HIP 56948
| Observation data Epoch Equinox |
|
|---|---|
| Constellation | Draco |
| Right ascension | 11h 40m 28.48381s[1] |
| Declination | +69° 00′ 30.5995″[1] |
| Apparent magnitude (V) | 8.70 |
| Characteristics | |
| Spectral type | G5V[2] |
| U−B color index | 0.155 |
| B−V color index | 0.647 ± 0.014[1] |
| Variable type | none |
| Astrometry | |
| Radial velocity (Rv) | 5.4[3] km/s |
| Proper motion (μ) | RA: –126.96[1] mas/yr Dec.: –2.13[1] mas/yr |
| Parallax (π) | 15.68 ± 0.67[1] mas |
| Distance | 208 ± 9 ly (64 ± 3 pc) |
| Absolute magnitude (MV) | 4.81 |
| Details | |
| Mass | 1.02 ± 0.02[4] M☉ |
| Radius | 0.99 R☉ |
| Luminosity | 0.99[5] L☉ |
| Surface gravity (log g) | 4.409[5] cgs |
| Temperature | 5795[5] K |
| Metallicity [Fe/H] | 0.02[5] dex |
| Age | ~3.5[4][6] Gyr |
| Other designations | |
| Database references | |
| SIMBAD | data |
| Exoplanet Archive | data |
HIP 56948 (also known as HD 101364) is a solar twin star of type G5V.[2] It is the most sun-like star yet known in terms of size, mass, temperature, chemical makeup and, arguably, age. Our sun is about 4.6 billion years old, and HIP 56948 is believed to be about a billion years younger—so both stars are between a third and a halfway through their life on the main sequence.[6][7]
It is 208 light years away in the constellation of Draco,[8] lying about halfway between Polaris and Dubhe on the celestial sphere.[9] Astronomers have looked for planets in the system, so far without finding any. These observations suggest that the star does not have any hot Jupiters.[10]
Discovery
Jorge Meléndez of the Australian National University and Iván Ramírez of the University of Texas analysed the star in 2007 using the 2.7 metre Harlan J. Smith telescope at McDonald Observatory.[11]
Lithium abundance
Other solar analogs such as 18 Scorpii are unlike the sun in that they have several times the lithium abundance. HIP 56948 is the best candidate for a solar twin because of the known possible contenders, its lithium abundance most resembles that of our own star.[5][12] A 2009 high-dispersion spectroscopic study from the Astronomical Society of Japan confirms this.[5]
Significance
In the abstract to their paper, the star's discoverers say:
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
For more than a decade, 18 Sco (HD 146233) has been considered the star that most closely resembles the Sun, even though significant differences such as its Li content, which is about 3 times solar, exist. Using high-resolution, high-S/N spectra obtained at McDonald Observatory, we show that the stars HIP 56948 and HIP 73815 are very similar to the Sun in both stellar parameters and chemical composition, including a low Li abundance, which was previously thought to be peculiar in the Sun. HIP 56948, in particular, has stellar parameters identical to solar within the observational uncertainties, being thus the best solar twin known to date. HIP 56948 is also similar to the Sun in its lack of hot Jupiters. Considering the age of this star (~1 ± 1 Gyr older than the Sun)[Notes 1] and its location and orbit around the Galaxy, if terrestrial planets exist around it, they may have had enough time to develop complex life, making it a prime target for SETI.
— Jorge Meléndez and Iván Ramírez
See also
References
- Footnotes
- Citations
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.Vizier catalog entry
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. See table 9.1.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Cowing, Keith: The remarkable solar twin HIP 56948 is a prime target in the quest for other earths. Spaceref.com, published 13 April 2012, retrieved 16 April 2012.
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ The Telegraph, retrieved 5 November 2010.
- ↑ New Scientist, retrieved 5 October 2009.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
