Mayan languages

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Ethnicity: Maya
Mesoamerica: Southern Mexico; Guatemala; Belize; western Honduras and El Salvador; small refugee and emigrant populations, especially in the United States and Canada
Linguistic classification: One of the world's primary language families
Proto-language: Proto-Mayan
ISO 639-2 / 5: myn
Glottolog: maya1287[1]
Location of Mayan speaking populations. See below for a detailed map of the different languages.

The Mayan languages[2] form a language family spoken in Mesoamerica and northern Central America. Mayan languages are spoken by at least 6 million indigenous Maya, primarily in Guatemala, Mexico, Belize and Honduras. In 1996, Guatemala formally recognized 21 Mayan languages by name,[3] and Mexico recognizes eight more within their territory.[4]

The Mayan language family is one of the best documented and most studied in the Americas.[5] Modern Mayan languages descend from Proto-Mayan, a language thought to have been spoken at least 5,000 years ago; it has been partially reconstructed using the comparative method.

Mayan languages form part of the Mesoamerican Linguistic Area, an area of linguistic convergence developed throughout millennia of interaction between the peoples of Mesoamerica. All Mayan languages display the basic diagnostic traits of this linguistic area. For example, all use relational nouns instead of prepositions to indicate spatial relationships. They also possess grammatical and typological features that set them apart from other languages of Mesoamerica, such as the use of ergativity in the grammatical treatment of verbs and their subjects and objects, specific inflectional categories on verbs, and a special word class of "positionals" which is typical of all Mayan languages.

During the pre-Columbian era of Mesoamerican history, some Mayan languages were written in the Mayan hieroglyphic script. Its use was particularly widespread during the Classic period of Maya civilization (c. 250–900 AD). The surviving corpus of over 10,000 known individual Maya inscriptions on buildings, monuments, pottery and bark-paper codices,[6] combined with the rich postcolonial literature in Mayan languages written in the Latin script, provides a basis for the modern understanding of pre-Columbian history unparalleled in the Americas.


Mayan languages are the descendants of a proto-language called Proto-Mayan or, in K'iche' Maya, Nab'ee Maya' Tzij ("the old Maya Language").[7] The Proto-Mayan language is believed to have been spoken in the Cuchumatanes highlands of central Guatemala in an area corresponding roughly to where Q'anjobalan is spoken today.[8]

According to the prevailing classification scheme by Lyle Campbell and Terrence Kaufman, the first division occurred around 2200 BC, when Huastecan split away from Mayan proper, after its speakers moved northwest along the Gulf Coast. Proto-Yucatecan and Proto-Ch'olan speakers subsequently split off from the main group and moved north into the Yucatán Peninsula. Speakers of the western branch moved south into the areas now inhabited by Mamean and Quichean people. When speakers of proto-Tzeltalan later separated from the Ch'olan group and moved south into the Chiapas highlands, they came into contact with speakers of Mixe–Zoquean languages.[9] According to an alternative theory by Robertson and Stephen D. Houston, Huastecan stayed in the Guatemalan highlands with speakers of Ch'olan-Tzeltalan, separating from that branch at a much later date than proposed by Kaufman.[10]

In the Archaic period (before 2000 BC), a number of loanwords from Mixe–Zoquean languages seem to have entered the proto-Mayan language. This has led to hypotheses that the early Maya were dominated by speakers of Mixe–Zoquean languages, possibly the Olmec culture.[11] In the case of the Xinca and Lenca languages, on the other hand, Mayan languages are more often the source than the receiver of loanwords. Mayan language specialists such as Campbell believe this suggests a period of intense contact between Maya and the Lencan and Xinca people, possibly during the Classic period (250–900 CE).[5]

Approximate migration routes and dates for various Mayan language families. The region shown as Proto-Mayan is now occupied by speakers of the Q'anjobalan branch (light blue in other figures).[12]

The split between Proto-Yucatecan (in the north, that is, the Yucatán Peninsula) and Proto-Ch'olan (in the south, that is, the Chiapas highlands and Petén Basin) had already occurred by the Classic period, when most extant Maya inscriptions were written. Both variants are attested in hieroglyphic inscriptions at the Maya sites of the time, and both are commonly referred to as "Classic Maya language".

During the Classic period, all the major branches diversified into separate languages. Although a single prestige language was by far the most frequently recorded on extant hieroglyphic texts, evidence for at least five different varieties of Mayan have been discovered within the hieroglyphic corpus—an Eastern Ch'olan variety found in texts written in the southern Maya area and the highlands, a Western Ch'olan variety diffused from the Usumacinta region from the mid-7th century on,[13] a Yukatekan variety found in the texts from the Yucatán Peninsula,[14] a Tzeltalan variety found in the Western Lowlands (i.e. Tonina, Pomona), and possibly a highland Maya language belonging to K'ichean major within texts painted on Nebaj ceramics.[citation needed]

It has been suggested that the specific variety of Ch'olan found in the glyphic texts is best understood as "Classic Ch'olti'an", the ancestor language of modern Ch'orti' and Ch'olti'. It is thought to have originated in western and south-central Petén Basin; it would have been used in the inscriptions and perhaps also spoken by elites and priests.[15] The reason why only two linguistic varieties are found in the glyphic texts is probably that these served as prestige dialects throughout the Maya region; hieroglyphic texts would have been composed in the language of the elite.[14] By the Classic period, the common Maya people must already have spoken a number of distinct languages.

During the Spanish colonization of Central America, all indigenous languages were eclipsed by Spanish, which became the new prestige language. The use of Mayan languages in many important domains of society, including administration, religion and literature, came to an end. Yet the Maya area was more resistant to outside influence than others,[16] and perhaps for this reason, many Maya communities still retain a high proportion of monolingual speakers. The Maya area is now dominated by the Spanish language. While a number of Mayan languages are moribund or are considered endangered, others remain quite viable, with speakers across all age groups and native language use in all domains of society.[17]

As Maya archaeology advanced during the 20th century and nationalist and ethnic-pride-based ideologies spread, the Mayan-speaking peoples began to develop a shared ethnic identity as Maya, the heirs of the Maya civilization.[18]

The word "Maya" was likely derived from the postclassical Yucatán city of Mayapan; its more restricted meaning in pre-colonial and colonial times points to an origin in a particular region of the Yucatán Peninsula. The broader meaning of "Maya" now current, while defined by linguistic relationships, is also used to refer to ethnic or cultural traits. Most Mayans identify first and foremost with a particular ethnic group, e.g. as "Yucatec" or "K'iche'"; but they also recognize a shared Maya kinship.[19] Language has been fundamental in defining the boundaries of that kinship.[20] This pride in unity has led to an insistence on the distinctions of different Mayan languages, some of which are so closely related that they could easily be referred to as dialects of a single language. But, given that the term "dialect" has been used by some with racialist overtones in the past, as scholars made a spurious distinction between Amerindian "dialects" and European "languages", the preferred usage in Mesoamerica in recent years has been to designate the linguistic varieties spoken by different ethnic group as separate languages.[21]

In Guatemala, matters such as developing standardized orthographies for the Mayan languages are governed by the Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala (ALMG; Guatemalan Academy of Mayan Languages), which was founded by Maya organisations in 1986. Following the 1996 peace accords, it has been gaining a growing recognition as the regulatory authority on Mayan languages both among Mayan scholars and the Maya peoples.[22][23]

Genealogy and classification

Relations with other families

The Mayan language family has no demonstrated genetic ties to other language families. Similarities with some languages of Mesoamerica are understood to be due to diffusion of linguistic traits from neighboring languages into Mayan and not to common ancestry. Mesoamerica has been proven to be an area of substantial linguistic diffusion.[24]

A wide range of proposals have tried to link the Mayan family to other language families or isolates, but none are generally supported by linguists. Examples include linking Mayan with Chipaya-Uru, Mapudungun, Lenca, Purépecha and Huave. Mayan has also been included in various Hokan and Penutian hypotheses. The linguist Joseph Greenberg included Mayan in his highly controversial Amerind hypothesis, which is rejected by most historical linguists as unsupported by available evidence.[25]

According to Lyle Campbell, an expert in Mayan languages, the most promising proposal is the "Macro-Mayan" hypothesis, which posits links between Mayan, Mixe–Zoquean languages and Totonacan, but more research is needed to support or disprove this hypothesis.[5]


The Mayan language family is extremely well documented, and its internal genealogical classification scheme is widely accepted and established, except for some minor unresolved differences.

One point still at issue is the position of Ch'olan and Q'anjobalan–Chujean. Some scholars think these form a separate Western branch[26] (as in the diagram below). Other linguists do not support the positing of an especially close relationship between Ch'olan and Q'anjobalan–Chujean; consequently they classify these as two distinct branches emanating directly from the proto-language.[27] An alternative proposed classification groups the Huastecan branch as springing from the Ch'olan-Tzeltalan node, rather than as an outlying branch springing directly from the proto-Mayan node.[28][29]

Genealogy of Mayan languages.

Geography and demographics

Map of areas where the various Mayan languages are spoken. Font sizes indicate relative sizes of speaker populations (Yucatec and K'iche' with 900,000 and 400,000 speakers respectively; 100,000–500,000 speakers; 10,000–100,000 speakers; and under 10,000 speakers.)

Huastecan branch

Wastek (also spelled Huastec and Huaxtec) is spoken in the Mexican states of Veracruz and San Luis Potosí by around 110,000 people.[30] It is the most divergent of modern Mayan languages. Chicomuceltec was a language related to Wastek and spoken in Chiapas that became extinct some time before 1982.[31]

Yucatecan branch

Yucatec Maya (known simply as "Maya" to its speakers) is the most commonly spoken Mayan language in Mexico. It is currently spoken by approximately 800,000 people, the vast majority of whom are to be found on the Yucatán Peninsula.[32][33] It remains common in Yucatán and in the adjacent states of Quintana Roo and Campeche.[34]

The other three Yucatecan languages are Mopan, spoken by around 10,000 speakers primarily in Belize; Itza', an extinct or moribund language from Guatemala's Petén Basin;[35] and Lacandón or Lakantum, also severely endangered with about 1,000 speakers in a few villages on the outskirts of the Selva Lacandona, in Chiapas.[36]

Western branch


The Ch'olan languages were formerly widespread throughout the Maya area, but today the language with most speakers is Ch'ol, spoken by 130,000 in Chiapas.[37] Its closest relative, the Chontal Maya language,[38] is spoken by 55,000[39] in the state of Tabasco. Another related language, now endangered, is Ch'orti', which is spoken by 30,000 in Guatemala.[40] It was previously also spoken in extreme west of Honduras and El Salvador, but the Salvadorian variant is now extinct and the Honduran one is considered moribund. Ch'olti', a sister language of Ch'orti', is also extinct.[41]

Ch'olan languages are believed to be the most conservative in vocabulary and phonology, and are closely related to the language of the Classic-era inscriptions found in the Central Lowlands. They may have served as prestige languages, coexisting with other dialects in some areas. This assumption provides a plausible explanation for the geographical distance between the Ch'orti' zone and the areas where Ch'ol and Chontal are spoken.[42]


The closest relatives of the Ch'olan languages are the languages of the Tzeltalan branch, Tzotzil and Tzeltal, both spoken in Chiapas by large and stable or growing populations (265,000 for Tzotzil and 215,000 for Tzeltal).[43] Tzeltal has tens of thousands of monolingual speakers.[44]


Q'anjob'al is spoken by 77,700 in Guatemala's Huehuetenango department,[33] with small populations elsewhere.[45] Jakaltek (also known as Popti'[46]) is spoken by almost 100,000 in several municipalities[47] of Huehuetenango. Another member of this branch is Akatek, with over 50,000 speakers in San Miguel Acatán and San Rafael La Independencia.[48]

Chuj is spoken by 40,000 people in Huehuetenango, and by 9,500 people, primarily refugees, over the border in Mexico, in the municipality of La Trinitaria, Chiapas, and the villages of Tziscau and Cuauhtémoc. Tojolab'al is spoken in eastern Chiapas by 36,000 people.[49]

Eastern branch


The Quichean–Mamean languages and dialects, with two sub-branches and three subfamilies, are spoken in the Guatemalan highlands.

Q'eqchi' (sometimes spelled Kekchi), which constitutes its own sub-branch within Quichean–Mamean, is spoken by about 400,000 people in the southern Petén, Izabal and Alta Verapaz departments of Guatemala, and also in Belize by 9,000 speakers. In El Salvador it is spoken by 12,000 as a result of recent migrations.[50]

The Uspantek language, which also springs directly from the Quichean–Mamean node, is native only to the Uspantán municipio in the department of El Quiché, and has 3,000 speakers.[51]


The largest language in this branch is Mam, spoken by 478,000 people in the departments of San Marcos and Huehuetenango. Awakatek is the language of 20,000 inhabitants of central Aguacatán, another municipality of Huehuetenango. Ixil (possibly three different languages) is spoken by 70,000 in the "Ixil Triangle" region of the department of El Quiché.[52] Tektitek (or Teko) is spoken by over 6,000 people in the municipality of Tectitán, and 1,000 refugees in Mexico. According to the Ethnologue the number of speakers of Tektitek is growing.[53]

Core Quichean

K'iche' (Quiché), the Mayan language with the largest number of speakers, is spoken by around 1,000,000 K'iche' Maya in the Guatemalan highlands, around the towns of Chichicastenango and Quetzaltenango and in the Cuchumatán mountains, as well as by urban emigrants in Guatemala City.[33] The famous Maya mythological document, Popol Vuh, is written in an antiquated K'iche' often called Classical K'iche' (or Quiché). The K'iche' culture was at its pinnacle at the time of the Spanish conquest. Q'umarkaj, near the present-day city of Santa Cruz del Quiché, was its economic and ceremonial center.[54]

Achi is spoken by 85,000 people in Cubulco and Rabinal, two municipios of Baja Verapaz. In some classifications, e.g. the one by Campbell, Achi is counted as a form of K'iche'. However, owing to a historical division between the two ethnic groups, the Achi Maya do not regard themselves as K'iche'.[55]

The Kaqchikel language is spoken by about 400,000 people in an area stretching from Guatemala City westward to the northern shore of Lake Atitlán.[56]

Tz'utujil has about 90,000 speakers in the vicinity of Lake Atitlán.[57] Other members of the K'ichean branch are Sakapultek, spoken by about 15,000 people mostly in El Quiché department,[58] and Sipakapense, which is spoken by 8,000 people in Sipacapa, San Marcos.[59]


The Poqom languages are closely related to Core Quichean, with which they constitute a Poqom-K'ichean sub-branch on the Quichean–Mamean node.[60]

Poqomchi' is spoken by 90,000 people[61] in Purulhá, Baja Verapaz, and in the following municipalities of Alta Verapaz: Santa Cruz Verapaz, San Cristóbal Verapaz, Tactic, Tamahú and Tucurú. Poqomam is spoken by around 49,000 people in several small pockets in Guatemala.[62]


The Mayan languages are primarily distributed across southern Mexico, Belize, and Guatemala, with a few languages also spoken in central Mexico, Honduras, and El Salvador. The most spoken Mayan language, by far, is K'iche' with 2.3 million speakers and the largest indigenous population in Guatemala. Yucatec Maya is the most widely spoken Mayan language in Mexico, with a number of speakers in the Yucatán peninsula. The Mexican state of Chiapas and the Guatemalan departments of Huehuetenango and El Quiché are known for their diversity of Mayan languages. In terms of the Mayan script, much of the written material is thought to have been written in Yucatec Maya or the Classic Maya language, which is the literary form of the Ch'olti' language.[63]


Proto-Mayan sound system

Proto-Mayan (the common ancestor of the Mayan languages as reconstructed[64] using the comparative method) has a predominant CVC syllable structure, only allowing consonant clusters across syllable boundaries.[65] Most Proto-Mayan roots were monosyllabic except for a few disyllabic nominal roots. Due to subsequent vowel loss many Mayan languages now show complex consonant clusters at both ends of syllables. Following the reconstruction of Lyle Campbell and Terrence Kaufman, the Proto-Mayan language had the following sounds;[66] the sounds present in the modern languages are largely similar to this root set.[citation needed]

Proto-Mayan vowels
Front Central Back
Short Long Short Long Short Long
High i u
Mid e o
Low a
Proto-Mayan consonants
Bilabial Alveolar Palatal Velar Uvular Glottal
Plain Implosive Plain Ejective Plain Ejective Plain Ejective Plain Ejective Plain
Oral stops p ɓ t tʲʼ k q ʔ
Affricates t͡s t͡sʼ t͡ʃ t͡ʃʼ
Fricative s ʃ χ h
Nasals m n ŋ
Liquids l   r
Glides j w

Phonological evolution of Proto-Mayan

The classification of Mayan languages is based on changes shared between groups of languages. For example, languages of the western group (such as Huastecan, Yucatecan and Ch'olan) all changed the Proto-Mayan phoneme */r/ into [j], some languages of the eastern branch retained [r] (K'ichean), and others changed it into [tʃ] or, word-finally, [t] (Mamean). The shared innovations between Huastecan, Yucatecan and Ch'olan show that they separated from the other Mayan languages before the changes found in other branches had taken place.[67]

Reflexes of Proto-Mayan *[r] in daughter languages
Proto-Mayan Wastek Yucatec Mopan Tzeltal Chuj Q'anjob'al Mam Ixil K'iche' Kaqchikel Poqomam Q'eqchi'
[jaʃ] [jaʔʃ] [jaʔaʃ] [jaʃ] [jaʔaʃ] [jaʃ] [tʃaʃ] [tʃaʔʃ] [raʃ] [rɐʃ] [raʃ] [raːʃ]
[waj] [waj] [wɐjn] [waj] [waj] [waj] [wit]
[wat] [war] [war] [wɨr] [war]

The palatalized plosives [tʲʼ] and [tʲ] are not found in any of the modern families. Instead they are reflected differently in different branches, allowing a reconstruction of these phonemes as palatalized plosives. In the eastern branch (Chujean-Q'anjobalan and Ch'olan) they are reflected as [t] and [tʼ]. In Mamean they are reflected as [ts] and [tsʼ] and in Quichean as [tʃ] and [tʃʼ]. Yucatec stands out from other western languages in that its palatalized plosives are sometimes changed into [tʃ] and sometimes [t].[68]

Reflexes of Proto-Mayan [tʲʼ] and [tʲ][69]
Proto-Mayan Yucatec Q'anjob'al Popti' Mam Ixil K'iche' Kaqchikel
[tʃeʔ] [teʔ] [teʔ] [tseːʔ] [tseʔ] [tʃeːʔ] [tʃeʔ]
[taʔn] [tan] [taŋ] [tsaːx] [tsaʔ] [tʃaːx] [tʃax]

The Proto-Mayan velar nasal *[ŋ] is reflected as [x] in the eastern branches (Quichean–Mamean), [n] in Q'anjobalan, Ch'olan and Yucatecan, [h] in Huastecan, and only conserved as [ŋ] in Chuj and Jakaltek.[67]

Reflexes of Proto-Mayan [ŋ][69]
Proto-Mayan Yucatec Q'anjobal Jakaltek Ixil K'iche'
[neːh] [ne] [ŋe] [xeh] [xeːʔ]

Other innovations

The subgrouping of the Mayan family is based on shared linguistic innovations. Some phonological developments that have been used to establish the current classification are described here.[citation needed]

The divergent status of Huastecan is revealed by a number of innovations not shared by other groups. Huastecan is the only branch to have changed Proto-Mayan *[w] into [b]. Wastek (but not Chicomuceltec) is also the only Mayan language to have a phonemic labialized velar phoneme [kʷ]. However, this is known to be a postcolonial development: comparing colonial documents in Wastek to modern Wastek, it can be seen that instances of modern [kʷ] were originally sequences of *[k] followed by a rounded vowel and a glide. For example, the word for "vulture", which in modern Wastek is pronounced [kʷiːʃ], was written ⟨cuyx⟩ in colonial Wastek, and pronounced *[kuwiːʃ].[citation needed]

The grouping together of the Ch'olan and Yucatecan branches is partly based on the innovative change of short *[a] to [ɨ]. All Cholan languages have changed the Proto-Mayan long vowels *[eː] and *[oː] to [i] and [u] respectively. The independent status of Yucatecan is evident in that all Yucatecan languages shifted proto-Mayan *[t] to [tʃ] in word-final position.[citation needed]

Quichean–Mamean, and some Q'anjobalan languages, have retained Proto-Mayan uvular stops ([q] and [qʼ]); in some other languages, such as the Yucatecan languages, these sounds merged with [k] and [kʼ], respectively, but in other languages, such as the Cholan languages, this merger did not take place, because the velar stops had earlier merged with the palato-alveolar affricates,[70] so such languages simply changed the uvular stops to velar, without merging them with previous velars. Thus the Quichean–Mamean grouping can be said to rest mostly on shared retentions rather than innovations, at least as far as phonological changes are concerned, but this grouping shares some vocabulary innovations.[citation needed]

Mamean is largely differentiated from K'ichean by a chain shift which changed *[r] into [t], *[t] into [tʃ], *[tʃ] into [tʂ] and *[ʃ] into [ʂ]. These retroflex affricates and fricatives later spread to Q'anjob'alan through language contact.[71]

Within the Quichean branch, Kaqchikel and Tz'utujil differ from Quichean proper in having changed a final Proto-Mayan *[h] and *[ɓ] into [j] and [ʔ] respectively, the latter change only in polysyllabic words.[72]

Some other changes are frequent throughout the Mayan family. For example, the Proto-Mayan glottal fricative *[h], which few languages have retained as such, has numerous reflexes in the various daughter languages depending on its position within a word. In some cases it lengthened a preceding vowel in languages which retained vowel length. In other languages it became [w], [j], [ʔ], [x], or disappeared.[73]

Other sporadic innovations have occurred independently in several branches. For example, distinctive vowel length has been lost in Q'anjobalan–Chujean (except for Mocho' and Akateko), Kaqchikel and Ch'olan. Other languages have transformed the length distinction into one of tense versus lax vowels, later losing the distinction in a majority of cases. However, Kaqchikel has preserved a centralized lax, schwa-like vowel as a reflex of Proto-Mayan [a].[74] Two languages, Yucatec and Uspantek, as well as one dialect of Tzotzil,[75] have introduced a tonal distinction in vowels, with high and low tones corresponding to former vowel length as well as reflecting *[h] and *[ʔ].[citation needed]


The morphology of Mayan languages is simpler than that of other Mesoamerican languages,[76] yet its morphology is still considered agglutinating and polysynthetic.[77] Verbs are marked for aspect or tense, the person of the subject, the person of the object (in the case of transitive verbs), and for plurality of person. Possessed nouns are marked for person of possessor. There are no cases or genders in Mayan languages.[citation needed]

Word order

Proto-Mayan is thought to have had a basic verb–object–subject word order with possibilities of switching to VSO in certain circumstances, such as complex sentences, sentences where object and subject were of equal animacy and when the subject was definite.[78] Today Yucatecan, Tzotzil and Tojolab'al have a basic fixed VOS word order. Mamean, Q'anjob'al, Jakaltek and one dialect of Chuj have a fixed VSO one. Only Ch'orti' has a basic SVO word order. Other Mayan languages allow both VSO and VOS word orders.[citation needed]

Numeral classifiers

When counting it is, in many Mayan languages, necessary to use numeral classifiers which specify the class of items being counted; the numeral cannot appear without an accompanying classifier. Some Mayan languages, such as Kaqchikel, do not use numeral classifiers. Class is usually assigned according to whether the object is animate or inanimate or according to an object's general shape.[79] Thus when counting "flat" objects, a different form of numeral classifier is used than when counting round things, oblong items or people. In some Mayan languages such as Chontal, classifiers take the form of affixes attached to the numeral; in others such as Tzeltal, they are free forms. Jakaltek has both numeral classifiers and noun classifiers, and the noun classifiers can also be used as pronouns.[80]

The meaning denoted by a noun may be altered significantly by changing the accompanying classifier. In Chontal, for example, when the classifier -tek is used with names of plants it is understood that the objects being enumerated are whole trees. If in this expression a different classifier, -ts'it (for counting long, slender objects) is substituted for -tek, this conveys the meaning that only sticks or branches of the tree are being counted:[81]

Semantic differences in numeral classifiers (from Chontal)
untek wop (one-tree Jahuacte) "one jahuacte tree" unts'it wop (one-stick jahuacte) "one stick from a jahuacte tree"
un- tek wop un- ts'it wop
one- "plant" jahuacte tree one- "long.slender.object" jahuacte tree


The morphology of Mayan nouns is fairly simple: they inflect for number (plural or singular), and, when possessed, for person and number of their possessor. Pronominal possession is expressed by a set of possessive prefixes attached to the noun, as in Kaqchikel ru-kej "his/her horse". Nouns may furthermore adopt a special form marking them as possessed. For nominal possessors, the possessed noun is inflected as possessed by a third-person possessor, and followed by the possessor noun, e.g. Kaqchikel ru-kej ri achin "the man's horse" (literally "his horse the man").[82] This type of formation is a main diagnostic trait of the Mesoamerican Linguistic Area and recurs throughout Mesoamerica.[83]

Mayan languages often contrast alienable and inalienable possession by varying the way the noun is (or is not) marked as possessed. Jakaltek, for example, contrasts inalienably possessed wetʃel "my photo (in which I am depicted)" with alienably possessed wetʃele "my photo (taken by me)". The prefix we- marks the first person singular possessor in both, but the absence of the -e possessive suffix in the first form marks inalienable possession.[82]

Relational nouns

Mayan languages which have prepositions at all normally have only one. To express location and other relations between entities, use is made of a special class of "relational nouns". This pattern is also recurrent throughout Mesoamerica and is another diagnostic trait of the Mesoamerican Linguistic Area. In Mayan most relational nouns are metaphorically derived from body parts so that "on top of", for example, is expressed by the word for head.[84]

Relational nouns are possessed by the constituent that is the reference point of the relation, and the relational noun names the relation. Thus in Mayan one would say "the mountain's head" (literally "its head the mountain") to mean "on (top of) the mountain". Thus in the Classical Quiché of the Popol Vuh we read u-wach ulew "on the earth" (literally "its face the earth").[citation needed]

Subjects and objects

Mayan languages are ergative in their alignment. This means that the subject of an intransitive verb is treated similarly to the object of a transitive verb, but differently from the subject of a transitive verb.[85]

Mayan languages have two sets of affixes that are attached to a verb to indicate the person of its arguments. One set (often referred to in Mayan grammars as set A) indicates the person of subjects of intransitive verbs, and of objects of transitive verbs. They can also be used with adjective or noun predicates to indicate the subject.[86]

Set A
Usage Example Language of example Translation
Subject of an intransitive verb x-ix-ok Kaqchikel "You [plural] entered"
Object of a transitive verb x-ix-ru-chöp Kaqchikel "He/she took you [plural]"
Subject of an adjective predicate ix-samajel Kaqchikel "You [plural] are hard-working."
Subject of a noun predicate 'antz-ot
Tzotzil "You are a woman."

Another set (set B) is used to indicate the person of subjects of transitive verbs (and in some languages, such as Yucatec, also the subjects of intransitive verbs, but only in the incompletive aspects), and also the possessors of nouns (including relational nouns).[87]

Set B
Usage Example Language of example Translation
Subject of a
transitive verb
x-ix-ru-chöp Kaqchikel "He/she took you guys"
Possessive marker ru-kej ri achin Kaqchikel "the man’s horse" (literally: "his horse the man")
Relational marker u-wach ulew Classical Quiché "on the earth" (literally: "its face the earth", i.e. "face of the earth")


In addition to subject and object (agent and patient), the Mayan verb has affixes signalling aspect, tense, and mood as in the following example:

Mayan verb structure
Aspect/mood/tense Class A prefix Class B prefix Root Aspect/mood/voice Plural
k- in- a- ch'ay -o
Incompletive 1st person sg. Patient 2nd person sg. Agent hit Incompletive
(K'iche') kinach'ayo "You are hitting me"

Tense systems in Mayan languages are generally simple. Jakaltek, for example, contrasts only past and non-past, while Mam has only future and non-future. Aspect systems are normally more prominent. Mood does not normally form a separate system in Mayan, but is instead intertwined with the tense/aspect system.[88] Kaufman has reconstructed a tense/aspect/mood system for proto-Mayan that includes seven aspects: incompletive, progressive, completive/punctual, imperative, potential/future, optative, and perfective.[89]

Mayan languages tend to have a rich set of grammatical voices. Proto-Mayan had at least one passive construction as well as an antipassive rule for downplaying the importance of the agent in relation to the patient. Modern K'iche' has two antipassives: one which ascribes focus to the object and another that emphasizes the verbal action.[71] Other voice-related constructions occurring in Mayan languages are the following: mediopassive, incorporational (incorporating a direct object into the verb), instrumental (promoting the instrument to object position) and referential (a kind of applicative promoting an indirect argument such as a benefactive or recipient to the object position).[90]

Statives and positionals

In Mayan languages, words are usually viewed as belonging to one of four classes: verbs, statives, adjectives, and nouns.[citation needed]

Statives are a class of predicative words expressing a quality or state, whose syntactic properties fall in between those of verbs and adjectives in Indo-European languages. Like verbs, statives can sometimes be inflected for person but normally lack inflections for tense, aspect and other purely verbal categories. Statives can be adjectives, positionals or numerals.[91]

Positionals, a class of roots characteristic of, if not unique to, the Mayan languages, form stative adjectives and verbs (usually with the help of suffixes) with meanings related to the position or shape of an object or person. Mayan languages have between 250 and 500 distinct positional roots:[91]

Telan ay jun naq winaq yul b'e.

There is a man lying down fallen on the road.

Woqan hin k'al ay max ek'k'u.

I spent the entire day sitting down.

Yet ewi xoyan ay jun lob'aj stina.

Yesterday there was a snake lying curled up in the entrance of the house.

In these three Q'anjob'al sentences,[92] the positionals are telan ("something large or cylindrical lying down as if having fallen"), woqan ("person sitting on a chairlike object"), and xoyan ("curled up like a rope or snake").[citation needed]

Word formation

Compounding of noun roots to form new nouns is commonplace; there are also many morphological processes to derive nouns from verbs. Verbs also admit highly productive derivational affixes of several kinds, most of which specify transitivity or voice.[93]

Some Mayan languages allow incorporation of noun stems into verbs, either as direct objects or in other functions. However, there are few affixes with adverbial or modal meanings.[citation needed]

As in other Mesoamerican languages, there is widespread metaphorical use of roots denoting body parts, particularly to form locatives and relational nouns such as Tzeltal/Tzotzil ti' na "door" (lit. "mouth of house"), or Kaqchikel chi ru-pam "inside" (lit. "mouth its-stomach").[citation needed]

Mayan loanwords

A number of loanwords of Mayan or potentially Mayan origins are found in other languages, principally Spanish, English, and some neighboring Mesoamerican languages. In addition, there are words in Mayan languages that are known or suspected to ultimately derive from non-Mayan languages, especially Spanish.[94]

According to Mayan language scholars, the English word "shark" comes directly from the Yucatec Maya xoc for "fish".[95][96] The OED print edition describes the origin of shark as "uncertain", noting that it "seems to have been introduced by the sailors of Captain (afterwards Sir John) Hawkins's expedition, who brought home a specimen which was exhibited in London in 1569".[97]

Another Mayan loanword is "cigar". "Sic" is Mayan for "tobacco" and "sicar" means "to smoke tobacco leaves". This is the most likely origin for cigar and thus cigarette.[98]

The word "hurricane" is clearly related to the Maya deity Jun Raqan. However, it is probable that the word passed into European languages from a Cariban language or Taino.[99]

Writing systems

Page 9 of the Dresden Codex showing the classic Maya language written in Mayan hieroglyphs (from the 1880 Förstermann edition)

The complex script used to write Mayan languages in pre-Columbian times and known today from engravings at several Maya archaeological sites has been deciphered almost completely. The script is a mix between a logographic and a syllabic system.[100]

In colonial times Mayan languages came to be written in a script derived from the Latin alphabet; orthographies were developed mostly by missionary grammarians.[101] Not all modern Mayan languages have standardized orthographies, but the Mayan languages of Guatemala use a standardized, Latin-based phonemic spelling system developed by the Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala (ALMG).[22][23] Orthographies for the languages of Mexico are currently being developed by the Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas (INALI).[102][103]

Glyphic writing

The pre-Columbian Maya civilization developed and used an intricate and fully functional writing system, which is the only Mesoamerican script that can be said to be almost fully deciphered. Earlier-established civilizations to the west and north of the Maya homelands that also had scripts recorded in surviving inscriptions include the Zapotec, Olmec, and the Zoque-speaking peoples of the southern Veracruz and western Chiapas area—but their scripts are as yet largely undeciphered. It is generally agreed that the Maya writing system was adapted from one or more of these earlier systems. A number of references identify the undeciphered Olmec script as its most likely precursor.[104]

In the course of the deciphering of the Maya hieroglyphic script, scholars have come to understand that it was a fully functioning writing system in which it was possible to express unambiguously any sentence of the spoken language. The system is of a type best classified as logosyllabic, in which symbols (glyphs or graphemes) can be used as either logograms or syllables.[100] The script has a complete syllabary (although not all possible syllables have yet been identified), and a Maya scribe would have been able to write anything phonetically, syllable by syllable, using these symbols.[100]

Maya glyphs in stucco at the Museo de sitio in Palenque, Mexico

At least two major Mayan languages have been confidently identified in hieroglyphic texts, with at least one other language probably identified. An archaic language variety known as Classic Maya predominates in these texts, particularly in the Classic-era inscriptions of the southern and central lowland areas. This language is most closely related to the Ch'olan branch of the language family, modern descendants of which include Ch'ol, Ch'orti' and Chontal. Inscriptions in an early Yucatecan language (the ancestor of the main surviving Yucatec language) have also been recognised or proposed, mainly in the Yucatán Peninsula region and from a later period. Three of the four extant Maya codices are based on Yucatec. It has also been surmised that some inscriptions found in the Chiapas highlands region may be in a Tzeltalan language whose modern descendants are Tzeltal and Tzotzil.[105] Other regional varieties and dialects are also presumed to have been used, but have not yet been identified with certainty.[14]

Use and knowledge of the Maya script continued until the 16th century Spanish conquest at least. Bishop Diego de Landa Calderón of the Catholic Archdiocese of Yucatán prohibited the use of the written language, effectively ending the Mesoamerican tradition of literacy in the native script. He worked with the Spanish colonizers to destroy the bulk of Mayan texts as part of his efforts to convert the locals to Christianity and away from what he perceived as pagan idolatry. Later he described the use of hieroglyphic writing in the religious practices of Yucatecan Maya in his Relación de las cosas de Yucatán.[106]

Colonial orthography

Colonial orthography is marked by the use of c for /k/ (always hard, as in cic /kiik/), k for /q/ in Guatemala or for /k’/ in the Yucatán, h for /x/, and tz for /ts/; the absence of glottal stop or vowel length (apart sometimes for a double vowel letter for a long glottalized vowel, as in uuc /u’uk/), the use of u for /w/, as in uac /wak/, and the variable use of z, ç, s for /s/. The greatest difference from modern orthography, however, is in the various attempts to transcribe the ejective consonants.[107]

In ca. 1550, Francisco de la Parra invented distinctive letters for ejectives in the Mayan languages of Guatemala, the tresillo and cuatrillo (and derivatives). These were used in all subsequent Franciscan writing, and are occasionally seen even today. In 1605, Alonso Urbano doubled consonants for ejectives in Otomi (pp, tt, ttz, cc / cqu), and similar systems were adapted to Mayan. Another approach, in Yucatec, was to add a bar to the letter, or to double the stem.[107]

Phoneme Yucatec Parra
pp, ꝑ, ꝑꝑ, 𝕡*
th, tħ, ŧ tt, th
tsʼ ɔ, dz
tʃʼ h

*Only the stem of 𝕡 is doubled, but that is not supported by Unicode.

A ligature for tz is used alongside and . The Yucatec convention of dz for /tsʼ/ is retained in Maya family names such as Dzib.

Modern orthography

Dinner menu in Kaqchikel, Antigua, Guatemala

Since the colonial period, practically all Maya writing has used a Latin alphabet. Formerly these were based largely on the Spanish alphabet and varied between authors, and it is only recently that standardized alphabets have been established. The first widely accepted alphabet was created for Yucatec Maya by the authors and contributors of the Diccionario Maya Cordemex, a project directed by Alfredo Barrera Vásquez and first published in 1980.[108] Subsequently, the Guatemalan Academy of Mayan Languages (known by its Spanish acronym ALMG), founded in 1986, adapted these standards to 22 Mayan languages (primarily in Guatemala). The script is largely phonemic, but abandoned the distinction between the apostrophe for ejective consonants and the glottal stop, so that ejective /tʼ/ and the non-ejective sequence /tʔ/ (previously t' and t7) are both written t'.[109] Other major Maya languages, primarily in the Mexican state of Chiapas, such as Tzotzil, Tzeltal, Ch'ol, and Tojolab'al, are not generally included in this reformation, and are sometimes written with the conventions standardized by the Chiapan "State Center for Indigenous Language, Art, and Literature" (CELALI), which for instance writes "ts" rather than "tz" (thus Tseltal and Tsotsil). In Mexico, names of archaeological sites and other items of historical record retain the colonial spellings, rather than the revised orthography.[citation needed]

ALMG orthography for the phonemes of Mayan languages
Vowels Consonants
a [a] aa [aː] ä [ɐ] b' [ɓ] b [b] ch [t͡ʃ] ch' [t͡ʃʼ] h [h]
e [e] ee [eː] ë [ɛ] j [χ] k [k] k' [kʼ] l [l] m [m]
i [i] ii [iː] ï [ɪ] n [n] nh [ŋ] p [p] q [q] q' [qʼ]
o [o] oo [oː] ö [ɤ̞] r [r] s [s] t [t] t' [tʼ] tz [t͡s]
u [u] uu [uː] ü [ʊ] tz' [t͡sʼ] w [w] x [ʃ] y [j]  '  [ʔ]

In tonal languages (primarily Yucatec), a high tone is indicated with an accent, as with "á" or "ée".

For the languages that make a distinction between palato-alveolar and retroflex affricates and fricatives (Mam, Ixil, Tektitek, Awakatek, Q'anjob'al, Popti', and Akatek in Guatemala, and Yucatec in Mexico) the ALMG suggests the following set of conventions.

ALMG convention for palato-alveolar and retroflex consonants
ch [tʃ] ch' [tʃʼ] x [ʃ]
tx [tʂ] tx' [tʂʼ] xh [ʂ]

One element of the revised orthographies that is not widely accepted, especially outside the Guatemalan context, is the conversion of proper nouns (such as names of archaeological sites, modern settlements, and cultures). Thus, the Cordemex continues to use the term "Yucatán" (rather than "Yukatan") in its preface, despite the fact that its orthography does not utilize a "c", and most scholarly archaeological texts continue to print the original spellings for archaeological sites and cultures that have been canonized in the literature over the centuries.[citation needed]


From the classic language to the present day, a body of literature has been written in Mayan languages. The earliest texts to have been preserved are largely monumental inscriptions documenting rulership, succession, and ascension, conquest and calendrical and astronomical events. It is likely that other kinds of literature were written in perishable media such as codices made of bark, only four of which have survived the ravages of time and the campaign of destruction by Spanish missionaries.[110]

Shortly after the Spanish conquest, the Mayan languages began to be written with Latin letters. Colonial-era literature in Mayan languages include the famous Popol Vuh, a mythico-historical narrative written in 17th century Classical Quiché but believed to be based on an earlier work written in the 1550s, now lost. The Título de Totonicapán and the 17th century theatrical work the Rabinal Achí are other notable early works in K'iche', the latter in the Achí dialect.[111] The Annals of the Cakchiquels from the late 16th century, which provides a historical narrative of the Kaqchikel, contains elements paralleling some of the accounts appearing in the Popol Vuh. The historical and prophetical accounts in the several variations known collectively as the books of Chilam Balam are primary sources of early Yucatec Maya traditions.[112] The only surviving book of early lyric poetry, the Songs of Dzitbalche by Ah Bam, comes from this same period.[113]

In addition to these singular works, many early grammars of indigenous languages, called "artes", were written by priests and friars. Languages covered by these early grammars include Kaqchikel, Classical Quiché, Tzeltal, Tzotzil and Yucatec. Some of these came with indigenous-language translations of the Catholic catechism.[114]

Almost no literature in indigenous languages was written in the postcolonial period (after 1821) except by linguists and ethnologists gathering oral literature.[115] The Mayan peoples had remained largely illiterate in their native languages, learning to read and write in Spanish, if at all. However, since the establishment of the Cordemex (1980) and the Guatemalan Academy of Mayan Languages (1986), native language literacy has begun to spread and a number of indigenous writers have started a new tradition of writing in Mayan languages. Notable among this new generation is the K'iche' poet Humberto Ak'ab'al, whose works are often published in dual-language Spanish/K'iche' editions,[116] as well as K'iche' scholar Luis Enrique Sam Colop (1955–2011) whose translations of the Popol Vuh into both Spanish and modern K'iche' achieved high acclaim.[117]

See also


  1. Nordhoff, Sebastian; Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin, eds. (2013). "Mayan". Glottolog. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  2. In linguistics, it is conventional to use Mayan when referring to the languages, or an aspect of a language. In other academic fields, Maya is the preferred usage, serving as both a singular and plural noun, and as the adjectival form.
  3. Spence, et al. (1998).
  4. Achi' is counted as a variant of K'iche' by the Guatemalan government. Counting Achi' there are 30 living Mayan languages.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Campbell (1997), p.165.
  6. Kettunen and Helmke (2005), p.6.
  7. England (1994).
  8. Campbell (1997), p. 165. The earliest proposal (Sapper 1912) which identified the Chiapas-Guatemalan highlands as the likely "cradle" of Mayan languages was published by the German antiquarian and scholar Karl Sapper; see attribution in Fernández de Miranda (1968), p. 75.
  9. Kaufman (1976)
  10. Robertson & Houston (2002).
  11. This theory was first proposed by Campbell and Kaufman (1976).
  12. Based on Kaufman (1976).
  13. Hruby and Child (2002)
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 Kettunen & Helmke (2006) p. 12.
  15. Houston, Robertson, and Stuart (2000).
  16. The last independent Maya kingdom (Tayasal) was not conquered until 1697, some 170 years after the first conquistadores arrived. During the Colonial and Postcolonial periods, Maya peoples periodically rebelled against the colonizers, such as the Caste War of Yucatán, which extended into the 20th century.
  17. Grenoble & Whaley (1998) characterized the situation this way: "Mayan languages typically have several hundreds of thousands of speakers, and a majority of Mayas speak a Mayan language as a first language. The driving concern of Maya communities is not to revitalize their language but to buttress it against the increasingly rapid spread of Spanish ... [rather than being] at the end of a process of language shift, [Mayan languages are] ... at the beginning." (Grenoble & Whaley 1998:xi-xii)
  18. Choi (2002) writes: "In the recent Maya cultural activism, maintenance of Mayan languages has been promoted in an attempt to support "unified Maya identity". However, there is a complex array of perceptions about Mayan language and identity among Mayans who I researched in Momostenango, a highland Maya community in Guatemala. On the one hand, Mayans denigrate K'iche' and have doubts about its potential to continue as a viable language because the command of Spanish is an economic and political necessity. On the other hand, they do recognize the value of Mayan language when they wish to claim the 'authentic Mayan identity'. It is this conflation of conflicting and ambivalent ideologies that inform language choice ...."
  19. Choi (2002)
  20. Fabri (2003: p. 61. n1) writes: "The term Maya is problematic because Maya peoples do not constitute a homogenous identity. Maya, rather, has become a strategy of self-representation for the Maya movements and its followers. The Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala (ALMG) finds twenty-one distinct Mayan languages."
  21. See Suárez (1993) chapter 2 for a thorough discussion of the usage and meanings of the words "dialect" and "language" in Mesoamerica.
  22. 22.0 22.1 French, B. M. (2003). The politics of Mayan linguistics in Guatemala: native speakers, expert analysts, and the nation. Pragmatics, 13(4).
  23. 23.0 23.1 England, N. C. (2007). The influence of Mayan-speaking linguists on the state of Mayan linguistics. Endangered languages, 14, 93.
  24. Campbell, Kaufman & Smith-Stark (1986)
  25. Campbell 1997 passim
  26. For example, Campbell and Kaufman (1985).
  27. Robertson (1977)
  28. Robertson & Houston (2003)
  29. Houston et al. (2000)
  30. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.). Ethnologue (2005).
  31. Campbell and Canger (1978).
  32. Población hablante de lengua indígena de 5 y más años por principales lenguas, 1970 a 2005 INEGI
  33. 33.0 33.1 33.2 Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.). Ethnologue, (2005).
  34. Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). "Maya, Yucatec" Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Eighteenth edition, (2015). Dallas, Texas: SIL International.
  35. There were only 12 remaining native speakers in 1986 according to Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.). Ethnologue, (2005).
  36. Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). "Lacandon" Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Eighteenth edition, (2015). Dallas, Texas: SIL International.
  37. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.), (2005). Ethnologue report on Ch'ol de Tila, Ethnologue report on Ch'ol de Tumbalá, both accessed March 07, 2007.
  38. Chontal Maya is not to be confused with the Tequistlatecan languages that are referred to as "Chontal of Oaxaca".
  39. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.), (2005). Ethnologue report on Chontal de Tabasco, accessed March 07, 2007.
  40. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.), (2005). Ch'orti': A language of Guatemala., accessed March 07, 2007.
  41. Campbell & Kaufman 1985
  42. Kettunen & Helmke (2006) p12.
  43. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.), (2005) Family Tree for Tzeltalan accessed March 26, 2007.
  44. Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). "Tzeltal" Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Eighteenth edition, (2015). Dallas, Texas: SIL International.
  45. The region of Q'anjobalan speakers in Guatemala, due to genocidal policies during the Civil War and its close proximity to the Mexican border, was the source of a number of refugees. Thus there are now small Q'anjob'al, Jakaltek, and Awakatek populations in various locations in Mexico, the United States (such as Tuscarawas County, Ohio), and, through postwar resettlement, other parts of Guatemala.
  46. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.), (2005). Gordon (2005) recognizes Eastern and Western dialects of Jakaltek, as well as Mocho' (also called Mototzintlec), a language with less than 200 speakers in the Chiapan villages of Tuzantán and Mototzintla.
  47. Jakaltek is spoken in the municipios of Jacaltenango, La Democracia, Concepción, San Antonio Huista and Santa Ana Huista, and in parts of the Nentón muncipio.
  48. Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). "Akateko" Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Eighteenth edition, (2015). Dallas, Texas: SIL International.
  49. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.), (2005) Tojolabal: A language of Mexico. and Chuj: A language of Guatemala. both accessed March 19, 2007.
  50. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.), (2005). Ethnologue report on Q'eqchi, accessed March 07, 2007.
  51. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.), (2005) Ethnologue report for Uspantec, accessed March 26, 2007.
  52. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.), (2005) Ethnologue report on Nebaj Ixil, Chajul Ixil & San Juan Cotzal Ixil, accessed March 07, 2008.
  53. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.), (2005) Ethnologue report for Tektitek, accessed March 07, 2007.
  54. Edmonson (1968), pp.250–251.
  55. The Ethnologue considers the dialects spoken in Cubulco and Rabinal to be distinct languages, two of the eight languages of a Quiché-Achi family. Raymond G., Gordon Jr. (ed.). Ethnologue, (2005). Language Family Tree for Mayan, accessed March 26, 2007.
  56. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.), (2005). Family Tree for Kaqchikel, accessed March 26, 2007.
  57. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.), (2005). Ethnologue report on Eastern Tz'utujil, Ethnologue report on Western Tz'utujil, both accessed March 26, 2007.
  58. Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). "Sakapulteko" Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Eighteenth edition, (2015). Dallas, Texas: SIL International.
  59. Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). "Sipakapense" Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Eighteenth edition, (2015). Dallas, Texas: SIL International.
  60. Campbell (1997), p.163.
  61. Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.), (2005). Ethnologue report on Eastern Poqomam, Ethnologue report on Western Poqomchi', both accessed March 07, 2007.
  62. Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). "Poqomam" Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Eighteenth edition, (2015). Dallas, Texas: SIL International.
  63. Wichmann 2006
  64. Campbell and Kaufman (1985) present the first thorough reconstruction of the Mayan proto-language.
  65. Proto-Mayan allowed roots of the shape CVC, CVVC, CVhC, CVʔC, an CVSC (where S is /s/, /ʃ/, or /x/)); see England (1994), p.77.
  66. As presented in England (1994), p.35.
  67. 67.0 67.1 England (1994), pp.30–31.
  68. England (1994), p. 35.
  69. 69.0 69.1 Adapted from cognate list in England (1994).
  70. Campbell, Lyle, (1998), "Historical Linguistics", Thames & Hudson p. 39.
  71. 71.0 71.1 Campbell (1997), p.164.
  72. Campbell, Lyle, (1998), "Historical Linguistics", Thames & Hudson p. 170.
  73. England (1994), p. 37.
  74. England (1994), pp.110–111.
  75. Tzotzil of San Bartolo according to Suárez (1983), p. 51. Antonio Garciá de Leon describes the phonological history of the Tzeltalan languages and mentions the tonogenesis of Tzotzil de San Bartolo in his "Elementos del Tzotzil colonial y moderno" Mexico UNAM, 1971.
  76. Suárez (1983), p. 65. writes: "Neither Tarascan nor Mayan have words as complex as those found in Nahuatl, Totonac or Mixe–Zoque, but, in different ways both have a rich morphology."
  77. Suárez (1983), p65.
  78. Lyle Campbell (1997) refers to studies by Norman and Campbell ((1978) "Toward a proto-Mayan syntax: a comparative perspective on grammar", in Papers in Mayan Linguistics, ed. Nora C. England, pp. 136–56. Columbia: Museum of Anthropology, University of Missouri) and by England ((1991) "Changes in basic word order in Mayan languages", IJAL 57:446–486).
  79. See, e.g., Tozzer (1977 [1921]), pp. 103, 290–292.
  80. Craig, Colette Grinevald, "The Structure of Jacaltec", University of Texas Press, 1977, p. 141.
  81. Example follows Suaréz (1983), p. 88.
  82. 82.0 82.1 Suaréz (1983), p. 85.
  83. Campbell, Kaufman & Smith Stark (1986) pp. 544–545
  84. Campbell, Kaufman & Smith Stark (1986) pp. 545–546
  85. Coon (2010) pp. 47–52
  86. Suarez 1983:77
  87. Another view has been suggested by Carlos Lenkersdorf, an anthropologist who studied the Tojolab'al language. He argued that a native Tojolab'al speaker makes no cognitive distinctions between subject and object, or even between active and passive, animate and inanimate, seeing both subject and object as active participants in an action. For instance, in Tojolab'al rather than saying "I teach you", one says the equivalent of "I-teach you-learn". See Lenkersdorf, (1996), p. 60–62.
  88. Suaréz (1983), p. 71.
  89. England (1994), p. 126.
  90. England (1994), pp. 97–103.
  91. 91.0 91.1 Coon, J., & Preminger, O. (2009). Positional roots and case absorption. New Perspectives in Mayan Linguistics, 35–58.
  92. England (1994), p. 87.
  93. Suárez (1983), p. 65–67.
  94. Hofling, Charles Andrew (2011). Mopan Maya-Spanish-English Dictionary. Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah Press. p. 6. ISBN 1607810298.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  95. Jones, Tom (1985). "The Xoc, the Sharke, and the Sea Dogs: An Historical Encounter". Fifth Palenque Round Table, 1983. The Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute. Retrieved 24 November 2013.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  96. Coe, Michael D. Breaking the Maya Code (3rd ed.). New York: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 9780500289556.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[page needed]
  97. "Shark". Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). 1989.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  98. Cigar, Online Etymology Dictionary.
  99. Read & González (2000), p.200
  100. 100.0 100.1 100.2 Kettunen & Helmke (2006), p. 6.
  101. Suárez (1983), p. 5.
  102. Campbell, Lyle. "Mayan history and comparison" (PDF). Cite journal requires |journal= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  103. MAXWELL, J. M. (2011). The Path Back to Literacy. After the Coup: An Ethnographic Reframing of Guatemala 1954, 115.
  104. Schele and Freidel (1990), Soustelle (1984).
  105. Kettunen & Helmke (2006), p. 12.
  106. Kettunen & Helmke (2006), pp. 7–8.
  107. 107.0 107.1 Arzápalo Marín, R. (2005). La representación escritural del maya de Yucatán desde la época prehispánica hasta la colonia: Proyecciones hacia el siglo XXI. in Zwartjes & Altman, 2005, Missionary Linguistics II: Orthography and Phonology.
  108. The Cordemex contains a lengthy introduction on the history, importance, and key resources of written Yucatec Maya, including a summary of the orthography used by the project (pp. 39a-42a).
  109. Josephe DeChicchis, "Revisiting an imperfection in Mayan orthography", Journal of Policy Studies 37 (March 2011)
  110. Coe, Michael D. (1987), p. 161.
  111. See Edmonson (1985) for a thorough treatment of colonial Quiché literature.
  112. Read Edmonson and Bricker (1985) for a thorough treatment of colonial Yucatec literature.
  113. Curl (2005).
  114. Suárez (1983), p5.
  115. Suárez (1983), p. 163–168.
  116. "Humberto Ak´abal" (in Spanish). Guatemala Ministerio de Cultura y Deportes. March 26, 2007. Archived from the original on February 14, 2006. Retrieved 2007-02-23. Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  117. "Luis Enrique Sam Colop, 1955–2011 | American Indian Studies". Retrieved 2011-12-19.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>


Barrera Vásquez, Alfredo; Bastarrachea Manzano, Juan Ramón; Brito Sansores, William (1980). Diccionario maya Cordemex : maya-español, español-maya. Mérida, Yucatán, México: Ediciones Cordemex. OCLC 7550928.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> (Spanish) (Yukatek Maya)
Bolles, David (2003) [1997]. "Combined Dictionary–Concordance of the Yucatecan Mayan Language" (Revized ed.). Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc. (FAMSI). Retrieved 2006-12-12.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> (Yukatek Maya) (English)
Bolles, David; Bolles, Alejandra (2004). "A Grammar of the Yucatecan Mayan Language" (revised online edition, 1996 Lee, New Hampshire). Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc. (FAMSI). The Foundation Research Department. Retrieved 2006-12-12.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> (Yukatek Maya) (English)
Campbell, Lyle (1997). American Indian Languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics, no. 4. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-509427-1.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Campbell, Lyle; Canger, Una (1978). "Chicomuceltec's last throes". International Journal of American Linguistics. 44 (3): 228–230. doi:10.1086/465548. ISSN 0020-7071.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Campbell, Lyle; Kaufman, Terrence (1976). "A Linguistic Look at the Olmec". American Antiquity. 41 (1): 80–89. doi:10.2307/279044. ISSN 0002-7316. JSTOR 279044.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Campbell, Lyle; Kaufman, Terrence (October 1985). "Mayan Linguistics: Where are We Now?". Annual Review of Anthropology. 14 (1): 187–198. doi:10.1146/<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Choi, Jinsook (2002). The Role of Language in Ideological Construction of Mayan Identities in Guatemala (PDF). Texas Linguistic Forum 45: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Symposium about Language and Society—Austin, April 12–14. pp. 22–31.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Coe, Michael D. (1987). The Maya (4th revised ed.). London: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 0-500-27455-X.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Coe, Michael D. (1992). Breaking the Maya Code. London: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 0-500-05061-9. OCLC 26605966.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Coon, Jessica (2010). "Complementation in Chol (Mayan): A Theory of Split Ergativity" (electronic version). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved 2010-07-15.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Curl, John (2005). Ancient American Poets. Tempe, AZ: Bilingual Press. ISBN 1-931010-21-8.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Dienhart, John M. (1997). "The Mayan Languages- A Comparative Vocabulary" (electronic version). Odense University. Retrieved 2006-12-12.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Edmonson, Munro S. (1968). "Classical Quiché". In Norman A. McQuown (Volume ed.) (ed.). Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 5: Linguistics. R. Wauchope (General Editor). Austin: University of Texas Press. pp. 249–268. ISBN 0-292-73665-7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Edmonson, Munro S. (1985). "Quiche Literature". In Victoria Reifler Bricker (volume ed.) (ed.). Supplement to the Handbook of Middle American Indians, Volume 3. Austin: University of Texas Press. ISBN 0-292-77593-8.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Edmonson, Munro S.; Bricker, Victoria R. (1985). "Yucatecan Mayan Literature". In Victoria Reifler Bricker (volume ed.) (ed.). Supplement to the Handbook of Middle American Indians, Volume 3. Austin: University of Texas Press. ISBN 0-292-77593-8.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
England, Nora C. (1994). Autonomia de los Idiomas Mayas: Historia e identidad. (Ukuta'miil Ramaq'iil Utzijob'aal ri Maya' Amaaq'.) (in español) (2nd ed.). Guatemala City: Cholsamaj. ISBN 84-89451-05-2.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Fabri, Antonella (2003). "Genocide or Assimilation: Discourses of Women's Bodies, Health, and Nation in Guatemala". In Richard Harvey Brown (ed.) (ed.). The Politics of Selfhood: Bodies and Identities in Global Capitalism. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 0-8166-3754-7.CS1 maint: extra text: editors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Fernández de Miranda, María Teresa (1968). "Inventory of Classificatory Materials". In Norman A. McQuown (Volume ed.) (ed.). Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 5: Linguistics. R. Wauchope (General Editor). Austin: University of Texas Press. pp. 63–78. ISBN 0-292-73665-7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Gossen, Gary (1985). "Tzotzil Literature". In Victoria Reifler Bricker (ed.). Supplement to the Handbook of Middle American Indians, Volume 3. Austin: University of Texas Press. ISBN 0-292-77593-8.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Grenoble, Lenore A.; Whaley, Lindsay J. (1998). "Preface" (PDF). In Lenore A. Grenoble and Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.) (ed.). Endangered languages: Current issues and future prospects. Cambridge University Press. pp. xi–xii. ISBN 0-521-59102-3.CS1 maint: extra text: editors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Houston, Stephen D.; Robertson, John; Stuart, David (2000). "The Language of Classic Maya Inscriptions". Current Anthropology. 41 (3): 321–356. doi:10.1086/300142. ISSN 0011-3204. PMID 10768879.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Kaufman, Terrence (1976). "Archaeological and Linguistic Correlations in Mayaland and Associated Areas of Meso-America". World Archaeology. 8 (1): 101–118. doi:10.1080/00438243.1976.9979655. ISSN 0043-8243.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Kettunen, Harri; Helmke, Christophe (2005). Introduction to Maya Hieroglyphs (PDF). Wayeb and Leiden University. Retrieved 2006-10-10.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Lenkersdorf, Carlos (1996). Los hombres verdaderos. Voces y testimonios tojolabales. Lengua y sociedad, naturaleza y cultura, artes y comunidad cósmica (in español). Mexico City: Siglo XXI. ISBN 968-23-1998-6.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Longacre, Robert (1968). "Systemic Comparison and Reconstruction". In Norman A. McQuown (Volume ed.) (ed.). Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 5: Linguistics. R. Wauchope (General Editor). Austin: University of Texas Press. pp. 117–159. ISBN 0-292-73665-7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
McQuown, Norman A. (1968). "Classical Yucatec (Maya)". In Norman A. McQuown (Volume ed.) (ed.). Handbook of Middle American Indians, Vol. 5: Linguistics. R. Wauchope (General Editor). Austin: University of Texas Press. pp. 201–248. ISBN 0-292-73665-7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Mooney, James Wikisource-logo.svg Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). [ "Maya Indians" ] Check |ws link in chapter= value (help). Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Oxlajuuj Keej Maya' Ajtz'iib' (OKMA) (1993). Maya' chii'. Los idiomas Mayas de Guatemala. Guatemala City: Cholsamaj. ISBN 84-89451-52-4.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Read, Kay Almere; González, Jason (2000). Handbook of Mesoamerican Mythology. Oxford: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 1-85109-340-0. OCLC 43879188.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Robertson, John (1977). "Proposed revision in Mayan subgrouping". International Journal of American Linguistics. 43: (2): 105–120. doi:10.1086/465466.CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Robertson, John (1992). The History of Tense/Aspect/Mood/Voice in the Mayan Verbal Complex. University of Texas Press.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Robertson, John; Houston, Stephen (2002). "El problema del Wasteko: Una perspectiva lingüística y arqueológica". In J.P. Laporte, B. Arroyo, H. Escobedo y H. Mejía (eds.). XVI Simposio de InvestigacionesArqueológicas en Guatemala. Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología, Guatemala. pp. 714–724.CS1 maint: uses editors parameter (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Sapper, Karl (1912). Über einige Sprachen von Südchiapas. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Congress of Americanists (1910) (in Deutsch). pp. 295–320.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Schele, Linda; Freidel, David (1990). A Forest of Kings: The Untold Story of the Ancient Maya. New York: William Morrow and Company. ISBN 0-688-07456-1.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Soustelle, Jacques (1984). The Olmecs: The Oldest Civilization in Mexico. New York: Doubleday and Co. ISBN 0-385-17249-4.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Spence, Jack; Dye, David R.; Worby, Paula; de Leon-Escribano, Carmen Rosa; Vickers, George; Lanchin, Mike (August 1998). "Promise and Reality: Implementation of the Guatemalan Peace Accords". Hemispheres Initiatives. Retrieved 2006-12-06.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Suaréz, Jorge A. (1983). The Mesoamerican Indian Languages. Cambridge Language Surveys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-22834-4.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Tozzer, Alfred M. (1977) [1921]. A Maya Grammar (unabridged republication ed.). New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-23465-7.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Wichmann, S. (2006). "Mayan historical linguistics and epigraphy: a new synthesis". Annual Review of Anthropology. 35: 279–294. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123257.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

External links

Bonampak painting+contrast.jpg
Maya civilization

Maya architecture
Maya calendar
Mayan languages
Maya mythology
Maya peoples
Maya religion
Maya society