Austral Líneas Aéreas Flight 2553

From Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core
Jump to: navigation, search
Austral Líneas Aéreas Flight 2553
Accident summary
Date 10 October 1997
Summary Instrument malfunction, possible pilot error
Site Nuevo Berlín, Uruguay
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
Passengers 69
Crew 5
Injuries (non-fatal) 0
Fatalities 74 (all)
Survivors 0
Aircraft type McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32
Operator Austral Líneas Aéreas
Registration LV-WEG
Flight origin General José de San Martín Airport, Posadas, Argentina
Destination Aeroparque Jorge Newbery, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Austral Líneas Aéreas Flight 2553, also known as Austral 2553, was a domestic scheduled PosadasBuenos Aires service operated with a McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32 that crashed on the lands of Estancia Magallanes, Nuevo Berlín, Lua error in Module:Convert at line 1851: attempt to index local 'en_value' (a nil value). away from Fray Bentos, Uruguay, on 10 October 1997.[1][2][3] All 74 passengers and crew died after the impact.[1][4][5] The accident remains the deadliest in Uruguayan aviation history.[1]

Aircraft

The aircraft involved in the accident was a McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32, registration LV-WEG.[1][2][6] It had its maiden flight in 1969,[1] and was 28 years old at the time of the accident. It had previously operated for Iberia with registration EC-BQT, and it was transferred to Austral after the buyout of the company by the Spanish carrier.[citation needed]

Accident

The aircraft, which left from Posadas and was due to land in Aeroparque Jorge Newbery, Buenos Aires,[6] was forced to divert towards Fray Bentos to avoid a storm. Examination of the aircraft's flight data recorder (FDR) revealed that shortly after the diversion occurred, the aircraft airspeed indicator began to fall to an alarmingly low indicated airspeed. Unbeknownst to the pilots, this was caused not directly, by a loss of power, but by ice formed inside the pitot tube, which reads the airspeed for the indicator by measuring the pressure of inflow air. The ice obstructing the pitot tube reduced the air inflow, thus giving an erroneously low indicated airspeed.

In response to what they interpreted as a loss of engine power, the pilots gradually increased power from the engines in order to maintain airspeed; seeing no improvement, they contacted the control tower in Ezeiza Airport and requested clearance to descend to a lower altitude. After receiving no response, the pilots decided to lower the aircraft's wing slats to maintain their altitude and lower the plane's stall speed. Consequently, at this point the airplane was actually flying at a speed not normal but even higher, and already descending, which further increased real airspeed to a point dangerously near to Vne or "never exceed speed", the speed above which structural damage to the aircraft might occur.

When lowering the slats at a speed beyond their operational limits, one of them was torn from the aircraft, causing catastrophic asymmetry in the air flow over the wings. The aircraft immediately became uncontrollable and crashed.

According to an investigation by both the Argentine and Uruguayan Air Forces, the pitot tube—the primary instrument for measuring aircraft airspeeds—froze when the aircraft passed through a 15,000-metre (49,000 ft) high cumulonimbus cloud,[1] blocking the instrument and causing it to give a false reading.[citation needed] Compounding this problem was the failure of the alarm designed to report such a malfunction (raising serious questions about inspection irregularities by the Argentine Air Force).

During the descent, the FDR recorded an increase in the airspeed from 300 kilometres per hour (190 mph) to 800 km/h (500 mph) in three seconds, which could only signify the sudden unfreezing of the pitot tube. Specialists estimated that the aircraft crashed almost perpendicularly to the ground,[6] at a speed of 1,200 kilometres per hour (750 mph). Depending upon the source, the crater left by the crash was 6 metres (20 ft) deep and 30 m (98 ft) wide,[3] 25 feet (7.6 m) deep and 30 ft (9.1 m) wide,[7] or 25 ft (7.6 m) deep and 80 ft (24 m) wide.[1]

See also

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Accident description at the Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved on 26 May 2011.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  3. 3.0 3.1 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  4. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  5. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
  7. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.

External links