Libel Act 1843

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

The Libel Act 1843[1]
Long title An Act to amend the Law respecting defamatory Words and Libel.
Citation 6 & 7 Vict c 96
Territorial extent England and Wales and Northern Ireland[2]
Dates
Royal assent 24 August 1843
Commencement 1 November 1843[3]
Text of statute as originally enacted
Revised text of statute as amended

The Libel Act 1843, commonly known as Lord Campbell's Libel Act[1], was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It enacted several important codifications of and modifications to the common law tort of libel.

This Act was repealed for the Republic of Ireland by section 4 of, and Part 2 of Schedule 1 to, the Defamation Act, 1961.

Preamble

The preamble was repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act 1891.

Section 3 - Publishing or threatening to publish a libel, or proposing to abstain from publishing any thing, with intent to extort money, punishable by imprisonment and hard labour

This section was repealed by the Schedule to the Larceny Act 1916.

Section 4 - Publication of libel known to be false

This section formerly provided:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

If any person shall maliciously publish any defamatory libel, knowing the same to be false, every such person, being convicted thereof, shall be liable to be imprisoned in the common gaol or house of correction for any term not exceeding two years, and to pay such fine as the court shall award.[4]

This section was repealed for England and Wales and Northern Ireland by section 178 of, and Part 2 of Schedule 23 to the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.

This section was replaced for the Republic of Ireland by section 12 of the Defamation Act, 1961.

Alternative verdict

See Boaler v R (1888) 21 QBD 284, (1888) 16 Cox 488, (1888) 4 TLR 565

Section 5 - Publication of libel

This section formerly provided:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

If any person shall maliciously publish any defamatory libel, every such person, being convicted thereof, shall be liable to fine or imprisonment or both, as the court may award, such imprisonment not to exceed the term of one year.[5]

This section did not create or define an offence. It provided the penalty for the existing common law offence of defamatory libel.[6]

This section was repealed for England and Wales and Northern Ireland by section 178 of, and Part 2 of Schedule 23 to the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. The repeal of this section was consequential on the abolition of the common law offence of defamatory libel by section 73(b) of that Act.

This section was replaced for the Republic of Ireland by section 11 of the Defamation Act, 1961.

Section 6 - Defence of truth and public benefit against defamatory libel

This section allowed the defendant to prove the truth of a libel as a valid defence in criminal proceedings, but only if it also be demonstrated that publication of the libel was to the "Public Benefit".[7] Proving the statement's truth had previously been allowed only in civil libel defences inasmuch as the criminal offence against the public at large was considered to be provoking a breach of peace via printing malicious statements rather than the defamation per se; the truth or falsity of the statement had therefore been considered irrelevant in criminal proceedings before the Act.

This section was repealed for England and Wales and Northern Ireland by section 178 of, and Part 2 of Schedule 23 to the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.

This section was replaced for the Republic of Ireland by section 6 of the Defamation Act, 1961.

This section did not apply to seditious libel.[8]

Section 7 - Evidence to rebut prima facie case of publication by an agent

In England and Wales and Northern Ireland, this section now reads:

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Whensoever [in Northern Ireland], upon the trial of any indictment or information for the publication of a [blasphemous] libel, under the plea of not guilty, evidence shall have been given which shall establish a presumptive case of publication against the defendant by the act of any other person by his authority, it shall be competent to such defendant to prove that such publication was made without his authority, consent, or knowledge, and that the said publication did not arise from want of due care or caution on his part.

The words in square brackets were inserted by section 177 of, and paragraph 66 of Schedule 21 to, the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.

This section was replaced for the Republic of Ireland by section 7 of the Defamation Act, 1961.

This section, in its original form, applied to a prosecution for blasphemous libel.[9]

Section 8 - Reimbursement of defence expenses upon acquittal

This section permitted a defendant who had been charged by a private prosecutor to recover the costs of his legal defence if found not guilty.[10]

This section was repealed by the Schedule to the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1908.

Oscar Wilde was bankrupted under this provision when he abandoned his libel prosecution against Lord Queensberry and was ordered to reimburse him for the considerable expenses Queensberry had incurred for legal representation and private detectives.

See also

References

  1. The citation of this Act by this short title was authorised by the Short Titles Act 1896.
  2. See section 10 of the Act and Defamation Act, 1961
  3. The Libel Act 1843, section 10
  4. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/6-7/96/section/4
  5. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/6-7/96/section/5
  6. R v Munslow [1895] 1 QB 758, 18 Cox 112, 72 LT 301, CCR
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. R v Duffy (1846) 2 Cox 45, (1846) 7 LT (OS) 546, (1846) 6 St Tr (NS) 303
  9. R v Bradlaugh (1883) 15 Cox 217
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links