Fringe theories on the location of New Albion

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search

Sir Francis Drake’s landing on the west coast of North America in 1579 has drawn the attention of scores of historians, geographers, linguists, anthropologists and other professionals. In addition, many history buffs have sought to locate Drake’s New Albion. More than a score of ideas have been put forth—covering the coast from Alaska to Southern California. These ideas span the eighteenth through the early twenty-first centuries.

Contents

Accepted site

The accepted site for Drake’s 1579 landing at New Albion is at Drake’s Cove in Drakes Bay in Marin County, California. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. [1][2]

Other ideas

More than twenty other locations have been advanced as the site of Drake's port.[3] Davidson recognized a plethora of confusion from chiefly armchair historians including Samuel Johnson[4] and Jules Verne.[5][6] Brian Kelleher has published the most extensive listing of individual’s opinions of the Drake landing site comprising over 140 people.[7]

Some writers have suggested that Queen Elizabeth’s desire to maintain secrecy of the locations and extent of Drake’s north Pacific explorations led to suppression and obfuscation of the reports.[8][9] The defeat of the Spanish Armada by Drake in 1588 obviated the need for any secrecy. Michael Turner’s visits to Drake sites around the world show that the records are very accurate.[10][11]

Following the coast from north to south, the suggested locations include

Prince William Sound

Laird Nelson proposed that Drake sailed as far north as Prince William Sound, Alaska Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. based on the westward run of the land in the area. Laird believes Drake was at 58 degrees north and "may have been even further north."[12] Drake then turned south to anchor at Birch Bay, Washington.

Stephens Passage

Samuel Bawlf maps Drake’s voyage as far north as the Stephens PassageLua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. in the now state of Alaska.[9] Bawlf proposes that Drake established New Albion at Comox Bay (see below) and careened the Golden Hinde at Whale Cove (see below).

Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada

Victoria, Vancouver Island, BC

In December, 2013, metal detector operator Bruce Campbell found an English coin made between 1551 and 1553 near Victoria, British Columbia. While Campbell believes the coin is only the oldest thing he's likely to ever find, and Royal British Columbia Museum curator Grant Keddie did not believe the find can be connected to Drake, Samuel Bawlf (see below) says the coin is proof the English arrived here (Canada) first.[13]Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Loose finds such as coins have little value in establishing landing sites.

Comox Bay, Vancouver Island, BC

In 2003 Canadian R. Samuel Bawlf suggested[14] that Drake's New Albion was Vancouver Island and that Drake erected a post containing such a proclamation at what is today Comox, British Columbia, located on Vancouver Island.[15]Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Bawlf supports the idea that Drake completed the "Neahkahnie Mountain Survey" and believes Drake careened the Golden Hind in Whale Cove, Oregon. He points to a number of pieces of evidence in support of his view that the official published record of Drake's voyage was deliberately altered to suppress the true extent of his discoveries. Bawlf also relies heavily upon the configuration of the coastline as depicted in some of the maps and globes of the era, including the so-called French and Dutch Drake Maps which depict his voyage as having reached a point northward of a chain of islands to the northwest of New Spain and other maps depicting New Albion at latitudes above those of northern California, such as Richard Hakluyt's 1587 map of the New World showing Nova Albion at 50 degrees north latitude. Bawlf also placed emphasis on the fact that on an initial rendition of his globe in 1592 Emery Molyneux depicted the line of the coast of North America behind Vancouver Island with remarkable accuracy, although the islands themselves, depicted on the French and Dutch Drake maps, do not appear.

Although Bob Ward initially drew some of the discrepancies between the official published accounts of Drake's voyage and other documents to Bawlf's attention, and concluded that Drake likely sailed much farther to the north than northern California, he has been critical of some of Bawlf's conclusions, such as Drake's erecting a post proclaiming New Albion at what is now Comox Bay.

Bawlf's claims regarding "spectral analysis" and four matching islands have been disputed by Derek Hayes.[16] Oliver Seeler disputes Bawlf's conclusions[17][18] as does Eric Powell[19]

Bawlf's work has also been criticized by Edward Von der Porten, President of the Drake Navigators Guild. Von der Porten calculates that Bawlf's theory requires the Golden Hinde to have traveled "an average of 5.95 knots... in a ship capable of less than one knot in those conditions." Further, Bawlf fails to identify the white cliffs, the Islands of St. James or the Coast Miwok People. Von der Porten states that Bawlf "has no evidence for either the conspiracy or his 'ten degree rule.'"[20][21]

Foul Bay, Vancouver Island, BC

In 2013, Bob Graham proposed that Drake landed at Foul Bay Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. at the southern end of Vancouver Island.[22]

Boundary Bay, BC

About 1995, Will Paulik, a local historian and environmentalist, suggested Drake landed at Boundary Bay Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Northeast of Point Roberts, Washington and to the east of Vancouver Island.[23]

Birch Bay, Washington

Fisherman Laird Nelson has proposed that Drake left Guatulco, Mexico, headed west 2,100 miles, then magnetic north for 2,700 miles (4800 miles)[24] with two ships: the un-renamed Pelican and the Los Reyes, a captured Spanish vessel.[25] From that point, the ships turned back south along the Alaska coast.[26] The ships then travelled 700 miles south through the lowerInside Passage to the first of three landing sites: Birch Bay. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Here, on the third day, the Pelican sank.[27][28]

Laird's distance of 4,800 miles for the west and first portion north is equivalent to 1,400 modern or 1600 old English leagues leagues.)[29] Laird's proposal has Drake traveling the entire distance and lower Inside Passage, covering 5400 miles in 56 days.

Lummi Bay, Washington

Nelson proposed that after the loss of his flagship, Drake explored in a small boat for five days and then moved the Los Reyes to a second port at Lummi Bay, Washington.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. .[30] Here Drake careened the Los Reyes.

Sandy Point, Washington

Nelson puts Drake's second anchorage at Sandy Point, Washington, a part of Lummi Bay, where Drake reportedly spent the second week of his New Albion visit.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[31] At Post Point, within Bellingham Bay, Drake created his "monument", a rock carvings in the cliff face of King Henry VIII and his sixth wife Katherine Parr. Initials attributed to the carver, Richard Cadwell were inscribed. The 3 ton rock carvings have been knocked down, but still there in 2000. The Plate of Brasse refers to the "thick coat of bottom paint" the carver put over the carvings.[32]

Strait of Juan de Fuca

Robert Ward proposes that Drake ventured as far north as the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. but traveled south to Whale Cove (see below) to careen the Golden Hinde and establish New Albion.[33]

Nehalem Bay, Tillamook County, Oregon

In 1971, Don Viles and Wayne Jensen published the idea that Drake landed at Nehalem Bay.[source?]Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Garry Gitzen has continued to support this idea.[34] Gitzen claims the "Neahkahnie Mountain Survey," the Hondius Map, the Edward Wright World Chart of 1599,[35] the Nehalem Indians and the Three Arch Rocks prove Drake’s landing site was in Nehalem Bay, Oregon as well as the Indian culture of the Pacific Northwest.[36]

Gitzen argues that the "Survey" is a formal survey by Robert Schultz A.S.C.E and Phillip Costaggini's 1981 Oregon State thesis "Survey of Artifacts at Neahkahnie Mountain Oregon (1976-1981" of the coastal area two to four miles north of Nehalem Bay encompassing the area up to one mile over the countryside of Neahkahnie Mountain. The incised rocks and carins are explained as recordings of a land survey and latitude showing angles and bearings in "The Treasure Rocks of Neah-kah-nie Mountain (2012).[citation needed],the "W" rock which has components that "represent a combination of sun and star sighting points to determine the longitude, date and time and day," and the "Rays Rock" which "is a compass rose point used to measure points on Neahkahnie Mountain and beyond.".[citation needed]

Gitzen claims the outline and topography of Nehalem Bay match the Hondius Map, and that the Islands of Saint James are the Three Arch Rocks 13 miles south of the entrance to Nehalem Bay.

An article "Edward Wright's World Chart 1599 published in the blind peer-review "Terrae Incognitae" journal of the Society for the Histories of Discoveries contains Queen Elizabeth's Privy Seal. The only such map of the 16th century to carry the Queen's seal. The map was originally published in 1599 by Richard Hakluyt and reissued by the Hakluyt Society's 2 volume publication "The Hakluyt Handbook"(1974) where it is identified by David Beers Quinn, editor, and Helen Wallis, Map Curator of the British Museum, both agree the map is the most authentic map Hakluyt published in his books.

Whale Cove, Lincoln County, Oregon

In 1978 British amateur historian Bob Ward, after making a study of the geography of the Pacific coast of the U.S. and Canada,[37] suggested that Drake actually landed much farther north, in Whale Cove in present-day Oregon.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Advocates of the Whale Cove theory argue that when Captain James Cook first sighted the American coast at Cape Foulweather two centuries later, he described it in his log, with unknowing accuracy, as "the long-looked for coast of New Albion." Whale Cove lies just north of Cape Foulweather. Advocates of the Whale Cove theory dismiss the latitude given by Drake on the grounds that he may have deliberately falsified it in order to deceive the rival Spanish. Although the official account of Drake's voyage gives the anchorage location as 38 degrees, the only two known hand-written accounts of the voyage, preserved in the British Library, say that it was at 44 degrees, which is on the mid-Oregon coast. Drake and Queen Elizabeth, they argue, falsified the location because he mistakenly thought he had discovered the North West Passage when he found, and sailed into, the Strait of Juan de Fuca, which today separates Vancouver Island, British Columbia from the mainland Olympic Peninsula of Washington state.[38][39] In 2012, Ward established a website supporting Whale Cove.[40]

Melissa Darby has established the Drake Anchorage Research Collaboration (DARC) in support of the possible Whale Cove landing site.[41]

Whale Cove is the site identified by Bawlf as Drake’s careening location.

Ward, Bawlf and Darby do not agree on the general route taken by Drake, but all have Drake’s careening site at Whale Cove.

Whale Cove remains an unnavigable bay in a dangerous part of the Oregon coast: mariners are advised to stay at least 600 yards offshore for the distance one mile north of Whale Cove to one mile south of Whale Cove. Whale Cove is not considered a usable bay by any size of vessel.[42]

Port Orford, Coos County, Oregon

Brereton reported that local citizens had suggested that Drake had landed at Port Orford, Oregon.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[43]

Chetco River, Curry County, Oregon

Brereton reported that local citizens had suggested that Drake had landed at the Chetco River in Oregon.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[43]

Trinidad Bay, Humboldt County, California

In 1926, Henry Wagner wrote about Drake’s circumnavigation. Determining that Drake would have stopped at the first suitable location, Wagner concluded that Drake spent most of his time at Trinidad Bay.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[44]

Campbell Cove, Bodega Bay, Sonoma County, California

In 1894, Edward Berthould wrote in National Geographic that the geography of Bodega Head and its proximity to the Farallon Islands seem to point to Bodega Bay as Drake’s landing site.[45]

Brian T. Kelleher established a website which concludes that Drake careened at Bodega, California.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[46]

Bob Graham has evaluated the reported latitudes and the technologies available to Drake. If the 38-1/2 degree value is more accurate than the 38 degree value, and if Drake took a scientific series of experimental data and averaged it (for which there is no evidence), then the Bodega Bay latitude is more likely to be right than the Drakes Bay latitude.[47] In comparison to other reported Drake latitudes across the globe, the reported latitudes establish that Drake’s harbor was within 1/2 degree of 38 degrees north latitude or 38-1/2 degrees north latitude based on average errors.[48]

Tomales Bay, Marin County, California

Sand Point

Just inside the entrance to Tomales Bay, behind Sand Point Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. is a location which has been suggested as Drake’s landing site.

Tom’s Point

Historian Robert Becker found a location to which the Hondius Broadside map could apply at Tom’s Point on the east side of Tomales Bay.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[49]

Drakes Bay, Marin County, California

One of San Francisco’s earliest historians, Frank Soule, wrote in support of a Drakes Bay landing site.[50] George Davidson concluded that Drake was at Drakes Bay, but believed the actual careening point was just inside Point Reyes Head. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Davidson’s work was based on sailing the coast. The identification of the careening point required exploring the site the way the artist of the Hondius Broadside inset viewed the site.[51]

Bolinas Bay, Marin County, California

Two Bolinas Bay locations have been proposed:

Agate Beach

George Epperson believed Drake stayed at Agate Beach.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. at Bolinas Bay in Marin County, California. Epperson collected many objects from the area, but none could be linked to Drake.[52][53]

Bolinas Lagoon

In 1974, Aubrey Neasham and William Pritchard wrote in support of Bolinas Lagoon Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. as Drake’s landing site.[54]

San Francisco Bay, California

San Francisco Bay, generally

Several claims put Drake in San Francisco Bay, but did not establish where in the Bay Drake visited and then careened the Golden Hinde. These include Robert Greenhow in 1845, Jules Verne in 1879[6][55] and Samuel Johnson.

Strawberry Cove, Marin County, California

Duane Van Dieman developed a theory that Drake entered San Francisco Bay and careened the Golden Hinde at Strawberry Cove. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Larkspur, Marin County, California

Robert Stupack believes Drake established New Albion at Portsmouth Cove Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. and then careened the Golden Hinde at Larkspur. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. [56][57] Stupack believes "Drake’s Treasure" was cached in the area and has done extensive excavations. 525,000 pounds of material have been removed from the site.[58][59] Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Point San Quentin, Marin County, California

Robert H. Power (1926–1991), co-owner of the Nut Tree in Vacaville, CA, promoted the idea that Drake’s New Albion was inside San Francisco Bay near Point San Quentin.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Among his arguments was that the Hondius Broadside map matched a part of the topography when parts were adjusted using a 2:1 correction.[60] Among the problems with Power’s idea is the difficulty of sailors finding San Francisco Bay from the ocean (it was first discovered by land and the first sea attempts to then locate the Bay failed), the lack of continuous foggy weather,[61] the multitudes of good harbors, and the extreme dangers of entering such a bay on an unknown basis.

A. Bray Dickinson supported an upper San Francisco Bay site in 1954.[62]

Walter Starr and Francis Farquhar supported the San Quentin site.[63]

Olompali, Petaluma River, Marin County, California

Robert C. Thomas advocates that Drake landed at Olompali, on the Petaluma River, inside San Francisco Bay.[64] "Under the shelter of cliffs" at Drakes Bay, Thomas believes Drake’s men saw seagulls that rode east on updrafts, so that the men "could see that the land over which they (the birds) were flying was really a peninsula (a Marin County peninsula formed by the Pacific coast and San Francisco Bay.)" "The home-bound gulls swept inland" to Olomp-ali. Thomas dismisses the likelihood that Drake stayed at Drakes Bay, but instead headed south.

Thomas believes that while "there appeared to be no break in the shoreline" showing San Francisco Bay, Drake ran into a "strong current." Risking "imminent danger," Drake "was committed to an uncontrollable approach" and then "miraculously…found that they had passed through…" the Golden Gate.

According to Thomas, over the next five days, Drake explored the 21 nautical miles in the northwest portion of San Francisco Bay, ignored numerous promising harbors, and moved "his ship on June 21" to Chok-olom, the port near Olomp-ali.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

Thomas glosses over the fact that the Marin "peninsula" is not visible or discernible from the coast. Thomas does not solve the problems with any proposed San Francisco Bay Drake landing site: the difficulty of sailors finding San Francisco Bay from the ocean (it was first discovered by land and the first sea attempts to then locate the Bay failed), the lack of continuous foggy weather, the multitudes of good harbors, and the extreme dangers of entering such a bay on an unknown basis. Thomas also proposes that Drake sailed inland a significant distance quickly without it being noted in any of the accounts

Grizzly Bay, Suisun Bay, Solano County, California

Allen Schuh suggested that Drake landed at Grizzly BayLua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. in Suisun Bay, Solano County, California.[65]

Half Moon Bay, San Mateo County, California

Alan Brown posed the question, "Did Drake Land Here" in 1960.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[66]

Point Año Nuevo Cove, San Mateo County, California

Louise Welshons Buell, Harry Morrison, Richard Scott and Gerald Webber suggested that Drake landed at Point Año Nuevo Cove.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[67]

Monterey Bay, Monterey County, California

Around 1934, a bottle found with a thin, rolled lead plate was found at Monterey Bay, California. Myron Oliver and Ed Kennedy believed this proved Drake at been at that location.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[68]

Carmel River, Monterey County, California

In 1718, mission friar Juan Amando Niel, speculated that Drake had entered the Carmel River.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[69]

Pirate’s Cove, San Luis Obispo Bay, San Luis Obispo County, California

Margie Mallagh reported a local legend regarding Drake landing in San Luis Obispo Bay at a site known as Mallagh's Landing Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. or Pirate's Cove.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. Robert Pate, Richard Dobson and Ethyl Sagen pursued this work.[70][71]

Goleta, Santa Barbara County, California

Justin M. Ruhge reported that he believed Drake landed at Goleta, California. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.[72] Jim Gilmore believes that cannon found in the area came from Drake.[73]

References

  1. The Drake’s Cove site began its review by the National Park Service (NPS) in 1994 [1], thus starting an 18-year study of the suggested Drake sites. The first formal Nomination to mark the Nova Albion site at Drake’s Cove as a National Historic Landmark was provided to NPS on January 1, 1996. As part of its review, NPS obtained independent, confidential comments from professional historians. The NPS staff concluded that the Drake’s Cove site is the "most probable" [2] and "most likely" [3] Drake landing site. The National Park System Advisory Board Landmarks Committee sought public comments on the Port of Nova Albion Historic and Archaeological District Nomination [4] and received more than two dozen letters of support and none in opposition. At the Committee’s meeting of November 9, 2011 in Washington, DC, representatives of the government of Spain, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Congresswoman Lynn Wolsey all spoke in favor of the nomination: there was no opposition. Staff and the Drake Navigators Guild’s president, Edward Von der Porten, gave the presentation. The Nomination was strongly endorsed by Committee Member Dr. James M. Allan, Archeologist, and the Committee as a whole which approved the nomination unanimously. The National Park System Advisory Board sought further public comments on the Nomination [5]: no additional comments were received. At the Board’s meeting on December 1, 2011 in Florida, the Nomination was further reviewed: the Board approved the nomination unanimously. On October 16, 2012 Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar formally established the Drakes Bay Historic and Archaeological District as a National Historic Landmark. He issued a press release on October 17, 2012.[6]
  2. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. San Francisco Chronicle: Again a safe harbor / Tiny cove many believe Sir Francis Drake repaired to 422 years ago suddenly reappears: July 18, 2001: Nolte, Carl
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Oko, Captain Adolph S., Jr., Francis Drake and Nova Albion, California Historical Society Quarterly, Vol. XLIII, No. 2, June 1964, pp. 6-7
  6. 6.0 6.1 Verne, Jules, Great Voyages and Great Navigators, Part II, No. 466, Vol. XXIV, George Munro publisher, 1879, p. 33
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  8. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  11. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  12. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  13. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  14. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  15. Bawlf's route for Drake is 2,000 NM (1,600 NM without detours) covered in 34 sailing days based on the theory that the published dates were intentionally in error. (GoogleEarth)
  16. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  17. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  18. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  19. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  20. Von der Porten, Edward, A New Drake Myth,Sea History, National Maritime Historical Society, No. 106, Winter 2004, pp. 10-12.
  21. Bookworld's one-page summary of seven key problems with Bawlf's theory.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  22. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  23. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  24. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  25. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  26. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  27. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  28. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  29. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  30. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  31. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  32. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  33. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  34. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  35. http://www.maneyonline.com/doi/abs/10.1179/0082288414Z.00000000027
  36. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  37. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  38. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  39. While Ward published one article in 1981, he writes that he will not be publishing a further work solely dedicated to his Drake landing site beliefs. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  40. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  41. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  42. Cape Foulweather is 1 NM south of Whale Cove. "Dangers extend for nearly 2 miles N of the N point of Cape Foulweather and about 600 yards offshore." Whale Cove is not even mentioned as a place to be considered by mariners of any size of vessel.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  43. 43.0 43.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  44. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  45. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  46. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  47. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  48. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  49. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  50. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  51. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  52. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  53. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  54. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  55. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  56. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  57. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  58. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  59. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  60. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  61. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  62. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  63. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  64. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  65. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  66. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  67. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  68. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  69. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  70. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  71. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  72. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  73. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.