Evenwel v. Abbott
| Evenwel v. Abbott | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||
| Argued December 8, 2015 Decided April 4, 2016 |
|||||
| Full case name | Sue Evenwel, et al., appellants v. Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, et al. | ||||
| Docket nos. | 14-940 | ||||
| Citations | 578 U.S. ___ (more) | ||||
| Holding | |||||
| A state may draw its legislative districts based on total population. Western District of Texas affirmed. | |||||
| Court membership | |||||
|
|||||
| Case opinions | |||||
| Majority | Ginsburg, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan | ||||
| Concurrence | Thomas | ||||
| Concurrence | Alito, joined by Thomas (except Part III–B) | ||||
| Laws applied | |||||
| U.S. Const., Amdt. XIV | |||||
Evenwel v. Abbott, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the one person, one vote principle under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment allows states to use total population, not just total voting-eligible population, in drawing of legislative districts.[1]
Background
The suit originated when Sue Evenwel and Edward Pfenninger filed suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, arguing that districts drawn based on total population dilute their vote compared to those in other Texas Senate districts. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of a claim on which relief could be granted.[2]
Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court affirmed the District Court and held that total population may be used in redistricting. It did not rule on whether states are permitted to base districts on the number of eligible voters instead of the total population.[3][4]
See also
- Edward Blum — director of Project on Fair Representation
- Reynolds v. Sims — a United States Supreme Court case that ruled that state legislature districts had to be roughly equal in population.
References
- ↑ Evenwel v. Abbott, No. 14-940, 578 U.S. ___, slip op. at 1 (2016).
- ↑ Evenwel, slip op. at 6.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
<templatestyles src="Asbox/styles.css"></templatestyles>
|
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
