Richard Seymour (writer)

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Richard Seymour (born 1977)[citation needed] is a Marxist writer and broadcaster, activist and owner of the blog Lenin's Tomb. The author of The Liberal Defence of Murder and other books, Seymour was born in Ballymena, Northern Ireland to a Protestant family,[1] and currently lives in London. A former member of the Socialist Workers Party,[2] he left the organisation in March 2013. He is currently preparing a PhD in sociology at the London School of Economics under the supervision of Paul Gilroy.[3] In the past he has written for The Guardian, but his contract to write for them ended in December 2014.

Lenin's Tomb and other outlets

The blog Lenin's Tomb began in June 2003[4] and was listed in 2005 as the 21st-most-popular blog in the United Kingdom.[5] Although run by Seymour, it also has front-page posts from other contributors, including, occasionally, China Miéville.[6] It has been cited by the BBC,[7][8] The Guardian, Private Eye, and Slate magazine.[9] Seymour writes about "issues such as imperialism, Zionism, Islamophobia and anti-capitalism, and covers strikes and protests with footage, images and reportage".

Beginning in January 2013, Seymour focused his blog on an internal crisis involving allegations of rape committed by a (now former) member of the SWP's central committee, and accepted guest entries from other party members criticising the party leadership's response.[10] He announced his resignation from the SWP on 11 March,[11][12] and began using the original blog to convey a more thorough account of the party's crisis than hitherto.[13] Writing in The Guardian, Seymour responded to an article by Julie Sherry,[14] a central committee member: "We will take no lessons from the Daily Mail, Sherry says. How right she is. With a record like this, who needs lessons from the Daily Mail?"[15]

On 2 September 2015, Seymour left a Facebook comment about a Telegraph column detailing Falklands War veteran and serious burns victim Simon Weston's comments regarding Labour Party Leadership candidate Jeremy Corbyn's plan, Weston believes, to "surrender" the Falkland Islands to Argentina. Seymour stated in his comment: "Seriously. Who gives a shit what Simon Weston thinks about anything? If he knew anything, he'd still have his face." Seymour was unapologetic on twitter for his comment.[16]

On 5 November 2015, Seymour told LBC that violence at the Million Mask March in London was "just part of the way things are." Asked "You don't care a jot about innocent people's safety do you?" he responded, "No, not a bit". [17]

Apart from The Guardian,[18] Seymour has written for the London Review of Books, ABC Australia, Al Jazeera, In These Times and other publications.[19][20][21][22] Since September 2014, he has recorded a regular segment for TeleSur English programme, The World Today with Tariq Ali.[23]

The Liberal Defence of Murder

A review by the journalist Gary Younge of Seymour's 2008 book, The Liberal Defence of Murder, which was featured on the book's cover, describes Seymour as "expertly" tracing the descent of liberal supporters of war "from humanitarian intervention to blatant islamophobia". China Miéville praised the book as an "indispensable" guide to the "pre-history and modern reality of the so-called 'pro-war Left'". Owen Hatherley, writing in the New Statesman, praised the book as "a freshly written, heavily footnoted and clearly obsessively researched history of 400 years of the 'decent left'".[24] An Independent on Sunday review described it as "an excellent antidote to the propagandists of the crisis of our times", and a later review in The Independent by the policy director of Save the Children described the book as "timely, provocative and thought-provoking".[25]

A review in The Times praised the book as a "powerful counter-blast against the monstrous regiment of 'useful idiots'" who have "contributed in recent decades to the murderous mess of modern times".[26] On the other hand, columnist Oliver Kamm, writing for his Times blog, disputed the review, accusing Seymour of historiographical distortions.[27] Seymour posted a lengthy reply to Kamm's criticisms on his own blog.[28]

A critical review in The Guardian by Philippe Sands contended that despite the book's "damning material" on the supporters of war, this "potentially important book" was weakened by "the generality" of its conclusions and the failure to concede that there are instances where the use of force is justified.[29] Seymour also responded to this critique on his blog. An enthusiastic review appeared in Resurgence magazine in March 2010, declaiming that: "Richard Seymour's obsessively researched, impressive first book holds its place as the most authoritative historical analysis of its kind".[30] A scholarly review in the Journal of American Studies commended the book's "truly impressive breadth and depth", arguing that it provided "a new European perspective – and a warning – on the left's pragmatic and ultimately shortsighted support for imperialist adventures".[31]

Computer programmer and Internet activist Aaron Swartz praised the book unreservedly in his 2009 review of books: "This book is like a little miracle. I’m not even sure how to describe it, except to say that it turns one’s understanding of history completely upside-down." [32]

A later interview on the literary website, ReadySteadyBook, discussed Seymour's motivations in writing the book, and his responses to critics. He explained that: "The shape the book eventually took, as a genealogy of liberal imperialism, was prompted by the combat clerisy themselves. They were the ones appealing to the legacy of 19th Century liberal imperialism. They were the ones vaunting a kitschy manifest-destinarianism, as well as a muscular determination to visit vengeance on the barbarians. It was they who culled their catchphrases from a disgraced imperial lexicon. Unless I wanted to write a gossipy, huffy polemic in the manner of Nick Cohen's What's Left, I had no choice but to anatomise these discursive strategies from their origins to the present day."[33]

Unhitched: The Trial of Christopher Hitchens

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Unhitched, published in 2013, focuses on Christopher Hitchens's work on religion, his engagement with British politics and his alleged embrace of American imperialism.[34] Seymour has said of Unhitched, "It is written in the spirit of a trial ... I do attempt to get a sense of the complexity and gifts of the man, but it is very clearly a prosecution, and you can guess my conclusion."[35]

Published works

Selected articles

Talks

References

  1. Richard Seymour « Interview « ReadySteadyBook – for literature. Readysteadybook.com. Retrieved on 21 September 2012.
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. Richard Seymour | London School of Economics – Academia.edu. Lse.academia.edu. Retrieved on 21 September 2012.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Paul Kellogg "Britain: Reflections on the crisis in the Socialist Workers Party", LINKS – Journal of International Socialist Renewal, 13 January 2013
  11. "Resigning from the Socialist Workers Party", International Socialism, 11 March 2013
  12. Richard Seymour "On resigning from the SWP", Lenin's Tomb, 12 March 2013
  13. 'Lenin' (Richard Seymour) "The crisis in the SWP: part I", Lenin's Tomb, 12 March 2013
  14. Julie Sherry "Challenging sexism is at the heart of the SWP's work", The Guardian, 21 March 2013
  15. Richard Seymour "The SWP leadership has turned the party into a sinking ship", guardian.co.uk, 22 Marcvh 2013
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. LBC Don't Care If Public Get Hurt, Protester Tells LBC 6 November 2015
  18. Richard Seymour. The Guardian. Retrieved on 21 September 2012.
  19. LENIN'S TOMB: Oh, by the way. Leninology.blogspot.com (16 September 2010). Retrieved on 21 September 2012.
  20. Richard Seymour – The Drum Opinion (Australian Broadcasting Corporation). Abc.net.au. Retrieved on 21 September 2012.
  21. Gore Vidal remembered: 'Every time a friend succeeds, I die a little' – Opinion. Al Jazeera English (4 August 2012). Retrieved on 21 September 2012.
  22. Richard Seymour – Profile. In These Times. Retrieved on 21 September 2012.
  23. "Missouri, goddam". Lenin's Tomb. Retrieved on 22 April 2015.
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  44. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links