Speech recognition

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Speech-to-Text)
Jump to: navigation, search

Speech recognition (SR) is the inter-disciplinary sub-field of computational linguistics which incorporates knowledge and research in the linguistics, computer science, and electrical engineering fields to develop methodologies and technologies that enables the recognition and translation of spoken language into text by computers and computerized devices such as those categorized as Smart Technologies and robotics. It is also known as "automatic speech recognition" (ASR), "computer speech recognition", or just "speech to text" (STT).

Some SR systems use "training" (also called "enrollment") where an individual speaker reads text or isolated vocabulary into the system. The system analyzes the person's specific voice and uses it to fine-tune the recognition of that person's speech, resulting in increased accuracy. Systems that do not use training are called "speaker independent"[1] systems. Systems that use training are called "speaker dependent".

Speech recognition applications include voice user interfaces such as voice dialing (e.g. "Call home"), call routing (e.g. "I would like to make a collect call"), domotic appliance control, search (e.g. find a podcast where particular words were spoken), simple data entry (e.g., entering a credit card number), preparation of structured documents (e.g. a radiology report), speech-to-text processing (e.g., word processors or emails), and aircraft (usually termed Direct Voice Input).

The term voice recognition[2][3][4] or speaker identification[5][6] refers to identifying the speaker, rather than what they are saying. Recognizing the speaker can simplify the task of translating speech in systems that have been trained on a specific person's voice or it can be used to authenticate or verify the identity of a speaker as part of a security process.

From the technology perspective, speech recognition has a long history with several waves of major innovations. Most recently, the field has benefited from advances in deep learning and big data. The advances are evidenced not only by the surge of academic papers published in the field, but more importantly by the world-wide industry adoption of a variety of deep learning methods in designing and deploying speech recognition systems. These speech industry players include Microsoft, Google, IBM, Baidu (China), Apple, Amazon, Nuance, IflyTek (China), many of which have publicized the core technology in their speech recognition systems being based on deep learning.


As early as 1932, Bell Labs researchers like Harvey Fletcher were investigating the science of speech perception.[7] In 1952 three Bell Labs researchers built a system for single-speaker digit recognition. Their system worked by locating the formants in the power spectrum of each utterance.[8] The 1950s era technology was limited to single-speaker systems with vocabularies of around ten words.

Unfortunately, funding at Bell Labs dried up for several years when, in 1969, the influential John Pierce wrote an open letter that was critical of speech recognition research.[9] Pierce's letter compared speech recognition to "schemes for turning water into gasoline, extracting gold from the sea, curing cancer, or going to the moon." Pierce defunded speech recognition research at Bell Labs.

Raj Reddy was the first person to take on continuous speech recognition as a graduate student at Stanford University in the late 1960s. Previous systems required the users to make a pause after each word. Reddy's system was designed to issue spoken commands for the game of chess. Also around this time Soviet researchers invented the dynamic time warping algorithm and used it to create a recognizer capable of operating on a 200-word vocabulary.[10] Achieving speaker independence was a major unsolved goal of researchers during this time period.

In 1971, DARPA funded five years of speech recognition research through its Speech Understanding Research program with ambitious end goals including a minimum vocabulary size of 1,000 words. BBN. IBM., Carnegie Mellon and Stanford Research Institute all participated in the program.[11] The government funding revived speech recognition research that had been largely abandoned in the United States after John Pierce's letter. Despite the fact that CMU's Harpy system met the goals established at the outset of the program, many of the predictions turned out to be nothing more than hype disappointing DARPA administrators. This disappointment led to DARPA not continuing the funding.[12] Several innovations happened during this time, such as the invention of beam search for use in CMU's Harpy system.[13] The field also benefited from the discovery of several algorithms in other fields such as linear predictive coding and cepstral analysis.

During the late 1960s Leonard Baum developed the mathematics of Markov chains at the Institute for Defense Analysis. At CMU, Raj Reddy's student James Baker and his wife Janet Baker began using the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) for speech recognition.[14] James Baker had learned about HMMs from a summer job at the Institute of Defense Analysis during his undergraduate education.[15] The use of HMMs allowed researchers to combine different sources of knowledge, such as acoustics, language, and syntax, in a unified probabilistic model.

Under Fred Jelinek's lead, IBM created a voice activated typewriter called Tangora, which could handle a 20,000 word vocabulary by the mid 1980s.[16] Jelinek's statistical approach put less emphasis on emulating the way the human brain processes and understands speech in favor of using statistical modeling techniques like HMMs. (Jelinek's group independently discovered the application of HMMs to speech.[17]) This was controversial with linguists since HMMs are too simplistic to account for many common features of human languages.[18] However, the HMM proved to be a highly useful way for modeling speech and replaced dynamic time warping to become the dominate speech recognition algorithm in the 1980s.[19] IBM had a few competitors including Dragon Systems founded by James and Janet Baker in 1982.[20] The 1980s also saw the introduction of the n-gram language model.

Much of the progress in the field is owed to the rapidly increasing capabilities of computers. At the end of the DARPA program in 1976, the best computer available to researchers was the PDP-10 with 4 MB ram.[18] Using these computers it could take up to 100 minutes to decode just 30 seconds of speech.[21] A few decades later, researchers had access to tens of thousands of times as much computing power. As the technology advanced and computers got faster, researchers began tackling harder problems such as larger vocabularies, speaker independence, noisy environments and conversational speech. In particular, this shifting to more difficult tasks has characterized DARPA funding of speech recognition since the 1980s. For example, progress was made on speaker independence first by training on a larger variety of speakers and then later by doing explicit speaker adaptation during decoding. Further reductions in word error rate came as researchers shifted acoustic models to be discriminative instead of using maximum likelihood models.[22]

Another one of Raj Reddy's former students, Xuedong Huang, developed the Sphinx-II system at CMU. The Sphinx-II system was the first to do speaker-independent, large vocabulary, continuous speech recognition and it had the best performance in DARPA's 1992 evaluation. Huang went on to found the speech recognition group at Microsoft in 1993.

The 1990s saw the first introduction of commercially successful speech recognition technologies. By this point, the vocabulary of the typical commercial speech recognition system was larger than the average human vocabulary.[18] In 2000, Lernout & Hauspie acquired Dragon Systems and was an industry leader until an accounting scandal brought an end to the company in 2001. The L&H speech technology was bought by ScanSoft which became Nuance in 2005. Apple originally licensed software from Nuance to provide speech recognition capability to its digital assistant Siri.[23]

21st Century

In the 2000s DARPA sponsored two speech recognition programs: Effective Affordable Reusable Speech-to-Text (EARS) in 2002 and Global Autonomous Language Exploitation (GALE). Four teams participated in the EARS program: IBM, BBN, Cambridge University and a team composed of ISCI, SRI and University of Washington. The GALE program focused on Mandarin broadcast news speech. Google's first effort at speech recognition came in 2007 after hiring some researchers from Nuance.[24] The first product was GOOG-411, a telephone based directory service. The recordings from GOOG-411 produced valuable data that helped Google improve their recognition systems. Google voice search is now supported in over 30 languages.

In the United States, the National Security Agency has made use of a type of speech recognition for keyword spotting since at least 2006.[25] This technology allows analysts to search through large volumes of recorded conversations and isolate mentions of keywords. Recordings can be indexed and analysts can run queries over the database to find conversations of interest. Some government research programs focused on intelligence applications of speech recognition, e.g. DARPA's EARS's program and IARPA's Babel program.

The use of deep learning for acoustic modeling was introduced during later part of 2009 by Geoffrey Hinton and his students at University of Toronto and by Li Deng and colleagues at Microsoft Research, initially in the collaborative work between Microsoft and University of Toronto which was subsequently expanded to include IBM and Google (hence "The shared views of four research groups" subtitle in their 2012 review paper).[26][27][28] A Microsoft research executive called this innovation "the most dramatic change in accuracy since 1979."[29] In contrast to the steady incremental improvements of the past few decades, the application of deep learning decreased word error rate by 30%. This innovation was quickly adopted across the field. Researchers have begun to use deep learning techniques for language modeling as well.

In the long history of speech recognition, both shallow form and deep form (e.g. recurrent nets) of artificial neural networks had been explored for many years during 80's, 90's and a few years into 2000.[30][31][32] But these methods never won over the non-uniform internal-handcrafting Gaussian mixture model/Hidden Markov model (GMM-HMM) technology based on generative models of speech trained discriminatively.[33] A number of key difficulties had been methodologically analyzed in the 1990s, including gradient diminishing and weak temporal correlation structure in the neural predictive models.[34][35] All these difficulties were in addition to the lack of big training data and big computing power in these early days. Most speech recognition researchers who understood such barriers hence subsequently moved away from neural nets to pursue generative modeling approaches until the recent resurgence of deep learning starting around 2009-2010 that had overcome all these difficulties. Hinton et al. and Deng et al. reviewed part of this recent history about how their collaboration with each other and then with colleagues across four groups (University of Toronto, Microsoft, Google, and IBM) ignited the renaissance of neural networks and initiated deep learning research and applications in speech recognition.[27][28][36][37]

Models, methods, and algorithms

Both acoustic modeling and language modeling are important parts of modern statistically-based speech recognition algorithms. Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are widely used in many systems. Language modeling is also used in many other natural language processing applications such as document classification or statistical machine translation.

Hidden Markov models

Modern general-purpose speech recognition systems are based on Hidden Markov Models. These are statistical models that output a sequence of symbols or quantities. HMMs are used in speech recognition because a speech signal can be viewed as a piecewise stationary signal or a short-time stationary signal. In a short time-scale (e.g., 10 milliseconds), speech can be approximated as a stationary process. Speech can be thought of as a Markov model for many stochastic purposes.

Another reason why HMMs are popular is because they can be trained automatically and are simple and computationally feasible to use. In speech recognition, the hidden Markov model would output a sequence of n-dimensional real-valued vectors (with n being a small integer, such as 10), outputting one of these every 10 milliseconds. The vectors would consist of cepstral coefficients, which are obtained by taking a Fourier transform of a short time window of speech and decorrelating the spectrum using a cosine transform, then taking the first (most significant) coefficients. The hidden Markov model will tend to have in each state a statistical distribution that is a mixture of diagonal covariance Gaussians, which will give a likelihood for each observed vector. Each word, or (for more general speech recognition systems), each phoneme, will have a different output distribution; a hidden Markov model for a sequence of words or phonemes is made by concatenating the individual trained hidden Markov models for the separate words and phonemes.

Described above are the core elements of the most common, HMM-based approach to speech recognition. Modern speech recognition systems use various combinations of a number of standard techniques in order to improve results over the basic approach described above. A typical large-vocabulary system would need context dependency for the phonemes (so phonemes with different left and right context have different realizations as HMM states); it would use cepstral normalization to normalize for different speaker and recording conditions; for further speaker normalization it might use vocal tract length normalization (VTLN) for male-female normalization and maximum likelihood linear regression (MLLR) for more general speaker adaptation. The features would have so-called delta and delta-delta coefficients to capture speech dynamics and in addition might use heteroscedastic linear discriminant analysis (HLDA); or might skip the delta and delta-delta coefficients and use splicing and an LDA-based projection followed perhaps by heteroscedastic linear discriminant analysis or a global semi-tied co variance transform (also known as maximum likelihood linear transform, or MLLT). Many systems use so-called discriminative training techniques that dispense with a purely statistical approach to HMM parameter estimation and instead optimize some classification-related measure of the training data. Examples are maximum mutual information (MMI), minimum classification error (MCE) and minimum phone error (MPE).

Decoding of the speech (the term for what happens when the system is presented with a new utterance and must compute the most likely source sentence) would probably use the Viterbi algorithm to find the best path, and here there is a choice between dynamically creating a combination hidden Markov model, which includes both the acoustic and language model information, and combining it statically beforehand (the finite state transducer, or FST, approach).

A possible improvement to decoding is to keep a set of good candidates instead of just keeping the best candidate, and to use a better scoring function (re scoring) to rate these good candidates so that we may pick the best one according to this refined score. The set of candidates can be kept either as a list (the N-best list approach) or as a subset of the models (a lattice). Re scoring is usually done by trying to minimize the Bayes risk[38] (or an approximation thereof): Instead of taking the source sentence with maximal probability, we try to take the sentence that minimizes the expectancy of a given loss function with regards to all possible transcriptions (i.e., we take the sentence that minimizes the average distance to other possible sentences weighted by their estimated probability). The loss function is usually the Levenshtein distance, though it can be different distances for specific tasks; the set of possible transcriptions is, of course, pruned to maintain tractability. Efficient algorithms have been devised to re score lattices represented as weighted finite state transducers with edit distances represented themselves as a finite state transducer verifying certain assumptions.[39]

Dynamic time warping (DTW)-based speech recognition

Dynamic time warping is an approach that was historically used for speech recognition but has now largely been displaced by the more successful HMM-based approach.

Dynamic time warping is an algorithm for measuring similarity between two sequences that may vary in time or speed. For instance, similarities in walking patterns would be detected, even if in one video the person was walking slowly and if in another he or she were walking more quickly, or even if there were accelerations and deceleration during the course of one observation. DTW has been applied to video, audio, and graphics – indeed, any data that can be turned into a linear representation can be analyzed with DTW.

A well-known application has been automatic speech recognition, to cope with different speaking speeds. In general, it is a method that allows a computer to find an optimal match between two given sequences (e.g., time series) with certain restrictions. That is, the sequences are "warped" non-linearly to match each other. This sequence alignment method is often used in the context of hidden Markov models.

Neural networks

Neural networks emerged as an attractive acoustic modeling approach in ASR in the late 1980s. Since then, neural networks have been used in many aspects of speech recognition such as phoneme classification,[40] isolated word recognition,[41] and speaker adaptation.

In contrast to HMMs, neural networks make no assumptions about feature statistical properties and have several qualities making them attractive recognition models for speech recognition. When used to estimate the probabilities of a speech feature segment, neural networks allow discriminative training in a natural and efficient manner. Few assumptions on the statistics of input features are made with neural networks. However, in spite of their effectiveness in classifying short-time units such as individual phones and isolated words,[42] neural networks are rarely successful for continuous recognition tasks, largely because of their lack of ability to model temporal dependencies.

However, recently Recurrent Neural Networks(RNN's)[43] and Time Delay Neural Networks(TDNN's)[44] have been used which have been shown to be able to identify latent temporal dependencies and use this information to perform the task of speech recognition. This however enormously increases the computational cost involved and hence makes the process of speech recognition slower. A lot of research is still going on in this field to ensure that TDNN's and RNN's can be used in a more computationally affordable way to improve the Speech Recognition Accuracy immensely.

Deep Neural Networks and Denoising Autoencoders[45] are also being experimented with to tackle this problem in an effective manner.

Due to the inability of traditional Neural Networks to model temporal dependencies, an alternative approach is to use neural networks as a pre-processing e.g. feature transformation, dimensionality reduction,[46] for the HMM based recognition.

Deep Neural Networks and Other Deep Learning Models

A deep neural network (DNN) is an artificial neural network with multiple hidden layers of units between the input and output layers.[27] Similar to shallow neural networks, DNNs can model complex non-linear relationships. DNN architectures generate compositional models, where extra layers enable composition of features from lower layers, giving a huge learning capacity and thus the potential of modeling complex patterns of speech data.[47] The DNN is the most popular type of deep learning architectures successfully used as an acoustic model for speech recognition since 2010.

The success of DNNs in large vocabulary speech recognition occurred in 2010 by industrial researchers, in collaboration with academic researchers, where large output layers of the DNN based on context dependent HMM states constructed by decision trees were adopted.[48][49] [50] See comprehensive reviews of this development and of the state of the art as of October 2014 in the recent Springer book from Microsoft Research.[51] See also the related background of automatic speech recognition and the impact of various machine learning paradigms including notably deep learning in a recent overview article.[52]

One fundamental principle of deep learning is to do away with hand-crafted feature engineering and to use raw features. This principle was first explored successfully in the architecture of deep autoencoder on the "raw" spectrogram or linear filter-bank features,[53] showing its superiority over the Mel-Cepstral features which contain a few stages of fixed transformation from spectrograms. The true "raw" features of speech, waveforms, have more recently been shown to produce excellent larger-scale speech recognition results.[54]

Since the initial successful debut of DNNs for speech recognition around 2009-2011, there have been huge new progresses made. This progress (as well as future directions) has been summarized into the following eight major areas:[37][47][51]

  1. Scaling up/out and speedup DNN training and decoding;
  2. Sequence discriminative training of DNNs;
  3. Feature processing by deep models with solid understanding of the underlying mechanisms;
  4. Adaptation of DNNs and of related deep models;
  5. Multi-task and transfer learning by DNNs and related deep models;
  6. Convolution neural networks and how to design them to best exploit domain knowledge of speech;
  7. Recurrent neural network and its rich LSTM variants;
  8. Other types of deep models including tensor-based models and integrated deep generative/discriminative models.

Large-scale automatic speech recognition is the first and the most convincing successful case of deep learning in the recent history, embraced by both industry and academic across the board. Between 2010 and 2014, the two major conferences on signal processing and speech recognition, IEEE-ICASSP and Interspeech, have seen near exponential growth in the numbers of accepted papers in their respective annual conference papers on the topic of deep learning for speech recognition. More importantly, all major commercial speech recognition systems (e.g., Microsoft Cortana, Xbox, Skype Translator, Google Now, Apple Siri, Baidu and iFlyTek voice search, and a range of Nuance speech products, etc.) nowadays are based on deep learning methods.[47][55][56] See also the recent media interview with the CTO of Nuance Communications.[57]


In-car systems

Typically a manual control input, for example by means of a finger control on the steering-wheel, enables the speech recognition system and this is signalled to the driver by an audio prompt. Following the audio prompt, the system has a "listening window" during which it may accept a speech input for recognition.[citation needed]

Simple voice commands may be used to initiate phone calls, select radio stations or play music from a compatible smartphone, MP3 player or music-loaded flash drive. Voice recognition capabilities vary between car make and model. Some of the most recent[when?] car models offer natural-language speech recognition in place of a fixed set of commands. allowing the driver to use full sentences and common phrases. With such systems there is, therefore, no need for the user to memorize a set of fixed command words.[citation needed]

Health care

Medical documentation

In the health care sector, speech recognition can be implemented in front-end or back-end of the medical documentation process. Front-end speech recognition is where the provider dictates into a speech-recognition engine, the recognized words are displayed as they are spoken, and the dictator is responsible for editing and signing off on the document. Back-end or deferred speech recognition is where the provider dictates into a digital dictation system, the voice is routed through a speech-recognition machine and the recognized draft document is routed along with the original voice file to the editor, where the draft is edited and report finalized. Deferred speech recognition is widely used in the industry currently.

One of the major issues relating to the use of speech recognition in healthcare is that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) provides for substantial financial benefits to physicians who utilize an EMR according to "Meaningful Use" standards. These standards require that a substantial amount of data be maintained by the EMR (now more commonly referred to as an Electronic Health Record or EHR). The use of speech recognition is more naturally suited to the generation of narrative text, as part of a radiology/pathology interpretation, progress note or discharge summary: the ergonomic gains of using speech recognition to enter structured discrete data (e.g., numeric values or codes from a list or a controlled vocabulary) are relatively minimal for people who are sighted and who can operate a keyboard and mouse.

A more significant issue is that most EHRs have not been expressly tailored to take advantage of voice-recognition capabilities. A large part of the clinician's interaction with the EHR involves navigation through the user interface using menus, and tab/button clicks, and is heavily dependent on keyboard and mouse: voice-based navigation provides only modest ergonomic benefits. By contrast, many highly customized systems for radiology or pathology dictation implement voice "macros", where the use of certain phrases - e.g., "normal report", will automatically fill in a large number of default values and/or generate boilerplate, which will vary with the type of the exam - e.g., a chest X-ray vs. a gastrointestinal contrast series for a radiology system.

As an alternative to this navigation by hand, cascaded use of speech recognition and information extraction has been studied[58] as a way to fill out a handover form for clinical proofing and sign-off. The results are encouraging, and the paper also opens data, together with the related performance benchmarks and some processing software, to the research and development community for studying clinical documentation and language-processing.

Therapeutic use

Prolonged use of speech recognition software in conjunction with word processors has shown benefits to short-term-memory restrengthening in brain AVM patients who have been treated with resection. Further research needs to be conducted to determine cognitive benefits for individuals whose AVMs have been treated using radiologic techniques.


High-performance fighter aircraft

Substantial efforts have been devoted in the last decade to the test and evaluation of speech recognition in fighter aircraft. Of particular note is the U.S. program in speech recognition for the Advanced Fighter Technology Integration (AFTI)/F-16 aircraft (F-16 VISTA), and a program in France installing speech recognition systems on Mirage aircraft, and also programs in the UK dealing with a variety of aircraft platforms. In these programs, speech recognizers have been operated successfully in fighter aircraft, with applications including: setting radio frequencies, commanding an autopilot system, setting steer-point coordinates and weapons release parameters, and controlling flight display.

Working with Swedish pilots flying in the JAS-39 Gripen cockpit, Englund (2004) found recognition deteriorated with increasing G-loads. It was also concluded that adaptation greatly improved the results in all cases and introducing models for breathing was shown to improve recognition scores significantly. Contrary to what might be expected, no effects of the broken English of the speakers were found. It was evident that spontaneous speech caused problems for the recognizer, as could be expected. A restricted vocabulary, and above all, a proper syntax, could thus be expected to improve recognition accuracy substantially.[59]

The Eurofighter Typhoon currently in service with the UK RAF employs a speaker-dependent system, i.e. it requires each pilot to create a template. The system is not used for any safety critical or weapon critical tasks, such as weapon release or lowering of the undercarriage, but is used for a wide range of other cockpit functions. Voice commands are confirmed by visual and/or aural feedback. The system is seen as a major design feature in the reduction of pilot workload, and even allows the pilot to assign targets to himself with two simple voice commands or to any of his wingmen with only five commands.[60]

Speaker-independent systems are also being developed and are in testing for the F35 Lightning II (JSF) and the Alenia Aermacchi M-346 Master lead-in fighter trainer. These systems have produced word accuracy in excess of 98%.[61]


The problems of achieving high recognition accuracy under stress and noise pertain strongly to the helicopter environment as well as to the jet fighter environment. The acoustic noise problem is actually more severe in the helicopter environment, not only because of the high noise levels but also because the helicopter pilot, in general, does not wear a facemask, which would reduce acoustic noise in the microphone. Substantial test and evaluation programs have been carried out in the past decade in speech recognition systems applications in helicopters, notably by the U.S. Army Avionics Research and Development Activity (AVRADA) and by the Royal Aerospace Establishment (RAE) in the UK. Work in France has included speech recognition in the Puma helicopter. There has also been much useful work in Canada. Results have been encouraging, and voice applications have included: control of communication radios, setting of navigation systems, and control of an automated target handover system.

As in fighter applications, the overriding issue for voice in helicopters is the impact on pilot effectiveness. Encouraging results are reported for the AVRADA tests, although these represent only a feasibility demonstration in a test environment. Much remains to be done both in speech recognition and in overall speech technology in order to consistently achieve performance improvements in operational settings.

Training air traffic controllers

Training for air traffic controllers (ATC) represents an excellent application for speech recognition systems. Many ATC training systems currently require a person to act as a "pseudo-pilot", engaging in a voice dialog with the trainee controller, which simulates the dialog that the controller would have to conduct with pilots in a real ATC situation. Speech recognition and synthesis techniques offer the potential to eliminate the need for a person to act as pseudo-pilot, thus reducing training and support personnel. In theory, Air controller tasks are also characterized by highly structured speech as the primary output of the controller, hence reducing the difficulty of the speech recognition task should be possible. In practice, this is rarely the case. The FAA document 7110.65 details the phrases that should be used by air traffic controllers. While this document gives less than 150 examples of such phrases, the number of phrases supported by one of the simulation vendors speech recognition systems is in excess of 500,000.

The USAF, USMC, US Army, US Navy, and FAA as well as a number of international ATC training organizations such as the Royal Australian Air Force and Civil Aviation Authorities in Italy, Brazil, and Canada are currently using ATC simulators with speech recognition from a number of different vendors.[citation needed]

Telephony and other domains

ASR in the field of telephony is now commonplace and in the field of computer gaming and simulation is becoming more widespread. Despite the high level of integration with word processing in general personal computing. However, ASR in the field of document production has not seen the expected[by whom?] increases in use.

The improvement of mobile processor speeds made feasible the speech-enabled Symbian and Windows Mobile smartphones. Speech is used mostly as a part of a user interface, for creating predefined or custom speech commands. Leading software vendors in this field are: Google, Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft Voice Command), Digital Syphon (Sonic Extractor), LumenVox, Nuance Communications (Nuance Voice Control), VoiceBox Technology, Speech Technology Center, Vito Technologies (VITO Voice2Go), Speereo Software (Speereo Voice Translator), Verbyx VRX and SVOX.

Usage in education and daily life

For language learning, speech recognition can be useful for learning a second language. It can teach proper pronunciation, in addition to helping a person develop fluency with their speaking skills.[62]

Students who are blind (see Blindness and education) or have very low vision can benefit from using the technology to convey words and then hear the computer recite them, as well as use a computer by commanding with their voice, instead of having to look at the screen and keyboard.[63]

Students who are physically disabled or suffer from Repetitive strain injury/other injuries to the upper extremities can be relieved from having to worry about handwriting, typing, or working with scribe on school assignments by using speech-to-text programs. They can also utilize speech recognition technology to freely enjoy searching the Internet or using a computer at home without having to physically operate a mouse and keyboard.[63]

Speech recognition can allow students with learning disabilities to become better writers. By saying the words aloud, they can increase the fluidity of their writing, and be alleviated of concerns regarding spelling, punctuation, and other mechanics of writing.[64] Also, see Learning disability.

Voice Recognition Software's use, in conjunction with a digital audio recorder, a personal computer and Microsoft Word has proven to be positive for restoring damaged short-term-memory capacity, in stroke and craniotomy individuals.

People with disabilities

People with disabilities can benefit from speech recognition programs. For individuals that are Deaf or Hard of Hearing, speech recognition software is used to automatically generate a closed-captioning of conversations such as discussions in conference rooms, classroom lectures, and/or religious services.[65]

Speech recognition is also very useful for people who have difficulty using their hands, ranging from mild repetitive stress injuries to involved disabilities that preclude using conventional computer input devices. In fact, people who used the keyboard a lot and developed RSI became an urgent early market for speech recognition.[66][67] Speech recognition is used in deaf telephony, such as voicemail to text, relay services, and captioned telephone. Individuals with learning disabilities who have problems with thought-to-paper communication (essentially they think of an idea but it is processed incorrectly causing it to end up differently on paper) can possibly benefit from the software but the technology is not bug proof.[68] Also the whole idea of speak to text can be hard for intellectually disabled person's due to the fact that it is rare that anyone tries to learn the technology to teach the person with the disability.[69]

This type of technology can help those with dyslexia but other disabilities are still in question. The effectiveness of the product is the problem that is hindering it being effective. Although a kid may be able to say a word depending on how clear they say it the technology may think they are saying another word and input the wrong one. Giving them more work to fix, causing them to have to take more time with fixing the wrong word.[70]

Further applications


The performance of speech recognition systems is usually evaluated in terms of accuracy and speed. Accuracy is usually rated with word error rate (WER), whereas speed is measured with the real time factor. Other measures of accuracy include Single Word Error Rate (SWER) and Command Success Rate (CSR).
However, speech recognition (by a machine) is a very complex problem. Vocalizations vary in terms of accent,[73] pronunciation, articulation, roughness, nasality, pitch, volume, and speed. Speech is distorted by a background noise and echoes, electrical characteristics. Accuracy of speech recognition vary with the following[74][citation needed]:

  • Vocabulary size and confusability
  • Speaker dependence vs. independence
  • Isolated, discontinuous, or continuous speech
  • Task and language constraints
  • Read vs. spontaneous speech
  • Adverse conditions


As mentioned earlier in this article, accuracy of speech recognition varies in the following:

  • Error rates increase as the vocabulary size grows:

e.g. The 10 digits "zero" to "nine" can be recognized essentially perfectly, but vocabulary sizes of 200, 5000 or 100000 may have error rates of 3%, 7% or 45% respectively.

  • Vocabulary is hard to recognize if it contains confusable words:

e.g. The 26 letters of the English alphabet are difficult to discriminate because they are confusable words (most notoriously, the E-set: "B, C, D, E, G, P, T, V, Z"); an 8% error rate is considered good for this vocabulary.[citation needed]

  • Speaker dependence vs. independence:

A speaker-dependent system is intended for use by a single speaker.
A speaker-independent system is intended for use by any speaker, more difficult.

  • Isolated, Discontinuous or continuous speech

With isolated speech single words are used, therefore it becomes easier to recognize the speech.
With discontinuous speech full sentences separated by silence are used, therefore it becomes easier to recognize the speech as well as with isolated speech.
With continuous speech naturally spoken sentences are used, therefore it becomes harder to recognize the speech, different from both isolated and discontinuous speech.

  • Task and language constraints

e.g. Querying application may dismiss the hypothesis "The apple is red."
e.g. Constraints may be semantic; rejecting "The apple is angry."
e.g. Syntactic; rejecting "Red is apple the."
Constraints are often represented by a grammar.

  • Read vs. Spontaneous Speech

When a person reads it's usually in a context that has been previously prepared, but when a person uses spontaneous speech, it is difficult to recognize the speech because of the disfluencies (like "uh" and "um", false starts, incomplete sentences, stuttering, coughing, and laughter) and limited vocabulary.

  • Adverse conditions

Environmental noise (e.g. Noise in a car or a factory)
Acoustical distortions (e.g. echoes, room acoustics)
Speech recognition is a multi-levelled pattern recognition task.

  • Acoustical signals are structured into a hierarchy of units;

e.g. Phonemes, Words, Phrases, and Sentences;

  • Each level provides additional constraints;

e.g. Known word pronunciations or legal word sequences, which can compensate for errors or uncertainties at lower level;

  • This hierarchy of constraints are exploited;

By combining decisions probabilistically at all lower levels, and making more deterministic decisions only at the highest level;
Speech recognition by a machine is a process broken into several phases. Computationally, it is a problem in which a sound pattern has to be recognized or classified into a category that represents a meaning to a human. Every acoustic signal can be broken in smaller more basic sub-signals. As the more complex sound signal is broken into the smaller sub-sounds, different levels are created, where at the top level we have complex sounds, which are made of simpler sounds on lower level, and going to lower levels even more, we create more basic and shorter and simpler sounds. The lowest level, where the sounds are the most fundamental, a machine would check for simple and more probabilistic rules of what sound should represent. Once these sounds are put together into more complex sound on upper level, a new set of more deterministic rules should predict what new complex sound should represent. The most upper level of a deterministic rule should figure out the meaning of complex expressions. In order to expand our knowledge about speech recognition we need to take into a consideration neural networks. There are four steps of neural network approaches:

  • Digitize the speech that we want to recognize

For telephone speech the sampling rate is 8000 samples per second;

  • Compute features of spectral-domain of the speech (with Fourier transform);

computed every 10 ms, with one 10 ms section called a frame;

Analysis of four-step neural network approaches can be explained by further information. Sound is produced by air (or some other medium) vibration, which we register by ears, but machines by receivers. Basic sound creates a wave which has 2 descriptions; Amplitude (how strong is it), and frequency (how often it vibrates per second).

The sound waves can be digitized: Sample a strength at short intervals like in picture above[where?] to get bunch of numbers that approximate at each time step the strength of a wave. Collection of these numbers represent analog wave. This new wave is digital. Sound waves are complicated because they superimpose one on top of each other. Like the waves would. This way they create odd-looking waves. For example, if there are two waves that interact with each other we can add them which creates new odd-looking wave.

  • Neural network classifies features into phonetic-based categories;

Given basic sound blocks that a machine digitized, one has a bunch of numbers which describe a wave and waves describe words. Each frame has a unit block of sound, which are broken into basic sound waves and represented by numbers which, after Fourier Transform, can be statistically evaluated to set to which class of sounds it belongs. The nodes in the figure on a slide represent a feature of a sound in which a feature of a wave from the first layer of nodes to the second layer of nodes based on statistical analysis. This analysis depends on programmer's instructions. At this point, a second layer of nodes represents higher level features of a sound input which is again statistically evaluated to see what class they belong to. Last level of nodes should be output nodes that tell us with high probability what original sound really was.

  • Search to match the neural-network output scores for the best word, to determine the word that was most likely uttered;

In 1982, Kurzweil Applied Intelligence and Dragon Systems released speech recognition products. By 1985, Kurzweil’s software had a vocabulary of 1,000 words—if uttered one word at a time. Two years later, in 1987, its lexicon reached 20,000 words, entering the realm of human vocabularies, which range from 10,000 to 150,000 words. But recognition accuracy was only 10% in 1993. Two years later, the error rate crossed below 50%. Dragon Systems released "Naturally Speaking" in 1997, which recognized normal human speech. Progress mainly came from improved computer performance and larger source text databases. The Brown Corpus was the first major database available, containing several million words. Carnegie Mellon University researchers found no significant increase in recognition accuracy.[75]

Further information

Conferences and Journals

Popular speech recognition conferences held each year or two include SpeechTEK and SpeechTEK Europe, ICASSP, Interspeech/Eurospeech, and the IEEE ASRU. Conferences in the field of natural language processing, such as ACL, NAACL, EMNLP, and HLT, are beginning to include papers on speech processing. Important journals include the IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing (later renamed IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing and since Sept 2014 renamed IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing --- after merging with an ACM publication), Computer Speech and Language, and Speech Communication.


Books like "Fundamentals of Speech Recognition" by Lawrence Rabiner can be useful to acquire basic knowledge but may not be fully up to date (1993). Another good source can be "Statistical Methods for Speech Recognition" by Frederick Jelinek and "Spoken Language Processing (2001)" by Xuedong Huang etc. More up to date are "Computer Speech", by Manfred R. Schroeder, second edition published in 2004, and "Speech Processing: A Dynamic and Optimization-Oriented Approach" published in 2003 by Li Deng and Doug O'Shaughnessey. The recently updated textbook of "Speech and Language Processing (2008)" by Jurafsky and Martin presents the basics and the state of the art for ASR. Speaker recognition also uses the same features, most of the same front-end processing, and classification techniuqes as is done in speech recognition. A most recent comprehensive textbook, "Fundamentals of Speaker Recognition"[76] by Homayoon Beigi, is an in depth source for up to date details on the theory and practice. A good insight into the techniques used in the best modern systems can be gained by paying attention to government sponsored evaluations such as those organised by DARPA (the largest speech recognition-related project ongoing as of 2007 is the GALE project, which involves both speech recognition and translation components).

A good and accessible introduction to speech recognition technology and its history is provided by the general audience book "The Voice in the Machine. Building Computers That Understand Speech" by Roberto Pieraccini (2012).

The most recent book on speech recognition is "Automatic Speech Recognition: A Deep Learning Approach" (Publisher: Springer) written by D. Yu and L. Deng published near the end of 2014, with highly mathematically-oriented technical detail on how deep learning methods are derived and implemented in modern speech recognition systems based on DNNs and related deep learning methods.[51] A related book, published earlier in 2014, "Deep Learning: Methods and Applications" by L. Deng and D. Yu provides a less technical but more methodology-focused overview of DNN-based speech recognition during 2009-2014, placed within the more general context of deep learning applications including not only speech recognition but also image recognition, natural language processing, information retrieval, multimodal processing, and multitask learning.[47]


In terms of freely available resources, Carnegie Mellon University's Sphinx toolkit is one place to start to both learn about speech recognition and to start experimenting. Another resource (free but copyrighted) is the HTK book (and the accompanying HTK toolkit). The AT&T libraries GRM and DCD are also general software libraries for large-vocabulary speech recognition.[citation needed] For more recent and state-of-the-art techniques, Kaldi toolkit can be used.

For more software resources, see List of speech recognition software.

See also


  1. "Speaker Independent Connected Speech Recognition- Fifth Generation Computer Corporation". Fifthgen.com. Retrieved 2013-06-15.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  2. "British English definition of voice recognition". Macmillan Publishers Limited. Retrieved February 21, 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  3. "voice recognition, definition of". WebFinance, Inc. Retrieved February 21, 2012.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  4. "The Mailbag LG #114". Linuxgazette.net. Retrieved 2013-06-15.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  5. Reynolds, Douglas; Rose, Richard (January 1995). "Robust text-independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models" (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing. IEEE. 3 (1): 72–83. doi:10.1109/89.365379. ISSN 1063-6676. OCLC 26108901. Retrieved 21 February 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  6. "Speaker Identification (WhisperID)". Microsoft Research. Microsoft. Retrieved 21 February 2014. When you speak to someone, they don't just recognize what you say: they recognize who you are. WhisperID will let computers do that, too, figuring out who you are by the way you sound.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  7. Huffman, Larry. "Stokowski, Harvey Fletcher, and the Bell Labs Experimental Recordings". www.stokowski.org. Retrieved February 17, 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  8. Juang, B. H.; Rabiner, Lawrence R. "Automatic speech recognition–a brief history of the technology development" (PDF): 6. Retrieved 17 January 2015. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  9. Pierce, John (1969). "Whither Speech Recognition". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. doi:10.1121/1.1911801.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  10. Benesty, Jacob; Sondhi, M. M.; Huang, Yiteng (2008). Springer Handbook of Speech Processing. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 3540491252.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  11. BLECHMAN, R.O.; BLECHMAN, NICHOLAS (June 23, 2008). "Hello, Hal". The New Yorker. Retrieved 17 January 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  12. Funding A Revolution. National Academy Press. 1999. Retrieved 22 January 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  13. Lowerre, Bruce. "The Harpy Speech Recognition System", Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 1976
  14. http://ethw.org/First-Hand:The_Hidden_Markov_Model
  15. http://www.sarasinstitute.org/Audio/JimBaker(2006).mp3
  16. "Pioneering Speech Recognition". Retrieved 18 January 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  17. http://www.sarasinstitute.org/Audio/JimBaker(2006).mp3. Retrieved 23 March 2015. Missing or empty |title= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  18. 18.0 18.1 18.2 Huang, Xuedong; Baker, James; Reddy, Raj. "A Historical Perspective of Speech Recognition". Communications of the ACM. Retrieved 20 January 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  19. Juang, B. H.; Rabiner, Lawrence R. "Automatic speech recognition–a brief history of the technology development" (PDF): 10. Retrieved 17 January 2015. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  20. "History of Speech Recognition". Retrieved 17 January 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  21. McKean, Kevin (Apr 8, 1980). "When Cole talks, computers listen". Sarasota Journal. AP. Retrieved 23 November 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  22. Morgan, Nelson; Cohen, Jordan; Krishnan, Sree Hari; Chang, S; Wegmann, S (2013). Final Report: OUCH Project (Outing Unfortunate Characteristics of HMMs). CiteSeerX:<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  23. "Nuance Exec on iPhone 4S, Siri, and the Future of Speech". Tech.pinions. October 10, 2011. Retrieved November 23, 2011.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  24. Kincaid, Jason. "The Power Of Voice: A Conversation With The Head Of Google's Speech Technology". Tech Crunch. Missing or empty |url= (help); |access-date= requires |url= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  25. Froomkin, Dan. "THE COMPUTERS ARE LISTENING". The Intercept. Retrieved 20 June 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  26. NIPS Workshop: Deep Learning for Speech Recognition and Related Applications, Whistler, BC, Canada, Dec. 2009 (Organizers: Li Deng, Geoff Hinton, D. Yu).
  27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 G. Hinton, L. Deng, D. Yu, G. Dahl, A. Mohamed, N. Jaitly, A. Senior, V. Vanhoucke, P. Nguyen, T. Sainath, B. Kingsbury (2012). "Deep Neural Networks for Acoustic Modeling in Speech Recognition --- The shared views of four research groups," IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 82-97.
  28. 28.0 28.1 Deng, L.; Hinton, G.; Kingsbury, B. (2013). "New types of deep neural network learning for speech recognition and related applications: An overview (ICASSP)". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  29. Markoff, John (November 23, 2012). "Scientists See Promise in Deep-Learning Programs". New York Times. Retrieved 20 January 2015.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  30. Morgan, Bourlard, Renals, Cohen, Franco (1993) "Hybrid neural network/hidden Markov model systems for continuous speech recognition. ICASSP/IJPRAI"
  31. T. Robinson. (1992) A real-time recurrent error propagation network word recognition system, ICASSP.
  32. Waibel, Hanazawa, Hinton, Shikano, Lang. (1989) "Phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing."
  33. J. Baker, Li Deng, Jim Glass, S. Khudanpur, C.-H. Lee, N. Morgan, and D. O'Shaughnessy (2009). "Research Developments and Directions in Speech Recognition and Understanding, Part 1," IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 75-80, 2009.
  34. Y. Bengio (1991). "Artificial Neural Networks and their Application to Speech/Sequence Recognition," Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Canada.
  35. L. Deng, K. Hassanein, M. Elmasry. (1994) "Analysis of correlation structure for a neural predictive model with applications to speech recognition," Neural Networks, vol. 7, No. 2., pp. 331-339.
  36. Keynote talk: Recent Developments in Deep Neural Networks. ICASSP, 2013 (by Geoff Hinton).
  37. 37.0 37.1 Keynote talk: "Achievements and Challenges of Deep Learning - From Speech Analysis and Recognition To Language and Multimodal Processing," Interspeech, September 2014 (by Li Deng).
  38. Goel, V.; Byrne, W. J. (2000). "Minimum Bayes-risk automatic speech recognition". Computer Speech & Language. 14 (2): 115–135. doi:10.1006/csla.2000.0138. Retrieved 2011-03-28.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  39. Mohri, M. (2002). "Edit-Distance of Weighted Automata: General Definitions and Algorithms" (PDF). International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science. 14 (6): 957–982. doi:10.1142/S0129054103002114. Retrieved 2011-03-28.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  40. Waibel, A.; Hanazawa, T.; Hinton, G.; Shikano, K.; Lang, K. J. (1989). "Phoneme recognition using time-delay neural networks". IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 37: 328–339. doi:10.1109/29.21701.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  41. Wu, J.; Chan, C. (1993). "Isolated Word Recognition by Neural Network Models with Cross-Correlation Coefficients for Speech Dynamics". IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 15: 1174–1185. doi:10.1109/34.244678.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  42. S. A. Zahorian, A. M. Zimmer, and F. Meng, (2002) "Vowel Classification for Computer based Visual Feedback for Speech Training for the Hearing Impaired," in ICSLP 2002
  43. Alex Graves, Abdel-rahman Mohamed and Geoffrey Hinton, "SPEECH RECOGNITION WITH DEEP RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS",ICASSP 2013
  44. Alex Waibel ,1988, "Modular Construction of Time-Delay Neural Networks for Speech Recognition"
  45. Andrew L. Maas, Quoc V. Le, Tyler M. O’Neil, Oriol Vinyals, Patrick Nguyen, Andrew Y. Ng, (2012) "Recurrent Neural Networks for Noise Reduction in Robust ASR", in Proceedings of Interspeech 2012, Portland
  46. Hongbing Hu, Stephen A. Zahorian, (2010) "Dimensionality Reduction Methods for HMM Phonetic Recognition," ICASSP 2010, Dallas, TX
  47. 47.0 47.1 47.2 47.3 L. Deng and D. Yu (2014) "Deep Learning: Methods and Applications" http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/209355/DeepLearning-NowPublishing-Vol7-SIG-039.pdf
  48. Yu, D.; Deng, L.; Dahl, G. (2010). "Roles of Pre-Training and Fine-Tuning in Context-Dependent DBN-HMMs for Real-World Speech Recognition". NIPS Workshop on Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  49. Dahl, G.; Yu, D.; Deng, L.; Acero, A. (2012). "Context-Dependent Pre-Trained Deep Neural Networks for Large-Vocabulary Speech Recognition". IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Signal Processing. 20(1): 30–42.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  50. Deng L., Li, J., Huang, J., Yao, K., Yu, D., Seide, F. et al. Recent Advances in Deep Learning for Speech Research at Microsoft. ICASSP, 2013.
  51. 51.0 51.1 51.2 Yu, D.; Deng, L. (2014). "Automatic Speech Recognition: A Deep Learning Approach (Publisher: Springer)". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  52. Deng, L.; Li, Xiao (2013). "Machine Learning Paradigms for Speech Recognition: An Overview". IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  53. L. Deng, M. Seltzer, D. Yu, A. Acero, A. Mohamed, and G. Hinton (2010) Binary Coding of Speech Spectrograms Using a Deep Auto-encoder. Interspeech.
  54. Z. Tuske, P. Golik, R. Schlüter and H. Ney (2014). Acoustic Modeling with Deep Neural Networks Using Raw Time Signal for LVCSR. Interspeech.
  55. McMillan, R. "How Skype Used AI to Build Its Amazing New Language Translator", Wire, Dec. 2014.
  56. Hannun et al. (2014) "Deep Speech: Scaling up end-to-end speech recognition", arXiv:1412.5567.
  57. Ron Schneiderman (2015) "Accuracy, Apps Advance Speech Recognition --- Interview with Vlad Sejnoha and Li Deng", IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Jan, 2015.
  58. Suominen, H., Zhou, L., Hanlen, L., & Ferraro, G. (2015). Benchmarking Clinical Speech Recognition and Information Extraction: New Data, Methods, and Evaluations. JMIR Medical Informatics, 3(2), e19. http://medinform.jmir.org/2015/2/e19/
  59. Speech.kth.se
  60. Eurofighter Direct Voice Input
  61. Researchers fine-tune F-35 pilot-aircraft speech system
  62. Cerf, Vinton; Wrubel, Rob; Sherwood, Susan. "Can speech-recognition software break down educational language barriers?". Discovery Communications, LLC. Retrieved 26 March 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  63. 63.0 63.1 "Speech Recognition for Learning". National Center for Technology Innovation. 2010. Retrieved 26 March 2014. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  64. Follensbee, Bob; McCloskey-Dale, Susan. "Speech recognition in schools: An update from the field". Retrieved 26 March 2014. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  65. "News from". MassMATCH. 2010-03-18. Retrieved 2013-06-15.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  66. "Speech recognition for disabled people".<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  67. Friends international support group
  68. Garrett, Jennifer Tumlin, et al. "Using Speech Recognition Software to Increase Writing Fluency for Individuals with Physical Disabilities." Journal of Special Education Technology 26.1 (2011): 25-41. Web.
  69. Forgrave, Karen E. "Assistive Technology: Empowering Students with Disabilities." Clearing House 75.3 (2002): 122-6. Web.
  70. Tang, K. W., Ridha Kamoua, and Victor Sutan. "Speech Recognition Technology for Disabilities Education." Journal of Educational Technology Systems 33.2 (2004): 173-84. Web.
  71. The Planetary Society. "[1]." .
  72. Govivace. "[2]." .
  73. Deng Y. , Li X. , Kwan C.,Raj B.,Stern R., Continuous Feature Adaptation for Non-Native Speech Recognition, International Journal of Computer, Information Science and Engineering Vol:1 No:6, 2007, http://waset.org/publications/1192/continuous-feature-adaptation-for-non-native-speech-recognition
  74. National Institute of Standards and Technology. The History of Automatic Speech Recognition Evaluation at NIST, http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/mig/publications/ASRhistory/
  75. "The History of Automatic Speech Recognition Evaluations at NIST". National Institute of Standards and Technology. May 2009. Retrieved May 2010. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  76. Beigi, Homayoon (2011). Fundamentals of Speaker Recognition. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-77591-3.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

Further reading

  • Pieraccini, Roberto. The Voice in the Machine. Building Computers That Understand Speech. The MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262016858.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Woelfel, Matthias; McDonough, John. Distant Speech Recognition. Wiley. ISBN 978-0470517048.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Karat, Clare-Marie; Vergo, John; Nahamoo, David (2007). "Conversational Interface Technologies". In Sears, Andrew; Jacko, Julie A. (eds.). The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications (Human Factors and Ergonomics). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. ISBN 978-0-8058-5870-9.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Managing editors: Giovanni Battista Varile, Antonio Zampolli. (1997). Cole (Editor in Chief), Ronald; Mariani, Joseph; Uszkoreit, Hans; Varile, Giovanni Battista; Zaenen, Annie; Zampolli; Zue, Victor (eds.). Survey of the state of the art in human language technology. Cambridge Studies In Natural Language Processing. XII–XIII. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-59277-1.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Junqua, J.-C.; Haton, J.-P. (1995). Robustness in Automatic Speech Recognition: Fundamentals and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN 978-0-7923-9646-8.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

External links