From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Early Minimoog by R.A. Moog Inc. (ca. 1970)

A sound synthesizer (usually abbreviated as "synthesizer" or "synth", also spelled "synthesiser") is an electronic musical instrument that generates electric signals that are converted to sound through instrument amplifiers and loudspeakers or headphones. Synthesizers may either imitate instruments like piano, Hammond organ, flute, vocals; natural sounds like ocean waves, etc.; or generate new electronic timbres. They are often played with a musical keyboard, but they can be controlled via a variety of other input devices, including music sequencers, instrument controllers, fingerboards, guitar synthesizers, wind controllers, and electronic drums. Synthesizers without built-in controllers are often called sound modules, and are controlled via MIDI or CV/Gate using a controller device, often a MIDI keyboard or other controller.

Synthesizers use various methods to generate electronic signals (sounds). Among the most popular waveform synthesis techniques are subtractive synthesis, additive synthesis, wavetable synthesis, frequency modulation synthesis, phase distortion synthesis, physical modeling synthesis and sample-based synthesis. Other less common synthesis types (see #Types of synthesis) include subharmonic synthesis, a form of additive synthesis via subharmonics (used by mixture trautonium), and granular synthesis, sample-based synthesis based on grains of sound, generally resulting in soundscapes or clouds.

Synthesizers were first used in pop music in the 1960s. In the 1970s, synths were used in disco, especially in the late 1970s. In the 1980s, the invention of the relatively inexpensive, mass market Yamaha DX7 synth made synthesizers widely available. 1980s pop and dance music often made heavy use of synthesizers. In the 2010s, synthesizers are used in many genres of pop, rock and dance music. Contemporary classical music composers from the 20th and 21st century write compositions for synthesizer.


Synthesizers before 19th century
Wolfgang von Kempelen's Speaking Machine in 1769–1791 (replica in 2007–2009)
Rudolph Koenig's sound synthesizer in 1865:
consists of tuning forks, electromagnets, and Helmholtz resonators.

The beginnings of the synthesizer are difficult to trace, as there is confusion between sound synthesizers and arbitrary electric/electronic musical instruments.[1][2]

Early electric instruments

One of the earliest electric musical instruments, the musical telegraph, was invented in 1876 by American electrical engineer Elisha Gray. He accidentally discovered the sound generation from a self-vibrating electromagnetic circuit, and invented a basic single-note oscillator. This musical telegraph used steel reeds with oscillations created by electromagnets transmitted over a telegraphy line. Gray also built a simple loudspeaker device into later models, consisting of a vibrating diaphragm in a magnetic field, to make the oscillator audible.[3][4]

This instrument was a remote electromechanical musical instrument using telegraphy and electric buzzers which can generate fixed timbre sound. Though it lacked an arbitrary sound-synthesis function, some have erroneously called it the first synthesizer.[1][2]

Early additive synthesizer: tonewheel organs

The Teleharmonium console (1897) and Hammond organ (1934).

In 1897, Thaddeus Cahill invented the Teleharmonium (or Dynamophone) which used dynamos (early electric generator),[5] and was capable of additive synthesis like the Hammond organ, which was invented in 1934. However, Cahill's business was unsuccessful for various reasons (size of system, rapid evolutions of electronics, crosstalk issues on the telephone line etc.), and similar but more compact instruments were subsequently developed, such as electronic and tonewheel organs.

Emergence of electronics and early electronic instruments

Left: Theremin (RCA AR-1264; 1930). Middle: Ondes Martenot (7G model; 1978). Right: Trautonium (Telefunken Volkstrautonium Ela T42; 1933).

In 1906, American engineer, Lee De Forest ushered in the "electronics age".[6] He invented the first amplifying vacuum tube, called the Audion tube. This led to new entertainment technologies, including radio and sound films. These new technologies also influenced the music industry, and resulted in various early electronic musical instruments that used vacuum tubes, including:

Most of these early instruments used "heterodyne circuits" to produce audio frequencies, and were limited in their synthesis capabilities. Ondes Martenot and Trautonium were continuously developed for several decades, finally developing qualities similar to later synthesizers.

Graphical sound

In the 1920s, Arseny Avraamov developed various systems of graphic sonic art,[9] and similar graphical sound systems were developed around the world, such as those as seen on the Holzer 2010.[10] In 1938, USSR engineer Yevgeny Murzin designed a compositional tool called ANS, one of the earliest real-time additive synthesizers using optoelectronics. Although his idea of reconstructing a sound from its visible image was apparently simple, the instrument was not realized until 20 years later, in 1958, as Murzin was "an engineer who worked in areas unrelated to music" (Kreichi 1997).[11]

Subtractive synthesis & polyphonic synthesizer

Hammond Novachord (1939) and Welte Lichtton orgel (1935)

In the 1930s and 1940s, the basic elements required for the modern analog subtractive synthesizers — audio oscillators, audio filters, envelope controllers, and various effects units — had already appeared and were utilized in several electronic instruments.

The earliest polyphonic synthesizers were developed in Germany and the United States. The Warbo Formant Organ developed by Harald Bode in Germany in 1937, was a four-voice key-assignment keyboard with two formant filters and a dynamic envelope controller[12][13] and possibly manufactured commercially by a factory in Dachau, according to the 120 years of Electronic Music.[14][verification needed] The Hammond Novachord released in 1939, was an electronic keyboard that used twelve sets of top-octave oscillators with octave dividers to generate sound, with vibrato, a resonator filter bank and a dynamic envelope controller. During the three years that Hammond manufactured this model, 1,069 units were shipped, but production was discontinued at the start of World War II.[15][16] Both instruments were the forerunners of the later electronic organs and polyphonic synthesizers.

Monophonic electronic keyboards

Harald Bode's Multimonica (1940) and Georges Jenny Ondioline (c.1941)

During the 1940s and 1950s, before the popularization of electronic organs and the introductions of combo organs, a number of portable monophonic electronic instruments with small keyboards were developed and commercialized. These small instruments consisted of an electronic oscillator, vibrato effect, passive filters etc., and most of them (except for Clavivox) were designed for use with conventional ensembles, rather than as experimental instruments for electronic music studios which later evolved into modern synthesizers. These small instruments included:

Other innovations

In the late 1940s, Canadian inventor and composer, Hugh Le Caine invented Electronic Sackbut, a voltage-controlled electronic musical instrument which provided the earliest realtime control of three aspects of sound (volume, pitch and timbre), corresponding to today's touch-sensitive keyboard, pitch and modulation controllers. The controllers were initially implemented as a multidimensional pressure keyboard in 1945, then changed to a group of dedicated controllers operated by left hand in 1948.[18]

In Japan, as early as in 1935, Yamaha released Magna organ,[19] a multi-timbral keyboard instrument based on electrically-blown free reeds with pickups.[20] It may have been similar to the electrostatic reed organs developed by Frederick Albert Hoschke in 1934 and then manufactured by Everett and Wurlitzer until 1961.

However, at least one Japanese was not satisfied the situation at that time. In 1949, Japanese composer Minao Shibata discussed the concept of "a musical instrument with very high performance" that can "synthesize any kind of sound waves" and is "...operated very easily," predicting that with such an instrument, "...the music scene will be changed drastically."[neutrality is disputed][21][22]

Electronic music studios as sound synthesizers

Synthesizer (left) and Audio console at the Studio di fonologia musicale di Radio Milano (of RAI)

After World War II, electronic music including electroacoustic music and musique concrète was created by contemporary composers, and numerous electronic music studios were established around the world, especially in Bonn, Cologne, Paris and Milan. These studios were typically filled with electronic equipment including oscillators, filters, tape recorders, audio consoles etc., and the whole studio functioned as a "sound synthesizer".

Origin of the term "sound synthesizer"

RCA Mark II Sound Synthesizer (1957) and Siemens Studio for Electronic Music (1959)

In 1951–1952, RCA produced a machine called the Electronic Music Synthesizer; however, it was more accurately a composition machine, because it did not produce sounds in real time.[23] RCA then developed the first programmable sound synthesizer, RCA Mark II Sound Synthesizer, installing it at the Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music Center in 1957.[24] Prominent composers including Vladimir Ussachevsky, Otto Luening, Milton Babbitt, Halim El-Dabh, Bülent Arel, Charles Wuorinen, and Mario Davidovsky used the RCA Synthesizer extensively in various compositions.[25]

From modular synthesizer to popular music

In 1959–1960, Harald Bode developed a modular synthesizer and sound processor,[26][27] and in 1961, he wrote a paper exploring the concept of self-contained portable modular synthesizer using newly emerging transistor technology.[28] He also served as AES session chairman on music and electronic for the fall conventions in 1962 and 1964.[29] His ideas were adopted by Donald Buchla and Robert Moog in the United States, and Paolo Ketoff et al. in Italy[30][31][32] at about the same time:[33] among them, Moog is known as the first synthesizer designer to popularize the voltage control technique in analog electronic musical instruments.[33]

A working group at Roman Electronic Music Center, composer Gino Marinuzzi, Jr., designer Giuliano Strini, MSEE, and sound engineer and technician Paolo Ketoff in Italy; their vacuum-tube modular "FonoSynth" slightly predated (1957–58) Moog and Buchla's work. Later the group created a solid-state version, the "Synket". Both devices remained prototypes (except a model made for John Eaton who wrote a "Concert Piece for Synket and Orchestra"), owned and used only by Marinuzzi, notably in the original soundtrack of Mario Bava's sci-fi film "Terrore nello spazio" (a.k.a. Planet of the Vampires, 1965), and a RAI-TV mini-series, "Jeckyll".[30][31][32]

The Moog modular synthesizer of 1960s–1970s

Robert Moog built his first prototype between 1963 and 1964, and was then commissioned by the Alwin Nikolais Dance Theater of NY;[34][35] while Donald Buchla was commissioned by Morton Subotnick.[36][37] In the late 1960s to 1970s, the development of miniaturized solid-state components allowed synthesizers to become self-contained, portable instruments, as proposed by Harald Bode in 1961. By the early 1980s, companies were selling compact, modestly priced synthesizers to the public. This, along with the development of Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI), made it easier to integrate and synchronize synthesizers and other electronic instruments for use in musical composition. In the 1990s, synthesizer emulations began to appear in computer software, known as software synthesizers. Later, VST and other plug-ins were able to emulate classic hardware synthesizers to a moderate degree.[clarification needed]

The synthesizer had a considerable effect on 20th-century music.[38] Micky Dolenz of The Monkees bought one of the first Moog synthesizers. The band was the first to release an album featuring a Moog with Pisces, Aquarius, Capricorn & Jones Ltd. in 1967,[39] which reached number 1 in the charts. The Perrey and Kingsley album The In Sound From Way Out! using the Moog and tape loops was released in 1966. A few months later, both the Rolling Stones' "2000 Light Years from Home" and the title track of the Doors' 1967 album Strange Days featured a Moog, played by Brian Jones and Paul Beaver, respectively. In the same year, Bruce Haack built a homemade synthesizer which he demonstrated on Mister Rogers' Neighborhood. The synthesizer included a sampler (musical instrument) which recorded, stored, played and looped sounds controlled by switches, light sensors and human skin contact. Wendy Carlos's Switched-On Bach (1968), recorded using Moog synthesizers, also influenced numerous musicians of that era and is one of the most popular recordings of classical music ever made,[40] alongside the records (particularly Snowflakes are Dancing in 1974) of Isao Tomita, who in the early 1970s utilized synthesizers to create new artificial sounds (rather than simply mimicking real instruments[41]) and made significant advances in analog synthesizer programming.[42]

The sound of the Moog reached the mass market with Simon and Garfunkel's Bookends in 1968 and The Beatles' Abbey Road the following year; hundreds of other popular recordings subsequently used synthesizers, most famously the portable Minimoog. Electronic music albums by Beaver and Krause, Tonto's Expanding Head Band, The United States of America, and White Noise reached a sizable[clarification needed] cult audience and progressive rock musicians such as Richard Wright of Pink Floyd and Rick Wakeman of Yes were soon using the new portable synthesizers extensively. Stevie Wonder and Herbie Hancock also contributed strongly[clarification needed] to the popularisation of synthesizers in Black American music.[43][44] Other early users included Emerson, Lake & Palmer's Keith Emerson, Todd Rundgren, Pete Townshend, and The Crazy World of Arthur Brown's Vincent Crane. In Europe, the first no. 1 single to feature a Moog prominently was Chicory Tip's 1972 hit "Son of My Father".[45]

Polyphonic keyboards and the digital revolution

The Prophet-5 synthesizer of the late 1970s-early 1980s.

In 1978, the success of the Prophet 5, a polyphonic and microprocessor-controlled keyboard synthesizer, strongly aided the shift of synthesizers towards their familiar modern shape, away from large modular units and towards smaller keyboard instruments.[46] This form factor helped accelerate the integration of synthesizers into popular music, a shift that had been lent powerful momentum by the Minimoog, and also later the ARP Odyssey.[47] Earlier polyphonic electronic instruments of the 1970s, rooted in string synthesizers before advancing to multi-synthesizers incorporating monosynths and more, gradually fell out of fashion in the wake of these newer, note-assigned polyphonic keyboard synthesizers.[48] These polyphonic synthesizers were mainly manufactured in the United States and Japan from the mid-1970s to the early-1980s, and included the Yamaha CS-80 (1976), Oberheim's Polyphonic and OBX (1975 and 1979), Sequential Circuits' Prophet-5 (1978), and Roland's Jupiter 4 and Jupiter 8 (1978 and 1981).

The Fairlight CMI of the late 1970s-early 1980s.

By the end of the 1970s, digital synthesizers and digital samplers arrived on the market around the world (and are still sold today),[note 1] as the result of preceding research and development.[note 1] Compared with analog synthesizer sounds, the digital sounds produced by these new instruments tended to have a number of different characteristics: clear attack and sound outlines, carrying sounds, rich overtones with inharmonic contents, and complex motion of sound textures, amongst others. While these new instruments were expensive, these characteristics meant musicians were quick to adopt them, especially in the United Kingdom[49] and the United States. This encouraged a trend towards producing music using digital sounds,[note 2] and laid the foundations for the development of the inexpensive digital instruments popular in the next decade (see below). Relatively successful instruments, with each selling more than several hundred units per series, included the NED Synclavier (1977), Fairlight CMI (1979), E-mu Emulator (1981), and PPG Wave (1981).[note 1][49][50][51][52]

The Yamaha DX7 of 1983.

In 1983, however, Yamaha's revolutionary DX7 digital synthesizer[53][54] swept through popular music, leading to the adoption and development of digital synthesizers in many varying forms during the 1980s, and the rapid decline of analog synthesizer technology. In 1987, Roland's D50 synthesizer was released, which combined the already existing sample-based synthesis[note 3] and the onboard digital effects,[55] while Korg's even more popular M1 (1988) now also heralded the era of the workstation synthesizer, based on ROM sample sounds for composing and sequencing whole songs, rather than solely traditional sound synthesis.[56]

The Clavia Nord Lead series released in 1995.

Throughout the 1990s, the popularity of electronic dance music employing analog sounds, the appearance of digital analog modelling synthesizers to recreate these sounds, and the development of the Eurorack modular synthesiser system, initially introduced with the Doepfer A-100 and since adopted by other manufacturers, all contributed to the resurgence of interest in analog technology. The turn of the century also saw improvements in technology that led to the popularity of digital software synthesizers.[57] In the 2010s, new analog synthesizers, both in keyboard instrument and modular form, are released alongside current digital hardware instruments.[58] In 2016, Korg announced the release of the Korg Minilogue, the first polyphonic analogue synth to be mass-produced in decades.

Impact on popular music

In the 1970s, Jean Michel Jarre, Larry Fast, and Vangelis released successful synthesizer-led instrumental albums. Over time, this helped influence the emergence of synthpop, a subgenre of new wave, in the late 1970s. The work of German electronic bands such as Kraftwerk and Tangerine Dream, British acts Gary Numan and David Bowie and the Japanese Yellow Magic Orchestra were also influential in the development of the genre.[59] Gary Numan's 1979 hits "Are 'Friends' Electric?" and "Cars" made heavy use of synthesizers.[60][61] OMD's "Enola Gay" (1980) used distinctive electronic percussion and a synthesized melody. Soft Cell used a synthesized melody on their 1981 hit "Tainted Love".[59] Nick Rhodes, keyboardist of Duran Duran, used various synthesizers including the Roland Jupiter-4 and Jupiter-8.[62]

Chart hits include Depeche Mode's "Just Can't Get Enough" (1981),[59] The Human League's "Don't You Want Me"[63] and Giorgio Moroder's "Flashdance... What a Feeling" (1983) for Irene Cara. Other notable synthpop groups included New Order, Visage, Japan, Men Without Hats, Ultravox,[59] Spandau Ballet, Culture Club, Eurythmics, Yazoo, Thompson Twins, A Flock of Seagulls, Heaven 17, Erasure, Soft Cell, Blancmange, Pet Shop Boys, Bronski Beat, Kajagoogoo, ABC, Naked Eyes, Devo, and the early work of Tears for Fears and Talk Talk. Giorgio Moroder, Howard Jones, Kitaro, Stevie Wonder, Peter Gabriel, Thomas Dolby, Kate Bush, Dónal Lunny, Deadmau5, Frank Zappa and Todd Rundgren, and Owl City all made use of synthesizers.

The synthesizer became one of the most important instruments in the music industry.[59]

Types of synthesis

Additive synthesis was utilized as early as on Teleharmonium in 1900s and Hammond organ in 1930s.

Additive synthesis builds sounds by adding together waveforms (which are usually harmonically related). Early analog examples of additive synthesizers are the Teleharmonium and Hammond organ. To implement real-time additive synthesis, wavetable synthesis is useful for reducing required hardware/processing power,[64] and is commonly used in low-end MIDI instruments (such as educational keyboards) and low-end sound cards.

Subtractive synthesis is still utilized on various synths, including virtual analog synth.

Subtractive synthesis is based on filtering harmonically rich waveforms. Due to its simplicity, it is the basis of early synthesizers such as the Moog synthesizer. Subtractive synthesizers use a simple acoustic model that assumes an instrument can be approximated by a simple signal generator (producing sawtooth waves, square waves, etc.) followed by a filter. The combination of simple modulation routings (such as pulse width modulation and oscillator sync), along with the physically unrealistic lowpass filters, is responsible for the "classic synthesizer" sound commonly associated with "analog synthesis"—a term which is often mistakenly used when referring to software synthesizers using subtractive synthesis.

FM synthesis was hugely successful in earliest digital synthesizers.

FM synthesis (frequency modulation synthesis) is a process that usually involves the use of at least two signal generators (sine-wave oscillators, commonly referred to as "operators" in FM-only synthesizers) to create and modify a voice. Often, this is done through the analog or digital generation of a signal that modulates the tonal and amplitude characteristics of a base carrier signal. FM synthesis was pioneered by John Chowning, who patented the idea and sold it to Yamaha. Unlike the exponential relationship between voltage-in-to-frequency-out and multiple waveforms in classical 1-volt-per-octave synthesizer oscillators, Chowning-style FM synthesis uses a linear voltage-in-to-frequency-out relationship and sine-wave oscillators. The resulting complex waveform may have many component frequencies, and there is no requirement that they all bear a harmonic relationship. Sophisticated FM synths such as the Yamaha DX-7 series can have 6 operators per voice; some synths with FM can also often use filters and variable amplifier types to alter the signal's characteristics into a sonic voice that either roughly imitates acoustic instruments or creates sounds that are unique. FM synthesis is especially valuable for metallic or clangorous noises such as bells, cymbals, or other percussion.

Phase distortion synthesis is a method implemented on Casio CZ synthesizers. It is quite similar to FM synthesis but avoids infringing on the Chowning FM patent. It can be categorized as both modulation synthesis (along with FM synthesis), and distortion synthesis along with waveshaping synthesis.

Granular synthesis is a type of synthesis based on manipulating very small sample slices.

Physical modelling synthesis is the synthesis of sound by using a set of equations and algorithms to simulate a real instrument, or some other physical source of sound. This involves modelling components of musical objects and creating systems that define action, filters, envelopes and other parameters over time. Various models can also be combined, e.g. the model of a violin with characteristics of a pedal steel guitar and the action of piano hammer. When an initial set of parameters is run through the physical simulation, the simulated sound is generated. Although physical modeling was not a new concept in acoustics and synthesis, it was not until the development of the Karplus-Strong algorithm and the increase in DSP power in the late 1980s that commercial implementations became feasible. The quality and speed of physical modeling on computers improves with higher processing power.

Analysis/resynthesis is typically used on the vocoder.
Sample-based synthesis may be one of the most popular methods at the moment.

Sample-based synthesis involves recording a real instrument as a digitized waveform, and then playing back its recordings at different speeds (pitches) to produce different tones. This technique is referred to a "sampling". Most samplers designate a part of the sample for each component of the Attack Decay Sustain Release (ADSR) envelope, repeating that section while changing the volume according to the envelope. This allows samplers to vary the envelope while playing the same note. See also Wavetable synthesis, Vector synthesis.

Analysis/resynthesis is a form of synthesis that uses a series of bandpass filters or Fourier transforms to analyze the harmonic content of a sound. The results are then used to resynthesize the sound using a band of oscillators. The vocoder, linear predictive coding, and some forms of speech synthesis are based on analysis/resynthesis.

Essynth is a mathematical model for interactive sound synthesis based on evolutionary computation and uses genetic operators and fitness functions to create sound.

Imitative synthesis

Sound synthesis can be used to mimic acoustic sound sources. Generally, a sound that does not change over time includes a fundamental partial or harmonic, and any number of partials. Synthesis may attempt to mimic the amplitude and pitch of the partials in an acoustic sound source.

When natural sounds are analyzed in the frequency domain (as on a spectrum analyzer), the spectra of their sounds exhibits amplitude spikes at each of the fundamental tone's harmonics corresponding to resonant properties of the instruments (spectral peaks that are also referred to as formants). Some harmonics may have higher amplitudes than others. The specific set of harmonic-vs-amplitude pairs is known as a sound's harmonic content. A synthesized sound requires accurate reproduction of the original sound in both the frequency domain and the time domain. A sound does not necessarily have the same harmonic content throughout the duration of the sound. Typically, high-frequency harmonics die out more quickly than the lower harmonics.

In most conventional synthesizers, for purposes of re-synthesis, recordings of real instruments are composed of several components representing the acoustic responses of different parts of the instrument, the sounds produced by the instrument during different parts of a performance, or the behavior of the instrument under different playing conditions (pitch, intensity of playing, fingering, etc.)


Basic components of an analogue subtractive synthesizer
analogue synth components

Synthesizers generate sound through various analogue and digital techniques. Early synthesizers were analog hardware based but many modern synthesizers use a combination of DSP software and hardware or else are purely software-based (see softsynth). Digital synthesizers often emulate classic analog designs. Sound is controllable by the operator by means of circuits or virtual stages that may include:

  • Electronic oscillators – create raw sounds with a timbre that depends upon the waveform generated. Voltage-controlled oscillators (VCOs) and digital oscillators may be used. Harmonic additive synthesis models sounds directly from pure sine waves, somewhat in the manner of an organ, while frequency modulation and phase distortion synthesis use one oscillator to modulate another. Subtractive synthesis depends upon filtering a harmonically rich oscillator waveform. Sample-based and granular synthesis use one or more digitally recorded sounds in place of an oscillator.
  • Low frequency oscillator (LFO) – an oscillator of adjustable frequency that can be used to modulate the sound rhythmically, for example to create tremolo or vibrato or to control a filter's operating frequency. LFOs are used in most forms of synthesis.
  • Voltage-controlled filter (VCF) – "shape" the sound generated by the oscillators in the frequency domain, often under the control of an envelope or LFO. These are essential to subtractive synthesis.
  • ADSR envelopes – provide envelope modulation to "shape" the volume or harmonic content of the produced note in the time domain with the principal parameters being attack, decay, sustain and release. These are used in most forms of synthesis. ADSR control is provided by envelope generators.
  • Voltage-controlled amplifier (VCA) – After the signal generated by one (or a mix of more) VCOs has been modified by filters and LFOs, and its waveform has been shaped (contoured) by an ADSR envelope generator, it then passes on to one or more voltage-controlled amplifiers (VCAs). A VCA is a preamp that boosts (amplifies) the electronic signal before passing it on to an external or built-in power amplifier, as well as a means to control its amplitude (volume) using an attenuator. The gain of the VCA is affected by a control voltage (CV), coming from an envelope generator, an LFO, the keyboard or some other source.[65]
  • Other sound processing effects such as ring modulators may be encountered.


Various filter modes.

Electronic filters are particularly important in subtractive synthesis, being designed to pass some frequency regions through unattenuated while significantly attenuating ("subtracting") others. The low-pass filter is most frequently used, but band-pass filters, band-reject filters and high-pass filters are also sometimes available.

The filter may be controlled with a second ADSR envelope. An "envelope modulation" ("env mod") parameter on many synthesizers with filter envelopes determines how much the envelope affects the filter. If turned all the way down, the filter producs a flat sound with no envelope. When turned up the envelope becomes more noticeable, expanding the minimum and maximum range of the filter.

Attack Decay Sustain Release (ADSR) envelope

Schematic of ADSR
Attack Decay Sustain Release
Key on off
Inverted ADSR envelope

When an acoustic musical instrument produces sound, the loudness and spectral content of the sound change over time in ways that vary from instrument to instrument. The "attack" and "decay" of a sound have a great effect on the instrument's sonic character.[66][67] Sound synthesis techniques often employ an envelope generator that controls a sound's parameters at any point in its duration. Most often this is an (ADSR) envelope, which may be applied to overall amplitude control, filter frequency, etc. The envelope may be a discrete circuit or module, or implemented in software. The contour of an ADSR envelope is specified using four parameters:

  • Attack time is the time taken for initial run-up of level from nil to peak, beginning when the key is first pressed.
  • Decay time is the time taken for the subsequent run down from the attack level to the designated sustain level.
  • Sustain level is the level during the main sequence of the sound's duration, until the key is released.
  • Release time is the time taken for the level to decay from the sustain level to zero after the key is released.

An early implementation of ADSR can be found on the Hammond Novachord in 1938 (which predates the first Moog synthesizer by over 25 years). A seven-position rotary knob set preset ADS parameter for all 72 notes; a pedal controlled release time.[15] The notion of ADSR was specified by Vladimir Ussachevsky (then head of the Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music Center) in 1965 while suggesting improvements for Bob Moog's pioneering work on synthesizers, although the earlier notations of parameter were (T1, T2, Esus, T3), then these were simplified to current form (Attack time, Decay time, Sustain level, Release time) by ARP.[68]

Some electronic musical instruments allow the ADSR envelope to be inverted, which results in opposite behavior compared to the normal ADSR envelope. During the attack phase, the modulated sound parameter fades from the maximum amplitude to zero then, during the decay phase, rises to the value specified by the sustain parameter. After the key has been released the sound parameter rises from sustain amplitude back to maximum amplitude.

8-step envelope on Casio CZ series

A common variation of the ADSR on some synthesizers, such as the Korg MS-20, was ADSHR (attack, decay, sustain, hold, release). By adding a "hold" parameter, the system allowed notes to be held at the sustain level for a fixed length of time before decaying. The General Instruments AY-3-8912 sound chip included a hold time parameter only; the sustain level was not programmable. Another common variation in the same vein is the AHDSR (attack, hold, decay, sustain, release) envelope, in which the "hold" parameter controls how long the envelope stays at full volume before entering the decay phase. Multiple attack, decay and release settings may be found on more sophisticated models.

Certain synthesizers also allow for a delay parameter before the attack. Modern synthesizers like the Dave Smith Instruments Prophet '08 have DADSR (delay, attack, decay, sustain, release) envelopes. The delay setting determines the length of silence between hitting a note and the attack. Some software synthesizers, such as Image-Line's 3xOSC (included with their DAW FL Studio) have DAHDSR (delay, attack, hold, decay, sustain, release) envelopes.

LFO section of Access Virus C


A low-frequency oscillator (LFO) generates an electronic signal, usually below 20 Hz. LFO signals create a periodic control signal or sweep, often used in vibrato, tremolo and other effects. In certain genres of electronic music, the LFO signal can control the cutoff frequency of a VCF to make a rhythmic wah-wah sound, or the signature dubstep wobble bass.


One of the earliest patch memory (bottom left) on Oberheim Four-voice (1975/1976)

A synthesizer patch (some manufacturers chose the term program) is a sound setting. Modular synthesizers used cables ("patch cords") to connect the different sound modules together. Since these machines had no memory to save settings, musicians wrote down the locations of the patch cables and knob positions on a "patch sheet" (which usually showed a diagram of the synthesizer). Ever since, an overall sound setting for any type of synthesizer has been referred to as a patch.

In mid–late 1970s, patch memory (allowing storage and loading of 'patches' or 'programs') began to appear in synths like the Oberheim Four-voice (1975/1976)[69] and Sequential Circuits Prophet-5 (1977/1978). After MIDI was introduced in 1983, more and more synthesizers could import or export patches via MIDI SYSEX commands. When a synthesizer patch is uploaded to a personal computer that has patch editing software installed, the user can alter the parameters of the patch and download it back to the synthesizer. Because there is no standard patch language it is rare that a patch generated on one synthesizer can be used on a different model. However, sometimes manufacturers design a family of synthesizers to be compatible.

Control interfaces

Non-contact interface (AirFX)
Tangible interface (Reactable)
Pitch & mod. wheels and touchpad
Drum pad
Guitar-style interface (SynthAxe)

Modern synthesizers often look like small pianos, though with many additional knob and button controls. These are integrated controllers, where the sound synthesis electronics are integrated into the same package as the controller. However, many early synthesizers were modular and keyboardless, while most modern synthesizers may be controlled via MIDI, allowing other means of playing such as:

Fingerboard controller

File:Ondes Martenot & Trautonium 1.jpg
Left: Ondes Martenot (6G in 1960)
Right: Mixture Trautonium (replica of 1952)
on Korg monotron
Ribbon controller
on Moog 3P (1972)

A ribbon controller or other violin-like user interface may be used to control synthesizer parameters. The idea dates to Léon Theremin's 1922 first concept[70] and his 1932 Fingerboard Theremin and Keyboard Theremin,[71][72]  Maurice Martenot's 1928 Ondes Martenot (sliding a metal ring),[73]  Friedrich Trautwein's 1929 Trautonium (finger pressure), and was also later utilized by Robert Moog.[74][75][76] The ribbon controller has no moving parts. Instead, a finger pressed down and moved along it creates an electrical contact at some point along a pair of thin, flexible longitudinal strips whose electric potential varies from one end to the other. Older fingerboards used a long wire pressed to a resistive plate. A ribbon controller is similar to a touchpad, but a ribbon controller only registers linear motion. Although it may be used to operate any parameter that is affected by control voltages, a ribbon controller is most commonly associated with pitch bending.

Fingerboard-controlled instruments include the Trautonium (1929), Hellertion (1929) and Heliophon (1936),[77][78][79] Electro-Theremin (Tannerin, late 1950s), Persephone (2004), and the Swarmatron (2004). A ribbon controller is used as an additional controller in the Yamaha CS-80 and CS-60, the Korg Prophecy and Korg Trinity series, the Kurzweil synthesizers, Moog synthesizers, and others.

Rock musician Keith Emerson used it with the Moog modular synthesizer from 1970 onward. In the late 1980s, keyboards in the synth lab at Berklee College of Music were equipped with membrane thin ribbon style controllers that output MIDI. They functioned as MIDI managers, with their programming language printed on their surface, and as expression/performance tools. Designed by Jeff Tripp of Perfect Fretworks Co., they were known as Tripp Strips. Such ribbon controllers can serve as a main MIDI controller instead of a keyboard, as with the Continuum instrument.

Wind controllers

Wind controller
Accordion synthesizer

Wind controllers (and wind synthesizers) are convenient for woodwind and brass players, being designed to imitate those instruments. These are usually either analog or MIDI controllers, and sometimes include their own built-in sound modules (synthesizers). In addition to the follow of key arrangements and fingering, the controllers have breath-operated pressure transducers, and may have gate extractors, velocity sensors, and bite sensors. Saxophone-style controllers have included the Lyricon, and products by Yamaha, Akai, and Casio. The mouthpieces range from alto clarinet to alto saxophone sizes. The Eigenharp, a controller similar in style to a bassoon, was released by Eigenlabs in 2009. Melodica and recorder-style controllers have included the Martinetta (1975)[80] and Variophon (1980),[81] and Joseph Zawinul's custom Korg Pepe.[82] A harmonica-style interface was the Millionizer 2000 (c. 1983).[83]

Trumpet-style controllers have included products by Steiner/Crumar/Akai, Yamaha, and Morrison. Breath controllers can also be used to control conventional synthesizers, e.g. the Crumar Steiner Masters Touch,[84] Yamaha Breath Controller and compatible products.[85] Several controllers also provide breath-like articulation capabilities.[clarification needed]

Accordion controllers use pressure transducers on bellows for articulation.


Other controllers include: Theremin, lightbeam controllers, touch buttons (touche d’intensité) on the Ondes Martenot, and various types of foot pedals. Envelope following systems, the most sophisticated being the vocoder, are controlled by the power or amplitude of input audio signal. The Talk box allows sound to be manipulated using the vocal tract, although it is rarely categorized as a synthesizer.

MIDI control

Synthesizers became easier to integrate and synchronize with other electronic instruments and controllers with the introduction of Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI) in 1983.[86] First proposed in 1981 by engineer Dave Smith of Sequential Circuits, the MIDI standard was developed by a consortium now known as the MIDI Manufacturers Association.[87] MIDI is an opto-isolated serial interface and communication protocol.[87] It provides for the transmission from one device or instrument to another of real-time performance data. This data includes note events, commands for the selection of instrument presets (i.e. sounds, or programs or patches, previously stored in the instrument's memory), the control of performance-related parameters such as volume, effects levels and the like, as well as synchronization, transport control and other types of data. MIDI interfaces are now almost ubiquitous on music equipment and are commonly available on personal computers (PCs).[87]

The General MIDI (GM) software standard was devised in 1991 to serve as a consistent way of describing a set of over 200 sounds (including percussion) available to a PC for playback of musical scores.[88] For the first time, a given MIDI preset consistently produced a specific instrumental sound on any GM-compatible device. The Standard MIDI File (SMF) format (extension .mid) combined MIDI events with delta times – a form of time-stamping – and became a popular standard for exchanging music scores between computers. In the case of SMF playback using integrated synthesizers (as in computers and cell phones), the hardware component of the MIDI interface design is often unneeded.

Open Sound Control (OSC) is another music data specification designed for online networking. In contrast with MIDI, OSC allows thousands of synthesizers or computers to share music performance data over the Internet in realtime.

Typical roles

Synth lead

In popular music, a synth lead is generally used for playing the main melody of a song, but it is also often used for creating rhythmic or bass effects. Although most commonly heard in electronic dance music, synth leads have been used extensively in hip-hop music since the 1980s and some types of rock songs since the 1970s. Many post-1980s pop music songs use a synth lead to provide a musical hook to sustain the listener's interest throughout a song.

Synth pad

A synth pad is a sustained chord or tone generated by a synthesizer, often employed for background harmony and atmosphere in much the same fashion that a string section is often used in orchestral music and film scores. Typically, a synth pad is performed using whole notes, which are often tied over bar lines. A synth pad sometimes holds the same note while a lead voice sings or plays an entire musical phrase or section. Often, the sounds used for synth pads have a vaguely organ, string, or vocal timbre. Much popular music in the 1980s employed synth pads, this being the time of polyphonic synthesizers, as did the then-new styles of smooth jazz and new-age music. One of many well-known songs from the era to incorporate a synth pad is "West End Girls" by the Pet Shop Boys, who were noted users of the technique.

The main feature of a synth pad is very long attack and decay time with extended sustains. In some instances pulse-width modulation (PWM) using a square wave oscillator can be added to create a "vibrating" sound.

Synth bass

The bass synthesizer (or "bass synth") is used to create sounds in the bass range, from simulations of the electric bass or double bass to distorted, buzz-saw-like artificial bass sounds, by generating and combining signals of different frequencies. Bass synth patches may incorporate a range of sounds and tones, including wavetable-style, analog, and FM-style bass sounds, delay effects, distortion effects, envelope filters. A modern digital synthesizer uses a frequency synthesizer microprocessor component to generate signals of different frequencies. While most bass synths are controlled by electronic keyboards or pedalboards, some performers use an electric bass with MIDI pickups to trigger a bass synthesizer.

In the 1970s miniaturized solid-state components allowed self-contained, portable instruments such as the Moog Taurus, a 13-note pedal keyboard played by the feet. The Moog Taurus was used in live performances by a range of pop, rock, and blues-rock bands. An early use of bass synthesizer was in 1972, on a solo album by John Entwistle (the bassist for The Who), entitled Whistle Rymes. Genesis bass player Mike Rutherford used a Dewtron "Mister Bassman" for the recording of their album Nursery Cryme in August 1971. Stevie Wonder introduced synth bass to a pop audience in the early 1970s, notably on "Superstition" (1972) and "Boogie On Reggae Woman" (1974). In 1977 Parliament's funk single "Flash Light" used the bass synthesizer. Lou Reed, widely considered a pioneer of electric guitar textures, played bass synthesizer on the song "Families", from his 1979 album The Bells.

When the programmable music sequencer became widely available in the 1980s (e.g., the Synclavier), bass synths were used to create highly syncopated rhythms and complex, rapid basslines. Bass synth patches incorporate a range of sounds and tones, including wavetable-style, analog, and FM-style bass sounds, delay effects, distortion effects, envelope filters. A particularly influential bass synthesizer was the Roland TB-303 following Firstman SQ-01. Released in late 1981, it featured a built-in sequencer and later became strongly associated with acid house music. This method gained wide popularity after Phuture used it for the single "Acid Tracks" in 1987.[90]

In the 2000s, several equipment manufacturers such as Boss and Akai produced bass synthesizer effect pedals for electric bass guitar players, which simulate the sound of an analog or digital bass synth. With these devices, a bass guitar is used to generate synth bass sounds. The BOSS SYB-3 was one of the early bass synthesizer pedals. The SYB-3 reproduces sounds of analog synthesizers with Digital Signal Processing saw, square, and pulse synth waves and user-adjustable filter cutoff. The Akai bass synth pedal contains a four-oscillator synthesizer with user selectable parameters (attack, decay, envelope depth, dynamics, cutoff, resonance). Bass synthesizer software allows performers to use MIDI to integrate the bass sounds with other synthesizers or drum machines. Bass synthesizers often provide samples from vintage 1970s and 1980s bass synths. Some bass synths are built into an organ style pedalboard or button board.


An arpeggiator (arp) is a feature available on several synthesizers that automatically steps through a sequence of notes based on an input chord, thus creating an arpeggio. The notes can often be transmitted to a MIDI sequencer for recording and further editing. An arpeggiator may have controls for speed, range, and order in which the notes play; upwards, downwards, or in a random order. More advanced arpeggiators allow the user to step through a pre-programmed complex sequence of notes, or play several arpeggios at once. Some allow a pattern sustained after releasing keys: in this way, sequence of arpeggio patterns may be built up over time by pressing several keys one after the other. Arpeggiators are also commonly found in software sequencers. Some arpeggiators/sequencers expand features into a full phrase sequencer, which allows the user to trigger complex, multi-track blocks of sequenced data from a keyboard or input device, typically synchronized with the tempo of the master clock.

[verification needed]

Arpeggiators seem to have grown from the accompaniment system of electronic organs in mid-1960s – mid-1970s,[91] and possibly hardware sequencers[citation needed] of the mid-1960s, such as the 8/16 step analog sequencer on modular synthesizers (Buchla Series 100 (1964/1966)). Also they were commonly fitted to keyboard instruments through the late 1970s and early 1980s. Notable examples are the RMI Harmonic Synthesizer (1974),[92] Roland Jupiter 8, Oberheim OB-8, Roland SH-101, Sequential Circuits Six-Trak and Korg Polysix. A famous example can be heard on Duran Duran's song "Rio", in which the arpeggiator on a Roland Jupiter-4 is heard playing a C minor chord in random mode. They fell out of favor by the latter part of the 1980s and early 1990s and were absent from the most popular synthesizers of the period but a resurgence of interest in analog synthesizers during the 1990s, and the use of rapid-fire arpeggios in several popular dance hits, brought with it a resurgence.

See also


  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 List of commercially successful early digital synthesizers and digital samplers introduced during the late-1970s and early-1980s, each sold over several hundred of units per series: etc. Most products listed above are still sold in the 21st century, e.g. Yamaha DX200 in 2001, E-mu Emulator X in 2009, Fairlight CMI 30A in 2011, and Waldorf's wavetable synthesis products as the reincarnations of PPG Wave.
    In addition, the long history of additive synthesis is notable for providing fundamental research that underlies the technology used in various forms of digital synthesis, but is not listed above due to the lack of commercially successful products. Additive synthesis has influenced most products in list above, and even the Yamaha Vocaloid released in 2003 (Excitation plus Resonance (EpR) which is based on Spectral modeling synthesis (SMS)).
  2. For the details of the new trend of music influenced by early digital instruments, see Fairlight§Artists who used the Fairlight CMI, Synclavier§Notable users and E-mu Emulator§Notable users.
  3. Sample-based synthesis was previously introduced by the E-mu Emulator II in 1984, Ensoniq Mirage in 1985, Ensoniq ESQ-1 and Korg DSS-1 in 1986, etc.


  1. 1.0 1.1 "The Palatin Project-The life and work of Elisha Gray". Palatin Project.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  2. 2.0 2.1 Brown, Jeremy K. (2010). Stevie Wonder: Musician. Infobase Publishing. p. 50. ISBN 978-1-4381-3422-2.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  3. "Elisha Gray and "The Musical Telegraph"(1876)", 120 Years of Electronic Music, 2005<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  4. Chadabe, Joel (February 1, 2001), The Electronic Century Part I: Beginnings, Electronic Musician, pp. 74–90<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  5. US patent 580,035, Thaddeus Cahill, "Art of and apparatus for generating and distributing msic electrically", issued 1897-04-06 
  6. Millard, Max (October 1993). "Lee de Forest, Class of 1893:Father of the Electronics Age". Northfield Mount Hermon Alumni Magazine.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  7. "The Audion Piano (1915)". 120 Years of Electronic Music.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  8. Glinsky, Albert (2000), Theremin: Ether Music and Espionage, Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, p. 26, ISBN 0-252-02582-2<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  9. Edmunds, Neil (2004), Soviet Music and Society Under Lenin and Stalin, London: Routledge Curzon<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  10. Holzer, Derek (February 2010), Tonewheels – a brief history of optical synthesis,<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  11. Kreichi, Stanislav (10 November 1997), The ANS Synthesizer: Composing on a Photoelectronic Instrument, Theremin Center, Despite the apparent simplicity of his idea of reconstructing a sound from its visible image, the technical realization of the ANS as a musical instrument did not occur until 20 years later. / Murzin was an engineer who worked in areas unrelated to music, and the development of the ANS synthesizer was a hobby and he had many problems realizing on a practical level.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  12. Rhea, Thomas L., "Harald Bode's Four-Voice Assignment Keyboard (1937)", eContact! (reprint ed.), Canadian Electroacoustic Community, 13 (4)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> (July 2011), originally published as Rhea, Tom (December 1979), "Electronic Perspectives", Contemporary Keyboard, 5 (12): 89<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  13. Warbo Formant Organ (photograph), 1937<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  14. "The 'Warbo Formant Orgel' (1937), The 'Melodium' (1938), The 'Melochord' (1947-9), and 'Bode Sound Co' (1963-)", 120 years of Electronic Music<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> (Note: the original URL is still active, however the original title and content have been changed)
  15. 15.0 15.1 Cirocco, Phil (2006). "The Novachord Restoration Project". Cirocco Modular Synthesizers.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  16. Steve Howell; Dan Wilson. "Novachord". Hollow Sun.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> (see also 'History' page)
  17. "Vox". Combo Organ Heaven ( Contrary to popular belief, the Univox is NOT a Clavioline. I'll let Derek Underdown tell it in his own words: “The Clavioline keyboard was on the UK market before the Univox. ... Tom Jennings saw the market potential ... Tom found a local electronic engineer, Les. Hills, who studied the Clavioline and designed another circuit different to the existing French patent. ... The mechanics having been cobbled together by the accordion service men at the time. I was head hunted by Tom to sort out the reliability problems. ... In about 1951/1952 the Univox took off in a big way ... The first version was the J6, single keyboard model, later followed by the J10 with two rows of Tone & effect tabs. ...”<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  18. Gayle Young (1999). "Electronic Sackbut (1945–1973)".<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  19. 一時代を画する新楽器完成 浜松の青年技師山下氏. Hochi Shimbun (in Japanese). 1935-06-08. Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  20. 新電氣樂器 マグナオルガンの御紹介 (in Japanese). Hamamatsu: 日本樂器製造株式會社 (Yamaha). October 1935. 特許第一〇八六六四号, 同 第一一〇〇六八号, 同 第一一一二一六号 Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  21. Fujii, Koichi (2004). "Chronology of early electroacoustic music in Japan: What types of source materials are available?". Organised Sound. Cambridge University Press. 9 (1): 63-77 [64-6]. doi:10.1017/S1355771804000093.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  22. Holmes 2008, p. 106, Early Electronic Music in Japan
  23. Davies, Hugh (2001). "Synthesizer [Synthesiser]". In ed. Stanley Sadie and John Tyrrell (ed.). The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians (second ed.). London: Macmillan Publishers. ISBN 978-0-19-517067-2.CS1 maint: extra text: editors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  24. Holmes 2008, p. 145–146, Early Synthesizers and Experimenters
  25. "The RCA Synthesizer & Its Synthesists". Contemporary Keyboard. GPI Publications. 6 (10): 64. October 1980. Retrieved 2011-06-05.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[full citation needed]
  26. Harald Bode (The Wurlitzer Company). "Sound Synthesizer Creates New Musical Effects" (PDF). Electronics (December 1, 1961).<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  27. Harald Bode (Bode Sound Co.) (September 1984). "History of Electronic Sound Modification" (PDF). Journal of the Audio Engineering Society (JAES). 32 (10): 730–739.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> (Note: Draft typescript is available at the tail of PDF version, along with HTML version at the Wayback Machine (archived June 9, 2011) without draft.)
  28. Bode, Harald (1961), "European Electronic Music Instrument Design", Journal of the Audio Engineering Society (JAES), ix (1961): 267<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  29. "In Memoriam" (PDF). Journal of the Audio Engineering Society (JAES). 35 (9): 741. September 1987. Retrieved 2007-07-18.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  30. 30.0 30.1 Vail 2000, p. 71, The Euro-Synth Industry - Italy. "First things first: In 1964, Paul Ketoff constructed the Synket in Rome. This was around the time that Bob Moog and Don Buchla independently began shipping their modular synthesizer wares."
  31. 31.0 31.1 Pizzaleo, Luigi (2012), "Durata e articolazione del progetto-Synket" (excerpt from PhD dissertation), (in Italian)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  32. 32.0 32.1 Pizzaleo, Luigi (2014-07-30), Il liutaio elettronico. Paolo Ketoff e l'invenzione del Synket, Immota harmonia (in Italian), 20, Aracne, ISBN 9788854873636CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  33. 33.0 33.1 Holmes 2008, p. 208. "Moog became the first synthesizer designer to popularize the technique of voltage control in analog electronic musical instruments. Donald Buchla in the United States and Paul Ketoff in Italy had been developing commercial synthesizers using the same principle at about the same time, but their equipment never reached the level of public acceptance of Moog's products and only a handful were sold."
  34. "This Week in Synths: The Stearns Collection Moog, Mike Oldfield's OB-Xa, MOOG IIIp". Create Digital Music. 2007-03-23.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
    Moog synthesizer, Stearns 2035 is known as 1st commercial Moog synthesizer commissioned by the Alwin Nikolais Dance Theater of New York in October 1964. Now it resides as part of the Stearns Collection at the University of Michigan
  35. Catchlove, Lucina (August 2002), "Robert Moog", Remix, Oklahoma City<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[verification needed]
  36. Gluck, Robert J. (February 2012), "Nurturing Young Composers: Morton Subotnick's Late-1960s Studio in New York City", Computer Music Journal, 36 (1): 65–80, doi:10.1162/COMJ_a_00106, Buchla's Electronic Music Box was designed in response to Subotnick's and (San Francisco) Tape Music Center colleague Ramon Sender's (b. 1934) desire for a compositional instrument that generated electronic sounds, and sequences of sounds, without the use of magnetic tape.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  37. Gluck, Bob (October 16, 2013), "Morton Subotnick's Sidewinder", New Music USA, When Subotnick (with Ramon Sender) commissioned Donald Buchla to design what became the Buchla Box, his goal was an artist-friendly compositional tool that didn’t depend upon recorded sound. ... The process of its development by Don Buchla, initially a spinning light wheel to create waveforms and then a modular system with integrated circuits, is described in the Spring 2012 issue of Computer Music Journal. ... The Buchla prototype was ready for the 1964-1965 season, but was little used prior to Subotnick’s departure for New York in 1966. His theater piece Play 4 (1966) was the only work for the Buchla that Subotnick completed in San Francisco.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  38. Eisengrein, Doug (September 1, 2005), Renewed Vision, Remix Magazine, retrieved 2008-04-16<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  39. Lefcowitz, Eric (1989), The Monkees Tale, Last Gasp, p. 48, ISBN 0-86719-378-6<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  40. Catchlove, Lucinda (April 1, 2002), Wendy Carlos (electronic musician), Remix Magazine<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  41. Tomita at AllMusic. Retrieved 2011-06-04.
  42. Mark Jenkins (2007), Analog synthesizers: from the legacy of Moog to software synthesis, Elsevier, pp. 133–4, ISBN 0-240-52072-6, retrieved 2011-05-27<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  43. Stevie Wonder, American profile, retrieved 2014-01-09<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  44. "Herbie Hancock profile", Sound on Sound (July 2002), retrieved 2014-01-09<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  45. Chicory Tip (official website)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  46. "The Prophet 5 and 10",, retrieved 2014-01-09<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  47. "The Synthesizers that shaped modern music",, retrieved 2014-01-09<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  48. Russ, Martin (May 2004), Sound Synthesis and Sampling, Taylor and Francis, retrieved 2014-01-09<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  49. 49.0 49.1 Leete, Norm. "Fairlight Computer". Sound On Sound (April 1999). The huge cost of the Fairlight CMI did not put the rich and famous off. Peter Vogel brought an early CMI to the UK in person, and one of the first people to get one was Peter Gabriel. Once UK distributor Syco Systems had been set up, the client list started to grow. ... as the total number of CMIs and Series II / IIxs comes to about 300 (of which only about 50 made it to the UK).<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>  (Note: CMI III seems not in count)
  50. Vogel, Peter (c. 2011). "History (and future)". Peter Vogel Instruments. over 300 “Fairlights” were sold world-wide.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  51. Reid, Gordon. "Yamaha GS1 & DX1 - Part 1: The Birth, Rise and Further Rise of FM Synthesis (Retro)". Sound On Sound (August 2001). the GS1 retailed for £12,000 ... Yamaha sold only around 100 or so GS1s and, in all likelihood, few more GS2s.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  52. Reid, Gordon. "SOUNDS OF THE '80S - Part 2: The Yamaha DX1 & Its Successors (Retro)". Sound On Sound (September 2001). With around 200,000 units sold, the DXs and TXs dominated the mid-'80s music scene in a way that no other keyboards or modules had done before, ...<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>  (Note: possibly this top sales record has been overwritten by Korg M1 (250,000 units), according to the Sound On Sound, February 2002)
  53. "[Chapter 2] FM Tone Generators and the Dawn of Home Music Production". Yamaha Synth 40th Anniversary - History. Yamaha Corporation. 2014.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  54. "Synthlearn – the DX7", synthlearn, retrieved 2014-01-09<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>[verification needed]
  55. Wiffen, Paul, "History Of Onboard Synth Effects, Part 1", Sound On Sound (March 1999), retrieved 2014-01-09<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  56. "Korg M1", Sound On Sound (February 2002), retrieved 2014-01-09<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  57. Holmes, Paul (22 May 2012), Electronic and Experimental Music, Routlege, retrieved 2014-01-09<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  58. The revival of analog electronics in a digital world, newelectronics, August 2013, retrieved 2014-01-09<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  59. 59.0 59.1 59.2 59.3 59.4 Borthwick 2004, p. 120
  60. George-Warren, Holly (2001), The Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock & Roll, Fireside, pp. 707–734, ISBN 0-7432-0120-5<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  61. Robbins, Ira A (1991), The Trouser Press Record Guide, Maxwell Macmillan International, p. 473, ISBN 0-02-036361-3<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  62. Black, Johnny (2003), "The Greatest Songs Ever! Hungry Like the Wolf", Blender Magazine (January/February 2003), archived from the original on October 13, 2007, retrieved 2008-04-16 Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  63. Borthwick 2004, p. 130
  64. Vail 2000, p. 68
  65. Reid, Gordon (2000). "Synth Secrets, Part 9: An Introduction to VCAs". Sound on Sound (January 2000). Retrieved 2010-05-25.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  66. Envelope (Sound) at Encyclopædia Britannica
  67. Charles Dodge, Thomas A. Jerse (1997). Computer Music. New York: Schirmer Books. p. 82.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  68. Pinch, Trevor; Frank Trocco (2004). Analog Days: The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-01617-0.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  69. "Oberheim Polyphonic Synthesizer Programmer (ad)". Contemporary Keyboard Magazine (ad) (September/October 1976): 19.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  70. Thom Holmes, Thomas B. Holmes (2002), Electronic and experimental music: pioneers in technology and composition, Routledge, p. 59, ISBN 978-0-415-93644-6<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  71. "Radio Squeals Turned to Music for Entire Orchestra", Popular Science (June 1932): 51<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
    — the article reported Léon Theremin's new electronic instruments used on his electric orchestra's first public recital at Carnegie Hall, New York City, including Fingerboard Theremin, Keyboard Theremin with fingerboard controller, and Terpsitone (a performance instrument in the style of platform on which a dancer could play a music by the movement of body).
  72. Glinsky, Albert (2000), Theremin: ether music and espionage, University of Illinois Press, p. 145, ISBN 978-0-252-02582-2, In addition to its 61 keys (five octaves), it had a "fingerboard channnel" offering an alternate interface for string players.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  73. Brend, Mark (2005). Strange sounds: offbeat instruments and sonic experiments in pop. Hal Leonard Corporation. p. 22. ISBN 0-87930-855-9.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  74. "Moogtonium (1966–1968)". Moog Foundation.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> — Max Brand's version of Mixture Trautonium, built by Robert Moog during 1966–1968.
  75. Synthesizer technique. Hal Leonard Publishing Corporation. 1984. p. 47. ISBN 0-88188-290-9.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  76. Pinch, Trevor; Frank Trocco (2004). Analog Days: The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer. Harvard University Press. p. 62. ISBN 0-674-01617-3.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  77. "The "Hellertion"(1929) & the "Heliophon"(1936)", 120 Years of Electronic Music<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  78. Peter Lertes (1933), Elektrische Musik:ein gemeinverständliche Darstellung ihrer Grundlagen, des heutigen Standes der Technik und ihre Zukunftsmöglickkeiten, (Dresden & Leipzig, 1933)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  79. J. Marx (1947). "Heliophon, ein neues Musikinstrument". Ömz. ii (1947): 314.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  80. Christoph Reuter, Martinetta and Variophon,<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  81. Christoph Reuter, Variophon and Martinetta Enthusiasts Page,<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  82. Joseph Pepe Zawinul,<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles> (also another photograph is shown on gallery page)
  83. Millioniser 2000 Promo Video Rock Erickson London, England 1983,, July 21, 2009<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  84. Crumar Steiner Masters Touch CV Breath Controller,, January 21, 2008<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  85. Yamaha DX100 with BC-1 Breath Controller,, December 16, 2007<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  86. The Complete MIDI 1.0 Detailed Specification, MIDI Manufacturers Association Inc., retrieved 2008-04-10<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  87. 87.0 87.1 87.2 Rothtein, Joseph (1995), MIDI: A Comprehensive Introduction, A-R Editions, pp. 1–11, ISBN 0-89579-309-1, retrieved 2008-05-30<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  88. Webster, Peter Richard; Williams, David Brian (2005), Experiencing Music Technology: Software, Data, and Hardware, Thomson Schirmer, p. 221, ISBN 0-534-17672-0<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  89. Royalty Free Music : Funk – incompetech (mp3). Kevin MacLeod (<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  90. Aitken, Stuart (10 May 2011). "Charanjit Singh on how he invented acid house ... by mistake". The Guardian.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  91. US patent 3,358,070, Alan C. Young (Hammond Co.), "Electronic Organ Arpeggio Effect Device", issued 1967-12-12 
  92. "RMI Harmonic Synthesizer". Jarrography – The ultimate Jean Michel Jarre discography.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>


Further reading

  • Gorges, Peter (2005). Programming Synthesizers. Germany, Bremen: Wizoobooks. ISBN 978-3-934903-48-7.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Schmitz, Reinhard (2005). Analog Synthesis. Germany, Bremen: Wizoobooks. ISBN 978-3-934903-01-2.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  • Shapiro, Peter (2000). Modulations: A History of Electronic Music: Throbbing Words on Sound. ISBN 1-891024-06-X.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

External links