Credit ombudsman service

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Credit Ombudsman Service Limited
Non Profit
Industry Ombudsman Service
Founded June 18, 2003 in Sydney, Australia
Founder Mortgage and Finance Association of Australia (MFAA)
Headquarters Sydney, Australia
Key people
 Mark Scanlon (Chairman)
Raj Venga(Ombudsman and CEO)
Members 16,500 (2009)
Number of employees
 50 (2009)
Website www.cosl.com.au

The Credit Ombudsman Service (COSL), is an Australian alternative dispute resolution or ombudsman that helps settle disputes between consumers and financial credit providers. It was established in 2003 as a result of the Mortgage & Finance Association of Australia ('MFAA') self-regulation, originally called the Mortgage Industry Ombudsman Scheme (MIOS). It later expanded its remit to include non-bank lending and other credit services, changing its name to the Credit Ombudsman Service Limited (COSL) to reflect this broader jurisdiction. The Credit Ombudsman Service is one of the largest External Dispute Resolution (EDR) schemes in Australia by number of members, totaling over 16,500 in 2013.

The ombudsman covers the following institutions:

History

The Credit Ombudsman Service was established in 2003 as the Mortgage Industry Ombudsman Service Limited (‘MIOS’) as an EDR (External Dispute Resolution, known in other regions as ADR) scheme and later adopted COSL as its current name in 2004. COSL is an approved[1][2][3] EDR scheme under scheme approved by ASIC’s Regulatory Guide RG 139 and its services are free for consumers. Funding is sourced from a combination of its membership fees and complaint fees paid by its participating Members. COSL can award compensation up to a maximum of $250,000 and other remedies, such as an apology, can be asked for.

Complaints process

COSL considers complaints or disputes about its participating Members' concerning their products and services, such as mortgages, credit products, financial planning, managed investment, insurance and deposit taking (savings).

COSL resolves disputes in a non-adjudicative means through conciliation, although the actual Ombudsman can make a decision which is binding on the member (a Determination). Like all ASIC RG 139 approved schemes, Determinations made by the Ombudsman bind Members but not complainants.

COSL’s conciliation process is both inquisitorial and consensus-based and focuses on producing a mutually satisfactory outcome. Both Members and consumers are afforded an equal opportunity to put forward their cases. This is intended to ensure procedural fairness and promote effective dispute resolution.

Coverage

The Credit Ombudsman Service covers complaints for consumers if they have dealt with a participating Member of COSL as:

  • a borrower or prospective borrower
  • a loan guarantor or prospective guarantor
  • or have in any way sought the services of a Member in the ordinary course of their business in the credit marketplace.

Prior steps

Before COSL can consider a complaint, the complainant's must first have tried to resolve their complaint with the Member concerned by expressing their dissatisfaction either in writing or via telephone.

Every COSL Member has to have a dedicated Complaints Contact Person as part of their membership and must also have in place procedures called Internal Dispute Resolution Procedures or 'IDR Procedures'. The IDR Procedures require that a Member must:

  • give you the name and contact details of their Complaints Contact Person before undertaking any services for you.
  • give you a copy of their Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR) Procedures if you ask for them.
  • give you a substantive response within 45 days of lodging your complaint with them (if there is a delay they must inform you of the reason).

Complaints covered

The types of complaints covered by the COSL are set out in the Credit Ombudsman Rules. In general, a consumer can make a complaint to COSL if they believe that the Member they have dealt with has:

  • breached relevant laws.
  • breached the MFAA Code of Practice or other recognised Codes of Practice.
  • not met standards of good practice in the Credit Industry.
  • acted unfairly.

There are some types of disputes that COSL are unable to consider which are specified in the Credit Ombudsman Rules.

  • if the complaint is about someone who is not a Member of the Credit Ombudsman Service at the time the complaint is made.
  • if the complainant is not the person to whom the credit services in question were directly provided by the Member.
  • if the complainant is claiming greater than $250,000.
  • if the complaint is being, or has previously been, dealt with by a court, tribunal, arbitrator or other dispute resolution scheme.
  • if the complaint is more appropriately dealt with by the courts or other procedure.

Cost

There is no fee for individuals or small businesses when making a complaint to the Credit Ombudsman Service all costs are covered by the scheme members.

See also

References

  1. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  2. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links

Retrieved from "https://infogalactic.com/w/index.php?title=Credit_ombudsman_service&oldid=642249863"