Skymark Airlines

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Skymark Airlines
スカイマーク
Sukai Māku
248px
IATA ICAO Callsign
BC SKY SKYMARK
Founded 12 November 1996
Commenced operations 19 September 1998
Hubs Haneda Airport
Focus cities Kobe Airport
Naha Airport
New Chitose Airport
Fukuoka Airport
Fleet size 26[1]
Destinations 11[2]
Headquarters Haneda Airport, Ōta, Tokyo, Japan
Key people Masakazu Arimori (President and CEO)
David Pflieger (Chairman from January 2016)
Revenue Decrease ¥86.0 billion (FY March 2014)[3]
Operating income Decrease (¥2.5 billion) (FY March 2014)[3]
Net income Decrease (¥1.8 billion) (FY March 2014)[3]
Total assets Decrease ¥74.1 billion (Dec. 2014)[4]
Total equity Decrease ¥31.1 billion (Dec. 2014)[4]
Employees 2,092 (June 2015)[5]
Website www.skymark.co.jp/en/

Skymark Airlines Inc. (スカイマーク株式会社 Sukaimāku Kabushiki-gaisha?) TYO: 9204 is a low-cost airline headquartered at Haneda Airport in Ōta, Tokyo, Japan,[5] operating scheduled passenger services within Japan. In addition to its base at Haneda, Skymark is the dominant carrier at Kobe Airport[6] and is the only domestic airline operating at Ibaraki Airport north of Tokyo.

Skymark was the first low-cost carrier established in Japan and is the only carrier offering domestic flights at Haneda Airport in competition with the duopoly of All Nippon Airways and Japan Airlines. Internet entrepreneur Shinichi Nishikubo controlled the company from 2003 to 2015, when the carrier filed for bankruptcy protection after attempting a fleet and service expansion. It remains the largest independent airline in Japan and the only independent low-cost carrier, as the other low-cost carriers in Japan are controlled by either ANA or JAL.[7] In August 2015, Skymark creditors agreed to restructure the airline under the control of Japanese private equity fund Integral Corporation (50.1%), with minority investments from All Nippon Airways (16.5%), Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and the Development Bank of Japan (33.4%).[8]

History

File:Skymark Airlines JA767E B767-328ER 2005.jpg
A Skymark Boeing 767 in old livery at Haneda Airport, 2005

Skymark Airlines was established in November 1996 as an independent domestic airline after deregulation of the Japanese airline industry and started operations on 19 September 1998.[5] It was originally owned by a consortium of investors led by the travel agency H.I.S. and headed by H.I.S. president Hideo Sawada;[9] another major early investor was the leasing company Orix. Its initial business plan called for it to be headquartered at Itami Airport in Osaka.[10] Takashi Ide, former head of British Airways' operation in Japan, was hired as the company's CEO in 1998.[11]

Skymark was able to obtain six slots at Haneda Airport in Tokyo in March 1997 and moved its headquarters to the Hamamatsucho district of Tokyo in March 1998. Its first scheduled flight from Haneda to Fukuoka was on September 19, 1998; it added routes from Itami to Fukuoka and Sapporo in 1999, but suspended these routes in 2000 in order to offer more frequencies on the Haneda-Fukuoka route.[12]

In 2002, Skymark took delivery of a third Boeing 767 aircraft and began service on the Haneda-Kagoshima route, as well as charter service from Haneda to Seoul. In 2003, with a fourth 767 dry-leased from All Nippon Airways, it began service to Aomori and Tokushima.[12]

The airline incurred considerable losses in its first few years of operations. It briefly considered a recapitalization led by Commerzbank but decided not to accept such an investment due to Air Do's issues with banks interfering in management. In August 2003, Sawada invited internet entrepreneur Shinichi Nishikubo to become Skymark's largest shareholder with a personal cash investment of 3.5 billion yen (having made around 9 billion yen from the IPO of his internet company in 2000).[9] Nishikubo took over as CEO in 2004, maintaining Ide as a "co-pilot" due to Ide's experience in the aviation industry.[11]

On 11 December 2003, Skymark announced that it expected a profit of 470 million yen for the half-fiscal year ending on 31 October, the first profit made since the airline began operations.[13] By using more efficient aircraft and systems developed in-house, Skymark attempted to undercut JAL and ANA on costs in order to offer lower fares.[14]

File:JA767F.JPG
A Skymark Boeing 767 in new livery at Haneda Airport, 2006

Skymark had a code sharing partnership with Japan Airlines starting with a Haneda-Osaka Kansai service in 2005-06,[12] and later on the Tokyo Haneda-Kobe route from Kobe Airport's opening in 2006.[15] JAL withdrew from Kobe in 2010, while Skymark developed Kobe into a secondary base.[16] Skymark purchased the naming rights for the Kobe Sports Park Baseball Stadium from 2005 to 2010.

Skymark announced in April 2010 that it would commence a "Narita Shuttle" service from Narita International Airport to Asahikawa, Sapporo, Fukuoka, and Okinawa in late 2011 and early 2012.[17]

Shift to premium service

A Skymark Boeing 737-800 landing at Haneda Airport (2007)

In November 2010 Skymark announced negotiations with Airbus for an order of four Airbus A380 aircraft and two options, making it the first Japanese airline to order the type.[18][19][20] The airline announced its intent to use the aircraft on long-haul trunk routes out of Narita Airport such as London, Frankfurt, Paris and New York, and that they would be operated in a two-class, 394-seat configuration — with 114 seats in business class and 280 in a premium economy class.[21] Nishikubo envisioned an unheard-of fully-flat product in economy class, which the Skymark team calculated would break even at a one-way fare of 100,000 yen.[11]

As Skymark began to prepare for international service, it began to face stiff competition from a new group of low-cost carriers in Japan beginning in 2012, particularly from AirAsia Japan (later Vanilla Air) and Jetstar Japan at its Narita base. This led to a reduction in Skymark's frequencies on highly contested routes such as Narita-Sapporo and Narita-Fukuoka, and a refocusing of aircraft on more exclusive routes such as Narita-Ishigaki.[22]

Skymark attempted a more competitive domestic offering by executing leases for seven Airbus A330-300 aircraft in July 2012.[23] Skymark announced that it would outfit these aircraft in a 271-seat single-class premium configuration with 38-inch seat pitch and 22-inch seat width, tentatively called "Green Seats" and comparable to the domestic "Class J" offering on Japan Airlines,[24] to win market share among business travelers on the key domestic trunk routes from Tokyo to Fukuoka and Sapporo.[25] Skymark also had plans to install "Green Seat" cabins on its 737 fleet to create a 2-class configuration[26] but cancelled the plan in early 2014 in favor of keeping a single-class 737 fleet for competition with other LCCs.[27]

Somewhat controversially, Skymark announced that A330 flight attendants would wear miniskirt uniforms, in contrast to Skymark's usual polo shirt uniforms, for the first six months of operation of each route.[28] The Japan Federation of Cabin Attendants publicly complained about the idea, claiming that the uniforms were unsafe to the women wearing them and would lead to harassment and objectification.[29]

Since 2013, Delta Air Lines has been highly interested in beginning a code-share agreement with Skymark. This is mainly due to Delta's expanding Tokyo service. [30] After ANA's investment in Skymark, the possibility is now more slim. [31]

Financial downturn

Skymark's finances were hit hard by foreign exchange rate fluctuations. In February 2011, when Skymark placed its initial A380 order, the Japanese yen was trading at historically high levels of around 82 yen to the U.S. dollar. After the introduction of the Abenomics policy in late 2012, the yen plunged in value, reaching around 102 yen to the dollar in early 2015. Many of Skymark's major investments and expenses were denominated in dollars—including the A380 orders, the A330 leases and its fuel costs—while its domestic ticket revenue was in yen, and the airline did not engage in exchange rate hedging.[32] Skymark recorded its first net loss in five years for the fiscal year ended March 2014.[14]

In early February 2014, Skymark announced that it would downsize the Narita operation to only three destinations (Sapporo, Yonago and Okinawa). Nishikubo stated that the base lost money in every month except August and that all LCCs were under pressure there. He also expressed some reservations about the A330 fleet plan, stating that while the airline had funding in place for the first two aircraft, the third and subsequent deliveries could be impacted by the performance of Skymark's domestic operation as well as the success of its initial international service. Skymark planned to re-deploy 737s from the Narita and Haneda bases for charter services to destinations such as Guam.[33]

Airbus completed Skymark's first A380 in April 2014 and sent the aircraft to Germany for cabin installation.[34] In May, Skymark requested to reschedule a meeting with a European bank involved in financing of its A380 order. Airbus interpreted this as a signal that Skymark sought to renegotiate the contract, and sent a team of financial advisors to Skymark's head office in June. After a week of meetings, they proposed an amendment of the A380 purchase agreement, with the condition that if Skymark did not meet a certain revenue target, Nishikubo would be required to sell his shares to an outside investor chosen by Airbus. Nishikubo rejected this proposal in early July, believing there was a significant chance that Skymark would miss the target.[35]

In late July, Airbus announced that it had terminated Skymark's A380 order, citing concerns over the airline's ability to fund the purchase in light of its poor financial performance. Nishikubo complained the airline was not given the opportunity to revise the contract, but simply received a fax notifying it of the termination.[36] After further negotiations, Airbus sued Skymark for damages in a London court; it was reported that Skymark had already paid Airbus 26.5 billion yen for the aircraft and could face up to 70 billion yen in penalties.[34]

File:AIB A380 F-WWSN!167 16mar15 LFBO.jpg
Two of the six Airbus A380's Skymark had on order in long-term storage at Toulouse Blagnac International Airport.

Skymark's A330s entered service on the Haneda-Fukuoka route in June 2014, but the additional seat capacity depressed Skymark's load factors on the route. Although Skymark's 737s were booked to more than 80% of capacity up to May 2014, the much larger A330s were only booked at 67% of capacity in December 2014, while ANA and JAL achieved similar load factors with much higher-capacity aircraft. In an attempt to raise revenue, Skymark raised advance purchase fares on the route by 23% in October, bringing them closer to the level of JAL and ANA and further harming the competitiveness of the service.[37]

As the Airbus dispute lingered, Skymark pursued new sources of cash. It announced in November 2014 that it was exploring a cooperative relationship with Japan Airlines under which Skymark's 36 daily round trips to and from Haneda Airport would be code shared with JAL, subject to approval by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.[38] Skymark initially pursued JAL due to a perception that JAL could not threaten Skymark's independence; the terms of JAL's bankruptcy restructuring prevented it from making an investment in Skymark. However, the Japanese government pressed Skymark to make the codeshare trilateral with both JAL and ANA, reflecting the ruling Liberal Democratic Party's preference for ANA. Skymark also attempted a sale and leaseback of over 1 billion yen in equipment as a cash-raising measure, negotiating with a JAL-affiliated trading company and then with an ANA-affiliated trading company. In January 2015, ANA refused to provide financial support to Skymark, and several investment funds also balked at the prospect of injecting cash into the company.[39]

Bankruptcy

Skymark filed for bankruptcy protection under the Corporate Rehabilitation Law (which is equivalent to a Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States of America or an administration in the United Kingdom) at the Tokyo District Court in January 2015 after reporting ¥71 billion (or $571.3 million) in liabilities. It announced that Nishikubo would step down as CEO and would be replaced by CFO Masakazu Arimori.[34] Skymark announced that the A330s would be withdrawn from operation in March, and that various services to Okinawa and Kyushu would be eliminated. In an attempt to regain price competitiveness, Skymark introduced a fare of ¥8,000 on the Haneda-Fukuoka route, 1,800 cheaper than the next cheapest competitor, StarFlyer.[37] Skymark was approached by several potential sponsors early in its bankruptcy proceedings, including ANA, AirAsia, Delta Air Lines and American Airlines.[40]

Skymark's restructuring plan, submitted to the court in May, called for turnaround sponsor Japanese private equity fund Integral to own 50.1% of the recapitalized company, ANA to own 16.5%, and the remainder 33.4% to be owned by an investment fund controlled by government-affiliated Development Bank of Japan and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, with Integral providing the new chairman, DBJ providing the new CEO, and code sharing between Skymark and ANA.[41] [42]

Intrepid Aviation and Airbus, who together held around two-thirds of Skymark's debt, opposed the plan, and Intrepid submitted a competing plan which called for another (unspecified) airline to sponsor Skymark's restructuring.[43] Intrepid reportedly approached several foreign airlines seeking support for this alternative plan.[44]

In the final creditor vote on August 6, 2015, the plan supported by ANA and Integral defeated a competing plan supported by Intrepid and Delta. The Delta plan was initially assumed to be the front runner based on Airbus's closer relationship with Delta, but Airbus ultimately switched sides and supported the ANA plan. The Nihon Keizai Shimbun reported that ANA made a conditional offer in late July to purchase Airbus aircraft, which Delta did not match by a prescribed midnight deadline, leading Airbus to switch its stance on the restructuring.[45]

During the restructuring, Integral management announced plans to change the airline's name to "Sky Bee" with a new logo in the form of a hornet. Another brand is considered such as Nok Air or other airline that agreed to purchased Skymark. Integral announced in August that it had no plans to change the name of Skymark, However It can be rebranded, but that the logo change remained under consideration with title included Japan. Also, Skymark announced that it will replace Kobe-Tokyo Haneda route by Osaka Itami-Tokyo Haneda route by January 2016. [46]

Destinations

Skymark Airlines has operated scheduled flights to the following destinations:[2][12]

Country City Airport Notes
Japan Amami Amami Airport Terminated
Japan Aomori Aomori Airport Terminated
Japan Asahikawa Asahikawa Airport Terminated
Japan Fukuoka Fukuoka Airport Base
Japan Ibaraki Ibaraki Airport
Japan Ishigaki New Ishigaki Airport Terminated
Japan Kagoshima Kagoshima Airport
Japan Kitakyushu Kitakyushu Airport Terminated
Japan Kobe Kobe Airport Base
Japan Kumamoto Kumamoto Airport Terminated
Japan Miyako Miyako Airport Terminated
Japan Nagasaki Nagasaki Airport
Japan Nagoya Chubu Centrair International Airport
Japan Naha Naha Airport Base
Japan Osaka Kansai International Airport Terminated
Japan Osaka Osaka International Airport Terminated
Japan Sapporo New Chitose Airport Base
Japan Sendai Sendai Airport
Japan Tokushima Tokushima Airport Terminated
Japan Tokyo Haneda International Airport Base
Japan Tokyo Narita International Airport Terminated
Japan Yonago Miho-Yonago Airport

Fleet

File:Sky ja767a yahoo japan.jpg
A Skymark Boeing 767 in Yahoo! Japan advertising
File:B767-3Q8ER JA767A.jpg
Skymark Boeing 767 in "Yamato" promotional livery

As August 2015, the Skymark Airlines fleet consists of the following aircraft:[47]

Aircraft In Service Orders Passengers Notes
J Y+ Y Total
Boeing 737-800 26 4 0 0 186 186 4 to be transferred from Air Berlin by 2016.
Total 26 4

Previously, Skymark operated seven Boeing 767-200 and Boeing 767-300 widebody aircraft between 1998 and 2005. Some 767 fuselages were painted in special "billboard" liveries advertising third party companies, including Yahoo Japan,[48] Microsoft[49] and USEN.[50] The six 767s acquired by Skymark carried registrations JA767A to JA767F; the seventh, JA8255, was leased from All Nippon Airways from 2003 to 2004.[12]

Under Nishikubo, Skymark began acquiring new Boeing 737-800 narrowbody aircraft in 2005 and eventually retired the 767 from its fleet in 2009.[51]

Also, Skymark ceased flying the A330 and most of the 737 during its bankruptcy.[52] All 6 original A380 orders were rescinded as well, although All Nippon Airways will take 3 of the 6 original orders.

Frequent flyer program

Skymark planned to introduce a frequent flyer program in January 2014 to coincide with the launch of its premium domestic service.[24] They delayed as of December 2013 to focus on preparing for international service in December 2014.[53] Skymark has provided award seats to members of the Delta Air Lines SkyMiles program since June 2011.[54]

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. 14.0 14.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  21. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. 24.0 24.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/13/us-delta-air-lines-skymark-airlines-idUSKCN0PN2L420150713
  31. http://centreforaviation.com/analysis/delta-air-lines-seeks-a-tokyo-haneda-base-skymark-a-potential-partner-to-shake-up-alliances-121506
  32. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. 34.0 34.1 34.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  36. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. 37.0 37.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  44. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  45. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. See also Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  46. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  47. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  48. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  49. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  50. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  51. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  52. Skymark stops flying A330
  53. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  54. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links