Visual cortex

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Visual cortex
Brodmann areas 17 18 19.png
View of the brain from behind. Red = Brodmann area 17 (primary visual cortex); orange = area 18; yellow = area 19
Brodmann Cytoarchitectonics 17.png
Brain shown from the side, facing left. Above: view from outside, below: cut through the middle. Orange = Brodmann area 17 (primary visual cortex)
Latin Cortex visualis
NeuroLex ID Visual cortex primary
TA Lua error in Module:Wikidata at line 744: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).
TH {{#property:P1694}}
TE {{#property:P1693}}
FMA {{#property:P1402}}
Anatomical terms of neuroanatomy
[[[d:Lua error in Module:Wikidata at line 863: attempt to index field 'wikibase' (a nil value).|edit on Wikidata]]]
The dorsal stream (green) and ventral stream (purple) are shown. They originate from primary visual cortex.

The visual cortex of the brain is the part of the cerebral cortex responsible for processing visual information. This article addresses the ventral/dorsal model of the visual cortex. Another model for the perceptual/conceptual neuropsychological model of the visual cortex was studied by Raftopolous.[1] In Russian neuropsychology, yet another model was discussed by Alexander Luria for the anterior/posterior approach to understanding the visual cortex.[2] The visual cortex is located in the occipital lobe (one of the four major lobes of the cerebral cortex) which is in turn located at the back of the head or skull. The visual cortex is made up of Brodmann area 17 (the primary visual cortex), and Brodmann areas 18 and 19, the extrastriate cortical areas.[citation needed]

The primary (parts of the cortex that receive sensory inputs from the thalamus) visual cortex is also known as V1, Visual area one, and the striate cortex. The extrastriate areas consist of visual areas two (V2), three (V3), four (V4), and five (V5). Both hemispheres of a brain contain a visual cortex; the left hemisphere visual cortex receives signals from the right visual field, and the right visual cortex from the left visual field.


This article addresses the ventral/dorsal model of the visual cortex. Another model for the perceptual/conceptual neuropsychological model of the visual cortex was studied by Raftopolous.[1] In Russian neurospychology, yet another model was discussed by Alexander Luria for the anterior/posterior approach to understanding the visual cortex.[2] The primary visual cortex, V1, is the koniocortex (sensory type)[citation needed] located in and around the calcarine fissure in the occipital lobe. Each hemisphere's V1 receives information directly from its ipsilateral lateral geniculate nucleus that receives signs from the contralateral visual field.

Each V1 transmits information to two primary pathways, called the ventral stream and the dorsal stream.

  • The ventral stream begins with V1, goes through visual area V2, then through visual area V4, and to the inferior temporal cortex (IP cortex). The ventral stream, sometimes called the "What Pathway", is associated with form recognition and object representation. It is also associated with storage of long-term memory.
  • The dorsal stream begins with V1, goes through Visual area V2, then to the dorsomedial area (DM/ V6) and Visual area MT (middle temporal/ V5) and to the posterior parietal cortex. The dorsal stream, sometimes called the "Where Pathway" or "How Pathway", is associated with motion, representation of object locations, and control of the eyes and arms, especially when visual information is used to guide saccades or reaching.

The what vs. where account of the ventral/dorsal pathways was first described by Ungerleider and Mishkin.[3] More recently, Goodale and Milner[4] extended these ideas and suggested that the ventral stream is critical for visual perception whereas the dorsal stream mediates the visual control of skilled actions. Although these ideas are contentious among some vision scientists and psychologists, the proposed division of labor between vision-for-perception and vision-for-action is supported by a broad range of findings from neuropsychology, neurophysiology, and neuroimaging. Some of the most controversial evidence comes from studies of visuomotor behaviour in normal observers. For example, it has been shown that visual illusions such as the Ebbinghaus illusion distort judgements of a perceptual nature, but when the subject responds with an action, such as grasping, no distortion occurs.[5] Other work such as the one from Scharnowski and Gegenfurtner[6] suggests that both the action and perception systems are equally fooled by such illusions. More recent studies, however, provide strong support for the idea that skilled actions such as grasping are not affected by pictorial illusions[7][8] and suggest that the action/perception dissociation is a useful way to characterize the functional division of labor between the dorsal and ventral visual pathways in the cerebral cortex.[9]

Neurons in the visual cortex fire action potentials when visual stimuli appear within their receptive field. By definition, the receptive field is the region within the entire visual field that elicits an action potential. But, for any given neuron, it may respond best to a subset of stimuli within its receptive field. This property is called neuronal tuning. In the earlier visual areas, neurons have simpler tuning. For example, a neuron in V1 may fire to any vertical stimulus in its receptive field. In the higher visual areas, neurons have complex tuning. For example, in the inferior temporal cortex (IT), a neuron may fire only when a certain face appears in its receptive field.

The visual cortex receives its blood supply primarily from the calcarine branch of the posterior cerebral artery.

Current research

Research on the primary visual cortex can involve recording action potentials from electrodes within the brain of cats, ferrets, rats, mice, or monkeys, or through recording intrinsic optical signals from animals or EEG, MEG, or fMRI signals from human and monkey V1.

One recent discovery concerning the human V1 is that signals measured by fMRI show very large attentional modulation. This result is consistent with another recent electrophysiology study. The study found that although V1 processes visual information before V2 and V4, the attentional modulation occurs in V4 followed by V2 and then finally in V1 suggesting attentional modulation occurs through feedback from higher-level visual areas to lower-level visual areas.[10] Other current work on V1 seeks to fully characterize its tuning properties, and to use it as a model area for the canonical cortical circuit.

Lesions to primary visual cortex usually lead to a scotoma, or hole in the visual field. Note that patients with scotomas are often able to make use of visual information presented to their scotomas, despite being unable to consciously perceive it. This phenomenon has been partially covered in one aspect of what Larry Weiskrantz of Oxford university called blindsight, and is widely studied by scientists who are also interested in the neural correlates of consciousness.

Primary visual cortex (V1)

Micrograph showing the visual cortex (pink). The pia mater and arachnoid mater including blood vessels are seen at the top of the image. Subcortical white matter (blue) is seen at the bottom of the image. HE-LFB stain.

The primary visual cortex is the best-studied visual area in the brain. In all mammals studied, it is located in the posterior pole of the occipital cortex (the occipital cortex is responsible for processing visual stimuli). It is the simplest, earliest cortical visual area. It is highly specialized for processing information about static and moving objects and is excellent in pattern recognition.

The functionally defined primary visual cortex is approximately equivalent to the anatomically defined striate cortex. The name "striate cortex" is derived from the line of Gennari, a distinctive stripe visible to the naked eye that represents myelinated axons from the lateral geniculate body terminating in layer 4 of the gray matter.

The primary visual cortex is divided into six functionally distinct layers, labeled 1 through 6. Layer 4, which receives most visual input from the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), is further divided into 4 layers, labelled 4A, 4B, 4Cα, and 4Cβ. Sublamina 4Cα receives most magnocellular input from the LGN, while layer 4Cβ receives input from parvocellular pathways.

The occipital cortex where the visual cortex resides is the smallest of the four cortexes of the human brain, which also includes the temporal cortex, parietal cortex, and frontal cortex. The average number of neurons in the adult human primary visual cortex, in each hemisphere, has been estimated at around 140 million.[11]


V1 has a very well-defined map of the spatial information in vision. For example, in humans, the upper bank of the calcarine sulcus responds strongly to the lower half of visual field (below the center), and the lower bank of the calcarine to the upper half of visual field. In concept, this retinotopic mapping is a transformation of the visual image from retina to V1. The correspondence between a given location in V1 and in the subjective visual field is very precise: even the blind spots are mapped into V1. In terms of evolution, this correspondence is very basic and found in most animals that possess a V1. In human and animals with a fovea in the retina, a large portion of V1 is mapped to the small, central portion of visual field, a phenomenon known as cortical magnification.[12] Perhaps for the purpose of accurate spatial encoding, neurons in V1 have the smallest receptive field size of any visual cortex microscopic regions.

The tuning properties of V1 neurons (what the neurons respond to) differ greatly over time. Early in time (40 ms and further) individual V1 neurons have strong tuning to a small set of stimuli. That is, the neuronal responses can discriminate small changes in visual orientations, spatial frequencies and colors. Furthermore, individual V1 neurons in human and animals with binocular vision have ocular dominance, namely tuning to one of the two eyes. In V1, and primary sensory cortex in general, neurons with similar tuning properties tend to cluster together as cortical columns. David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel proposed the classic ice-cube organization model of cortical columns for two tuning properties: ocular dominance and orientation. However, this model cannot accommodate the color, spatial frequency and many other features to which neurons are tuned[citation needed]. The exact organization of all these cortical columns within V1 remains a hot topic of current research. The mathematical modeling of this function has been compared to Gabor transforms.

Later in time (after 100 ms), neurons in V1 are also sensitive to the more global organisation of the scene (Lamme & Roelfsema, 2000).[13] These response properties probably stem from recurrent feedback processing (the influence of higher-tier cortical areas on lower-tier cortical areas) and lateral connections from pyramidal neurons (Hupe et al. 1998). While feedforward connections are mainly driving, feedback connections are mostly modulatory in their effects (Angelucci et al., 2003; Hupe et al., 2001). Evidence shows that feedback originating in higher-level areas such as V4, IT, or MT, with bigger and more complex receptive fields, can modify and shape V1 responses, accounting for contextual or extra-classical receptive field effects (Guo et al., 2007; Huang et al., 2007; Sillito et al., 2006).

The visual information relayed to V1 is not coded in terms of spatial (or optical) imagery but rather are better described as edge detection. As an example, for an image comprising half side black and half side white, the divide line between black and white has strongest local contrast (that is, edge detection) and is encoded, while few neurons code the brightness information (black or white per se). As information is further relayed to subsequent visual areas, it is coded as increasingly non-local frequency/phase signals. Note that, at these early stages of cortical visual processing, spatial location of visual information is well preserved amid the local contrast encoding (edge detection).


Visual area V2, or secondary visual cortex, also called prestriate cortex,[14] is the second major area in the visual cortex, and the first region within the visual association area. It receives strong feedforward connections from V1 (direct and via the pulvinar) and sends strong connections to V3, V4, and V5. It also sends strong feedback connections to V1.

In terms of anatomy, V2 is split into four quadrants, a dorsal and ventral representation in the left and the right hemispheres. Together, these four regions provide a complete map of the visual world. V2 has many properties in common with V1: Cells are tuned to simple properties such as orientation, spatial frequency, and color. The responses of many V2 neurons are also modulated by more complex properties, such as the orientation of illusory contours, binocular disparity,[15] and whether the stimulus is part of the figure or the ground (Qiu and von der Heydt, 2005). Recent research has shown that V2 cells show a small amount of attentional modulation (more than V1, less than V4), are tuned for moderately complex patterns, and may be driven by multiple orientations at different subregions within a single receptive field.

It is argued that the entire ventral visual-to-hippocampal stream is important for visual memory.[16] This theory, unlike the dominant one, predicts that object-recognition memory (ORM) alterations could result from the manipulation in V2, an area that is highly interconnected within the ventral stream of visual cortices. In the monkey brain, this area receives strong feedforward connections from the primary visual cortex (V1) and sends strong projections to other secondary visual cortices (V3, V4, and V5).[17][18] Most of the neurons of this area are tuned to simple visual characteristics such as orientation, spatial frequency, size, color, and shape.[19][20][21] V2 cells also respond to various complex shape characteristics, such as the orientation of illusory contours[21] and whether the stimulus is part of the figure or the ground.[22] Anatomical studies implicate layer 3 of area V2 in visual-information processing. In contrast to layer 3, layer 6 of the visual cortex is composed of many types of neurons, and their response to visual stimuli is more complex.

In a recent study, the Layer 6 cells of the V2 cortex were found to play a very important role in the storage of Object Recognition Memory as well as the conversion of short-term object memories into long-term memories.[23]

Third visual complex, including area V3

The term third visual complex refers to the region of cortex located immediately in front of V2, which includes the region named visual area V3 in humans. The "complex" nomenclature is justified by the fact that some controversy still exists regarding the exact extent of area V3, with some researchers proposing that the cortex located in front of V2 may include two or three functional subdivisions. For example, David Van Essen and others (1986) have proposed the existence of a "dorsal V3" in the upper part of the cerebral hemisphere, which is distinct from the "ventral V3" (or ventral posterior area, VP) located in the lower part of the brain. Dorsal and ventral V3 have distinct connections with other parts of the brain, appear different in sections stained with a variety of methods, and contain neurons that respond to different combinations of visual stimulus (for example, colour-selective neurons are more common in the ventral V3). Additional subdivisions, including V3A and V3B have also been reported in humans. These subdivisions are located near dorsal V3, but do not adjoin V2.

Dorsal V3 is normally considered to be part of the dorsal stream, receiving inputs from V2 and from the primary visual area and projecting to the posterior parietal cortex. It may be anatomically located in Brodmann area 19. Braddick using fMRI has suggested that area V3/V3A may play a role in the processing of global motion[24] Other studies prefer to consider dorsal V3 as part of a larger area, named the dorsomedial area (DM), which contains a representation of the entire visual field. Neurons in area DM respond to coherent motion of large patterns covering extensive portions of the visual field (Lui and collaborators, 2006).

Ventral V3 (VP), has much weaker connections from the primary visual area, and stronger connections with the inferior temporal cortex. While earlier studies proposed that VP contained a representation of only the upper part of the visual field (above the point of fixation), more recent work indicates that this area is more extensive than previously appreciated, and like other visual areas it may contain a complete visual representation. The revised, more extensive VP is referred to as the ventrolateral posterior area (VLP) by Rosa and Tweedale.[25]


Visual area V4 is one of the visual areas in the extrastriate visual cortex. In macaques, it is located anterior to V2 and posterior to posterior inferotemporal area (PIT). It comprises at least four regions (left and right V4d, left and right V4v), and some groups report that it contains rostral and caudal subdivisions as well. It is unknown what the human homologue of V4 is, and this issue is currently the subject of much scrutiny.[26]

V4 is the third cortical area in the ventral stream, receiving strong feedforward input from V2 and sending strong connections to the PIT. It also receives direct inputs from V1, especially for central space. In addition, it has weaker connections to V5 and dorsal prelunate gyrus (DP).

V4 is the first area in the ventral stream to show strong attentional modulation. Most studies indicate that selective attention can change firing rates in V4 by about 20%. A seminal paper by Moran and Desimone characterizing these effects was the first paper to find attention effects anywhere in the visual cortex.[27][28]

Like V2, V4 is tuned for orientation, spatial frequency, and color. Unlike V2, V4 is tuned for object features of intermediate complexity, like simple geometric shapes, although no one has developed a full parametric description of the tuning space for V4. Visual area V4 is not tuned for complex objects such as faces, as areas in the inferotemporal cortex are.

The firing properties of V4 were first described by Semir Zeki in the late 1970s, who also named the area. Before that, V4 was known by its anatomical description, the prelunate gyrus. Originally, Zeki argued that the purpose of V4 was to process color information. Work in the early 1980s proved that V4 was as directly involved in form recognition as earlier cortical areas. This research supported the Two Streams hypothesis, first presented by Ungerleider and Mishkin in 1982.

Recent work has shown that V4 exhibits long-term plasticity, encodes stimulus salience, is gated by signals coming from the frontal eye fields and shows changes in the spatial profile of its receptive fields with attention.


Visual area V5, also known as visual area MT (middle temporal), is a region of extrastriate visual cortex that is thought to play a major role in the perception of motion, the integration of local motion signals into global percepts, and the guidance of some eye movements.[29]


MT is connected to a wide array of cortical and subcortical brain areas. Its inputs include the visual cortical areas V1, V2, and dorsal V3 (dorsomedial area),[30][31] the koniocellular regions of the LGN,[32] and the inferior pulvinar.[33] The pattern of projections to MT changes somewhat between the representations of the foveal and peripheral visual fields, with the latter receiving inputs from areas located in the midline cortex and retrosplenial region.[34]

A standard view is that V1 provides the "most important" input to MT.[29] Nonetheless, several studies have demonstrated that neurons in MT are capable of responding to visual information, often in a direction-selective manner, even after V1 has been destroyed or inactivated.[35] Moreover, research by Semir Zeki and collaborators has suggested that certain types of visual information may reach MT before it even reaches V1.

MT sends its major outputs to areas located in the cortex immediately surrounding it, including areas FST, MST, and V4t (middle temporal crescent). Other projections of MT target the eye movement-related areas of the frontal and parietal lobes (frontal eye field and lateral intraparietal area).


The first studies of the electrophysiological properties of neurons in MT showed that a large portion of the cells are tuned to the speed and direction of moving visual stimuli[36][37] These results suggested that MT plays a significant role in the processing of visual motion.

Lesion studies have also supported the role of MT in motion perception and eye movements.[38] Neuropsychological studies of a patient unable to see motion, seeing the world in a series of static "frames" instead, suggested that V5 in the primate is homologous to MT in the human.[39][40]

However, since neurons in V1 are also tuned to the direction and speed of motion, these early results left open the question of precisely what MT could do that V1 could not. Much work has been carried out on this region, as it appears to integrate local visual motion signals into the global motion of complex objects.[41] For example, lesion to the V5 leads to deficits in perceiving motion and processing of complex stimuli. It contains many neurons selective for the motion of complex visual features (line ends, corners). Microstimulation of a neuron located in the V5 affects the perception of motion. For example, if one finds a neuron with preference for upward motion in a monkey's V5 and stimulates it with an electrode, then the monkey becomes more likely to report 'upward' motion when presented with stimuli containing 'left' and 'right' as well as 'upward' components.[42]

There is still much controversy over the exact form of the computations carried out in area MT[43] and some research suggests that feature motion is in fact already available at lower levels of the visual system such as V1. [44] [45]

Functional organization

MT was shown to be organized in direction columns.[46] DeAngelis argued that MT neurons were also organized based on their tuning for binocular disparity.[47]


The dorsomedial area (DM) also known as V6, appears to respond to visual stimuli associated with self-motion [48] and wide-field stimulation.[49] V6, is a subdivision of the visual cortex of primates first described by John Allman and Jon Kaas in 1975.[50] V6 is located in the dorsal part of the extrastriate cortex, near the deep groove through the centre of the brain (medial longitudinal fissure), and typically also includes portions of the medial cortex, such as the parieto-occipital sulcus. DM contains a topographically organized representation of the entire field of vision. Like the middle temporal area V5, DM receives direct connections from the primary visual cortex. Also similar to V5, DM is also characterized by high myelin content, a characteristic that is usually present in brain structures involved in fast transmission of information.[51] For many years, it was considered that DM only existed in New World monkeys. However, more recent research has suggested that DM also exists in Old World monkeys and perhaps humans. V6 is also sometimes referred to as the parietooccipital area (PO), although the correspondence is not exact.[52][53]


Neurons in area DM/V6 have unique response properties, including an extremely sharp selectivity for the orientation of visual contours, and preference for long, uninterrupted lines covering large parts of the visual field.[54][55] However, in comparison with area MT, a much smaller proportion of DM cells shows selectivity for the direction of motion of visual patterns. Another notable difference is that cells in DM are attuned to low spatial frequency components of an image, and respond poorly to the motion of textured patterns such as a field of random dots. In contrast, cells in MT are often strongly responsive to such stimuli. These response properties suggest that DM and MT may work in parallel, with the former analyzing self-motion relative to the environment, and the latter analyzing the motion of individual objects relative to the background.

Recently, an area responsive to wide-angle flow fields has been identified in the human and is thought to be a homologue of macaque area V6.[56]


The connections and response properties of cells in DM/ V6 suggest that this area is a key node in a sub-set of the "dorsal stream", referred to by some as the "dorsomedial pathway". This pathway is likely to be important for the control of skeletomotor activity, including postural reactions and reaching movements towards objects [53] The main "feedforward" connection of DM is to the cortex immediately rostral to it, in the interface between the occipital and parietal lobes (V6A). This region has, in turn, relatively direct connections with the regions of the frontal lobe that control arm movements, including the premotor cortex.

See also


  1. 1.0 1.1 Anastasios Raftopolous, Cognition and Perception, Oxford University Press, 2009.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Alexander Luria (1961). Higher Cortical Functions in Man, Basic Books.
  3. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M (1982). "Two Cortical Visual Systems". In Ingle DJ, Goodale MA and Mansfield RJW (ed.). Analysis of Visual Behavior. Boston: MIT Press. pp. 549–586.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  4. Goodale MA, Milner AD (1992). "Separate pathways for perception and action". Trends in Neuroscience. 15 (1): 20–25. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8. PMID 1374953.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  5. Aglioti S, DeSouza JF, Goodale MA. (1995). "Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand". Curr. Biol. 5 (6): 679–85. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(95)00133-3. PMID 7552179.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  6. Franz VH, Scharnowski F, Gegenfurtner (2005). "Illusion effects on grasping are temporally constant not dynamic". J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 31 (6): 1359–78. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1359. PMID 16366795.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  7. Ganel T, Goodale MA. (2003). "Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape". Nature. 426 (6967): 664–7. doi:10.1038/nature02156. PMID 14668865.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  8. Ganel T, Tanzer M, Goodale MA. (2008). "A double dissociation between action and perception in the context of visual illusions: opposite effects of real and illusory size". Psych. Sci. 19 (3): 221–5. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02071.x. PMID 18315792.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  9. Goodale MA. (2011). "Transforming vision into action". Vision Res. 51 (14): 1567–87. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.027. PMID 20691202.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  10. Buffalo, E.A., Fries, P., Landman, R., Liang, H., and Desimone, R. (2010). A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream. Proceedings for the National Academy of Sciences. 107(1), 361-365.
  11. Leuba G; Kraftsik R (1994). "Changes in volume, surface estimate, three-dimensional shape and total number of neurons of the human primary visual cortex from midgestation until old age". Anatomy and Embryology. 190 (4): 351–366. doi:10.1007/BF00187293. PMID 7840422.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  12. Barghout, Lauren (1999). On the Differences Between Peripheral and Foveal Pattern Masking. Berkeley, California, U.S.A.: Masters Thesis. U.C. Berkeley.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  13. Barghout, Lauren (2003 & 2014). Vision: How Global Perceptual Context Changes Local Contrast Processing (Ph.D. Dissertation). Updated to include computer vision techniques. Scholar's Press. ISBN 978-3-639-70962-9. Check date values in: |date= (help)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  14. Gazzaniga, Ivry & Mangun: Cognitive neuroscience, 2002
  15. Ts'o, Daniel; Mark Zarella; Guy Burkitt (2009). "Whither the hypercolumn?". Journal of Physiology. 587 (12): 2791–2805. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2009.171082. Retrieved 2012-03-19.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  16. Bussey, T J; Saksida, L. M (2007). "Memory, perception, and the ventral visual-perirhinal-hippocampal stream: thinking outside of the boxes". Hippocampus. 17 (9): 898–908. doi:10.1002/hipo.20320. PMID 17636546.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  17. Stepniewska, I; Kaas, J. H. (1996). "Topographic patterns of V2 cortical connections in macaque monkeys". The Journal of comparative neurology. 371 (1): 129–152. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960715)371:1<129::AID-CNE8>3.0.CO;2-5. PMID 8835723.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  18. Gattas, R; Sousa, A. P; Mishkin, M; Ungerleider, L. G. (1997). "Cortical projections of area V2 in the macaque". Cerebral Cortex. 7 (2): 110–129. doi:10.1093/cercor/7.2.110.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  19. Hegdé, Jay; Van Essen, D. C (2000). "Selectivity for Complex Shapes in Primate Visual Area V2". The Journal of Neuroscience. 20.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  20. Hegdé, Jay; Van Essen, D. C (2004). "Temporal dynamics of shape analysis in Macaque visual area V2". Journal of Psychology. 92 (5): 3030–3042. doi:10.1152/jn.00822.2003.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  21. 21.0 21.1 Anzai, A; Peng, X; Van Essen, D. C (2007). "Neurons in monkey visual area V2 encode combinations of orientations". Nature Neuroscience. 10 (10): 1313–21. doi:10.1038/nn1975. PMID 17873872.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  22. Maruko, I; et alt. (2008). "Postnatal Development of Disparity Sensitivity in Visual Area 2 (V2) of Macaque Monkeys". Journal of Neurophysiology. 100 (5): 2486–2495. doi:10.1152/jn.90397.2008.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  23. López-Aranda et alt. (2009). "Role of Layer 6 of V2 Visual Cortex in Object Recognition Memory". Science. 25 (5936): 87–89. doi:10.1126/science.1170869. PMID 19574389.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  24. Braddick, OJ, O'Brien, JM; et al. (2001). "Brain areas sensitive to coherent visual motion". Perception. 30 (1): 61–72. doi:10.1068/p3048. PMID 11257978.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  25. Rosa MG, Tweedale R (2000). "Visual areas in lateral and ventral extrastriate cortices of the marmoset monkey". J Comp Neurol. 422 (4): 621–51. doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20000710)422:4<621::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO;2-E. PMID 10861530.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  26. Goddard E; Goddard, Erin; McDonald, J. S.; Solomon, S. G.; Clifford, C. W. G.; et al. (2011). "Color responsiveness argues against a dorsal component of human V4". Journal of Vision. 11 (4): 3. doi:10.1167/11.4.3. PMID 21467155.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  28. Moran, J; Desimone, R (1985). "Selective Attention Gates Visual Processing in the Extrastriate Cortex". Science. 229 (4715): 782–4. doi:10.1126/science.4023713. PMID 4023713.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  29. 29.0 29.1 Born R, Bradley D (2005). "Structure and function of visual area MT". Annu Rev Neurosci. 28: 157–89. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131052. PMID 16022593.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  30. Felleman D, Van Essen D (1991). "Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex". Cereb Cortex. 1 (1): 1–47. doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a. PMID 1822724.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  31. Ungerleider L, Desimone R (1986). "Cortical connections of visual area MT in the macaque". J Comp Neurol. 248 (2): 190–222. doi:10.1002/cne.902480204. PMID 3722458.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  32. Sincich L, Park K, Wohlgemuth M, Horton J (2004). "Bypassing V1: a direct geniculate input to area MT". Nat Neurosci. 7 (10): 1123–8. doi:10.1038/nn1318. PMID 15378066.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  33. Warner CE, Goldshmit Y, Bourne JA (2010). "Retinal afferents synapse with relay cells targeting the middle temporal area in the pulvinar and lateral geniculate nuclei". Front Neuroanat. 12 (8): 4–24. doi:10.3389/neuro.05.008.2010. PMC 2826187. PMID 20179789.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  34. Palmer SM, Rosa MG (2006). "A distinct anatomical network of cortical areas for analysis of motion in far peripheral vision". Eur J Neurosci. 24 (8): 2389–405. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05113.x. PMID 17042793.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  35. Rodman HR, Gross CG, Albright TD (1989). "Afferent basis of visual response properties in area MT of the macaque. I. Effects of striate cortex removal". J Neurosci. 9 (6): 2033–50. PMID 2723765.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  36. Dubner R, Zeki S (1971). "Response properties and receptive fields of cells in an anatomically defined region of the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey". Brain Res. 35 (2): 528–32. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(71)90494-X. PMID 5002708.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>.
  37. Maunsell J, Van Essen D (1983). "Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation". J Neurophysiol. 49 (5): 1127–47. PMID 6864242.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  38. Dursteler M.R., Wurtz R.H., Newsome W.T. (1987). "Directional pursuit deficits following lesions of the foveal representation within the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey". Journal of Neurophysiology. 57 (5): 1262–87. PMID 3585468.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  39. Hess R.H., Baker C.L., Zihl J. (1989). "The "motion-blind" patient: low-level spatial and temporal filters". Journal of Neuroscience. 9 (5): 1628–40. PMID 2723744.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  40. Baker C.L. Jr, Hess R.F, Zihl J. (1991). "Residual motion perception in a "motion-blind" patient, assessed with limited-lifetime random dot stimuli". Journal of Neuroscience. 11 (2): 454–61. PMID 1992012.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  41. Movshon, J.A., Adelson, E.H., Gizzi, M.S., & Newsome, W.T. (1985). The analysis of moving visual patterns. In: C. Chagas, R. Gattass, & C. Gross (Eds.), Pattern recognition mechanisms (pp. 117-151), Rome: Vatican Press.
  42. Britten K.H., van Wezel R.J. (1998). "Electrical microstimulation of cortical area MST biases heading perception in monkeys". Nat Neurosci. 1 (1): 59–63. doi:10.1038/259. PMID 10195110.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  43. Wilson, H.R.; Ferrera, V.P.; Yo, C. (1992). "A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception". Vis Neurosci. 9 (1): 79–97. doi:10.1017/s0952523800006386.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  44. Tinsley, C.J., Webb, B.S., Barraclough, N.E., Vincent, C.J., Parker, A., & Derrington, A.M. (2003). "The nature of V1 neural responses to 2D moving patterns depends on receptive-field structure in the marmoset monkey". J Neurophysiol. 90 (2): 930–7. doi:10.1152/jn.00708.2002. PMID 12711710.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  45. Pack C.C., Born R.T., Livingstone M.S. (2003). "Two-dimensional substructure of stereo and motion interactions in macaque visual cortex". Neuron. 37 (3): 525–35. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01187-x. PMID 12575958.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  46. Albright T (1984). "Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque". J Neurophysiol. 52 (6): 1106–30. PMID 6520628.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  47. DeAngelis G, Newsome W (1999). "Organization of disparity-selective neurons in macaque area MT". J Neurosci. 19 (4): 1398–415. PMID 9952417.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  48. Cardin, V; Smith, AT (2010). "Sensitivity of human visual and vestibular cortical regions to stereoscopic depth gradients associated with self-motion". Cerebral Cortex. 20 (8): 1964–73. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp268.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  49. Pitzalis et alt. (2006). "Wide-Field Retinotopy Defines Human Cortical Visual Area V6". The Journal of Neuroscience. 26 (30): 7962–73. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0178-06.2006. PMID 16870741.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  50. Allman JM, Kaas JH (1975). "The dorsomedial cortical visual area: a third tier area in the occipital lobe of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus)". Brain Res. 100 (3): 473–487. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(75)90153-5.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  51. Rosa MG, et al. (2005). "Resolving the organization of the New World monkey third visual complex: the dorsal extrastriate cortex of the marmoset (Callithrix jacchus)". J Comp Neurol. 483: 164–191. doi:10.1002/cne.20412.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  52. Galletti C, et al. (2005). "The relationship between V6 and PO in macaque extrastriate cortex". Eur J Neurosci. 21: 959–970. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03911.x.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  53. 53.0 53.1 Galletti C, et al. (2003). "Role of the medial parieto-occipital cortex in the control of reaching and grasping movements". Exp Brain Res. 153: 158–170. doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1589-z.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  54. Baker JF, et al. (1981). "Visual response properties of neurons in four extrastriate visual areas of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus): a quantitative comparison of medial, dorsomedial, dorsolateral, and middle temporal areas". J Neurophysiol. 45: 397–416.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  55. Lui LL, et al. (2006). "Functional response properties of neurons in the dorsomedial visual area of New World monkeys (Callithrix jacchus)". Cereb Cortex. 16 (2): 162–177. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi094.<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>
  56. Pitzalis, S., Sereno, M.I., Committeri, G., Fattori, P., Galati, G., Patria, F., & Galletti, C. (2010). "Human v6: The medial motion area". Cereb Cortex. 20 (2): 411–424. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp112.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)<templatestyles src="Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css"></templatestyles>

External links