Electoral history of John Sherman
From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Electoral history of John Sherman, Representative, United States Senator, and cabinet member.
United States House of Representatives
Ohio's 13th congressional district, 1854:[1]
- John Sherman (AN: 8,617 (59.80%)
- William D. Lindsley (D): 5,794 (40.21%)
Ohio's 13th congressional district, 1856:[2]
- John Sherman (R): 9,926 (58.42%)
- Herman J. Brumback (D): 7,065 (41.58%)
Ohio's 13th congressional district, 1858:[3]
- John Sherman (R): 9,426 (57.06%)
- Shepard J. Patrick (D): 7,095 (42.95%)
Ohio's 13th congressional district, 1860:[4]
- John Sherman (R): 11,428 (57.16%)
- Barnabas Burns (D): 8,564 (42.84%)
United States Senate
United States Senate election in Ohio, 1861 (elected by state legislature):[5]
- John Sherman (R): 76 (58.91%)
- William Kennon, Sr. (D): 53 (41.09%)
United States Senate election in Ohio, 1866 (elected by state legislature):[6]
- John Sherman (R): 91 (68.93%)
- Allen G. Thurman (D): 41 (31.07%)
United States Senate election in Ohio, 1872 (elected by state legislature):[7]
- John Sherman (R): 73 (52.14%)
- George W. Morgan (D): 64 (45.71%)
- Jacob Dolson Cox (R): 1 (0.71%)
- Robert C. Schenck (R): 1 (0.71%)
- Aaron F. Perry (R) : 1 (0.71%)
United States Senate election in Ohio, 1881 (elected by state legislature):[8]
- John Sherman (R): 84 (61.76%)
- Allen G. Thurman (D): 52 (38.24%)
United States Senate election in Ohio, 1886 (elected by state legislature):[9]
- John Sherman (R): 84 (57.53%)
- Allen G. Thurman (D): 62 (42.47%)
United States Senate election in Ohio, 1892 (elected by state legislature):[10]
- John Sherman (R): 111 (75%)
- James E. Neal (D): 37 (25%)
Sources
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
References
- ↑ Smith 1898, p. 29.
- ↑ Smith 1898, p. 66.
- ↑ Smith 1898, p. 85.
- ↑ Smith 1898, p. 129.
- ↑ Smith 1898, p. 188.
- ↑ Smith 1898, p. 228.
- ↑ Sherman 1895, p. 480.
- ↑ Smith 1898, p. 448.
- ↑ Sherman 1895, p. 942.
- ↑ Smith 1898, p. 611.
