South Carolina Democratic primary, 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Election results by county.
Hillary Clinton
Bernie Sanders
|
|||||||||||||||||||
The 2016 South Carolina Democratic primary took place on February 27 in the U.S. state of South Carolina, marking the Democratic Party's fourth nominating contest in their series of presidential primaries ahead of the 2016 presidential election.
Clinton won the South Carolina Democratic primary, receiving a larger percentage of the African American vote than Obama, the first black President, did in 2008.[1]
With the Republican Party having already held its South Carolina primary a week earlier on February 20, the Democratic primary in South Carolina was the only presidential primary on that day.
Contents
Debates and forums
November 2015 forum in Rock Hill
<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Rachel Maddow was selected to moderate the First in the South Candidates Forum with Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Martin O'Malley, which was held at Winthrop University in Rock Hill, South Carolina, on November 6, co-sponsored by the Democratic Parties of 13 southern states.[2] The forum was not in debate format; instead, each candidate was interviewed individually and sequentially.[3] Lincoln Chafee and Jim Webb were also invited, but their campaigns never responded to the invitations,[4] and both have since withdrawn from the race. A Public Policy Poll of South Carolina Democratic voters conducted from November 7–8, after the forum, discovered that 67% of viewers thought Clinton won the forum, 16% thought Sanders won, and 6% thought O'Malley won, with 11% unsure.[5]
January 2016 debate in Charleston, South Carolina
<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
On January 17, 2016, the Democratic Party held a fourth debate at the Gaillard Center in Charleston, South Carolina. Hosted by Lester Holt and Andrea Mitchell, the debate aired on NBC News and was streamed on YouTube. It was also sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus. It was notable as being the final debate before the start of precinct caucuses and primary voting. Participants were Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Martin O'Malley. It was the final debate appearance of O'Malley, who suspended his campaign on February 1.
Both before and after the debate, commentators said the debate was focused on Sanders and his voting record on gun control and slights against President Obama, among other issues. During the debate, O'Malley interrupted to take 30 seconds to talk about "homeland security and preparedness".[6] Also during the debate, Clinton and Sanders had some back-and-forth exchanges to define themselves on Wall Street, foreign policy, and gun control.[6]
Opinion polling
<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>
Delegate count: 53 Pledged, 6 Unpledged
- Winner
Hillary Clinton- Primary date
- 27 February 2016
| Poll source | Date | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Results | February 27, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 73.5% |
Bernie Sanders 26.0% |
Other 0.6% |
|
| Clemson[7]
Margin of error: 3.0% |
February 20–25, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 64% |
Bernie Sanders 14% |
Others / Undecided 22% |
|
| Emerson College[8]
Margin of error: 6.0% |
February 22–24, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 60% |
Bernie Sanders 37% |
Others / Undecided 3% |
|
| NBC/WSJ/Marist[9]
Margin of error: 4.8% |
February 15–17, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 60% |
Bernie Sanders 32% |
Other 8% |
|
| Bloomberg Politics[10]
Margin of error: 4.9% |
February 13–17, 2016 |
Hillary Clinton 53% |
Bernie Sanders 31% |
Not sure 16% |
|
| ARG[11]
Margin of error: 5% |
February 14–16, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 61% |
Bernie Sanders 31% |
Someone else 1% | No opinion 7% |
| Public Policy Polling[12]
Margin of error: ± 4% |
February 14–15, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 55% |
Bernie Sanders 34% |
Undecided 12% | |
| CNN/ORC[13]
Margin of error: 6% |
February 10–15, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 56% |
Bernie Sanders 38% |
Someone else 3% | No opinion 4% |
| ARG[14]
Margin of error: ± 5.0% |
February 12–13, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 65% |
Bernie Sanders 27% |
Other 1%, Undecided 7% | |
| One America News Network/Gravis Marketing[15]
Margin of error: ± 4% |
February 11–13, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 59% |
Bernie Sanders 41% |
||
| YouGov/CBS News[16]
Margin of error: ± 8.7% |
February 10–12, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 59% |
Bernie Sanders 40% |
No Preference 1% | |
| NBC/WSJ/Marist[17]
Margin of error: ± 4.6% |
January 17–23, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 64% |
Bernie Sanders 27% |
Martin O'Malley 2% |
Undecided 7% |
| YouGov/CBS News[18]
Margin of error: ± 9.4% |
January 17–21, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 60% |
Bernie Sanders 38% |
Martin O'Malley 0% |
Undecided 2% |
| SC New Democrats
Margin of error: ± ?% |
January 12–15, 2016 | Hillary Clinton 47% |
Bernie Sanders 28% |
Martin O'Malley 2% |
Undecided 22% |
<templatestyles src="Template:Hidden begin/styles.css"/>
| Poll source | Date | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YouGov/CBS News[19]
Margin of error: ± 5.0% |
December 13–17, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 67% |
Bernie Sanders 31% |
Martin O'Malley 2% |
No Preference 0% |
| Fox News
Margin of error: ± 5.0% |
December 5–8, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 65% |
Bernie Sanders 21% |
Martin O'Malley 3% |
Other 1%, None of the Above 7%, DK 3% |
| YouGov/CBS News[20]
Margin of error: ± 6.0% |
November 15–19, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 72% |
Bernie Sanders 25% |
Martin O'Malley 2% |
Undecided 1% |
| Public Policy Polling[21]
Margin of error: ± 4.9% |
November 7–8, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 72% |
Bernie Sanders 18% |
Martin O'Malley 5% |
Unsure 5% |
| Monmouth University[22]
Margin of error: ± 4.9% |
November 5–8, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 69% |
Bernie Sanders 21% |
Martin O'Malley 1% |
Other 1% No Preference 8% |
| Winthrop University[23]
Margin of error: ± 3.4% |
October 24 – November 1, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 71% |
Bernie Sanders 15% |
Martin O'Malley 2% |
Refused 2% Undecided 9% Wouldn't Vote 1% |
| YouGov/CBS News[24]
Margin of error: ± 8.2% |
October 15–22, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 68% |
Bernie Sanders 25% |
Martin O'Malley 1% |
Jim Webb 1%, Lincoln Chafee 0%, Lawrence Lessig 0%, No preference 4% |
| Clemson Palmetto[25]
Margin of error: 4.0% |
October 13–23, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 43% |
Bernie Sanders 6% |
Martin O'Malley 1% |
Undecided 50% |
| CNN/ORC[26]
Margin of error: 5.5% |
October 3–10, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 49% |
Joe Biden 24% |
Bernie Sanders 18% |
Martin O'Malley 3%, Someone else 1%, None/No one 1%, No opinion 4% |
| Gravis Marketing[27]
Margin of error: ± ?% |
September 25–27, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 50% |
Joe Biden 19% |
Bernie Sanders 13% |
Lincoln Chafee 1%, Jim Webb <1%, Martin O'Malley <1%, Unsure 17% |
| YouGov/CBS News[28]
Margin of error: ± 6.8% |
Sep. 3–10, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 46% |
Bernie Sanders 23% |
Joe Biden 22% |
No preference 8%, Jim Webb 1%, Lincoln Chafee 0%, Martin O'Malley 0% |
| Public Policy Polling[29]
Margin of error: ± 5.6% |
Sep. 3–6, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 54% |
Joe Biden 24% |
Bernie Sanders 9% |
Martin O’Malley, Jim Webb 2%; Lincoln Chafee 1% |
| Gravis Marketing[30]
Margin of error: ± 4.0% |
July 29–30, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 78% |
Bernie Sanders 8% |
Elizabeth Warren 6% |
Joe Biden 6%, Jim Webb 1%, Martin O'Malley 1%, Lincoln Chafee 1% |
| Morning Consult[31]
Margin of error: ? |
May 31 – June 8, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 56% |
Joe Biden 15% |
Bernie Sanders 10% |
Martin O'Malley 3%, Jim Webb 2%, Lincoln Chafee 1%, Someone else 2% Undecided 11% |
| Public Policy Polling
Margin of error: ± 6.2% |
February 12–15, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 59% |
Joe Biden 18% |
Elizabeth Warren 10% |
Martin O'Malley 3%, Bernie Sanders 1%, Jim Webb 1%, Other/Undecided 8% |
| NBC News/Marist
Margin of error: ± 5.2% |
February 3–10, 2015 | Hillary Clinton 65% |
Joe Biden 20% |
Bernie Sanders 3% |
Martin O'Malley 2%, Jim Webb 2%, Undecided 8% |
<templatestyles src="Template:Hidden begin/styles.css"/>
| Poll source | Date | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson University
Margin of error: ±6% |
May 26 – June 2, 2014 | Hillary Clinton 50% |
Joe Biden 12% |
Andrew Cuomo 2% |
Martin O'Malley 1%, Deval Patrick 0%, Brian Schweitzer 0%, Undecided/Don't know 35% |
Results
| South Carolina Democratic primary, February 27, 2016 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate | Popular vote | Estimated delegates | |||
| Count | Percentage | Pledged | Unpledged | Total | |
| Hillary Clinton | 272,379 | 73.44% | 39 | 5 | 44 |
| Bernie Sanders | 96,498 | 26.02% | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Willie Wilson | 1,314 | 0.35% | |||
| Martin O'Malley (withdrawn) | 713 | 0.19% | |||
| Uncommitted | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Total Votes | 370904 | 100% | 53 | 6 | 59 |
| Void? | 2,159 | 0.58% | |||
| Total Ballots | 373,063 | 100.58% | |||
| Sources: The Green Papers, South Carolina State Election Commission | |||||
Delegates: The South Carolina Democratic Party - State Election Results
References
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ http://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/politics-columns-blogs/the-buzz/article60547281.html
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/polls/arg-23748
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
