Logic in computer science

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Diagrammatic representation of computer logic gates

Logic in computer science covers the overlap between the field of logic and that of computer science. The topic can essentially be divided into three main areas:

  • Theoretical foundations and analysis
  • Use of computer technology to aid logicians
  • Use of concepts from logic for computer applications

Theoretical foundations and analysis

Logic plays a fundamental role in computer science. Some of the key areas of logic that are particularly significant are computability theory (formerly called recursion theory), modal logic and category theory. The theory of computation is based on concepts defined by logicians and mathematicians such as Alonzo Church and Alan Turing.[1][2] Church first showed the existence of algorithmically unsolvable problems using his notion of lambda-definability. Turing gave the first compelling analysis of what can be called a mechanical procedure and Gödel asserted that he found Turing's analysis "perfect."[3] In addition some other major areas of theoretical overlap between logic and computer science are:

  • Gödel's incompleteness theorem proves that any logical system powerful enough to characterize arithmetic will contain statements that can neither be proven true nor false within that system. This has direct application to theoretical issues relating to the feasibility of proving the completeness and correctness of software.[4]
  • The Frame problem is a basic problem that must be overcome when using first order logic to represent the goals and state of an artificial intelligence agent.[5]
  • The Curry-Howard correspondence is a relation between logical systems and software. This theory established a precise correspondence between proofs and programs. In particular it showed that terms in the simply-typed lambda-calculus correspond to proofs of intuitionistic propositional logic.
  • Category theory represents a view of mathematics that emphasizes the relations between structures. It is intimately tied to many aspects of computer science: type systems for programming languages, the theory of transition systems, models of programming languages and the theory of programming language semantics.[6]

Computers to Assist Logicians

One of the first applications to use the term Artificial Intelligence was the Logic Theorist system developed by Allen Newell, J.C. Shaw, and Herbert Simon in 1956. One of the things that a Logician does is to take a set of statements in Logic and deduce the conclusions (additional statements) that must be true by the laws of logic. For example If given a logical system that states "All humans are mortal" and "Socrates is human" a valid conclusion is "Socrates is mortal". Of course this is a trivial example. In actual logical systems the statements can be numerous and complex. It was realized early on that this kind of analysis could be significantly aided by the use of computers. The Logic Theorist validated the theoretical work of Bertrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead in their influential work on mathematical logic called Principia Mathematica. In addition subsequent systems have been utilized by logicians to validate and discover new logical theorems and proofs.[7]

Logic applications for computers

There has always been a strong influence from mathematical logic on the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI). From the beginning of the field it was realized that technology to automate logical inferences could have great potential to solve problems and draw conclusions from facts. Ron Brachman has described First Order Logic (FOL) as metric by which all AI knowledge representation formalism should be evaluated. There is no more general or powerful known method for describing and analyzing information than FOL. The reason FOL itself is simply not used as a computer language is that it is actually too expressive, in the sense that FOL can easily express statements that no computer, no matter how powerful, could ever solve. For this reason every form of knowledge representation is in some sense a trade off between expressivity and computability. The more expressive the language is, the closer it is to FOL, the more likely it is to be slower and prone to an infinite loop.[8]

For example, IF THEN rules used in Expert Systems are a very limited subset of FOL. Rather than arbitrary formulas with the full range of logical operators the starting point is simply what logicians refer to as Modus Ponens. As a result the computability of rule based systems can be quite good, especially if they take advantage of optimization algorithms and compilation.[9]

Another major area of research for logical theory was software engineering. Research projects such as the Knowledge-Based Software Assistant and Programmer's Apprentice programs applied logical theory to validate the correctness of software specifications. They also used them to transform the specifications into efficient code on diverse platforms and to prove the equivalence between the implementation and the specification.[10] This formal transformation driven approach is often far more effort than traditional software development. However, in specific domains with appropriate formalisms and reusable templates the approach has proven viable for commercial products. The appropriate domains are usually those such as weapons systems, security systems, and real time financial systems where failure of the system has excessively high human or financial cost. An example of such a domain is Very Large Scale Integrated (VLSI) Design—the process for designing the chips used for the CPU's and other critical components of digital devices. An error in a chip is catastrophic. Unlike software chips can't be patched or updated. As a result there is commercial justification for using formal methods to prove that the implementation corresponds to the specification.[11]

Another important application of logic to computer technology has been in the area of Frame languages and automatic classifiers. Frame languages such as KL-ONE have a rigid semantics. Definitions in KL-ONE can be directly mapped to set theory and the predicate calculus. This allows specialized theorem provers called classifiers to analyze the various declarations between sets, subsets, and relations in a given model. In this way the model can be validated and any inconsistent definitions flagged. The classifier can also infer new information, for example define new sets based on existing information and change the definition of existing sets based on new data. The level of flexibility is ideal for handling the ever changing world of the Internet. Classifier technology is built on top of languages such as the Web Ontology Language to allow a logical semantic level on to the existing Internet. This layer of is called the Semantic web.[12][13]

Temporal logic is used for reasoning in concurrent systems.[14]


  1. Lewis, Harry R.; Christos H. Papadimitriou (1981). Elements of the Theory of Computation. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0-13-273417-6.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  2. Davis, Martin. "Influences of Mathematical Logic on Computer Science". In Rolf Herken (ed.). The Universal Turing Machine. Springer Verlag. Retrieved 26 December 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  3. Kennedy, Juliette. Interpreting Godel. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved 17 August 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  4. Hofstadter, Douglas R. Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0465026562.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  5. McCarthy, J; P.J. Hayes (1969). "Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence". Machine Intelligence. 4: 463–502.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  6. Barr, Michael; Charles Wells (1990). Category Theory for Computer. Prentice-Hall.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  7. Newell, Allen; J.C. Shaw; H.C. Simon (1963). "Empirical explorations with the logic theory machine". In Ed Feigenbaum (ed.). Computers and Thought. McGraw Hill. pp. 109–133. ISBN 978-0262560924.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  8. Levesque, Hector; Ronald Brachman (1985). "A Fundamental Tradeoff in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning". In Ronald Brachman and Hector J. Levesque (ed.). Reading in Knowledge Representation. Morgan Kaufmann. p. 49. ISBN 0-934613-01-X. The good news in reducing KR service to theorem proving is that we now have a very clear, very specific notion of what the KR system should do; the bad new is that it is also clear that the services can not be provided... deciding whether or not a sentence in FOL is a theorem... is unsolvable.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  9. Forgy, Charles (1982). "Rete: A Fast Algorithm for the Many Pattern/Many Object Pattern Match Problem*" (PDF). Artificial Intelligence. 19: 17–37. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(82)90020-0. Retrieved 25 December 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  10. Rich, Charles; Richard C. Waters (November 1987). "The Programmer's Apprentice Project: A Research Overview" (PDF). IEE Expert Special Issue on the Interactions between Expert Systems and Software Engineering. Retrieved 26 December 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  11. Stavridou, Victoria (1993). Formal Methods in Circuit Design. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. ISBN 0-521-443369. Retrieved 26 December 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  12. MacGregor, Robert (June 1991). "Using a description classifier to enhance knowledge representation". IEEE Expert. 6 (3). Retrieved 10 November 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  13. Berners-Lee, Tim; James Hendler; Ora Lassila (May 17, 2001). "The Semantic Web A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities". Scientific American.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  14. Colin Stirling (1992). "Modal and Temporal Logics". In S. Abramsky, D. M. Gabbay, T. S. E. Maibaum, editors, (ed.). Handbook of Logic in Computer Science. II. Oxford University Press. pp. 477–563. ISBN 0-19-853761-1.CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>


See also

External links