Wassermann test

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
(Redirected from Wassermann reaction)
Jump to: navigation, search

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

File:The Road to Ruin (1934) - Eve's Positive Wassermann Test.jpg
The test was sufficiently familiar to American movie audiences that the 1934 exploitation film The Road to Ruin simply showed a card with a positive Wassermann test (misspelled in the film) without any further explanation to indicate a character had contracted syphilis.

The Wassermann test or Wassermann reaction (WR)[1] is an antibody test for syphilis, named after the bacteriologist August Paul von Wassermann, based on complement-fixation.

Method

A sample of blood or cerebrospinal fluid is taken and introduced to the antigen - cardiolipin extracted from bovine muscle or heart. Syphilis non-specific antibodies (reagin, see RPR) react with the lipid - the Wassermann reaction of antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs). The intensity of the reaction (1, 2, 3, or 4) indicates the severity of the condition.

Uncertainty

File:Taking a Wasserman blood test.jpg
Administration of a Wassermann test at a clinic for Florida migratory farm workers in 1941.

The reaction is not specific to syphilis and will produce a positive reaction to other diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, malaria, and tuberculosis. It is possible for an infected individual to produce no reaction and for a successfully treated individual to continue to produce a reaction (known as being "Wassermann fast" or "fixed").

Development and refinement

The antibody test was developed by Wassermann, Julius Citron, and Albert Neisser at the Robert Koch Institute for Infectious Diseases in 1906.[2][3] The test was a growth from the work of Bordet and Gengou on complementing-fixation reaction, published in 1901, and the positive reaction is sometimes called the Bordet-Gengou-Wassermann reaction or Bordet-Wassermann reaction.

The Wassermann test has been refined - the Kahn test,[4] and the Kolmer test[citation needed] - and it is rarely used today. Replacement tests such as the VDRL test and the RPR test, initially based on flocculation techniques (Hinton), have been shown to produce far fewer false positive results[citation needed]. Indeed the "biologic false positives" of modern tests usually indicate a serious alternate condition, often an autoimmune disease.

References

  1. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. doctor/2511 at Who Named It?
  3. A Wassermann, A. Neisser and C. Bruck. Eine serodiagnostische Reaktion bei Syphilis. Deutsche medicinische Wochenschrift, Berlin, 1906, 32: 745-746. Announcing the test for syphilis.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  • Citron, Dr. Julius, "Immunity" (English translation) 1914 163-164

External links