United States House of Representatives elections, 1912

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
United States House of Representatives elections, 1912

← 1910 November 5, 1912[Note 1] 1914 →

All 435 seats to the United States House of Representatives
218 seats needed for a majority
  Majority party Minority party
  ChampClark.jpg James Robert Mann 1909.jpg
Leader Champ Clark James Mann
Party Democratic Republican
Leader's seat Missouri-9th Illinois-2nd
Last election 230 seats 163 seats[Note 2]
Seats won 291[1][2] 134[1][2]
Seat change Increase 61 Decrease 29
Popular vote 8,446,624[citation needed] 6,849,927[citation needed]
Percentage 43.1% 35.0%

  Third party Fourth party
 
Party Progressive Socialist
Last election 0 seats 1 seat
Seats won 9[1][2] 0
Seat change Increase 9 Decrease 1
Popular vote 2,609,578[citation needed] 1,259,273[citation needed]
Percentage 13.3% 6.4%

Speaker before election

Champ Clark
Democratic

Elected Speaker

Champ Clark
Democratic

Elections to the United States House of Representatives in 1912 were held for members of the 63rd Congress, coinciding with the election of President Woodrow Wilson.

Wilson's victory was partly due to the division of the opposition Republican Party into conservative and progressive factions. While many progressives stayed within the party framework, they maintained lukewarm relationships with Republican leadership. Others formed a third party known as the Progressives and several switched allegiance to the Democrats. A message of unity was portrayed by the Democrats, allowing this group to present themselves as above the bickering and corruption that had become associated with the Republican internal feud. Many of the new seats that were added after the prior census ended up in Democratic hands. In addition, William Kent, who had been elected to the House as a Republican in 1908, was elected to California's 1st congressional district as an Independent.

The number of representatives was increased for this election to 435, where it currently stands (aside from 1959 when Alaska and Hawaii were admitted as states).

Overall results

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Parties Seats Popular Vote
1910 1912 +/– Strength Vote  % Change
  Democratic Party 230 291 Increase 61 66.67% 8,446,624 43.14% Decrease 3.55%
  Republican Party 163[Note 2] 134 Decrease 29 30.80% 6,849,927 34.99% Decrease 11.59%
  Progressive Party 0 9 Increase 9 2.30% 2,609,578 13.33% New Party
  Socialist Party 1 0 Decrease 1 0% 1,259,273 6.43% Increase 2.22%
Prohibition Party 0 0 Steady 0% 244,919 1.25% Decrease 0.17%
  Others 0 1 Increase 1 0.2% 169,064 0.86% Decrease 0.24%
Total 394 435 Increase 41 100.0% 19,579,385 100.0% -

Election summaries

In reapportionment following the 1910 census,[citation needed] 41 new seats were added, bringing the House to its modern size. This would be the last time the size of the House changed, except for a temporary addition of two seats in 1959 after the admission of Alaska and Hawaii and subsequent return to 435 in 1963. In the reapportionment, 1 state lost 1 seat, 22 states had no change in apportionment, 16 states gained 1 seat each, 5 states gained 2 seats each, 2 states gained 3 seats, 1 state gained 4 seats, and 1 state gained 6 seats. Twelve states used at-large seats in addition to districts to elect new seats.

291 1 9 134
Democratic I P Republican
State Type Total
seats
Democratic Republican Progressive
Seats Change Seats Change Seats Change Seats Change
Alabama District
+at-large[Note 3]
10 Increase 1 10 Increase 1 0 Steady 0 Steady
Arizona At-large 1 Steady 1 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Arkansas District 7 Steady 7 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
California District 11[Note 4] Increase 3 3 Increase 2 7 Steady 0 Steady
Colorado District
+2 at-large[Note 3]
4 Increase 1 4 Increase 1 0 Steady 0 Steady
Connecticut District[Note 5] 5 Steady 5 Increase 4 0 Decrease 4 0 Steady
Delaware At-large 1 Steady 1 Increase 1 0 Decrease 1 0 Steady
Florida District
+at-large[Note 3]
4 Increase 1 4 Increase 1 0 Steady 0 Steady
Georgia District 12 Increase 1 12 Increase 1 0 Steady 0 Steady
Idaho At-large 2 Increase 1 0 Steady 2 Increase 1 0 Steady
Illinois District
+2 at-large[Note 3]
27 Increase 2 20 Increase 9 5 Decrease 9 2 Increase 2
Indiana District 13 Steady 13 Increase 1 0 Decrease 1 0 Steady
Iowa District 11 Steady 3 Increase 2 8 Decrease 2 0 Steady
Kansas District 8 Steady 5 Increase 5 3 Decrease 5 0 Steady
Kentucky District 11 Steady 9 Steady 2 Steady 0 Steady
Louisiana District 8 Increase 1 8 Increase 1 0 Steady 0 Steady
Maine[Note 6] District 4 Steady 1 Decrease 1 3 Increase 1 0 Steady
Maryland District 6 Steady 6 Increase 1 0 Decrease 1 0 Steady
Massachusetts District 16 Increase 2 7 Increase 3 9 Decrease 1 0 Steady
Michigan District
+at-large[Note 3]
13 Increase 1 2 Steady 9 Decrease 1 2 Increase 2
Minnesota District
+at-large[Note 3]
10 Increase 1 1 Steady 9 Increase 1 0 Steady
Mississippi District 8 Steady 8 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
Missouri District 16 Steady 15 Increase 2 1 Decrease 2 0 Steady
Montana At-large 2 Increase 1 2 Increase 2 0 Decrease 1 0 Steady
Nebraska District 6 Steady 3 Steady 3 Steady 0 Steady
Nevada At-large 1 Steady 0 Steady 1 Steady 0 Steady
New Hampshire District 2 Steady 2 Increase 2 0 Decrease 2 0 Steady
New Jersey District 12 Increase 2 11 Increase 4 1 Decrease 2 0 Steady
New Mexico At-large 1 Decrease 1 1 Steady 0 Decrease 1 0 Steady
New York District 43 Increase 6 31 Increase 8 11 Decrease 3 1 Increase 1
North Carolina District 10 Steady 10 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
North Dakota District 3 Increase 1 0 Steady 3 Increase 1 0 Steady
Ohio District
+at-large[Note 3]
22 Increase 1 19 Increase 3 3 Decrease 2 0 Steady
Oklahoma District
+3 at-large[Note 3]
8 Increase 3 6 Increase 3 2 Steady 0 Steady
Oregon District 3 Increase 1 0 Steady 3 Increase 1 0 Steady
Pennsylvania District
+4 at-large[Note 3]
36 Increase 4 12 Increase 4 22 Decrease 2 2 Increase 2
Rhode Island District 3 Increase 1 2 Increase 1 1 Steady 0 Steady
South Carolina District 7 Steady 7 Steady 0 Steady 0 Steady
South Dakota District[Note 7] 3 Increase 1 0 Steady 3 Increase 1 0 Steady
Tennessee District 10 Steady 8 Steady 2 Steady 0 Steady
Texas District
+2 at-large[Note 3]
18 Increase 2 18 Increase 2 0 Steady 0 Steady
Utah At-large 2 Increase 1 0 Steady 2 Increase 1 0 Steady
Vermont[Note 6] District 2 Steady 0 Steady 2 Steady 0 Steady
Virginia District 10 Steady 9 Steady 1 Steady 0 Steady
Washington District
+2 at-large[Note 3]
5 Increase 2 0 Steady 3 Steady 2 Increase 2
West Virginia District
+at-large[Note 3]
6 Increase 1 2 Decrease 2 4 Increase 3 0 Steady
Wisconsin District 11[Note 8] Steady 3 Increase 1 8 Steady 0 Steady
Wyoming At-large 1 Steady 0 Steady 1 Steady 0 Steady
Total 435 Increase 41 291
66.9%
Increase 61 134
30.8%
Decrease 29 9
2.1%
Increase 9
House seats
Democratic
  
66.90%
Republican
  
30.80%
Progressive
  
2.07%
Independent
  
0.23%
House seats by party holding plurality in state
  80.1-100% Democratic
  80.1-100% Republican
  60.1-80% Democratic
  60.1-80% Republican
  Up to 60% Democratic
  Up to 60% Republican
Net gain in party representation
  6+ Democratic gain
 
  6+ Republican gain
  3-5 Democratic gain
 
  3-5 Republican gain
  1-2 Democratic gain
  1-2 Progressive gain
  1-2 Republican gain
  no net change

Early election dates

Two states, with 6 seats between them, held elections early in 1912:

This was the last year that Vermont held early elections.

Complete results

Party abbreviations

California

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

District Incumbent Party First
elected
Result Candidates
California 1 William Kent
Redistricted from the 2nd district
Republican 1910 Re-elected as an Independent
Independent gain
William Kent (I) 37.27%
I. G. Zumwalt (D) 34.37%
Edward H. Hart (R) 19.40%
Joseph Bredsteen (S) 8.96%
California 2 John E. Raker
Redistricted from the 1st district
Democratic 1910 Re-elected John E. Raker (D) 62.64%
Frank M. Rutherford (R) 27.17%
J. C. Williams (S) 10.19%
California 3 None (District created) New seat
Republican gain
Charles F. Curry (R) 58.85%
Gilbert McMillan Ross (D) 28.79%
William L. Wilson (S) 12.36%
California 4 Julius Kahn Republican 1898 Re-elected Julius Kahn (R) 56.09%
Bert Schlesinger (D) 32.72%
Norman W. Pendleton (S) 11.19%
California 5 None (District created) New seat
Republican gain
John I. Nolan (R) 52.27%
Stephen V. Costello (D) 34.69%
E. L. Reguin (S) 13.04%
California 6 Joseph R. Knowland
Redistricted from the 3rd district
Republican 1904 Re-elected Joseph R. Knowland (R) 53.70%
J. Stitt Wilson (S) 40.00%
Hiram A Luttrell (D) 6.31%
California 7 James C. Needham
Redistricted from the 6th district
Republican 1898 Lost re-election
Democratic gain
Denver S. Church (D) 44.05%
James C. Needham (R) 42.65%
J. S. Cato (S) 13.30%
California 8 Everis A. Hayes
Redistricted from the 5th district
Republican 1904 Re-elected Everis A. Hayes (R) 50.95%
James B. Holohan (D) 35.18%
Robert Whitaker (S) 13.86%
California 9 None (District created) New seat
Progressive gain
Charles W. Bell (Prog) 47.25%
Thomas H. Kirk (D) 23.87%
Ralph L. Criswell (S) 18.22%
George S. Yarnall (Proh) 10.66%
California 10 William Stephens
Redistricted from the 7th district
Republican 1910 Re-elected
as Progressive
William Stephens (Prog) 53.45%
George Ringo (D) 21.91%
Fred C. Wheeler (S) 20.98%
Emory D. Martindale (Proh) 3.67%
California 11 Sylvester C. Smith
Redistricted from the 8th district
Republican 1904 Retired and died before the Congress ended
Democratic gain
William Kettner (D) 42.69%
Samuel C. Evans (R) 36.85%
Noble A. Richardson (S) 12.14%
Helen M. Stoddard (Proh) 8.33%

Florida

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

District Incumbent Party First
elected
Result Candidates
Florida 1 Stephen M. Sparkman Democratic 1894 Re-elected Stephen M. Sparkman (D) 78.5%
C. C. Allen (S) 12.0%
George W. Beall (R) 4.9%
J. D. Hazzard (Prog) 3.0%
George C. Kelley (Proh) 1.6%
Florida 2 Frank Clark Democratic 1904 Re-elected Frank Clark (D) 81.1%
J. J. Collins (S) 7.3%
John W. Howell (R) 6.7%
C. E. Speir (Prog) 4.9%
Florida 3 Dannite H. Mays Democratic 1908 Lost primary
Democratic hold
Emmett Wilson (D) 86.4%
W. M. Lamberry (S) 6.3%
Thomas F. McGourin (R) 4.7%
John T. Poder (Prog) 2.7%
Florida at-large None (District created) Democratic win Claude L'Engle (D) 77.4%
A. N. Jackson (S) 8.2%
George W. Allen (R) 6.6%
E. R. Gunby (Prog) 6.0%
Frances P. Coffin (Proh) 1.8%

New Mexico

District Incumbent Party First
elected
Result Candidates
New Mexico at-large George Curry Republican 1911 Retired
Democratic gain
Harvey B. Fergusson (D) 45.6%
Nathan Jaffa (R) 36.9%
Andrew J. Eggum (S) 12.1%
Marcos DeBaca (Prog) 5.5%
Harvey B. Fergusson Democratic 1911 Re-elected

South Carolina

<templatestyles src="Module:Hatnote/styles.css"></templatestyles>

District Incumbent Party First
elected
Result Candidates
South Carolina 1 George Swinton Legaré Democratic 1902 Re-elected George Swinton Legaré (D) 97.2%
Aaron P. Prioleau (R) 1.8%
William Eberhard (S) 1.0%
South Carolina 2 James F. Byrnes Democratic 1910 Re-elected James F. Byrnes (D) 100%
South Carolina 3 Wyatt Aiken Democratic 1902 Re-elected Wyatt Aiken (D) 100%
South Carolina 4 Joseph T. Johnson Democratic 1900 Re-elected Joseph T. Johnson (D) 100%
South Carolina 5 David E. Finley Democratic 1898 Re-elected David E. Finley (D) 100%
South Carolina 6 J. Edwin Ellerbe Democratic 1904 Lost primary
Democratic hold
J. Willard Ragsdale (D) 100%
South Carolina 7 Asbury F. Lever Democratic 1901 (special) Re-elected Asbury F. Lever (D) 98.4%
A. D. Dantzler (R) 1.6%

See also

Notes

  1. Maine and Vermont held elections early, in September 1912.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Included one Progressive Republican.
  3. 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 Additional seat or seats elected at-large due to State not redistricting.
  4. One Independent, William Kent, was elected to CA-01.
  5. At-large seat eliminated in redistricting.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Elections held early.
  7. Changed from at-large.
  8. Previous election had 1 Socialist.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Martis, pp. 166–167.

Bibliography

  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links