Wove paper was regularly in use in England soon after its invention and became popular with the printers who produced fine books. In 1777 Benjamin Franklin acquired some of this wove paper and brought it with him to France where he introduced it to various persons there. By 1782, it was being successfully manufactured in that country. Wove paper thereafter was soon being produced in the paper mills of the now independent United States. The earliest known use is found in examples by Isaiah Thomas in Worcester, in 1795, whereafter it soon came into use by most American printers.[186][187]

Prominent early American printers and publishers

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

See also

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

Citations

  1. Hildeburn, 1885, p. vi
  2. Adelman, 2013, p. 519
  3. Berthold, 1970, p. 37
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Schlesinger, 1935, p. 63
  5. 5.0 5.1 Eldridge, 1995, p. 18,
  6. Roden, 1905, p. 10
  7. Morgan, 1953, pp. 187–188
  8. Thomas, 1847, pp. xxi, 140, 158
  9. Berthold, 1970, p. 1
  10. Wroth, 1922, p. V
  11. Adelman, 2010, p. 715
  12. Frasca, 2006, p. 13
  13. Clark, 1991, 243
  14. Moore, 1886, p. 22
  15. Weeks, 1916, p. 18
  16. Gloege, 2013, p. 78, 140
  17. Thomas, 1874, vol. I, pp. 89, 94
  18. Littlefield, 1907, p. 13
  19. 19.0 19.1 Wroth, 1938, p. 19
  20. Thomas, 1874, vol. I, p. 94
  21. Shaw, 1959, p. 414
  22. Streeter, 1856, p. 4
  23. 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 The Antiquarian Society, 2021 Essay
  24. 24.0 24.1 Roden, 1905, p. 9
  25. Thomas, 1874, vol. I. pp. 49, 90
  26. Burns, 2007, p. 37-38
  27. Schlesinger, 1935, p. 64
  28. Thomas Jefferson to Edward Carrington, Paris, January 16, 1787
  29. Humphrey, 2013, pp. 23–26, 127–129
  30. Adelman, 2013, pp. 519, 544
  31. University of Wisconsin, Department of History, Essay, 2021
  32. Hildeburn, 1885, p. IX
  33. 33.0 33.1 Wroth, 1922, pp. 86–87
  34. Lee, 1923, pp. 29-30
  35. Buckingham, 1850, p. 49
  36. Thomas, 1874, p. 29
  37. Hudson, 1873, p. 66-67
  38. Buckingham, 1850, pp. 62-64
  39. Thomas, 1874, pp. 16, 111
  40. Isaacson, 2003, p. 64
  41. Aldridge, 1962, p. 77
  42. Clark & Wetherall, 1989, p. 282
  43. Franklin, 1895, p. 121
  44. Benjamin Franklin Historical Society, Essay
  45. Miller, 1961, pp. 97-98
  46. Devoye, McGill University Montreal, Canada, essay
  47. Lockridge, 1912, p. 13
  48. Hudson, 1873, pp. 66-67
  49. Bailyn & Hench (eds.), 1981, pp. 18–19
  50. Isaacson, 2003, p. 127
  51. Frasca, 2006, p. 125
  52. 52.0 52.1 Bailyn & Hench (eds.), 1981, p. 25
  53. Wilson & Fiske, 1887, p. 39
  54. Johnson, 1904, p. 1872
  55. Elliot, 1965, p. 7
  56. Thomas, 1874, Vol. II, p. 166
  57. Lee, 1923, pp. 53-54
  58. Wroth, 1938, p. 21
  59. 59.0 59.1 Thomas, 1874, Vol II, pp. 85–86
  60. Schlesinger, 1958, p. 57
  61. Connecticut Newspaper Project, Connecticut State Library, November, 1996
  62. Thomas, 1874, Vol II, p. 83
  63. Thomas, 1847, Vol II, pp. 138–139
  64. Thomas, 1847, Vol II, p. 142
  65. Museum of the American Revolution, Essay
  66. Dickens, 1964, pp. 166, 283
  67. King, The book-trade under Edward VI and Mary I
  68. 68.0 68.1 Brigham, 1936, p. 536
  69. Streeter, 1856, p. 3
  70. Eldridge, Journal, 1995, p. 355
  71. Eldridge, Journal, 1995, p. 337
  72. Thomas, 1847, Vol I, p. lxvii
  73. Nelson, 1959, p. 160
  74. Duniway, 1906, p. 70
  75. 75.0 75.1 Wroth, 1938, p. 176
  76. 76.0 76.1 Scott, 1958, pp. 217-218
  77. Reese, 1990, Essay
  78. 78.0 78.1 Weeks, 1891, p. 6
  79. Hudson, 1873, pp. 102-103
  80. Lee, 1923, p. 55
  81. Stamp Act, 1895 [1765] , pp. 1-34
  82. Maier, 1991, p. 51
  83. 83.0 83.1 83.2 Bailyn & Hench (eds.), 1981, p. 23
  84. Thomas, 1874, Vol I, p. xxxii
  85. Lee, 1923, pp. 55-56
  86. Schlesinger, 1935, pp. 67, 74
  87. Thomas, 1874, Vol II, p. 10
  88. Ashley, 1985, Vol XLIII, pp. 249, 351
  89. Thomas, 1874, Vol. II, pp.130-131
  90. Dyer, 1985, p. 88
  91. Thomas, 1874, pp. xxxii, 158
  92. Irvin, 2003, p. 202
  93. Wroth, 1922, p. 83
  94. Bergan, 2005, pp. 6–7 28
  95. 95.0 95.1 Roden, 1905, pp. 95–96
  96. Wigglesworth, 1867 [1662]
  97. Duniway, 1906, p. 11
  98. Duniway, 1906, pp. 11–14
  99. Duniway, 1906, pp. 10–15
  100. Nelson, 1959, pp. 162–163
  101. Wroth, 1938, p. 7
  102. Newgass, 1958, p. 32
  103. Thomas, 1874, Vol. I, pp. 107-108
  104. Drake, 1856, pp. 630, 774
  105. De Normandie, 1912, pp. 364-365
  106. Cogley, 1991, p. 227
  107. Reese, 1990 Antiquarian Society, Essay
  108. Jefferson, 1779
  109. Jefferson, 1779, National Archives
  110. Wroth, 1922, p. 27-28
  111. Wroth, 1938, pp. 138–139
  112. Roden, 1905, pp. 8, 143
  113. Wroth, 1922, pp. 75–77
  114. Baldwin, 1902, 26:3, pp. 291–292
  115. Galloway, 1780, pp. 3, 55
  116. Frasca, 2006, p. 40
  117. Weintraub, 1976, p. 232
  118. Bralier, 1976, p. 57
  119. Kidd, 2017, pp. 8, 68
  120. Adelman, 2013, p. 522
  121. Hildeburn, 1885, p. viii
  122. Adelman, 2013, p. 535
  123. Wroth, 1938, p. 237
  124. 124.0 124.1 Prince, 1823 [1744]
  125. Ramsay, 1789, Vol II, p. 319
  126. Schlesinger, 1958, p. vii
  127. Brauer, 1976, p. 1
  128. Eldridge, 1995, p. 13.
  129. Hosmer, 1899, pp. 10–11
  130. Frasca, 2006, p. 162,
  131. Johannesen, 1975
  132. Thomas, 1874, pp. 260–261
  133. Saillant, 2015, Encyclopedia article
  134. Adelman, 2013, p. 540
  135. Maier, 1991, p. 218
  136. Thomas, 1874, pp. lviii, 6
  137. Thomas, 1874, Vol I, p. 18
  138. Parkinson, 2021, Essay
  139. Dickerson, 1951, p. 468
  140. Thomas, 1847, p. vol. I, pp. 172, 313
  141. Thomas, 1847, vol. I, pp. 300-301
  142. Potter & Calhoon; Bailyn & Hench (eds.), 1981, pp. 37, 232
  143. Yodelis, 1975, p. 16
  144. Hosmer, 1899, p. 134
  145. Thomas, 1874, p. lix
  146. Hosmer, 1899, pp. 129–130
  147. Hosmer, 1899, pp. 44–45, 101
  148. Hosmer, 1899, pp. 129–134
  149. Burns, 2007, p. 137
  150. Maier, 1991, p. 264
  151. Adelman, 2013, pp. 534, 540
  152. Thomas Jefferson, John Dunlap (ed), 1774
  153. Thomas, 1874, Vol I, p. 259.
  154. 154.0 154.1 Thomas, 1874, Vol II, p. 139
  155. Adelman, 2013, pp. 516–517
  156. Yost, 1961, p. 32
  157. Wroth, 1938, pp. 90-92
  158. Wroth, 1938, p. 90
  159. Wroth, 1938, pp. 87, 137
  160. Wroth, 1938, p. 88
  161. Wroth, 1938, pp. 82-83
  162. Oxford University Press, 1922, p. 12
  163. Mulford, 2008, p. 491
  164. Miller, 1955, p. 421
  165. Updike, 1922, Vol. II, p. 151
  166. 166.0 166.1 French, 1962, p. 145
  167. Samford & Hemphill, 1990, p. 10
  168. Wroth, 1938, pp. xi, 205-206
  169. Daily Press, February 27, 1983 issue, p. C3
  170. Thomas, 1909, p. 32
  171. Lehmann, French & Rogers, 1967, p. v
  172. Weeks, 1916, p. 2
  173. Weeks, 1916, p. 3
  174. Weeks, 1916, pp. 6-7
  175. Thomas, 1874, Vol. I, pp. 23
  176. Wroth, 1938, p. 137
  177. Weeks, 1916, p. 19
  178. 178.0 178.1 Wroth, 1938, pp. 147–148
  179. 179.0 179.1 Leonard, 1950, p. 488
  180. Tyler, 1907, p. 30
  181. Ford, 1958, p. 12
  182. Wroth, 1938, p. 148
  183. Weeks, 1916, pp. 92-94
  184. Leonard, 1950, p. 495
  185. Weeks, 1891, pp. 98-99
  186. Wroth, 1938, pp. 125-126
  187. Rollins, 1937, p. 60

Notes

  1. Not to be confused with the rival newspaper of the same name, published also in Williamsburg[33]
  2. Franklin and Meredith began the paper with No. 40[43]
  3. Also spelled as Sauer
  4. Hall to Franklin, June 20, 1765, Franklin papers, 12: 188–189[52]
  5. The counterfeiting of ten shilling notes was a problem in Rhode island at this time, and Franklin explained why they were so easy to duplicate and offered an alternative method, but he was passed over for Samuel Vernon for the job.[76]
  6. Daye's printing press is depicted on a 1939 U.S. Postage stamp, commemorating the 300th anniversary of printing in colonial America.
  7. The duties or taxes imposed by the Stamp Act had to be paid in gold or silver.[82] The Stamp Act imposed a Sterling Halfpenny on every half sheet of newspaper, two Shillings Sterling on every advertisement, and Fourpiece Sterling on every almanac.[83]
  8. Other than the Bible itself, Michael Wigglesworth, with editorial comment by Cotton Mather, both Puritan ministers, published The Day of Doom, the most popular book in colonial America, which could be found in virtually every Puritan home.[95][96]
  9. The thirty-three regulations are outlined in Clyde Duniway's work of 1906.[98]
  10. No reference can be found in the Journals of the Virginia House of Delegates about the printing of Jefferson's Bill as it was submitted to the May 1779 session, though it is attributed to the year 1785 in the bibliographies of Sabin and others, it was printed in the summer of 1779 as a broadside.[109]
  11. Galloway was a former speaker of the Pennsylvania General Assembly and later served as delegate to the First Continental Congress from Pennsylvania.
  12. Galloway had harbored a deep resentment of the Presbyterians that dated back to the 1760s and with whom he regarded as rioters and of the baser elements of society.[114]
  13. Franklin emphasized the important role of general religion when he wrote, "If men are so wicked as we now see them with religion, what would they be without it?"[118]
  14. Originally printed in 1744, republished by Samuel T. Armstrong in 1823[124]
  15. Samuel Adams frequently used this pen name in his articles also.
  16. Otis' well-known catch-phrase "Taxation without Representation is tyranny" became the basic Patriot position.[147]
  17. From September, 1777, to July 1778, when the British army was in possession of Philadelphia, the Packet was printed in Lancaster.[154]

Bibliography

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. (Google book)
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. (Google book)
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Google book
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
Primary sources
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
Online sources
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.


Further reading

<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Tracts of the American Revolution, 1763–1776
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links